| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
Environ Eng Res > Volume 24(2); 2019 > Article
Kwon, Park, Kim, Choi, Oh, Ahn, and Choi: Size distributions of atmospheric particulate matter and associated trace metals in the multi-industrial city of Ulsan, Korea

Abstract

Particulate matter (PM) was collected using micro-orifice uniform deposit impactors from a residential (RES) site and an industrial (IND) site in Ulsan, South Korea, in September–October 2014. The PM samples were measured based on their size distributions (11 stages), ranging from 0.06 μm to over 18.0 μm. Nine trace metals (As, Se, Cr, V, Cd, Pb, Ba, Sb, and Zn) associated with PM were analyzed. The PM samples exhibited weak bimodal distributions irrespective of sampling sites and events, and the mean concentrations of total PM (TPM) measured at the IND site (56.7 μg/m3) was higher than that measured at the RES site (38.2 μg/m3). The IND site also showed higher levels of nine trace metals, reflecting the influence of industrial activities and traffic emissions. At both sites, four trace metals (Ba, Zn, V, and Cr) contributed to over 80% of the total concentrations in TPM. The modality of individual trace metals was not strong except for Zn; however, the nine trace metals in PM2.5 and PM10 accounted for approximately 50% and 90% of the total concentrations in TPM, respectively. This result indicates that the size distributions of PM and trace metals are important to understand how respirable PM affects public health.

1. Introduction

Suspended solid particles and/or liquid droplets in the atmosphere are known as particulate matter (PM), which are of great environmental concern associated with air quality and public health. PM can be classified into nano, ultrafine, fine, coarse, and super coarse particles according to their aerodynamic diameter, e.g., particles with diameters exceeding 2.5 μm and those with diameters below 2.5 μm are classified as coarse and fine particles, respectively [1]. On the basis of the characteristics of the source, PM can be classified as natural and anthropogenic, and these can be further divided into two major groups: primary and secondary particles. Soil dust, ocean, volcano, and forest fire are designated as natural sources [26], whereas traffic, industrial activities, coal combustion, and incineration are major anthropogenic sources [7, 8] responsible for primary particles. In addition, the formation of secondary inorganic and organic aerosol through chemical reactions and physical processes is also important [9, 10]. It is known that the size distribution of PM is strongly affected by the type of sources [11].
Owing to various emission sources and size-distribution patterns, PM has different physicochemical properties, which ultimately affects the aerosol composition and alters ambient-air quality [12]. The size distribution and composition of PM are closely related to public health because mortality and morbidity are strongly related to PM exposure. For instance, numerous epidemiological studies have reported significant correlations between adverse health effects and PM uptake via respiratory deposition [13, 14]. Fine particles are particularly hazardous to public health because they can penetrate into the bloodstream through the alveoli [13, 15]. Sub-micrometer-size particles (below 1 μm in diameter: PM1.0) have a higher probability of depositing deeper in the respiratory tract compared with super-micrometer-size particles [16]. In addition, PM adversely affects vulnerable groups (i.e., children and elderly people) with low-level immunity, and toxic substances associated with PM can induce various respiratory and other diseases upon inhalation [13]. PM is composed of diverse substances, such as organic compounds, elemental carbon, ions, and trace metals [1720]. Among them, toxic metals (e.g., Pb, Cr, Cd, and As) in PM can pose dangerous risks for public health. Hence, monitoring PM levels, their size distribution, and trace metals is essential, particularly in heavily industrial areas.
Ulsan is the largest industrial city in South Korea and has a population of over 1.1 million. It is called the industrial capital of South Korea because it hosts large-scale petrochemical, non-ferrous, automobile, and shipbuilding and heavy industrial complexes. Because they are located close to residential areas, their impact on air quality is a major environmental concern. According to the data from the national heavy metal monitoring network in Korea, the highest level of ∑9 metals in PM10 was observed in Ulsan [21]. Even though the main industries in Ulsan are believed to be an important source of PM and trace metals, only limited studies have looked at the size distribution of PM and associated trace metals in urban residential areas in Ulsan [22, 23].
In this study, PM samples were collected at an industrial (IND) site and a residential (RES) site in Ulsan using micro-orifice uniform deposit impactors (MOUDIs), and trace metals were analyzed. The contamination characteristics at both sites were compared, and the possible emission sources were discussed based on size distribution and the levels of PM and trace metals. This study is the first one that used MOUDIs and reports the highest particle-size resolution data in Ulsan.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling Sites and Methods

PM samples were collected simultaneously at an IND site and a RES site (Fig. 1) in September (1, 6, 8, 15, 16, 20, and 22) and October (22, 25, and 29) 2014 (n = 10). The sampling days were selected to reflect a normal local pollution condition in Ulsan. For example, winter and spring exhibit strong effects of long-range transport of Asian dust and smog episodes in Northern China. In summer, decreased fossil fuel burning and frequent precipitation result in relatively low PM concentrations. The IND site was located near a petrochemical complex, and the RES site was located at the center of a residential area (6.6 km from the IND site). Meteorological data were collected from automatic weather stations (AWS) operated by the Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA).
The PM samples were simultaneously collected using two MOUDIs (110R, MSP Corp, USA) with Zeflour filters (PTFE, 47 mm, 2.0 μm, Pall Corp, USA) at the two sampling sites. The flow rate of the MOUDIs was 30 L/min, and they were operated over 24 h periods, starting at 14:00. Particles in 11 size fractions (inlet and 10 stages) were collected: sub-micrometer size (0.06–0.10, 0.10–0.18, 0.18–0.32, 0.32–0.56, and 0.56–1.00 μm) and super-micrometer size (1.00–1.80, 1.80–3.20, 3.20–5.60, 5.60–10.0, 10.0–18.0, and over 18.0 μm). The filters were stored in a desiccator for 48 h to maintain constant relative humidity (RH) and temperature (45% and 24°C) conditions before collecting PM samples. Field blanks were collected from all sampling events at both sampling sites (n = 20).

2.2. Instrumental Analysis

The filters were pre-weighed using a high-precision microbalance (XP6 microbalance, Mettler-Toledo, Germany, precision = 1 μg). After the sampling, the filters were reweighed, and then each filter was divided into four segments. To extract trace metals, filter segments (i.e., one-quarter of each filter) were immersed into 14 mL of HCl with HNO3 (v/v 3:1) in Teflon vessels and digested using a graphite digestion (heating plate) system (Odlab, OD-98-002P, Korea) at 200°C for 2 h. After cooling under ambient temperature for 30 min, the digested samples were diluted with ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ cm at 25°C, Barnstead GenPure × CAD Plus, Thermo Scientific, USA) to prepare a final volume of 50 mL and then stored in a refrigerator at 4°C prior to instrumental analysis.
Trace metals were analyzed using an inductively coupled plasma- mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) (ELAN DRC-e, PerkinElmer, USA). The target metals were arsenic (As), selenium (Se), chromium (Cr), vanadium (V), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), barium (Ba), stibium (Sb), and zinc (Zn), which were selected based on the detection frequency and levels, toxicity, human health risk, and for local-source identification requested by the Youngnam intensive monitoring station in Ulsan. The extracts were introduced at a rate of 1 mL/min, and the RF power was 1,150 W. The flow rates of coolant gas, auxiliary gas, and nebulizer gas were 18.0, 1.00, and 0.92 L/min, respectively.
For QA/QC, method blanks were analyzed after every extraction batch (n = 7) to confirm the contamination during the experiment, and the analytical data were blank corrected. Method detection limits (MDLs) were calculated by the product of the standard deviations of seven replicates of spiked filter blank samples and the Student’s t-value (t = 3.14) at a 99% confidence level. The MDL values ranged from 0.04 ng/m3 to 0.74 ng/m3. A standard reference material (SRM-2783, urban dust, NIST, USA) was used to check accuracy and precision. The results (n = 3) were satisfactory with a mean recovery of 94.6% and a mean relative standard deviation of 4.7%.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Total Particulate Matter

The concentrations of total PM (TPM) (i.e., the sum of 11 stage concentrations) ranged from 38.3 to 66.7 μg/m3 (mean: 56.7 μg/m3, median: 59.6 μg/m3) at the IND site and from 22.5 to 57.1 μg/m3 (mean: 38.2 μg/m3, median: 42.5 μg/m3) at the RES site (Table 1 and Fig. 2). The concentrations of TPM at the IND site were about 1.5 times higher than those at the RES site for all sampling events. The TPM concentrations exceeded 50 μg/m3 (annual guideline of PM10 in Korea) for all the sampling events (except for the 1st sampling) at the IND site, whereas the RES site showed much lower concentrations below 50 μg/m3 for all the events except for the 9th sampling. Similar patterns of PM2.5 and PM10 were also observed in previous studies [1, 3, 24]. The enhanced TPM concentrations at the IND site can be explained by the proximity of emission sources from the petrochemical industrial complex (Fig. 1) and also other industrial facilities (e.g., stainless-steel factories and auto mechanics). In addition, the IND site was located near a large and busy intersection. Previous studies reported positive correlations between traffic volumes and PM concentrations [25, 26], suggesting that road dust raise by vehicles is another potential source of PM in our study.
When northern winds were dominant (from the 2nd to 4th sampling events), the mean concentration of TPM at the IND site was 1.7 times greater than the concentration at the RES site. Auto mechanics and urban areas are located north of the IND site. Thus, the enhanced PM concentrations at the IND site might be related to the activities of the auto mechanics and to traffic emissions. In contrast, the concentrations of TPM at the IND and RES sites were similar during 9th and 10th sampling events, which can be attributed to dominant southern winds during these samplings events from the industrial complexes and main roads.

3.2. Size Distribution of Particulate Matter

The modality of particle size distribution is an important parameter to develop air quality guidelines [16]. In particular, PM1.0 is strongly related to public health due to its enhanced possibility of deposition in the pulmonary region of the human lung [13]. In this study, a slight bimodal distribution pattern appeared. At the IND site, the mean concentration of sub-micrometer (< 1 μm) PM (41%) was less than that of super-micrometer (> 1 μm) PM (59%) (Fig. 2(b)). The mean concentrations of PM in the particle-size ranges at the IND site ranged from 3.68 μg/m3 in stage 7 (0.56–1.0 μm) to 7.47 μg/m3 in stage 2 (10–18 μm). The highest mean and median concentrations at the IND site were detected from stage 2 (10–18 μm) and stage 1 (> 18 μm), respectively, and the sum of stages 1 and 2 accounted for 25% of TPM. At the RES site, the mean concentrations of PM ranged from 2.69 μg/m3 (stage 2: 10–18 μm) to 4.50 μg/m3 (stage 4: 3.2–5.6 μm and stage 8: 0.32–0.56 μm). The highest mean concentrations were found at stages 4 and 8, and the sum of two stages accounted for 24% of TPM. The mean fractions of sub- and super-micrometer PM at the RES site were similar (48% and 52%, respectively), representing relatively even distributions of fine and coarse PM. The fractions of super-micrometer PM at the IND site were slightly greater than those at the RES site, possibly due to road dust [27] or sea salt [4]. This issue is further discussed later in this section.
If PM2.5 and PM10 are considered to be collected mostly in stages 5–11 and 2–11, the mean concentrations of PM10 at the IND (49.7 μg/m3) and RES (35.0 μg/m3) sites were below the regulatory guideline of the 24-h Korean ambient air quality standard (100 μg/m3), the World Health Organization (WHO) guideline (50 μg/m3), and the US Environmental Protection Agency guideline (150 μg/m3). Even though the mean concentration of PM10 at the IND site was similar to the WHO guideline, the levels of PM10 during the 4–7th and 9th sampling events at the IND site and the 9th event at both sites were higher than the WHO guideline. In the case of PM2.5, the mean concentrations at the IND site (33.4 μg/m3) and at the RES site (24.6 μg/m3) were slightly higher or similar to the WHO guideline (25 μg/m3) and lower than the Korean ambient air quality standard (35 μg/m3). Particularly, the concentrations of PM2.5 at the IND site were higher than the WHO guideline (except for the 8th event). For the RES site, the concentrations of PM2.5 during the 1st, 6–9th, and 10th events were higher than the WHO guideline. Therefore, the PM10 and PM2.5 levels in this study indicated a moderate level of pollution that could cause adverse effects on public health.
Among the 10 sampling events, three (upper 30%) were regarded as high-concentration events. The mean concentrations of TPM during the high-concentration events at the IND and RES sites were 62.0 and 49.0 μg/m3, respectively. According to the PM size distributions, stage 2 (10–18 μm) at the IND site and stage 8 (3.2–5.6 μm) at the RES site showed the highest concentrations. The fractions of super-micrometer (> 1 μm) PM at both sites exceeded 50% (62% at the IND site and 56% at the RES site).
Overall, we found similar total concentrations of sub-micrometer (< 1 μm) PM during the high-concentration events (mean of both sites: 22.4 μg/m3) and during all the sampling events (mean of both sites: 20.8 μg/m3). Meanwhile, the concentrations of super-micrometer (> 1 μm) PM during the high-concentration events (mean of both sites: 33.1 μg/m3) were higher than the concentrations of all the events (mean of both sites: 26.7 μg/m3). The reasons for the higher concentrations of super-micrometer PM at the IND site might be due to road dust raised by heavy-duty vehicles or sea salt. However, the wind directions suggest that road dust is a more probable explanation. Industrial combustion and fugitive emissions from the petrochemical industrial complex are the main PM source in Ulsan, with much larger emissions of PM10 than PM2.5 [28]. This emission property can be an additional reason for the higher fractions of super-micrometer PM at the IND site.

3.3. Trace Metals Associated with Total Particulate Matter

Fig. 3 shows the concentrations of trace metals associated with PM. The total concentrations of nine trace metals (∑9 metals) in the TPM were 0.23–0.37 μg/m3 (mean: 0.30 μg/m3, median: 0.29 μg/m3) at the IND site and 0.19–0.32 μg/m3 (mean: 0.26 μg/m3, median: 0.26 μg/m3) at the RES site. The concentrations of individual trace metals (As, Cr, Cd, and Pb) were comparable with the data from the national heavy metal monitoring network [21]. The other metals were not analyzed from the national monitoring network. The mean concentration of ∑9 metals at the IND site was 1.2 times higher than the concentration at the RES site. A statistical difference exists between the two sites (t-test, p < 0.05). Most trace metals (except for V) appeared at higher levels at the IND site than at the RES site, but only Zn showed a significant difference (t-test, p < 0.01). Compared with TPM, the difference in metals between the two sites is relatively small. The reasons for this observation could be different daily wind patterns, elevations (IND: 21 m, RES: 127 m), and unknown emission sources. A long-term monitoring study is required to interpret this phenomenon.
The concentrations of Ba, Zn, V, and Cr were much higher than the concentrations of other metals, with fractions of the sum of the four metals over 80% at both sampling sites during all the sampling events. The mean fractions of As, Se, Cd, and Sb were below 1%, and Pb accounted for less than 3% of the total metal concentration at both sites. Furthermore, the concentrations of As, Cd, and Pb were much lower than the air quality guidelines: As (24 h, 3.0 μg/m3), Cd (annual, 10–20 ng/m3) and Pb (annual, 0.5–1.0 μg/m3) [29]. Therefore, the four metals (Ba, Zn, V, and Cr) were further considered, and their levels and possible emission sources are discussed in the following paragraphs.
The mean concentrations of Ba were very similar at both sites: 0.110 and 0.105 μg/m3 at the IND and RES sites, respectively. The similar concentrations and temporal variations (irrespective of sampling events at both sites) may be explained by identical emission sources, such as diesel vehicles using Ba as a fuel additive [30] and catalytic filters [31, 32]. Furthermore, transport equipment and machinery manufacturing is known as an important source of Ba in Korea [33].
In this study, most metals showed rather similar levels at both sampling sites. However, Zn was detected at concentrations 1.7 times (maximum 3.7 times) higher at the IND site (mean: 0.104 μg/m3, median: 0.101 μg/m3) than at the RES site (mean: 0.068 μg/m3, median: 0.066 μg/m3). The higher concentration of Zn at the IND site can be explained by the direct influence of industrial activities at the nearby stainless-steel factories [34] and by traffic emissions (i.e., tire-wear particles [35] and discharge from automotive brake pads [36]). In addition, metal smelting, plating, and alloys in non-ferrous industries can be an important source of Zn [37].
The mean concentrations of Cr at the IND and RES sites were 0.025 μg/m3 (median: 0.021 μg/m3) and 0.019 μg/m3 (median: 0.018 μg/m3), respectively. Cr is classified as Group 1 (carcinogenic to human) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Cr is known to be directly emitted from steel and refractory industries [38]. In addition, coal combustion can increase Cr levels [7]. Indeed, a strong influence of coal combustion from the non-ferrous industrial complex in Ulsan was reported in our previous study [39].
V is classified as Group 2B (possibly carcinogenic to human) by the IARC and is mostly emitted by oil combustion [40, 41]. The mean concentrations of V were 0.044 μg/m3 (median: 0.042 μg/m3) at the IND site and 0.050 μg/m3 (median: 0.043 μg/m3) at the RES site. The similar levels at both sites were due to the last sampling event showing the highest V concentration. Some industrial facilities presumably using heavy oil are located north of the RES site, and northern winds were prevailing during this sampling event, which suggests that these winds were responsible for the higher concentrations of V at the RES site. However, this conclusion could not be confirmed because of the lack of emission data from the industrial facilities located north of the sampling site.

3.4. Trace Metals in Particle-size Ranges

The mean concentration and distribution patterns of nine trace metals across the particle-size ranges were generally similar (except for Zn and V). For the IND site, the highest concentration of Sb and Zn occurred in stage 6 (1.0–1.8 μm). As, Pb, and Ba appeared strongly in stage 4 (3.2–5.6 μm), whereas Cr and V showed the highest levels in stage 2 (10–18 μm) and stage 1 (> 18 μm), respectively. Therefore, most trace metals (except for Se and Cd) showed higher concentrations in super-micrometer PM, accounting for more than 50% of the total concentration. Meanwhile, for the RES site, Pb and Sb showed the highest levels in stage 6 (1.0–1.8 μm), whereas Ba occurred strongly in stage 4 (3.2–5.6 μm). The fractions of Ba, Sb, Zn, and Cr in super-micrometer PM exceeded 50% of the total concentration, whereas the other metals accumulated more in sub-micrometer PM. In brief, the concentrations of individual trace metals in each particle-size range were rather similar, but their size distribution differed between the two sampling sites.
For the high-concentration events (upper 30% of TPM), the concentrations of each trace metal were also similar regardless of the particle-size distribution (except for Zn and V). For Zn, stage 6 (0.015 and 0.015 μg/m3) and stage 7 (0.011 and 0.016 μg/m3) showed the highest concentrations measured from the IND and RES sites, respectively. The highest concentrations of Zn at both sites were four times higher than the lowest concentrations. The concentration of V in stage 1 (> 18 μm) was five times higher than the lowest concentration in stage 11. In addition, each trace metal in PM2.5 (stages 5–11) and PM10 (stages 2–11) contributed more than 50% and 90%, respectively, of their total concentration in TPM at both sampling sites. Therefore, trace metals associated with respirable particles may affect the respiratory system, and higher TPM levels along with trace metals can have significant adverse effects on public health because of their synergistic effects.

4. Conclusions

The size distributions of PM and associated nine trace metals in Ulsan, South Korea were analyzed. We used MOUDIs in Ulsan for the first time and reports the highest particle-size resolution data. A weak bimodal distribution of PM was found, and the levels of PM and trace metals were generally higher at the IND site. The level of PM10 and PM2.5 indicated moderate pollution based on international standard guidelines. The concentrations of ∑9 metals in TPM were higher at the IND site than at the RES site. Among the target metals, Ba, Zn, V, and Cr were dominant, which is attributed to industrial emissions and the accompanying traffic of heavy-duty vehicles. They have not been monitored in the national heavy metal monitoring network, except Cr. On the basis of this study, therefore, local source-receptor relationships of trace metals can be further investigated. Note that the high fractions of trace metals in respirable particles in this study (50% and 90% in PM2.5 and PM10) may have adverse synergistic effects on public health. Thus, further intensive monitoring of the size distributions of other various pollutants (e.g., persistent organic pollutants and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) are required to better understand the impact of PM on public health.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017R1A2B4003229 and 2017M3D8A1092015) and the National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER). We acknowledge Won-Joon Choi at NIER for the help of sampling and Ezaz Ahmed for constructive comments.

References

1. Taiwo AM, Beddows DCS, Shi Z, Harrison RM. Mass and number size distributions of particulate matter components: Comparison of an industrial site and an urban background site. Sci Total Environ. 2014;475:29–38.
crossref

2. Zhang R, Jing J, Tao J, et al. Chemical characterization and source apportionment of PM2.5 in Beijing: Seasonal perspective. Atmos Chem Phys. 2013;13:7053–7074.
crossref pdf

3. Chu HJ, Yu HL, Kuo YM. Identifying spatial mixture distributions of PM2.5 and PM10 in Taiwan during and after a dust storm. Atmos Environ. 2012;54:728–737.
crossref

4. Beuck H, Quass U, Klemm O, Kuhlbusch TAJ. Assessment of sea salt and mineral dust contributions to PM10 in NW Germany using tracer models and positive matrix factorization. Atmos Environ. 2011;45:5813–5821.
crossref

5. Pitz M, Gu J, Soentgen J, Peters A, Cyrys J. Particle size distribution factor as an indicator for the impact of the Eyjafjallajökull ash plume at ground level in Augsburg, Germany. Atmos Chem Phys. 2011;11:9367–9374.
crossref pdf

6. Slezakova K, Morais S, Pereira MdC. Forest fires in Northern region of Portugal: Impact on PM levels. Atmos Res. 2013;127:148–153.
crossref

7. Wang J, Hu Z, Chen Y, Chen Z, Xu S. Contamination characteristics and possible sources of PM10 and PM2.5 in different functional areas of Shanghai, China. Atmos Environ. 2013;68:221–229.
crossref

8. Jones AM, Harrison RM. Emission of ultrafine particles from the incineration of municipal solid waste: A review. Atmos Environ. 2016;140:519–528.
crossref

9. Squizzato S, Masiol M, Brunelli A, et al. Factors determining the formation of secondary inorganic aerosol: A case study in the Po Valley (Italy). Atmos Chem Phys. 2013;13:1927–1939.
crossref pdf

10. Hallquist M, Wenger J, Baltensperger U, et al. The formation, properties and impact of secondary organic aerosol: Current and emerging issues. Atmos Chem Phys. 2009;9:5155–5236.
crossref pdf

11. Al-Taani AA, Howari FM, Nazzal Y, Yousef A. Seasonal impact to air qualities in industrial areas of the Arabian Gulf region. Environ Eng Res. 2018;23:143–149.
crossref pdf

12. Wall SM, John W, Ondo JL. Measurement of aerosol size distributions for nitrate and major ionic species. Atmos Environ. 1988;22:1649–1656.
crossref

13. Park SS, Wexler AS. Size-dependent deposition of particles in the human lung at steady-state breathing. J Aerosol Sci. 2008;39:266–276.
crossref

14. Reyes-Zárate E, Sánchez-Pérez Y, Gutiérrez-Ruiz MC, et al. Atmospheric particulate matter (PM10) exposure-induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis evasion through STAT3 activation via PKCζ and Src kinases in lung cells. Environ Pollut. 2016;214:646–656.
crossref

15. Valiulis D, Šakalys J, Plauškaite K. Heavy metal penetration into the human respiratory tract in vilnius. Lith J Phys. 2008;48:349–355.
crossref

16. Morawska L, Bofinger ND, Kocis L, Nwankwoala A. Submicrometer and supermicrometer particles from diesel vehicle emissions. Environ Sci Technol. 1998;32:2033–2042.
crossref

17. Xu J, Wang Z, Yu G, Qin X, Ren J, Qin D. Characteristics of water soluble ionic species in fine particles from a high altitude site on the northern boundary of Tibetan Plateau: Mixture of mineral dust and anthropogenic aerosol. Atmos Res. 2014;143:43–56.
crossref

18. Allen AG, Nemitz E, Shi JP, Harrison RM, Greenwood JC. Size distributions of trace metals in atmospheric aerosols in the United Kingdom. Atmos Environ. 2001;35:4581–4591.
crossref

19. Kim D-J, Shin H-J, Ahn B-K, Lee J-H. Competitive adsorption of thallium in different soils as influenced by selected counter heavy metals. Appl Biol Chem. 2016;59:695–701.
crossref pdf

20. Nguyen TNT, Jung K-S, Son JM, Kwon H-O, Choi S-D. Seasonal variation, phase distribution, and source identification of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons at a semi-rural site in Ulsan, South Korea. Environ Pollut. 2018;236:529–539.
crossref

21. NIER. Annual report of air quality. Ministry of Environment; Inchon, Korea: 2015.


22. Ny MT, Lee B-K. Size distribution of airborne particulate matter and associated metallic elements in an urban area of an industrial city in Korea. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2011;643–653.
crossref pdf

23. Lee BK, Hieu NT. Seasonal variation and sources of heavy metals in atmospheric aerosols in a residential area of Ulsan, Korea. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2011;11:679–688.
crossref pdf

24. Hu J, Wang Y, Ying Q, Zhang H. Spatial and temporal variability of PM2.5 and PM10 over the North China Plain and the Yangtze River Delta, China. Atmos Environ. 2014;95:598–609.
crossref

25. Huang W, Long E, Wang J, Huang R, Ma L. Characterizing spatial distribution and temporal variation of PM10 and PM2.5 mass concentrations in an urban area of Southwest China. Atmos Pollut Res. 2015;6:842–848.
crossref

26. Roy D, Singh G, Yadav P. Identification and elucidation of anthropogenic source contribution in PM10 pollutant: Insight gain from dispersion and receptor models. J Environ Sci. 2016;


27. Jancsek-Turóczi B, Hoffer A, Nyírő-Kósa I, Gelencsér A. Sampling and characterization of resuspended and respirable road dust. J Aerosol Sci. 2013;65:69–76.
crossref

28. NIER. National air pollutants emission. Ministry of Environment; Inchon, Korea: 2016.


29. WHO. Evolution of WHO air quality guidelines: Past, present and future. World Health Organization; Copenhagen, Denmark: 2017.


30. Ribeiro NM, Pinto AC, Quintella CM, et al. The role of additives for diesel and diesel blended (ethanol or biodiesel) fuels: A review. Energ Fuel. 2007;21:2433–2445.
crossref

31. Milt VG, Querini CA, Miró EE, Ulla MA. Abatement of diesel exhaust pollutants: NOx adsorption on Co, Ba, K/CeO2 catalysts. J Catal. 2003;220:424–432.
crossref

32. Pisarello ML, Milt VG, Peralta MA, Querini CA, Miró EE. Catalytic abatement of pollutants from diesel exhausts. Lat Am Appl Res. 2003;33:345–352.


33. MOE. PRTR (Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers). Ministry of Environment; Sejong, Korea: 2014.


34. Fernández-Olmo I, Andecochea C, Ruiz S, Fernández-Ferreras JA, Irabien A. Local source identification of trace metals in urban/industrial mixed land-use areas with daily PM10 limit value exceedances. Atmos Res. 2016;171:92–106.
crossref

35. Councell TB, Duckenfield KU, Landa ER, Callender E. Tire-wear particles as a source of zinc to the environment. Environ Sci Technol. 2004;38:4206–4214.
crossref

36. Whiley AJ. Copper and zinc loading associated with automotive brake-pad and tire wear. Washington State Department of Ecology; Olympia, Washington: 2011.


37. Emsley J. Nature’s building blocks: An A-Z guide to the elements. Oxford; Oxford University Press; 2001.


38. EPA. Locating and estimation air emissions from sources of chromium. United States Environmental Protection Agency; Research Triangle Park, North Carolina: 1984.


39. Kwon H-O, Choi SD. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soils from a multi-industrial city, South Korea. Sci Total Environ. 2014;470–471:1494–1501.
crossref

40. Lopez JM, Callen MS, Murillo R, et al. Levels of selected metals in ambient air PM10 in an urban site of Zaragoza (Spain). Environ Res. 2005;99:58–67.
crossref

41. Ganor E, Altshuller S, Foner HA, Brenner S, Gabbay J. Vanadium and nickel in dustfall as indicators of power plant pollution. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1988;42:241–252.
crossref

Fig. 1
Locations of two sampling sites and wind patterns during sampling events in Ulsan, Korea. Red areas indicate industrial complexes.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2018-226f1.gif
Fig. 2
Concentrations of PM at each sampling site: (a) daily concentrations of TPM (left) and boxplots of TPM concentrations for all sampling events (right) and (b) size distributions of PM.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2018-226f2.gif
Fig. 3
Concentrations of trace metals associated with PM at each site: (a) mean concentrations of each trace metal in TPM (left) and mean fractions (right), and (b) mean concentrations of each trace metal in the given particle-size ranges.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2018-226f3.gif
Table 1
Concentrations of PM in Particle Size Ranges at Industrial (IND) and Residential (RES) Sites in Ulsan, South Korea
Size distribution (μm) IND (μg/m3) RES (μg/m3)


Min Max Mean ± SD Median Min Max Mean ± SD Median
TPM* 38.3 66.7 56.7 ± 8.3 59.6 22.5 57.1 38.2 ± 12.0 42.5

Stage 1 18 < 1.56 16.8 6.99 ± 4.2 6.59 0.59 6.34 3.18 ± 2.2 3.02
Stage 2 10–18 2.80 19.8 7.47 ± 5.2 6.32 0.46 5.59 2.69 ± 1.5 2.77
Stage 3 5.6–10 3.04 7.34 4.67 ± 1.5 4.22 0.95 5.74 3.28 ± 1.6 3.14
Stage 4 3.2–5.6 2.49 6.50 4.18 ± 1.4 4.06 1.15 9.02 4.50 ± 2.5 4.57
Stage 5 1.8–3.2 2.41 6.87 4.36 ± 1.5 4.31 0.87 7.37 3.65 ± 2.2 3.18
Stage 6 1.0–1.8 1.40 7.69 4.29 ± 1.7 4.31 1.64 4.00 2.70 ± 0.8 2.59
Stage 7 0.56–1.0 2.44 4.84 3.68 ± 1.0 3.61 0.28 6.67 3.17 ± 1.8 3.02
Stage 8 0.32–0.56 3.03 9.63 5.11 ± 1.8 4.76 0.88 7.89 4.50 ± 2.5 4.40
Stage 9 0.18–0.32 2.70 13.4 5.24 ± 3.3 4.10 2.26 6.45 3.61 ± 1.4 3.31
Stage 10 0.10–0.18 1.74 15.6 5.70 ± 3.8 5.46 1.67 6.63 3.75 ± 1.7 3.50
Stage 11 0.056–0.10 2.86 9.99 5.05 ± 2.5 3.93 0.59 7.90 3.18 ± 2.2 2.61

Sum of all stages

Table 2
Mean Concentrations of Nine Trace Metals in Particle Size Ranges at Two Sampling Sites during the 10 Sampling Events
(ng/m3) Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5 Stage 6 Stage 7 Stage 8 Stage 9 Stage 10 Stage 11

18 < 10–18 5.6–10 3.2–5.6 1.8–3.2 1.0–1.8 0.56–1.0 0.32–0.56 0.18–0.32 0.10–0.18 0.056–0.10
IND As 0.11 0.13 0.18 0.24 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.22 0.16 0.12 0.09
Se 0.27 0.30 0.13 0.31 0.33 0.40 0.38 0.44 0.33 0.31 0.36
Cr 1.80 2.21 1.72 1.67 1.95 2.04 2.14 1.73 1.79 1.62 2.02
V 6.67 5.17 3.93 5.57 4.98 2.63 2.23 3.80 4.13 2.19 2.22
Cd 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.07 0.06 0.04
Pb 0.61 0.53 0.52 1.83 0.87 0.77 0.90 1.03 0.60 0.24 0.24
Ba 9.12 10.2 9.76 11.3 10.6 11.2 10.5 9.54 9.19 8.86 8.80
Sb 0.06 0.07 0.05 0.26 0.27 0.32 0.20 0.19 0.07 0.00 0.02
Zn 6.56 9.78 9.34 7.64 8.55 14.9 11.8 10.4 8.03 8.81 11.4

RES As 0.07 0.07 0.11 0.17 0.17 0.25 0.28 0.27 0.18 0.35 0.10
Se 0.17 0.20 0.21 0.21 0.22 0.32 0.33 0.32 0.26 0.54 0.17
Cr 1.48 1.26 1.48 2.61 1.54 1.43 1.67 1.64 1.50 1.48 3.04
V 4.29 2.30 3.38 4.79 5.72 2.86 3.25 5.08 7.08 5.42 5.54
Cd 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.04 0.07 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.03
Pb 0.10 0.09 0.28 0.67 0.76 1.47 1.46 1.12 0.58 0.45 0.73
Ba 9.72 9.53 10.1 10.9 10.2 10.0 9.82 8.56 8.87 8.48 8.38
Sb 0.02 0.04 0.04 0.18 0.20 0.25 0.20 0.14 0.07 0.06 ND
Zn 5.96 5.33 5.47 6.23 5.09 9.95 10.13 6.18 4.08 4.84 4.62

ND: Not Detected.

Editorial Office
464 Cheongpa-ro, #726, Jung-gu, Seoul 04510, Republic of Korea
TEL : +82-2-383-9697   FAX : +82-2-383-9654   E-mail : eer@kosenv.or.kr

Copyright© Korean Society of Environmental Engineers.        Developed in M2PI
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers