| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
Environ Eng Res > Volume 31(4); 2026 > Article
khan, Kamal, Ur Rehman, Niaz, Rizqi, Jaafar, Irfan, and Ismail: Recent advancements, modification strategies, and practical implications in semiconductor photocatalysts for efficient wastewater treatment: A review

Abstract

Energy-efficient semiconductor photocatalysis efficiently degrades contaminants and transforms them into eco-friendly substances. The attractive properties make this approach a potential wastewater treatment alternative. Although promising, the semiconductor materials possess limitations. This study examines fundamentals of photocatalysis, potential semiconductor materials, bibliometric background (2007–2025), sophisticated modification techniques, practical application, and future research trends in the field, differentiating it from conventional studies. This study investigates the efficacy and mechanisms of LDHs, piezo-photocatalysts, g-C3N4, TiO2, perovskite, ZnO, and MOFs. Modification techniques include bandgap engineering, heterojunction formation, synergetic-assisted surface plasmon-resonance, defect manipulation, and co-catalyst combination. Cutting-edge approaches improve innovative light-driven composite materials to address existing challenges. The extensive research shows how structural and electrical adjustments affect semiconductor photocatalysts’ performance, such as active and broad-efficient light absorption, charge separation dynamics, and contaminant degradation kinetics. The present research addresses complex structure-activity correlations to facilitate the transition of laboratory discoveries to an industrial scale. For multi-mechanistic photocatalysis, we examine sustainable synthesis, interface engineering, and integrated renewable-energy-driven photoreactors. The study aims to analyze materials and link theoretical advances with experimental validation and practical relevance. Further investigation into enhanced photoactivity and its practical applications is recommended. In a flexible, carbon-free economy, semiconductor photocatalysis is essential for AOPs and wastewater treatment.

Graphical Abstract

/upload/thumbnails/eer-2025-435f7.gif

1. Introduction

The industrial expansion, population increase, and urbanization have generated numerous persistent organic contaminants (POCs) in the aquatic environment and affect the global clean water availability [1, 2]. Surfactants, medical waste, hazardous dyes, pesticides, fertilizers, and phenolic compounds for the leather, textile, cosmetics, paint, medicine, and plastics industries are among these contaminants. Due to their chemical toxicity, durability, cumulative nature, and bioaccumulation propensity, these contaminants pose a severe threat to aquatic ecosystems and human health, including cancer, hormone abnormalities, and embryotoxicity [3, 4]. Existing water treatment methods are in use, but have several serious challenges. Although slow, odoriferous, and inefficient against resistant chemical compounds, biological approaches work across strains [5]. Since other waste should be handled, membrane filtration and adsorption only transform contaminants [6, 7]. Reagents are needed for chemical flocculation and coagulation, which produce plenty of sludge [8]. Thermal oxidation can mineralize, but it is expensive and energy-intensive [9]. Traditional methods are highly resource-intensive and rarely mineralize complex organic contaminants [10]. Due to these limitations, non-conventional, energy-efficient, and green wastewater treatment technologies are required to mineralize hazardous contaminants completely, including the emerging organic contaminants (EOCs), before discharging them into waterways [11].
Advanced oxidation based on a photocatalytic approach is one of the most efficient and preferred techniques for degrading organic contaminants from wastewater in environmental and chemical engineering [12]. The advantages are simplicity, durability, relative inexpensiveness, complete degradation, and convenience of use. This environmentally safe, low-energy, renewable, and innocuous technology employs light energy to remove contaminants and accelerate operations for reducing contamination [13, 14]. Under standard atmospheric conditions, semiconductor photoactive materials completely mineralize contaminants into harmless end products such as CO2, H2O, and various minerals within this sustainable technology. These photocatalysts have a wide range of possible applications, including the production of H2, the reduction of CO2, antimicrobial effects, and N2 fixation [15, 16]. Environmental applications, including wastewater treatment and air purification, can also utilize these photocatalysts. Researchers examined various semiconductors as highly effective photocatalytic materials for water treatment [17]. Well-known semiconductor photoactive materials included titanium dioxide (TiO2) [18], cerium dioxide (CeO2) [19], cobalt-aluminum layered double hydroxide (CoAl-LDH) [20], copper oxide (CuO) [21], strontium titanate (SrTiO3) [22], graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) [23], cadmium sulfide (CdS) [24], nickel oxide (NiO) [25], iron oxide (Fe2O3) [26], zinc oxide (ZnO) [27], and zinc sulfide (ZnS) [28]. Moreover, their advantageous electrical and optical characteristics, cost-efficiency, high surface area, lack of toxicity, chemical and thermal stability, eco-friendliness, recyclability, and high photostability and activity have sparked interest in contaminant photodegradation [29]. However, semiconductor photocatalysts, despite their widespread utilization, encounter several challenges. The challenges included in this context are (a) a low charge transfer rate, (b) an elevated rate of photocarrier recombination, (c) a large bandgap energy that constrains the absorption of visible light, and (d) limitations in scalability that limit the quality and effectiveness of material synthesis [30]. The overall performance of photocatalysis is influenced by multiple factors, such as the semiconductor material synthesis method, photoreactor configuration, and operating conditions, which strongly affect photocatalyst removal efficacy. Alternative methods to improve these materials’ intrinsic efficacy are widely researched. Doping to optimize carrier transport, surface modification and functionalization for photoactivity, morphology-based composite preparation for synergistic properties, bandgap engineering for light absorption, and heterojunctions for charge separation at interfaces are trending techniques [31, 32]. The photocatalytic activity of semiconductor-based catalysts can be improved. Photocatalytic materials utilize photon energy depending on the bandgap energy of catalysts and photoexcite electrons (e) from the valence band (VB) to the conduction band (CB) [33]. Irradiating semiconductor photocatalyst materials with high-energy photons creates highly reactive reducing or oxidizing species, also known as reactive oxygen species (ROSs). Photocatalysis engages these ROSs with contaminants in chemical redox reactions [34]. Semiconductor photocatalysts mineralize inorganic and organic contaminants. Research on increasing the visible light absorption spectrum to employ the effective utilization of solar energy for industrial use and high quantum yield photoactivity is much needed. Modified advanced composite materials can facilitate the transition of laboratory-based photocatalytic mechanisms to industrial applications, thereby achieving these objectives [35].
Therefore, semiconductor photocatalysis developments should be critically assessed in light of the growing demand for practical applications and water treatment sustainability. This paper discusses potential semiconductor photocatalysts such as layered double hydroxide (LDH), piezoelectric photocatalysts, graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4), titanium dioxide (TiO2), perovskite (ABO3), zinc oxide (ZnO), and metal-organic framework (MOF). These materials are well-known systems and major examples of environmental light-driven catalysis research due to their attractive properties and targeted optimization. This analysis examines the complex structure-activity interactions that affect photocatalytic performance throughout various materials’ outcomes. In photocatalytic technology, innovative modification approaches improve optical, electrical, and structural features to overcome the above disadvantages and alter these semiconductor catalysts. This work covers semiconductor modification strategies like accurate bandgap tuning, systematic construction of complex heterojunctions, and surface plasmon-resonance (SPR) enhancement by decorating with noble metal nanoparticles, intentionally adding defects, and using co-catalysts and robust support materials. These methods aim to create advanced modified materials with lower surface redox reaction overpotentials, higher charge extraction kinetics, enhanced light harvesting, mechanical stability, and recyclability. This work integrates advanced modification methods with modern academic case studies on photocatalytic behavior to aid in mechanism and design rationale, as well as a bibliometric analysis that standard reviews lack. The paper compares semiconductor properties and discusses theoretical advances relevant to experiments and applications. This contribution covers fundamentals of photocatalysis, mass transfer mechanisms, reactive species generation, the 2007–2025 bibliometric background, and future research trends in the field. The study examines materials, methods, and interfacial engineering to improve charge dynamics, photostability, and visible light absorption in semiconductors to create robust, scalable, and environmentally friendly systems. The paper combines existing findings to suggest important future research avenues for hybrid and multi-mechanistic nanostructures that work in ambient solar light. Semiconductor photocatalysis is inevitable for circular and carbon-neutral wastewater treatment and preservation of the environment due to green synthesis, interface engineering, and sustainable, renewable energy-driven photoreactors.

2. Photodegradation and Mass Transfer Mechanism

The photocatalytic process has been extensively employed for the degradation of organic contaminants. This is primarily due to their ability to function at ambient pressure and temperature, as well as their capacity to completely mineralize pollutants and their byproduct materials without causing any additional harm [36]. Furthermore, these reactions are known for their low maintenance costs. Exposing the photocatalyst to light with an energy (E) equal to or greater than the bandgap energy (Eg) of the semiconductor catalyst materials initiates the photocatalytic process. The absorption of light energy excites electrons, causing them to shift from the VB to the CB [37].
This results in the formation of photoactive electrons (eCB) and holes (h+VB). The adsorbed components are the ones that trigger the secondary chemical reactions with the photoexcited e eCB/h+VB pairs [38]. The photoactivated eCB reacts when it comes in contact with O2, and the h+VB reacts with H2O. The product of this process is highly reactive species such as superoxide radicals (O2•−), hydroperoxyl radicals (HOO), and hydroxyl radicals (•OH). The reactive species are critical in initiating the photodegradation of organic contamination [39, 40]. In order to achieve the best photodegradation efficiency, one should make sure that there is sufficient generation of these highly reactive species. The radicals are very reactive and can oxidize organic pollutants to produce water (H2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) among other nonhazardous elements. It is noteworthy that this process does not result in any further contamination [41]. Excited eCB/ h+VB pairs may recombine to release energy after the absorption of light. The active charge recombination is explained by the fact that the quantum efficiency of the semiconductor is low, and it affects its light-to-energy conversion capacity [42]. In the absence of recombination, the photoexcited eCB/ h+VB pairs move to the catalyst surface, where they react with the adsorbed components [43]. Fig. 1(a) illustrates the mechanism of photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants using semiconductor photocatalyst.
In a photocatalytic reaction, activated e transferred between the VB of a semiconductor photocatalyst to the CB upon exposure to light, leaving an equal number of photoinduced h+ in the VB. The light then excites some charge carriers, which move to the photocatalyst’s surface to participate in catalytic redox reactions [44]. Fig. 1(b) depicts the mass transfer process associated with the photocatalysis process. The mass transfer mobility and target pollutants in the conventional photo reactivity process can be categorized into four separate stages. During the initial stage, O2 dissolves in the solution, while H2O can adhere to the photocatalyst surface. These components react with photoexcited eCB/ h+VB pairs to generate highly active radicals [45]. In the next stage, pollutants adsorb onto the surface of the catalyst and undergo chemical reactions with photogenerated species. During the third stage, final products and intermediates are produced by photocatalytic redox processes. The last stage removes photoexcited reactive redox species from the catalyst’s surface, forming final products (CO2 and H2O). Mass transfer from the bulk solution to the catalyst’s surface is crucial for high degradation performance [46]. Adsorption and desorption are affected by the amount of pollutants present, the temperature of the reaction medium, and the surface properties of the photocatalyst, such as its charge, area, and functional groups. Surface charge has an impact on electrostatic forces between pollutants and photocatalysts. A higher surface area improves the adsorption capability of active sites and eliminates pollutants. Mass transfer occurs when pollutants move from the bulk solution to the catalyst surface for adsorption and reaction [47, 48]. The photocatalyst adsorbed the reactants through the pore space for the redox reaction, and then desorption of the byproducts occurred to efficiently optimize the photoactivity. Photocatalytic material’s porous structure lets pollutants disperse [49]. Improper mixing, separation issues, pore shape, and the size of particles could prevent mass transfer. A concentration gradient can slow mass transfer and reaction if a lot of pollutants are near the catalyst surface. Mass transfer optimization can maintain reactant concentration at the catalyst surface, maximizing photocatalyst use and reaction rate [50].

3. Bibliometric Assessment and Research Development

In wastewater treatment research, the bibliometric study quantifies semiconductor photoactive catalysts that degrade contaminants. The figures and tables show the theme focus, publication volume, key journals, citations, and author influence. The pattern in question shows the progression of sustainable design, including traditional and innovative research. Fig. 2(a) shows how Scopus websearch identifies articles using fundamental data like publication year and field-relevant research reference details. The complete Scopus article selection method maintains dataset consistency and relevance. Scopus discovered 706 relevant articles after including the title, abstract, and keywords (semiconductor photocatalyst and wastewater treatment). Materials science, chemical engineering, and environmental science refine important articles. Because the data comes from a rigorously selected and thematically appropriate database result set, this selection process helps reduce extraneous data and ensures that the bibliometric analysis is more reliable. The annual output of literature data illustrates the exponential growth in scientific research on semiconductor photocatalysis in Fig. 2(b). The issue was covered in a single article that was published in 2007, but by the year 2015, there were a total of eleven papers that were accessible through online databases. The number of articles significantly increased from 20 to 75 between the years 2017 and 2021. In addition, the data reveal that there has been a constant upward publication trend during the years that have passed between these two locations. The exponential growth of semiconductor photoactive catalysts shows that more and more academics and researchers are interested in them. Minor fluctuations punctuate the upward trend, demonstrating original ideas’ persistence and importance. Until a more effective method for material development and wastewater treatment emerges, this reasoning remains valid. The Sankey diagram in Fig. 2(c) shows the complex relationship between notable authors, frequently cited publications, and key terms in semiconductor photocatalysis. The 1972 research by Fujishima and Honda remains influential, while newer scholars like Amit Senthil and Kumar have strong search and citation rates. The authors of the articles examine various methodologies and materials modifications, such as heterojunctions, improved semiconductors, wastewater treatment, and photocatalysis. This map shows the collaborative database and how foundational research affects recent author contributions on TiO2-based systems and organic contaminant degradation. This map shows the field’s conceptual history and challenges.
Table S1 summarizes the dynamic development that semiconductor photocatalysis research has influenced. Annual publications (N) increased exponentially from 2007 to 2025, indicating strong field growth. Over this span, the mean total citation per item drops from early heights (1400 in 2008) to later lows (28.31 in 2024). In fast-expanding fields, the average citation per article decreases as the output multiplies, especially for recently published articles with limited citation years. Due to restricted time for citation accumulation, the mean total citation per year has decreased in recent years. This data shows the field’s rapid growth and requires age-normalized criteria for effect assessment.
Fig. 3(a) demonstrates that the Journal of Hazardous Materials, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, and Applied Catalysis B: Environmental are the most important publishing sources for high-impact research in this field. Journals like Environmental Science and Pollution Research have notable cumulative developments in article publishing. Table S2 displays the most widely cited research on semiconductor photoactive catalysis. Foundational contributions in material science and detailed overviews are shown in the table from Advanced Materials and Chemical Society Reviews. Early advances in visible-light-active TiO2 and heterojunction photocatalysts were made by Wang (2014) and Low (2017) in Chemical Society Reviews and Advanced Materials, respectively. The regular publication of the Journal of Hazardous Materials and Applied Catalysis B: Environmental (e.g., Akpan, 2009; Peláez, 2012) highlights their importance in publishing practical research on organic contaminant degradation. Several highly cited studies (Gaya, 2008; Li, 2016; Ong, 2018) focus on review articles, showing a need for comprehensive syntheses of developments in ZnO, TiO2, and g-C3N4-based photocatalysts. It indicates that innovative research regarding catalyst growth and analytical review studies shape the discipline. Fig. 3(b) illustrates the production of review articles by publishing sources over time, highlighting a steep increase in the top five sources after 2018 and a significant rise from 2020 to 2025. The rapid increase shows semiconductor photocatalysis’ growing environmental importance and intellectual interest. The increase in journals shows a significant increase in research output. Fig. 3(c) recognizes R. Asahi and P. Sharma as prominent and notable researchers in the field. These writers’ large number of published articles and dispersed research investigations suggests a strong interest in subdisciplines beyond photocatalysis, placing them to lead research in these areas. Understanding these influential authors can help define potential collaborations and research pathways. Fig. 3(d) demonstrates the keyword cloud, which includes photocatalysis, photocatalytic activity, semiconductor, TiO2, and water/wastewater treatment. These phrases emphasize application-oriented and material development research in the literature. The addition of degradation and organic contaminants emphasizes photocatalysts’ practical significance, which matches the proposed semiconductor photocatalyst study. The absence of sophisticated alteration techniques in the keywords may allow the review to synthesize upcoming strategies that are not yet central to the keyword landscape.

4. Recent Advancements in Semiconductor Photocatalysts

The advanced oxidation process (AOP) effectively photodegrades hazardous organic contaminants in industrial wastewater, offering easy handling, notable reproducibility, simple operations, and high efficiency [51]. Under standard operational conditions, the technique employs atmospheric oxygen to completely mineralize organic contaminants into benign byproducts, utilizing a relatively inexpensive and effective strategy [52, 53]. This process is recognized as an ecologically sustainable, non-toxic, and low-energy consumption method for the decomposition of toxic substances. Light energy irradiation alone does not solely achieve the photoreaction process; photocatalysts, a critical component of the technique, harness photon energy to initiate redox reactions in a suitable reactor system [42]. The primary challenges in employing semiconductor photocatalysts, according to numerous studies, are [54, 55]:
  • Restricted photon energy absorption within the visible light spectrum.

  • Low quantum yield results from rapid recombination of e/h+ pairs.

  • Limited access to the photocatalyst surface area resulted in a lower degradation performance.

Consequently, various teams of researchers are investigating methods to address the limitations in visible light absorption utilized for solar-powered photoexcitation. These strategies are designed to produce certain results, such as using cation or anion doping to speed up the photocatalytic reaction and adding more conductors and semiconductor photocatalysts [56]. Alternative approaches, including vesicles, microemulsions, and micelles, have been documented to mitigate active carrier recombination [57]. The mechanism of photocatalytic chemical reactions, as outlined in Eqs. (120), can be summarized as follows [58]:
(1)
OH+AOPContaminantsH2O+CO2+Inorganic Ions
Charge Separation Triggers the Generation of ROSs:
(2)
hv+Photocatalyste-+h+
(3)
e-+O2O2
(4)
HO2+O2
(5)
2H++e-+O2H2O2
(6)
H2O2HO2-+H+
(7)
O2+2e-+2H+H2O2
(8)
O2+2e-+2H+H2O2
(9)
e-+H2O2OH-+OH
(10)
H2O+h+H++OH
(11)
2HO2O12H2O2
(12)
O2-+h+O12
Radical interaction:
(13)
2HO2O2+H2O2
(14)
2HO2+H2O+O2-OH-+O2+H2O2
(15)
2HO2H2O2
(16)
H2O2+hv(UV)2OH
(17)
H2O2+O2-OH+O2+OH-
Oxidation reaction:
(18)
Contaminants+h+,ROSEnd Products (H2O,CO2)
(19)
hv+Contaminats+O2PhotocatalystEnd Products (H2O,CO2)
Photoexcited charge carriers recombination:
(20)
h++e-Heat Energy+Decay
Photoinduced e release energy as light or heat through recombination and revert to their original state in the VB where they were photoexcited [59]. Photocatalysts with a narrow bandgap experience a greater recombination disadvantage than those with a wide bandgap. Catalysts with a large bandgap typically employ ultraviolet (UV) light to enhance their performance. The primary focus in this research area for water treatment is to synthesize a competitive photocatalyst to address its reported limitations [52].

4.1. Layered Double Hydroxide (LDH)

Layered double hydroxides (LDHs) represent basic materials composed of lamellar inorganic compounds. LDHs have recently attracted considerable attention owing to their distinctive structure and potential applications as an anion exchanger, adsorbent, catalyst, flame retardant, precursor, and others [60]. Photoactive catalytic materials have garnered interest from researchers in both industry and academia owing to their non-toxicity, eco-friendliness, straightforward synthesis, low cost, thermal and chemical stability, natural abundance, and customizable structure and composition [61]. In contrast to many other layered materials, LDHs are capable of forming hybrid catalytically active materials. They exhibit high surface area, facilitate ion exchange for specific species, and demonstrate structural recovery, making them applicable in various fields. The unique memory effect in LDHs allows them to be immersed in an aqueous solution, followed by a calcination process to regenerate the original structure. The characteristic of these materials enables the removal of cationic contaminants from effluent and the synthesis of photoactive catalysts [62]. LDHs present unique advantages that position them as viable alternatives to TiO2-based catalytic materials for certain applications related to the degradation of hazardous organic contaminants [63]. The materials utilize superior electrical and structural properties for environmental and energy applications [64]. The anion exchangeability, memory effect, and compositional adaptation of LDHs have enabled their integration into nanotechnology and hybrid materials. Pristine LDHs exhibit a broad bandgap (approximately 3.0–3.6 eV) and high photoexcited charge recombination rates, which restrict visible-light absorption and consequently result in low photodegradation rate constants (<0.01/min) [65]. Furthermore, the gradual diffusion of the interlayer and the release of oxidative metal ions result in reduced stability and efficacy. Innovative methods such as target doping, heterojunction interaction, nanosheet stripping, and additional strategies have significantly enhanced photoactivity in terms of light absorption, charge mobility, and stability [66]. These improvements enhance the kinetic and photophysical properties of pristine LDHs, rendering them more suitable for long-term contaminant-degrading processes [67]. The basic LDH synthesis technique provides exquisite conditional control over shape, framework, and chemical makeup. Recent material synthesis techniques have enabled fibrous structures, microspheres, LDH films on the dopant, and nanosized belts, facilitating the generation of smart, multipurpose, high-performance materials [68].
Two-dimensional, versatile layered inorganic nanomaterials termed LDHs contain synthetic or natural anionic mineral clay. Fig. 4(a) illustrates LDH’s basic structure, and the general formula for it is [M1-X 2+ Mx3+(OH)2]X+ (AX/n) n−.mH2O. M2 and M3 are bivalent and trivalent metal ions, respectively, whereas An− (anion) balances charge in LDHs in the interlayer area [69]. The formula indicates ‘m’, which shows the volume of water molecules in interlayer sections of interlamellar regions without anions. CO2+, Ni2+, Zn2+, Mg2+, Cd2+, Fe2+, Cu2+, Ti2+, Ca2+, or Mn2+ are bivalent ions (M2), while Co3+, Al3+, Ni3+, Mn3+, La3+, Cr3+, Ga3+, In3+, and Fe3+ are trivalent. Anions (Cl, CO32-, and NO3-) can be conveniently replaced in passageways between material layers. The hydrotalcite phase is reached in pure LDH materials when x = M3/(M2 + M3) is between 0.2 and 0.33 [70]. Interlayer molecules of water and anionic species stabilize LDHs. Thus, changing cations, interlamellar anions, and ratios created diverse, efficient LDH-based compounds [71]. LDHs are important because they lack crosslinking between cation layers, allowing interlayer space to expand or contract to regulate anions. Oxo-anions (nitrates, carbonates, etc.), oxo/polyoxometalates (chromate, dichromate), and halides (chlorides, fluorides, etc.) can compensate for any charge in material interlayers [60]. Hydrotalcite [Mg6Al2(OH)16CO3.4H2O] resembles a layered double hydroxide. Hydrotalcite is named for its high water content and talc for its appearance. Hydrotalcite, the parent of LDHs, is found in layered double hydroxide clays. Researchers discovered it as a mixture of hydroxides in 1842, but later in 1920, they identified it as magnesium iron hydroxide and magnesium aluminium. Considering double-layered materials, Feitknecht studied their production, solubility, stability, and structure identification by the 1930s. Allmann and Taylor employed X-ray diffraction of a single crystal for these specimens of minerals in the 1960s to properly recognize the layered double hydroxides’ layered structure [72, 73].
Comparing LDH to brucite (Mg (OH)2) facilitates structural examination easy. Dense stacking of hexagonal hydroxide ions and alternate octahedral gaps for Mg2+ ions generates neutral hydroxide layers in brucite [74]. Van der Waals forces stack and hold together the neutral hydroxide layers at 0.48 nm basal spacing. In the brucite structure, the limited isomorphous replacement of bivalent ions by trivalent ions generated mixed metals with hydroxide layers (M1-X 2+ Mx3+(OH)2)X+ alongside a positive charge [75]. Anion intercalation on the LDH-like metal hydroxide layers compensates for the residual positive charges in the interlayer regions. Significant hydrogen attraction in the interlamellar region bonds water molecules to anions and metal hydroxide layers to stabilize the LDH crystal structure. Intercalation in the interlayer area between anions and water molecules has increased the basal spacing of brucite from 0.48 nm to 0.77 nm for hydrotalcite [76]. Positively charged layers give LDHs excellent anion mobility, a base surface, and potential anion exchange. Water molecules and anionic species in interlayers can be easily transformed by another anion employing an anion exchange process [77]. Calcination of photocatalytic layered double hydroxides produces mixed metal oxides. The memory effect, or structural restoration, happens when stacked double hydroxides disintegrate at higher temperatures and treat the mixed metal oxide with the necessary anion [78]. To improve LDH magnetic properties, organic anions can be added to material layers.
LDH photocatalysts can be synthesized through multiple techniques, depending on the intercalated anion, the cations in the layers of hydroxides, and the final material’s physicochemical properties, such as shape, porosity, crystal structure, phase purity, and optical/electronic features [79]. Indirect methods for LDH synthesis include memory effect (restoring), delamination, and anion exchange. LDH production can be done directly via sol-gel, salt-oxide, co-precipitation, electrochemical, in-situ film growth, and urea hydrolysis methods [80]. Co-precipitation is one of the processes that can create LDH that has an exceptional crystalline structure and uniformity. The co-precipitation technique can synthesize amorphous or well-crystallized materials by satisfying preparation conditions like base solution nature, total cation concentration, reaction medium pH, M2+/M3+ molar ratios, base solution concentration, aging temperature, and aging time [81].
Persistent organic contaminants harm the biosystem, atmosphere, and water resources. Their complex chemical structure makes photodegradation difficult [82]. LDHs-based materials can degrade multiple contaminants, such as chlorinated aromatics, phenolic derivatives, colours (azo and xanthene groups), and carboxylic acids under visible light irradiation into non-hazardous end products such as H2O, CO2, and other minerals [83]. Composite semiconductor photocatalytic materials are made by combining multiple materials utilizing numerous manufacturing techniques [84]. In composite materials, a narrow bandgap semiconductor material with more negative charges at the CB level is combined with a wide bandgap semiconductor to confine photoexcited positive holes (h+) and release photogenerated electrons (e) into the wide bandgap semiconductors in the presence of a light source [85]. Consequently, effective charge separation in composite materials can be attained. The pure TiO2 absorbs UV photon energy, restricting its uses, while combining it with calcined Mg/Al-LDH enhances photoactivity, overcoming its inherent limitations [86]. Dopants such as platinum (Pt) and manganese (Mn) modify the LDH materials’ atomic structure by creating new energy bands in the bandgap configuration and reducing the recombination rate [87]. Fig. 4(b) demonstrates the advantageous properties and necessary characteristics of LDH for improvement.
Table 1 summarizes the LDH-based composites for the removal of contaminants. To ensure efficient photodegradation of organic contaminants, in particular phenol, different operating parameters have been employed as shown in the table. Actual degradation for all relevant experiments was observed under consistent UV and UV-visible light to generate photoactive charge carriers and assess the LDH-based composite’s photoactivity. Each part describes the photocatalyst, synthesis technique, contaminant concentrations, photocatalyst loading, testing conditions, and degradation performance. Defect engineering improved photocatalytic performance as Co(OH)2/MgFe LDH degraded chloramphenicol by 95.9% under visible light. The hydrothermal synthesis method worked well with CuAl-LDH/CL, degrading doxycycline by 96.2%. NiAl-LDH/Cu-MOF degraded methyl orange (MO) by 99% due to its improved charge mobility through built-in electric fields. Also remarkable are ZnFe-CO3LDH, which completely degraded phenol, and CoAl-LDH/BiPO4, which increased charge carrier separation. The preparation technique and structural characteristics of LDH materials influence their photocatalytic activity. This table illustrates the potential of LDH materials and suggests directions for further research on the design of these catalysts for practical applications.

4.2 Piezoelectric Photocatalysts

The concept of “piezoelectricity” comes from the Greek words “piezo” (to force or squeeze) and “electron” (amber, electric charge source) [111]. According to Nie et al. (2021), piezoelectric materials are non-centrosymmetric structures with an uneven arrangement of elements in the crystal lattice. Mechanical stress causes polarization due to positive (h+) and negative (e) charge deformation. Some non-centrosymmetric inorganic and organic piezoelectric materials can convert mechanical energy into electrical energy and vice versa [112]. Piezoelectric catalysis relies on charge transfer driven by external tension through displacement. Mechanical forces such as wind, physical bending, ultrasonic waves, vortex-induced shearing force, tide, and atmospheric pressure can be employed to induce piezo-catalysis and piezo-photocatalysis [113]. Devices made of piezoelectric materials can create piezotronics by causing charge separation and polarization in the field. In particular, piezotronics function similarly to traditional mechanosensing systems. Piezoelectric materials create positive and negative charges on opposite sides due to external stress-induced deformation along their non-symmetric orientation [114]. The piezoelectric effect occurs when electric polarization and mechanical force are combined. The non-symmetric piezoelectric effect causes external stress to create a Schottky junction at the surface or interface of materials, resulting in an unequal arrangement of elements [115]. Research has explored electrochemical reactions utilizing surface-free active charges for polymerization, photodynamic therapy, wastewater treatment, biomedical applications, and water electrolysis [116120]. Piezo-photocatalysts conduction/valence bands tilt during reactions, triggering an advanced oxidation process (AOP) with ultrasonic waves, resulting in separated oxidation/reduction charges and reactive oxygen species (ROSs) at the material surface [121]. Fig. 5(a) shows the photocatalytic reaction’s ROS generation mechanism in all circumstances. Excited charge carriers can start redox processes that break down harmful organic contaminants and make ROS and water/oxygen for wastewater treatment. Increasing the polarization potential in piezo-catalysts is crucial for generating more ROS. According to Han et al. (2008), piezo-photocatalyst materials can generate piezoelectric or ferroelectric effects by converting chemical energy, mechanical strain, and light energy [122]. They become electrically polarized when they are under large-scale stress, collecting and changing mechanical energy for sensing, controlling motion, biological activities, and electrostatic induction [123].
Interfacial redox reactions start on polarized material surfaces with high Gibbs free energy. Small molecules of organic material and water can be employed in redox reactions to produce H2, O2, and other chemically reactive species [124]. The piezo-potential of 1D or 2D ferroelectric/piezoelectric materials goes up when their structure is simply deformed compared to when the particles are packed together. Researchers are increasingly using nanoflowers (NFs) and nanowires (NWs) in piezoelectric photocatalysis [112]. Hong et al. (2010) reported water splitting on piezoelectric BaTiO3 micro-dendrites and ZnO micro-fibers using induced stress charge separation. In 2012, they found that ultrasonic vibrations effectively degraded acid orange dye on the surface of the micro-dendrites [125, 126]. Eqs. (2124) divide piezo-catalytic and degradation mechanisms of contaminants into four simple steps [127].
(21)
Piezocatalytic materials+StressPiezocatalytic materials+h+/e-
(22)
OH-+h+OH
(23)
e-+O2O2-
(24)
(O2-/OH/e-/h+)Hazardious PollutantsCO2+H2O
Photocatalysis for organic contaminants degradation utilizes integrated and hybrid piezo-photocatalysts. Piezo-potential in piezoelectric semiconductors create a built-in field that separates photoexcited h+/e sets in integrated-type piezo-photocatalysts [112]. The hybrid piezo-photocatalyst has two elements and uses induced charge polarization from neighbouring piezoelectric materials to separate the photo-excited charge carriers [114]. Photocatalysis, based on piezoelectric catalysis, relies on charge carrier energy or separation performance during light irradiation and has garnered attention. Piezo-potential induces mechanical stress or strain, which efficiently transfers photoexcited positive holes (h+) and negative electrons (e) to create a large electric field [128]. Although capable, piezo materials have certain limits that impact their performance as individuals. Under mechanical stress, polarization-induced piezoelectric effect (electric fields), which may not be sufficient for efficient charge mobility, results in low apparent rate constants (less than 0.02/min) and significant recombination rates [129]. Due to their photoactivity’s dependence on external stimulation frequency, reaction solution viscosity, and amplitude, scaling and photoreactor design are difficult. Reduced surface areas and structural stress under repetitive pressure decrease longevity and stability. Recently, piezo-photo synergy heterojunctions (e.g., ZnO/SrTiO3, ZnO/BaTiO3, SrTiO3/TiO2, BiFeO3/g-C3N4, and Cu/SrTiO3) have been developed to increase degradation kinetics by increasing light absorption and interfacial charge transfer [130, 131]. Nano-structuring and defect engineering enhance strain-induced photocarrier mobility and charge density, while surface modification with ferroelectric or conductive components increases internal polarization fields [132]. New design concepts limit mechanical deterioration and recombination, making piezoelectric photocatalysts appropriate for hybrid energy-driven systems.
Calcium titanate (CaTiO3) is a conventional perovskite, but structured materials include XBX3 compounds like PbTiO3 [133], PbZrO3 [134], SrTiO3 [135], LiNbO3 [136], KNbO3 [137], BaTiO3 [138], BaZrO3 [139], BaCeO3 [140], CaRbF3 [141], and others. XTiO3-type oxides, among other perovskite materials, have garnered attention in energy conversion and environmental remediation due to their surface reactive oxygen species (ROSs) and unique electrical, optical, thermal, structural, and physicochemical properties [142]. Different surface catalytic processes can be triggered by XTiO3 perovskites. XTiO3 perovskites VB and CB are elevated by vortex shearing force or ultrasonic vibration to separate charge carriers in the reaction medium during piezo-catalytic reactions [143]. These materials are particularly popular for their adaptability and availability. Photocatalytic piezoelectric materials may directly distinguish photo-activated h+/e sets during piezo/light stimulation [113]. Traditional methods for enhancing interfacial charge separation feature Schottky and p-n junctions for unilateral conductivity, but the electric field is insufficient and challenging to manage. Instead of a weak local field, a sufficient piezo-potential driving force will allow the material to function similarly in semiconductor-semiconductor and metal-semiconductor composite systems [123]. Recent research suggests that using intrinsic electric fields from piezoelectric, ferroelectric, or pyroelectric phenomena in photocatalytic materials can improve charge carrier separation [144]. Materials exhibiting piezoelectric properties are categorized as piezoelectric, ferroelectric, and pyroelectric. Understanding the origins of piezoelectricity involves understanding the crystalline structure’s symmetry [145, 146]. Hence, the sequence of elements is briefly addressed and shown in Fig. 5(b). Out of 32 crystal point groups, 21 are non-symmetrical, and 20 exhibit piezoelectric action [147]. Ten out of twenty non-symmetrical point groups are polar crystals, characterized by a unique polar axis with distinct properties at both ends [127]. Materials with a unique polar axis can spontaneously polarize, and polar crystals may additionally be polarized. Pyroelectric materials include ZnO, PbTi O3, PbZrO3, and (CH2CF2)n, which create an electric charge on the crystal face perpendicular to the polar axis when temperature changes [148]. Ferroelectric crystals have naturally occurring polarization along their polar axis and can be reversed by altering the electric field’s polarity [149]. Therefore, all ferroelectric crystal materials are both piezoelectric and pyroelectric [150]. While all pyroelectric crystal materials are piezoelectric, only a few materials with polar group symmetry, such as gallium nitride (GaN) and aluminium nitride (AlN), are pyroelectric [151].
Table 2 encapsulates the photocatalytic efficacy of piezoelectric composites for photodegradation in pertinent experiments conducted to remediate wastewater comprising diverse organic contaminants. Various operational parameters, facilitated by ultrasonic wave irradiation, are employed to assure efficient photodegradation of organic contaminants, as illustrated in the table. Degradation was seen in all pertinent studies under continuous irradiation of UV, UV-visible, and visible light to produce photoexcited active charge carriers, which were utilized to assess the photoactivity of the piezo-based composite. The table lists piezoelectric photocatalytic materials, their synthesis techniques, pollutant concentrations, evaluation circumstances, and degradation percentages. BaTiO3/pDEB, which degraded bisphenol A 100% under visible light and ultrasonic vibration, shows the combined benefits of piezo-photocatalysis. Ultrasonic stimulation increased piezoelectric ozonation efficiency (90.1% degradation rate for atrazine (ATZ) in BaTiO3/g-C3N4/O3). Hydrothermally produced Bi3TiNbO9 degraded tetracycline hydrochloride by 64.5% under mechanical stress and visible light, demonstrating the relevance of piezoelectric properties in photocatalytic activity. The table shows that charge mobility improvement increases photodegradation rates, as BaTiO3/CuPbSbS3 heterostructures degraded rhodamine B (RhB) by 90.56%. Other data entry, including AgI/Ag3PO4/BaTiO3 and SrBi4Ti4O15/Ag2O, demonstrates the variety of synthesis methods and piezoelectric materials’ ability to degrade organic contaminants. This table shows that piezoelectric photocatalysts may degrade contaminants efficiently under various experimental settings.

4.3. Graphitic Carbon Nitride (g-C3N4)

Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) has received much attention in wastewater treatment for the photocatalytic degradation of pollutants, owing to its excellent characteristics. Hence, g-C3N4 displays numerous attractive attributes such as high performance/cost ratio, chemical inertness, suitable electronic band structure, a moderate energy bandgap (approximately 2.7 eV), non-toxicity, and wide absorption of light in the visible spectrum range and facile synthetic procedure with chemical and physical stability [181]. The g-C3N4 photocatalyst has the strong reduction active abilities as for photo-induced electrons (e) in its CB. g-C3N4 is a metal-free inorganic semiconductor photocatalyst, which has attracted tremendous attention for its applications in CO2 reduction, pollutants degradation, and photocatalytic H2 generation [182]. Fig. S1, a schematic illustration of the structural arrangement of the primitive g-C3N4. Although there are many deficiencies of pure g-C3N4 as photocatalyst leading to unsatisfactory efficiencies, these drawbacks involve low surface area, fast recombination rate, poor light absorbability and electron conductivity, quantum confinement effects and interfacial grain boundaries [183].
Therefore, modification of g-C3N4 materials is necessary to improve the light absorption efficiency which is important for wide applications in sunlight and enhance the photocatalytic activity [184]. To overcome these limitations, a series of modification strategies such as element doping, bandgap structure design, tuning the pore size, electronic structural combination, morphology evolution, heterojunction formation and composite creation [185]. Doping with elemental composition for bandgap engineering is regarded as the most powerful approach toward modulation of optical and electronic properties of g-C3N4 and thus fabricating efficient photodegradation applications. Its designed reduction and oxidation reactions could be realized by tuning the bandgap potential and facilitating light energy adsorption with incorporation of nonmetallic elements for instance [186]. Composite materials based on modified g-C3N4, generated through advanced elemental doping strategies, demonstrate improved light absorption across a wide spectrum during the photoexcitation process. The preparation of mesopore g-C3N4 materials has been reported successively by means of two kinds of templating methods namely hard and soft [187]. Mesoporous-based materials demonstrate enhanced light absorption properties, compared to bulk g-C3N4, owing to increased physicochemical properties, including tunable pore size, numerous active sites on the material surface, large surface area and controllable morphology [188].
Yang and colleagues investigated g-C3N4 co-doped with S/P for photocatalytic RhB degradation in 2024 through secondary calcination. Initial synthesis produced S/P-CN-1 by calcination at 550 °C. Second calcination using similar settings produced S/P-CN-2. S/P-CN-2 degraded RhB with 99.4% efficiency in 4 minutes, 15 times higher than pristine g-C3N4. S/P and secondary calcination synergistically boost g-C3N4 light absorption, active site formation, and recombination inhibition. Further investigations showed that S/P-CN-2 outperformed CN-1 (37.9%), S-CN-1 (56.9%), P-CN-1 (63.1%), and S/P-CN-1 (81.3%). S/P-CN-2 possesses a higher specific surface area, resulting from secondary calcination, and shows high RhB adsorption, while S/P-CN-3, with excessive calcination, causes structural damage and low performance, highlighting the importance of balance in thermal treatment optimization. S/P-CN-2 is durable and recyclable to ensure its practicality and scalability, for the removal of 99.4%, 99.1%, 98.1% and 95.3% of adsorption performance after four reuse cycles, respectively. The stability of S/P-CN-2 was confirmed by the comprehensive characterization test. The introduction of co-doped was found to be essential for a stable S/P-CN-2 photoactive material with improved photoredox behavior and efficiency for environmental remediation [189].

4.4. Titanium Dioxide (TiO2)

Titanium dioxide (TiO2) stands out among semiconductor photocatalysts for natural world decontamination, primarily because of its exceptional photocatalytic performance. Its beneficial features include low toxicity, durability, availability, cost-effectiveness, chemical stability, and an extremely high hydrophobic nature [190]. Organic contaminants are efficiently transformed owing to their substantial oxidizing aptitude, facilitated by photogenerated active holes (h+), while the material’s chemical stability supports the reaction [191]. Photocatalytic water splitting on TiO2 electrode surfaces was initially reported by Fujishima and Honda in 1972, subsequently establishing it as a prominent catalyst with an increased research focus on environmental applications [192]. Titanium dioxide catalysts effectively mineralize a variety of organic contaminants, including phenol, bisphenol, chlorophenol, pesticides, colorants, surfactants, halocarbons, mercaptans, cyanides, and refinery chemical waste. Organic contaminants are properly transformed into benign end products, including H2O, CO2, and other components, through UV light exposure [56]. Fig. S2 illustrates the mechanism of contaminant degradation employing photocatalytic activity on the TiO2 photocatalyst surface.
The process for the establishment of heterogeneous photocatalytic reactions is typically divided into five essential steps [193195].
  1. Mass transfer of organic compounds on the surface of TiO2 in the fluid phase.

  2. Adsorption of organic contaminants on the TiO2 surface is induced by photon energy activation through illumination.

  3. Redox reactions take place on the photocatalyst surface for absorbed contaminants.

  4. Intermediates are released from the external surface of the catalyst following decomposition.

  5. Reverse mass transfer takes place in the bulk fluid from the interface region.

TiO2 materials exhibit three primary crystal polymorph structures: brookite (orthorhombic), rutile (tetragonal-like needle), and anatase (tetragonal-like pyramid), with bandgap energies of 3.13, 3.02, and 3.2 eV, respectively [196]. Among all three categories of TiO2 photocatalysts, rutile is recognized as having a more stable adapted crystalline structure in comparison to brookite and anatase, which transform rutile at elevated temperatures (700 to 1000 °C). The synthesis of brookite poses considerable challenges and is rarely reported, leading to a limited number of studies available for examination [197]. A significant portion of the photon energy emitted from solar light is absorbed by rutile due to its fine bandgap energy. Todorova et al. found that the photodegradation of organic contaminants is enhanced by the combination of rutile and anatase, while the reduced rate of recombination for e/h+ sets is attributed to the narrow bandgap of rutile [198]. The synthesis technique of the rutile form is more stable at a higher temperature, whereas the anatase form of TiO2 exhibits stability at ambient temperatures [199]. Anatase demonstrates a significant capacity for active species absorption on its surface, attributable to its high surface volume, resulting in improved photocatalytic activity. In addition, an excessive amount of rutile inhibits the rate of photodegradation; thus, a lower quantity of rutile is valuable for improved photoreactivity [200]. Anatase shows appropriate features for effective photocatalytic oxidation reactions, including enhanced UV light absorption, reliability in fluids across various pH levels, and superior pigmentary aspects [201].
The rapid recombination of e/h+ sets in TiO2 catalysts presents a significant drawback in the photocatalysis process, attributed to the large bandgap energy (3.2 eV) that necessitates light exposure for activation, thereby diminishing photoactivity performance [202]. The substantial energy demands for bandgap excitation restrict its applicability in scientific resources and functionality, owing to the low absorption of visible light prevalent in solar irradiation. Additionally, the reliance on ultraviolet (UV) light escalates treatment costs [203]. Consequently, the alteration of the optical response of TiO2 materials within the visible light spectrum will enhance photoactivity, yielding favorable outcomes [204]. Regulating operational parameters for TiO2-based photocatalytic treatment enhances the efficacy of photoactivity. The general efficiency of degradation by the photocatalytic method is influenced by factors such as light intensity, types of contaminants, the form and structure of TiO2, type of doping, and pH level [205].

4.5. Perovskite

Perovskite oxide has garnered significant attention owing to its remarkable physicochemical, structural, and electronic properties and photocatalytic applications. Due to their effective light-harvesting capabilities and semiconductor characteristics, they are extensively utilized in the photodegradation process [206]. Photosensitized oxidation is recognized as an effective method for inducing oxygen adsorption on the substrate surface. Photooxidation happens when molecular oxygen interacts with the excited photosensitizer. However, the limited recyclability, instability, and high costs associated with these materials have significantly restricted their practical applications [207]. Photocatalytic degradation utilizing perovskite represents an environmentally friendly and efficient method for the selective photooxidation of contaminants at ambient conditions. Multiple techniques are employed in the preparation of perovskite photocatalysts, including the solid-phase high-temperature reaction, solvothermal method, hot injection, sol-gel procedure, hydrothermal synthesis, and soft/hard templating or co-precipitation approach [208]. The method employed to synthesize perovskite significantly influences the morphology, size, purity, and surface area of the nanocrystalline material, subsequently affecting its electrical properties [209]. Perovskite (ABO3) oxides, originating from CaTiO3, are extensively researched as photocatalysts across various applications, attributed to their high photodegradation performance [210].
Several perovskites have been identified in recent years, consisting of various elements that exhibit an ABO3-type structure. In the atomic structure of ABO3 materials, oxygen exists as O2-, while B4+ is smaller than A2+. Additionally, a substantial variety of identical materials can be synthesized by substituting various elements at the A- and B-sites [211]. This enables researchers to dope or substitute specific atoms in the crystal lattice of materials at various available sites to create innovative catalysts with enhanced photoactivity. The cubic symmetry is isometrically covered in the ABO3 structure type, where the A-cations occupy the center and are 12-fold coordinated, while B-cations exhibit octahedral coordination with 6 oxygen anions (Fig. S3) [212]. Additionally, various cation elements exhibit distinct ionic radii in different perovskites, related to lattice distortions arising from lower-symmetry host structures, including triclinic, rhombohedral, monoclinic, tetragonal, and orthorhombic shapes [213]. The change in the perovskite materials’ structure influences the dipole moment, crystal field effect, and electronic configuration. The overall geometry of the perovskite lattice remains generic, accommodating a diverse range of compositional structures and elements [214]. Up to 90% of various metal components can be effectively integrated with perovskite to improve degradation functionality. In ABO3-type perovskites, three active sites can be modified by doping with various composite cations, potentially altering the structure of these materials by introducing defects. Sites A and B mitigate distortion of the perovskite structure through material manipulation via doping [215]. The lattice of B-site cations comprises a transition metal species. The material’s properties are closely associated with the A- and B-site cations within the perovskite crystal matrix. The cation in the 12-coordinated A-site position is sourced by the BO6 network and generally occurs as either a rare earth or alkaline earth metal [216].
These materials are generally sensitive to UV light due to their wide bandgap. Generating composites via doping can increase their photoactivity, enabling their use as visible-light active catalysts. The method serves as a general approach wherein doped materials partially inhibit charge recombination following light irradiation, thereby improving photodegradation performance and sensitizing the host catalyst material to visible light [217]. The selection of a catalyst for photodegradation treatment is critical for achieving high performance. The absorption coefficient in semiconductors is primarily determined by their electronic structure, widely considered the most significant factor. The absorption coefficient is a critical parameter for photocatalyst materials, influenced by both the bandgap and photon energy [218].

4.6. Zinc Oxide (ZnO)

Zinc oxide (ZnO) has been recognized as an effective semiconductor photocatalyst for photodegradation, attributed to its strong oxidation capabilities, substantial degradation efficacy, and non-toxic features [219]. The material exhibits a bandgap energy of 3.2 eV and functions as an n-type semiconductor, comparable to the characteristics of a TiO2 photocatalyst. Consequently, the application of ZnO as a photocatalytic material for the degradation of organic contaminants is advantageous considering its preferred electronic and optical characteristics, rich sensitivity to light, inexpensiveness, and sustainable nature compared to other semiconductor catalysts [220]. The bandgap value for ZnO semiconductor material is approximately 3.37 eV, and it decomposes various toxic compounds when stimulated under UV light exposure [221]. The photocatalytic mechanism for ZnO mirrors that of TiO2 materials, wherein high-energy light exposure generates OH and O2•− radicals by exciting e/h+ sets. These radicals subsequently react with H2O and O2 during the degradation of organic contaminants. As a result, the organic contaminant molecules interact with free oxidized radicals in the medium, leading to the formation of H2O and CO2 as benign by-products [56]. The primary limitation of the ZnO photocatalyst is its broad bandgap energy level, necessitating a high-energy light source (UV) for electron stimulation, which diminishes the catalyst’s effectiveness in adsorbing visible light. Moreover, the recombination of e/h+ sets induced by light exposure, resulting from the unintended adsorption of photon energy without the presence of electron acceptors or donors in the reaction medium, leads to reduced quantum efficiency and energy dissipation as heat or light during the photocatalytic process [222].
The adoption of an alternative approach for altering the crystal structure of a ZnO-based photocatalyst aims to modify the bandgap configuration to enhance visible light adsorption and facilitate the movement of interfacial photoexcited charge carriers, thereby enhancing activity for extensive and practical application [223]. Various tempering techniques are employed to alter the bandgap configuration to align with the visible light spectrum, accommodating a wide range of irradiating energy sources. Transformation strategies involve foreign ion co-doping, doping with nonmetal or metal ions, deposition of noble metals, and sensitization by means of organic dyes or inorganic compounds [224]. Nonmetal additives include S, C, F, and N, while doping metals consist of Fe, Sm, Ag, Au, La, and Cu, which serve to reduce the energy absorption spectrum of light within the bandgap of the ZnO photocatalyst. The development of heterojunction structures through the combination with substances possessing distinct physical properties enhances the efficiency of photoexcited charge carrier separation at the interface during photocatalytic treatment [225]. Zinc oxide and titanium dioxide exhibit comparable bandgap energies along with similar physical and chemical features, allowing for the substitution of TiO2 catalytic materials with ZnO photocatalysts. The broad bandgap energy range of ZnO enables the utilization of ultraviolet (UV) light frequencies for electron excitation in the photocatalytic process [226]. Various techniques have been evaluated for the fabrication of nanostructures of zinc oxide to enhance photocatalytic activity. These techniques include the sol-gel method, microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis, sono-chemical preparation, reflux method, thermal decomposition, and solvothermal processes, among others [227].

4.7. Metal-Organic Framework (MOF)

Studies in the past have demonstrated the positive impact of metal-organic framework (MOF)-based materials in contaminant degradation, linking these benefits to their porous structures. Key characteristics include an adequate number of active sites for photoreactions, a high density of charge carriers with efficient transfer channels, and robust absorption and desorption capabilities during photoactivity [228]. Materials based on MOFs indicate a porous structure, characterized by intermolecular pores created through the formation of metal ion nodes or clusters of several metal ions, supported by a framework of multiple organic bonds [229]. The catalyst exhibits several advantages compared to other semiconductor-based photocatalysts: a) the structural integrity of the material is enhanced through inorganic and organic combinations of MOF; b) the adjustable configuration of MOF’s elements facilitates improved charge carrier transfer and separation; c) the densely porous nature of MOF allows for a significant number of active sites on the surface, thereby increasing light energy absorption capacity [230, 231].
The lattice structure development consistently maintains the coordination positions of the crystalline framework of suitable MOF metallic elements, rendering it an effective material for the photodegradation of organic contaminants. These positions are generally occupied by water as a solvent molecule or any available molecule from the immediate environment during the synthesis process of photocatalysts [232]. Heating the MOF at ambient temperature under vacuum circumstances allows for the frequent evacuation of interchangeable coordinate spots that lack molecular occupancy, resulting in the formation of coordinatively unsaturated sites and Lewis acid sites adjacent to the metal ions. In certain instances, defects and irregularities in the lattice arrangement of the material may produce coordinatively unsaturated sites in proximity to the metal center [233]. Nonetheless, the intricate synthesis techniques required for pure MOFs, coupled with the high cost of manufacture, inadequate material reproducibility, kinetic energy unrest, and a broad bandgap that restricts visible light absorption under standard ambient conditions, constrain their practical applications [234]. Considering these limitations, several post-synthetic adaptation strategies have been established, including hybrid composites of MOFs achieved through semiconductor encapsulation and ligand functionalization. These strategies aim to enhance the absorption features of visible light energy while reducing the recombination rate of photoexcited carriers [235]. Fig. S4 shows a schematic representation of the MOF’s general crystal arrangement, including organic linkers and metal ion configurations. Recent investigations have employed MOF-based photocatalysts in various energy conversion systems, including the oxygen evolution reaction, nitrogen reduction reaction, hydrogen evolution reaction, photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants, and CO2 reduction reaction [236, 237]. A significant increase in research publications has been observed regarding MOFs and their modified composites in the field of photocatalysis, attributed to their distinctive characteristics. According to Ahmad et al. (2025), porphyrin-integrated Cu-MOF/ZnFe2O4 (ZFO) heterojunctions are sophisticated materials that utilize photodegradation and adsorption through synergistic structural and photoredox design. The copper metal-organic framework (Cu-TCCP-MOF) component offers coordination sites and π-conjugation for contaminant adsorption and visible-light absorption, while ZFO offers magnetic chemical durability, separability, and efficient charge carrier separation. The composite showed superior efficiencies of 92.3 % degradation for p-nitrophenol in 70 min and 97.2 % for RhB in 90 min. The reaction was reported to have a pseudo-first-order rate constant of 0.08124/min, outperforming pure ZFO by 2.5-fold and pristine Cu-MOF by 1.35-fold. The Langmuir isotherm (LG-I) behavior (R2 = 0.999) showed a maximum adsorption capacity of 20.72 mg/g, demonstrating an adsorption monolayer with well-defined photoactive sites. The heterojunction promoted e/h+ mobility and separation through CB and VB offsets (Cu-MOF CB = −0.36eV; ZFO CB = −0.41eV), increasing ROS formation (•OH, •O2-) and inhibiting charge recombination. After six reuse cycles, the photocatalyst retained above 90% photoactivity and structural integrity, proving operational stability. The abundance of precursors and the hydrothermal synthesis method indicate that this composite system has the potential to be scaled up. The work quantifies the Cu-MOF/ZFO heterojunction as a high-efficiency, durable, and repeatable composite material for large-scale processes with photoinduced oxidation [238]

5. Effective Enhancement Strategies for Materials

Single semiconductor photocatalysts, while offering various advantages, exhibit several limitations, including high charge recombination, restricted light absorption, inadequate charge carrier mobility, a broad bandgap, limited active sites, and low durability during extended operation. Several strategies are implemented to increase the efficiency of semiconductor photocatalysts in degrading toxic contaminants by addressing the material-related limitations. These strategies include defect engineering, bandgap modification, heterojunction formation, dye sensitization, morphological engineering, doping (with metal and non-metal elements), generating oxygen vacancies, substrate immobilization, addition of co-catalysts, integration of quantum dots, plasmonic enhancement, photo-electrocatalysis (bias-assisted), and surface alteration. The modifying strategies mentioned above can achieve high charge transfer and separation rates, reduced bandgap, increased reactive species production, better mass transfer efficiency, enhanced catalyst electronic properties, increased active sites, photoactivity under visible light irradiation, improved photo-redox reaction rates, boosted material conductivity, better e/h+ pair generation, low recombination rates, and upgraded surface and physical properties. The following section discusses and investigates some extremely efficient techniques that improve the degrading characteristics of semiconductor photocatalysts, along with relevant published case studies.

5.1. Bandgap Engineering

The bandgap is the energy difference that exists between the valence band maximum and the conduction band minimum. The principles of solid-state physics and quantum chemistry reinforce bandgap modification. The recurring electric field of atoms in a crystalline material forms bands separated by an electron-free energy gap known as a bandgap [239]. Bandgap (Eg) width defines semiconductor, conductor, or dielectric (insulator) properties. The Eg value of semiconductor photocatalysts is important for light absorption, while the potentials of the conduction and valence bands have the most impact on the thermodynamics of photoreactions [240]. Semiconductors have an average Eg (1.0–3.6 eV), conductors feature overlapping CB/VB, while dielectrics have a broad Eg greater than 4 eV. Bandgap engineering involves altering the Eg of a semiconductor or composite material by manipulating the crystal structures or composition of catalysts. Multiple techniques have been employed to reduce the Eg of catalysts, enabling their photoreactivity under visible light, which makes them more secure and accessible than ultraviolet and/or UV-Vis irradiation [241]. Developing efficient electrophotonic semiconductor materials requires bandgap engineering for adjusting the energies of bands to produce desired catalyst traits. Bandgap engineering improves semiconductor photocatalyst electronic features to increase light absorption, reduce photoexcited carrier recombination, and boost h+/e mobility [242]. In the quantum confinement effect, utilizing nanostructured semiconductors with the quantum dot (QD) size enables excellent Eg adjustment. QDs can absorb specific wavelengths for photocatalysis due to their energy levels and Eg size. Lead sulfide quantum dots (PbS-QDs) optimize photocatalytic effectiveness with variable Eg based on particle size [243].
Self-doping has also been gaining recognition recently. Wu et al. (2024) synthesized a single anatase crystal-type nano-TiO2 with uniform particle sizes. Self-doped nano-TiO2 with a particle size of 10 nm exhibits good dispersion, stability, and visible light photoactivity because of a reduced Eg from 3.2 to 1.8 eV. Surface hydroxyl groups were found to be abundant on the synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles. Self-doped nano-TiO2 demonstrated remarkable antibacterial activity in a test under low-power LED lighting, with an eradication rate of nearly 100%. This suggests extensive application opportunities for the self-doping technique [244]. Among the most prominent bandgap engineering methods, heteroatom doping adapts the electrical properties and band structures of broad Eg catalysts to extend their visible light absorption spectrum for greater solar light consumption. Adding additional materials can trap excited electrons and extend their lifespan in photoactivated charge carriers. Controlled metal or nonmetal materials can generate Eg donor or acceptor states [245].

5.2. Photocatalyst Heterojunctions

The semiconductor photocatalyst greatly affects degradation rates. Chemical composition and morphology are important considerations for semiconductor materials. The mobility of photocatalytic charge carriers depends on the chemical composition. The unique properties of an individual semiconductor material serve as a photocatalyst, enabling it to degrade organic contaminants effectively. Single-component photocatalyst materials, despite surface photosensitization or doping, exhibit e/h+ set recombination, chemical instability, and a limited absorption spectrum [246]. Photoexcited carriers increase the recombination rate, limiting photocatalytic efficiency and photochemical processes. The recombination process released light or heat. Different studies show that single semiconductor catalysts generally function poorly due to recombination and charge separation difficulties. Combining materials to form heterojunctions enhances photocatalyst performance and photo reactivity [247]. Defect engineering, functionalization, coating, doping, and metal alloying can create heterojunctions by adding chemicals and creating a plasmonic effect. Heterojunctions help neighboring bands move e and h+. Heterojunctions can be type 1 (straddling-gap), type 2 (staggered-gap), or type 3 (broken-gap). These categories are classified based on the material’s ability to form adjacent band structures [248]. In Fig. S5(a), band structures suggest heterojunctions. In a type 1 heterojunction, the first material (M-I) CB is more negative than the second material (M-II), and its VB is more positive, indicating a straddling-gap. M-II accumulates e and h+ under light irradiation, causing unstable charge separation and low redox potential [249]. A type 2 heterojunction has staggered form bands because M-I’s CB is more negative than M-II’s and its VB is less positive. However, photo reactivity aptitude disparities limit redox potential. In a type 3 heterojunction, M-II’s CB and VB are lower than M-I’s, creating a broken-gap band structure [250]. Misalignment occurs in bands that do not have overlapping gaps, reducing their effectiveness. Staggered-gap heterojunctions (type 2) are best for spatially separating active e/h+ sets. To increase photo reactivity, researchers developed staggered-gap heterojunction photocatalysts, including CsPbBrCl2/g-C3N4 [251], Sn3O4/SnFe2O4 [252], and Bi2WO6/BiOBr [253]. These catalysts have potent mass transfer, charge separation, and visible light absorption. In photocatalysis, semiconductor heterojunctions are chosen due to their improved charge separation efficacy, response to broad light spectrum, and reduced energy loss via recombination [232]. Semiconductor catalyst-incorporated heterojunctions fall into four categories: semiconductor-metal, multicomponent, semiconductor-semiconductor, and semiconductor-carbon group heterojunctions. When two semiconductors with different Fermi-levels contact, e migrate from the high-level semiconductor to the low-level semiconductor, minimizing system energy [254].
The e/h+ transfer kinetics between materials and photoactivity-enhancing techniques classify heterojunctions as p-n, Z-scheme, and S-scheme. Fig. S5(b) displays heterojunction setups that are relevant to charge transfer kinetics. The p-n heterojunction, which connects an n-type semiconductor with excess e and a p-type semiconductor with excess h+, is a key design concept. The heterojunction’s interface (interaction region) has an intrinsic electric field [255]. During interaction, e from the n-type material band moves into the p-type material band, and h+ from the p-type material band into the n-type. This makes an electric field depletion zone without photoexcited carriers. The electric field zone facilitates charge carrier separation. Diffusion of charges continues until Fermi-level equilibrium [256, 257]. Z-scheme heterojunctions are formed by aligning semiconductor materials to develop synergistic effects [258]. This configuration improves charge transfer efficiency by facilitating carrier separation and photoinduction along a Z-shaped channel. This scheme mimics the natural process of photosynthesis by increasing photo reactivity [259, 260]. S-schemes combine the benefits of staggered-gap and Z-scheme heterojunctions. The band arrangement is stepwise, with M-I’s VB higher than M-II’s and the CB lower [261]. This technique uses an axial transfer channel for e and h+ to efficiently separate them while minimizing the loss of energy during carrier transfer. Photoinduced e from M-I can transfer to M-II’s CB, whereas h+ may move in the opposite direction, improving efficiency [262, 263]. The Cu2O/BiOBr photocatalyst was synthesized by Gao et al. in 2023 to create an S-scheme hetero-junction. The S-scheme that was constructed showed great photodegradation efficiency for a wide range of organic contaminants by slowing down the recombination rate. The combination of the accelerated movement of photoexcited charges and the Fenton-like response of copper facilitates the enhanced formation of active radicals [264].

5.3. Defect and Vacancy Engineering

Defect and vacancy engineering in photocatalytic materials is a successful strategy to enhance their effectiveness in converting light energy to chemical reactivity. Defect is an essential factor in the design of photocatalysts among different configurations [265]. The introduction of defects or oxygen vacancies in the crystal structure of photocatalytic materials enhances the number of photoactive sites and improves the mobility of induced charge carriers. Defects can alter significant properties of a material, including its electronic features, crystal structure, atomic arrangement, electrical conductivity, and charge carrier density [266, 267]. Vacancies within the semiconductor lattice function as electron (e) traps, facilitating the production of active species and preventing the recombination of e/h+ pairs, thereby improving contaminants photodegradation. Crystalline defects are changes in the flawless, regular configuration of atoms within the molecular structure of the material [268]. These defects significantly impact their photocatalytic efficacy. The functions of crystalline defects in semiconductor catalysts have been formerly interpreted incorrectly. Defects were generally regarded as simply negative for photoactivity. Researchers imagined that the defects in the structure of catalysts functioned as charge carrier recombination sites, collecting photoinduced e/h+ sets during the redox process [269]. Additionally, these defects disrupted the electronic composition found in a formerly flawless regular crystalline structure and served as dispersion sites for the movement of e/h+, and both of these reasons were considered as preventing factors for the migration of photoexcited charge carriers. The constructive functions of defects and vacancies for boosting photoreactivity are becoming increasingly acknowledged, coinciding with advancements in restrained defect materials in photocatalytic systems [270]. Currently, extensive studies are conducted to improve the efficiency of photocatalytic reactions by employing defect and vacancy engineering. The arrangement of the bands in semiconductor materials is frequently modified by introducing bulk defects that increase their sensitivity to the light spectrum, whereas surface defects can function as photoactive sites for chemical redox reactions. Multiple techniques are present to induce defects and vacancies in semiconductor photocatalysts [271, 272]. These techniques include plasma treatment, adding impurities (doping), chemical and electrochemical reduction, heating in controlled environments (thermal annealing), ion irradiation, and specialized water-based processes (solvothermal and hydrothermal) for defect introduction. These modifications enhance the durability of the nanoparticles (NPs) and improve the performance of semiconductor photocatalysts throughout different applications [273]. Oxygen vacancies are extensively documented in metal oxide semiconductor catalysts, such as CeO2 [274, 275], TiO2 [276, 277], CuO [278280], SrTiO3 [281], WO3 [282, 283], NiO [284], BiO2 [285, 286], Fe2O3 [287289], BiOCl [290, 291], and ZnO [292294].
Gowthaman et al. (2022) synthesized environmentally friendly ZnO NPs (capsule-shaped) combined with anatase TiO2 nanoplates for the first time, using biologically active elements from Cinnamon verum extracted from the leaves. These biologically active elements, such as phytol and linalool, functioned as self-gapping and reducing materials, enhancing oxygen vacancies on the surface while maintaining the lattice structure of the prepared catalyst. ZnO with TiO2 minimizes the recombination of e/h+ sets and the observed long light emission behavior is consistent with the results of UV-DRS, which shows an increase in the bandgap (Eg) in TiO2/ZnO. The SEM analysis coupled with EDX examination reveals that the prepared NCs possess organized oxygen vacancies. This improves the capability of isolating excited e/h+, which is equivalent to the findings of the photoluminescence (PL) tests. The photodegradation of water-based organic dye (methylene blue) contaminants using TiO2/ZnO is enhanced by sixty (60) minutes of visible light exposure. The high surface area, nano-architecture, and wide Eg of prepared NCs are unique and highly enhance its photoreactivity [295].

5.4. Surface Plasmon-Resonance

Surface Plasmon-Resonance (SPR) is a technique that has gained importance and is growing in popularity over the past few years to enhance the performance of semiconductor catalysts in photocatalysis [296]. The SPR method that employs noble metals like Pt, Ir, Ag, Pd and Au has created a lot of interest in the plasmon-mediated photocatalysis. This method entails the coating of the surface of a semiconductor catalyst with noble metals, and light is directed at a given angle to the prepared composite material [297]. In noble metals, electrons (e) are photoexcited and then transferred to the CB of the semiconductor materials. The replacement of e by semiconductor is termed as plasmons. The movement of excited e that responds to the variations in the reflectivity of the prepared photocatalyst generates the electric field near the metal surface [298]. Noble metal deposition increases photoactivity by increasing the absorption in the visible light spectrum and decreasing the recombination of photoinduced e/h+. Plasmonic photocatalysis is a comparatively new technology, but it has achieved a lot in the field of improving the absorption of sunlight and the separation of charge carriers produced by light [299]. The influence of irradiating the noble metal/semiconductor composite with UV light is different compared to the influence of exposure to the visible light [300]. The metals are used as storage materials due to their enhanced e retention capabilities, where the excited charge carriers are obtained in the attached semiconductor CB. This exposure is the main cause of increasing the average lifespan of the photoactivated e/h+ sets, thus improving the photoreactivity of the composite materials [301]. Fig. 6 illustrates the SPR process of deposition of noble metal onto the surface of a semiconductor photocatalyst with light direction. The effectiveness of electromagnetic photocatalysis is determined by the precise interaction between irradiation light and the localized surface plasmon-resonance frequency of noble metal nanostructures. Enhancing the proximity between the plasmon resonance peak and the stimulation spectrum, which can be achieved via nanoparticle morphology, size, and interparticle spacing, can boost charge generation and reaction turnover frequencies significantly compared to non-plasmonic alternatives [302, 303]. A more comprehensive mechanistic understanding shows that, in addition to direct electron injection, the LSPR’s intensified electromagnetic fields facilitate non-radiative transmission of energy to the catalyst, substantially improving solar light spectrum utilization [304].
Bhuskute et al. (2022) generated Ag-Au/TiO2 nanocomposites (NCs) using the SPR photo-deposition technique, employing silver and gold to examine the impact on the photodegradation of methylene blue (MB) and water splitting under solar illumination. The photo-deposition durations were adjusted for monometallic Au/TiO2-NCs and Ag/TiO2-NCs to achieve the highest SPR absorbance in the range of the visible spectrum. The photoreactivity of bimetallic NCs (Ag-Au/TiO2) outperformed that of single metal deposited NCs only when gold (Au) was initially incorporated into titanium dioxide (TiO2), a phenomenon credited to the Au-core-Ag-shell NCs. The outcomes indicate that mixing metals and semiconductors via sequential photo-deposition offers new perspectives for the fabrication of TiO2-based catalysts featuring plasmon-improved visible light absorption [305].
Wajid et al. (2023) synthesized Au-CdS photocatalysts using the hydrothermal approach in a separate study. The Au-NPs were deposited onto the surface of CdS using the chemical reduction method. The methyl orange (MO) photodegradation rate was analyzed using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer. The outcomes indicate that the presence of Au-NPs on the surface of CdS enhances photoreactivity. The improved functions were attributed to the transfer of photoexcited e from Au-NPs to the CB of cadmium sulfide. Close interactions between Schottky junctions lead to increased charge separation and the creation of new Fermi levels during the photocatalytic process. Various factors have been investigated in this study to evaluate the optimal conditions for MO degradation [306].

6. Prospective Research Trends in Photocatalysis

Global environmental challenges are driving semiconductor photocatalysis’ efficacy, sustainability, and functional diversity. The photocatalysis field is growing, but its future depends on addressing multiple interconnected challenges [307]. Developing visible light-driven photocatalysts is essential because 40–48% of the natural solar spectrum is visible and abundant. This spectrum must be effectively utilized by photoactive materials to gather solar energy [308]. Persulfate-based systems, doping, heterojunction formation, and bandgap tuning strategies are being utilized to optimize occupant light harvesting and charge carrier behavior, but their structural durability and sustainable working under harsh conditions remain major obstacles [309]. The diametrical fabrication of single atoms and defect-abundant catalysts would regulate surface active sites microscopically for improved charge transfer and photoredox efficiency. They enable nearly complete atom and photon-to-electron conversion, aligning photocatalytic innovation with green chemistry and energy savings [310]. These discoveries in machine learning and AI have altered catalyst development by predicting synthesis conditions and appropriate formulations. System-level AI trained on big, high-quality databases can reduce empirical testing, accelerating innovation and reducing investment costs [311]. The circular economy revolutionized photocatalytic research. Waste organic matter from agriculture or industrial residues might enhance catalyst performance and reduce waste for large-scale applications [312]. Engineering issues, including photocatalytic reactor design and catalyst recovery & disposal, must be addressed to achieve these economic and environmental benefits [313, 314]. Nanoparticle aggregation and low recovery in typical slurry photoreactors increase process expenditures, waste, and secondary contamination. Immobilized catalytic material systems enable post-reaction modification; however, their limited active surface area impairs kinetics [315, 316]. Mass transfer restrictions and light distribution make large photocatalytic reactor systems ineffective at decomposing contaminants. Photoreactor concepts, material recovery mechanisms, continuous optical engineering, and safety procedures for disposing of catalytic materials after treatment must be addressed to maintain reaction efficiency and photon flux over long operation [317, 318].
Semiconductor-based photocatalysis must scale sustainably and functionally. Research on advanced semiconductor photocatalysis requires a fundamental transition from the real world, unattainable by incremental efficiency increases. Photocatalysis, persulfate-based AOPs, and membrane technology have transformed contaminant-degradation systems [319]. Photocatalysis and persulfate-based AOPs have revolutionized the decomposition of persistent organic contaminants that conventional oxidation cannot eliminate. A dual photo-oxidation system with redox potentials above 2.6 V was formed by semiconductor photocatalysts activating persulfate (S2O82-) to generate sulfate (SO4) and ROSs [320]. Under visible light, hybrid systems remove 95% of harmful pharmaceuticals, dyes, phenolics, and hazardous emerging chemical toxins. To be efficient, these methods must maximize ROS generation kinetics and reduce parasite radical scavenging in complicated water matrices [309]. Next, rational bandgap tuning, defect engineering, and surface functionalization of photoactive materials can enhance persulfate activation under solar light irradiation, along with quantitative radical dynamics modeling to improve reaction selectivity and reduce secondary byproduct formation [321].
Hybrid photocatalytic membrane reactors (HPMR) are another advancing technology that is trending for practical application use. HPMRs are effectively capable of eliminating contaminants and immobilizing the active photocatalyst throughout a single operational analysis, while slurry methods fail to recover material and leach nanoparticles [322, 323]. This method uses fouling and physicochemically resistant substrates with photocatalysts for continuous flow oxidation. Recent investigations suggest that modifying the membrane surface chemistry and pore architecture can increase permeate flux and rejection efficiency by 90–95%, while reducing energy demand and pressure drops [324]. Photocatalyst immobilization sometimes causes partial inactivity/deactivation due to interfacial recombination losses or light-shielding consequences, requiring photocatalyst and membrane interfacial engineering modification [325]. Prospective studies must produce systematically configured membranes with strategically scattered catalysts to ensure uniform and maximum active site exposure, improved charge transfer kinetics for long-term photoactivity, and adaptive wettability characteristics for improved efficiency [326]. Wang et al. (2017) examined the degradation of ofloxacin (OFLX) using a persulfate-based inorganic-organic composite incorporated into a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane, subjected to ultraviolet (UV) light in a membrane chemical reactor (MCR), showing a substantial advancement in the field. The composite membrane Na2S2O8@PVDF-g-PDMAEMA/PVDF combines persulfate-based AOP with separation by membrane for the treatment of wastewater. The membrane combines SO4 production with PVDF ultrafiltration, synthesized using non-solvent induced phase inversion separation, sequential atom transfer radical polymerization, and following dipping treatment. The system removed 54% OFLX in 30 min, surpassing single-process controls of 7% and 13.7%, respectively. Persulfate generates SO4 (E° = 2.5–3.1 V) via in situ UV activation and electrostatic attraction of S2O82- anions through positively charged N,N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (PDMAEMA) substitutes, resulting in improved oxidation efficiency. Uniform distribution of Na2S2O8 and PDMAEMA integration was established using structural characterization, enabling radical production and contamination absorption. Operational stability was observed as a drawback; after reuse (10 cycles), OFLX elimination dropped 40% (from 54% to 14%), comparable to UV alone functioning. Efficiency declines with Na2S2O8 depletion, which points to the importance of reversible activation through electrochemical recovery. In real wastewater treatment applications, persulfate-integrated multifunctional membranes have both performance potential and endurance constraints. This work evaluates the synergistic increase of membrane filtration and photocatalytic oxidation [327].
Used photocatalysts should be properly managed following functional depletion or degradation to ensure economic and environmental viability. Final safe disposal and selective preservation through regeneration are the primary traditional options, depending on photocatalyst composition, functional restoration possibilities, and residual harmful effects [328]. Effective disposal needs extensive precautionary measures to prevent secondary contamination and hazardous species leaching from metallic catalysts (e.g., CdS, Cu2O, PbS, Sb2S3, and particular MOFs). To immobilize chemicals and limit leachability, previous stabilization, commonly with cement encapsulation, makes landfilling environmentally acceptable [329]. Incineration, however rare for robust inorganic semiconductors, adds Valorization strategies focus on resource recovery and functional rehabilitation, recovering noble metals (e.g., Ag, Pt, Ir, Pd, Au/TiO2) and reprocessing semiconductor oxides (e.g., SrTiO3, TiO2, ZnO, WO3, Cu2O) while preserving structural integrity [330, 331]. Prolonged photocatalyst lifespan is achieved through thermal treatments to minimize organic fouling, targeted surface reactivation, and chemical washes to eliminate surface poisons. If they are physicochemically stable, fully deactivated materials can serve as inert fillers or adsorbents [332]. Innovative catalysts exhibiting intrinsic recyclable properties, such as durable composites, core-shell architectures, and magnetically separable components, are under development; however, large-scale water treatment uses encounter challenges related to scalability and cost competitiveness [314].
Future semiconductor photocatalysts depend on AI guidance, atomically customized materials, visible light responsiveness, and a hybrid system-scale. Advances in persulfate-assisted photocatalysis, hybrid reactors, and membrane-integrated systems can influence wastewater treatment with solar photocatalysis. Photocatalytic materials that balance efficiency, long-term stability, and operation cost can be more commercially viable. Modular, consistent systems can assure acceptable degradation efficiencies during continuous operation, eliminating practical concerns and enabling semiconductor photocatalysis from lab discovery to scaled-up environmental remediation systems. Materials science, process technology, and computational engineering must be combined in innovative hybrid systems to scale large-scale photocatalysis from a promising laboratory approach to an environmentally viable remediation technology.

7. Conclusion

Semiconductor materials have made great strides in degrading hazardous organic contaminants in wastewater, giving an attractive and effective alternative to traditional methods of treatment that typically underperform. Materials like LDHs, TiO2, g-C3N4, perovskites, ZnO, and MOFs are at the forefront of photocatalytic research due to their ability to use UV or visible light, large surface area, physicochemical stability, and ecological suitability. The significant interlayer anion transfer capacity and structural flexibility make piezoelectric materials and LDH-based photocatalysts promising for contaminant absorption and degradation. Pristine semiconductor materials, despite their advantageous properties, face limitations such as rapid charge recombination, wide band-gaps, restricted absorption of visible light, insulating characteristics, and instability in aqueous environments. Advanced strategies are essential for addressing these inherent deficiencies and improving photocatalytic efficacy. To overcome these constraints, heterojunction fabrication, bandgap adjustment, and ion doping have been suggested. Type-II and Z-scheme heterojunctions improve light absorption and photoactive carrier lifespan. Although piezoelectric semiconductor catalysts improve photoactive carriers’ mobility under mechanical stress, they are intriguing possibilities, but most reported systems need high-frequency ultrasonic vibration, which uses energy. Development of piezocatalysts that optimize the particle size and surface-active sites, respond well to low-frequency mechanical forces, and have piezoelectric coefficients to maximize degradation efficiency with little energy input should be the future step. The bibliometric analysis of semiconductor photocatalysts from 2007 to 2025 identifies prominent authors and their affiliations, key terms, trending topics, citation metrics, publication frequency, and relevant journals in the field. The bibliometric study reveals a significant increase in scholarly and research engagement with semiconductor photoactive catalysts.
Semiconductor photocatalysts have applications beyond water treatment, including CO2 reduction, clean air, H2 generation, and natural and renewable energy activities. However, difficult manufacturing procedures, high synthesis expenses, and real environmental system performance discrepancies limit their large-scale application. Scalable and inexpensive synthesis methods with long-term stability under practical operational circumstances are required to overcome these obstacles. Future photocatalytic performance improvements will require targeted semiconductor material modifications. Defect engineering can improve active sites and carrier mobility by adding lattice deformities or oxygen vacancies. Bandgap engineering optimizes solar energy by tailoring light absorption to the visible range. Developing heterojunctions, especially type-II and Z-scheme systems, improves charge transfer and separation, whereas noble metals increase light harvesting and electron (e) excitation through surface plasmon resonance (SPR). We discussed numerous current academic articles as case studies to demonstrate the practicality of these property enhancement techniques. In wastewater treatment, heterojunctions, defect and bandgap engineering, and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) have been performed effectively. Data-driven optimization, materials design, and hybrid photoreactor technology are all required to move semiconductor photocatalysis from lab to industrial water treatment. Reproducible degradation efficiencies of >90% under visible-light circumstances in continuous-circulating photoreactors must be quantified. If the long-term stability of the photocatalyst and the efficiency of charge transfer are measured, integrated persulfate-assisted and membrane-coupled hybrid photocatalytic reactors can reach this goal. Closed-loop recovery and regeneration frameworks ensure catalyst utilization efficiency exceeds single-use models by limiting additional waste. Semiconductor photocatalysis becomes essential to the sustainable restoration of the environment because it requires scalable, modular structures that can support high reaction efficiency with low energy costs. Combining these methods allows for the design of highly stable, active, and economically feasible catalysts that promote long-term restoration of the environment.

Supplementary Information

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors of this paper would like to acknowledge the Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia, for their support through the HICoE award, R.J130000.7809.4J657, and Universiti Teknologi Malaysia for the financial assistance funding provided by the Hi-Tech (F4) grant, Q.J130000.4609.00Q14. We would like to extend our gratitude to the Higher Education Commission (HEC), Pakistan.

Author Contribution

Z.K. (PhD student) designed the review framework, conducted the extensive literature survey, collected literature, integrated the information, and wrote the manuscript draft. M.K. (PhD student) advised on technical matters, examined the text, and improved the analysis’s scientific rigor. G.U.R. (Postdoctoral fellow) organized data and critically discussed photocatalyst modification options. U.N. (PhD student) helped compile case studies and reviewed practical implications and scalability. H.D.R. (PhD student) helped analyze photocatalytic mechanisms, performance comparisons, and trend visualization in recent studies. J.J. (Professor) designed and directed the study, coordinated research, critically evaluated the article, and approved the final version. M.I. (Postdoctoral fellow) supervised the work, gave expert comments, and critically assessed the manuscript for intellectual substance. A.F.I. (Professor) refined concepts, revised critically, and clarified the work.

AI Declaration

We acknowledge utilizing ChatGPT’s free version to evaluate the review article’s language (grammar) and flow for coherence and clarity. No part of it or any section of it has been generated by an AI-assisted tool.

Declaration of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

1. Koe WS, Lee JW, Chong WC, Pang YL, Sim LC. An overview of photocatalytic degradation: Photocatalysts, mechanisms, and development of photocatalytic membrane. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2020;27(3)2522–2565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07193-5
crossref pmid

2. Tariq S, Khan Z, Bakhsh A, et al. A modified experimental approach to determine formation porosity from rock cuttings. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 2023;16(8)493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-023-11602-y
crossref

3. Lee D-E, Kim M-K, Danish M, Jo WK. State-of-the-art review on photocatalysis for efficient wastewater treatment: Attractive approach in photocatalyst design and parameters affecting the photocatalytic degradation. Catalysis Communications. 2023;106764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2023.106764
crossref

4. Bakhsh A, Zhang L, Wei H, et al. Development of co2-sensitive viscoelastic fracturing fluid for low permeability reservoirs: A review. Processes. 2022;10(5)885. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10050885
crossref

5. Kamal M, Jaafar J, Khan AA, et al. A critical review of the advancement approach and strategy in speek-based polymer electrolyte membrane for hydrogen fuel cell application. Energy & Fuels. 2024;38(14)12337–12386. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c00462
crossref

6. Verma S, Daverey A, Sharma A. Slow sand filtration for water and wastewater treatment–a review. Environmental Technology Reviews. 2017;6(1)47–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622515.2016.1278278
crossref

7. Azzouz A, Kailasa SK, Lee SS, et al. Review of nanomaterials as sorbents in solid-phase extraction for environmental samples. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 2018;108:347–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.08.009
crossref

8. Saravanan A, Kumar PS, Jeevanantham S, et al. Effective water/wastewater treatment methodologies for toxic pollutants removal: Processes and applications towards sustainable development. Chemosphere. 2021;280:130595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130595
crossref pmid

9. Qiu T, Liang L. Thermal oxidation degradation characteristics and kinetic analysis of waste shell powders for efficient utilization and environmental protection. Combustion Science and Technology. 2024;197(19)1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2024.2427730
crossref

10. Punia P, Naagar M, Chalia S, et al. Recent advances in synthesis, characterization, and applications of nanoparticles for contaminated water treatment-a review. Ceramics International. 2021;47(2)1526–1550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.09.050
crossref

11. Zhao W, Chen I-W, Huang F. Toward large-scale water treatment using nanomaterials. Nano Today. 2019;27:11–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2019.05.003
crossref

12. Ma D, Yi H, Lai C, et al. Critical review of advanced oxidation processes in organic wastewater treatment. Chemosphere. 2021;275:130104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130104
crossref pmid

13. Tufail A, Price WE, Mohseni M, Pramanik BK, Hai FI. A critical review of advanced oxidation processes for emerging trace organic contaminant degradation: Mechanisms, factors, degradation products, and effluent toxicity. Journal of Water Process Engineering. 2021;40:101778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101778
crossref

14. Khan Z, Kamal M, Jaafar J, et al. Recent advances in photoreactor designs for the degradation of persistent organic contaminants with influential effects of configuration and parameters: A review. Journal of Water Process Engineering. 2025;69:106825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.106825
crossref

15. Kaur K, Badru R, Singh PP, Kaushal S. Photodegradation of organic pollutants using heterojunctions: A review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2020;8(2)103666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.103666
crossref

16. Kamal M, Jaafar J, Khan AA, et al. A critical review of the advancement approach and strategy in speek-based polymer electrolyte membrane for hydrogen fuel cell application. Energy & Fuels. 2024;38(14)12337–12386. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c00462
crossref

17. Byrne C, Subramanian G, Pillai SC. Recent advances in photocatalysis for environmental applications. Journal of environmental chemical engineering. 2018;6(3)3531–3555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.07.080
crossref

18. Sari Y, Gareso PL, Armynah B, Tahir D. A review of tio2 photocatalyst for organic degradation and sustainable hydrogen energy production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2023;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.11.126
crossref

19. Mekonnen TB. An overview on the photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants in the presence of cerium oxide (ceo 2) based nanoparticles: A review. Nanoscience and Nanometrology. 2021;7:11648. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.nsnm.20210701.12
crossref

20. Selvaraj VSS, Karuppasamy G. Layered double hydroxide nanocomposites: A promising platform for sustainable photocatalytic solutions—a short review. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 2025;27(2)39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-024-06167-0
crossref

21. Singh J, Kaur G, Rawat M. A brief review on synthesis and characterization of copper oxide nanoparticles and its applications. Journal of Bioelectronics and Nanotechnology. 2016;1(9)https://doi.org/10.13188/2475-224X.1000003
crossref

22. Sharma N, Hernadi K. The emerging career of strontium titanates in photocatalytic applications: A review. Catalysts. 2022;12(12)1619. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12121619
crossref

23. Ismael M. A review on graphitic carbon nitride (g-c3n4) based nanocomposites: Synthesis, categories, and their application in photocatalysis. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2020;846:156446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156446
crossref

24. Shenoy S, Jang E, Park TJ, Gopinath CS, Sridharan K. Cadmium sulfide nanostructures: Influence of morphology on the photocatalytic degradation of erioglaucine and hydrogen generation. Applied Surface Science. 2019;483:696–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.018
crossref

25. Ahmad W, Bhatt SC, Verma M, Kumar V, Kim H. A review on current trends in the green synthesis of nickel oxide nanoparticles, characterizations, and their applications. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management. 2022. 18:100674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2022.100674
crossref

26. Pang YL, Lim S, Ong HC, Chong WT. Research progress on iron oxide-based magnetic materials: Synthesis techniques and photocatalytic applications. Ceramics International. 2016;42(1)9–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.08.144
crossref

27. Lee KM, Lai CW, Ngai KS, Juan JC. Recent developments of zinc oxide based photocatalyst in water treatment technology: A review. Water research. 2016;88:428–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.09.045
crossref pmid

28. Lee G-J, Wu JJ. Recent developments in zns photocatalysts from synthesis to photocatalytic applications—a review. Powder technology. 2017;318:8–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2017.05.022
crossref

29. Opoku F, Govender KK, Van Sittert CGCE, Govender PP. Recent progress in the development of semiconductor-based photocatalyst materials for applications in photocatalytic water splitting and degradation of pollutants. Advanced Sustainable Systems. 2017;1(7)1700006. https://doi.org/10.1002/adsu.201700006
crossref

30. Mestre AS, Carvalho AP. Photocatalytic degradation of pharmaceuticals carbamazepine, diclofenac, and sulfamethoxazole by semiconductor and carbon materials: A review. Molecules. 2019;24(20)3702. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24203702
crossref pmid pmc

31. Kumar SG, Rao KK. Comparison of modification strategies towards enhanced charge carrier separation and photocatalytic degradation activity of metal oxide semiconductors (tio2, wo3 and zno). Applied Surface Science. 2017;391:124–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.081
crossref

32. Mir F, Jaafar J, Khan AA, et al. Innovative mxene/tio2 photocatalytic membranes: A comprehensive approach to efficient visible light photodegradation and sustainable energy generation. Defect and Diffusion Forum 2025. Trans Tech Publ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/p-WEf1i1
crossref

33. Zhang F, Wang X, Liu H, et al. Recent advances and applications of semiconductor photocatalytic technology. Applied Sciences. 2019;9(12)2489. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9122489
crossref

34. Khaki MRD, Shafeeyan MS, Raman AaA, Daud W, Ma W. Application of doped photocatalysts for organic pollutant degradation-a review. Journal of environmental management. 2017;198(Pt 2)78–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.099
crossref pmid

35. Wang H, Li X, Zhao X, et al. A review on heterogeneous photocatalysis for environmental remediation: From semiconductors to modification strategies. Chinese Journal of Catalysis. 2022;43(2)178–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63910-4
crossref

36. Kumar A, Pandey G. A review on the factors affecting the photocatalytic degradation of hazardous materials. Mater Sci Eng Int J. 2017;1(3)1–10. https://doi.org/10.15406/mseij.2017.01.00018
crossref

37. Liang C, Li C, Zhu Y, et al. Recent advances of photocatalytic degradation for btex: Materials, operation, and mechanism. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2023;455:140461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.140461
crossref

38. Lu Y, Cai Y, Zhang S, et al. Application of biochar-based photocatalysts for adsorption-(photo) degradation/reduction of environmental contaminants: Mechanism, challenges and perspective. Biochar. 2022;4(1)45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-022-00173-y
crossref

39. Zhou C, Xia W, Huang D, et al. Strategies for enhancing the perylene diimide photocatalytic degradation activity: Method, effect factor, and mechanism. Environmental Science: Nano. 2021;8(3)602–618. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EN01245A
crossref

40. Khan Z, Jaafar J, Khan AA, et al. Mxene as future potential photoactive co-catalyst material for efficient visible light photodegradation of persistent organic contaminants: A review. ASEAN Engineering Journal. 2024;14(4)101–111. https://doi.org/10.11113/aej.v14.21320
crossref

41. Kumari H, Sonia Suman, et al. A review on photocatalysis used for wastewater treatment: Dye degradation. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. 2023;234(6)349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-023-06359-9
crossref

42. Jabbar ZH, Graimed BH, Ammar SH, et al. The latest progress in the design and application of semiconductor photocatalysis systems for degradation of environmental pollutants in wastewater: Mechanism insight and theoretical calculations. Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing. 2024;173:108153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2024.108153
crossref

43. Zada A, Khan M, Khan MA, et al. Review on the hazardous applications and photodegradation mechanisms of chlorophenols over different photocatalysts. Environmental Research. 2021;195:110742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.110742
crossref pmid

44. Dai B, Zhou Y, Xiao X, et al. Fluid field modulation in mass transfer for efficient photocatalysis. Advanced Science. 2022;9(28)2203057. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202203057
crossref pmid pmc

45. Malayeri M, Haghighat F, Lee CS. Modeling of volatile organic compounds degradation by photocatalytic oxidation reactor in indoor air: A review. Building and Environment. 2019;154:309–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.02.023
crossref

46. Constantino DS, Dias MM, Silva AM, Faria JL, Silva CG. Intensification strategies for improving the performance of photocatalytic processes: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022;340:130800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130800
crossref

47. De Brito Lira JO, Riella HG, Padoin N, Soares C. An overview of photoreactors and computational modeling for the intensification of photocatalytic processes in the gas-phase: State-of-art. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2021;9(2)105068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105068
crossref

48. Yu M, Wang J, Tang L, et al. Intimate coupling of photocatalysis and biodegradation for wastewater treatment: Mechanisms, recent advances and environmental applications. Water research. 2020;175:115673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115673
crossref pmid

49. Hamd W, Daher EA, Tofa TS, Dutta J. Recent advances in photocatalytic removal of microplastics: Mechanisms, kinetic degradation, and reactor design. Frontiers in Marine Science. 2022;9:885614. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.885614
crossref

50. Rafiq A, Ikram M, Ali S, et al. Photocatalytic degradation of dyes using semiconductor photocatalysts to clean industrial water pollution. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 2021;97:111–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2021.02.017
crossref

51. Zare EN, Iftekhar S, Park Y, et al. An overview on non-spherical semiconductors for heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of organic water contaminants. Chemosphere. 2021;280:130907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130907
crossref pmid

52. Sudhaik A, Raizada P, Shandilya P, Jeong D-Y, Lim J-H, Singh P. Review on fabrication of graphitic carbon nitride based efficient nanocomposites for photodegradation of aqueous phase organic pollutants. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 2018;67:28–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2018.07.007
crossref

53. Vaya D, Surolia PK. Semiconductor based photocatalytic degradation of pesticides: An overview. Environmental Technology & Innovation. 2020. 20:101128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101128
crossref

54. Tang X, Wang Z, Wang Y. Visible active n-doped tio2/reduced graphene oxide for the degradation of tetracycline hydrochloride. Chemical Physics Letters. 2018;691:408–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2017.11.037
crossref

55. Matos J, Miralles-Cuevas S, Ruíz-Delgado A, Oller I, Malato S. Development of tio2-c photocatalysts for solar treatment of polluted water. Carbon. 2017;122:361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.06.091
crossref

56. Zhu D, Zhou Q. Action and mechanism of semiconductor photocatalysis on degradation of organic pollutants in water treatment: A review. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management. 2019. 12:100255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2019.100255
crossref

57. Kar P, Shukla K, Jain P, Sathiyan G, Gupta RK. Semiconductor based photocatalysts for detoxification of emerging pharmaceutical pollutants from aquatic systems: A critical review. Nano Materials Science. 2021;3(1)25–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoms.2020.11.001
crossref

58. Sharma S, Dutta V, Singh P, et al. Carbon quantum dot supported semiconductor photocatalysts for efficient degradation of organic pollutants in water: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;228:755–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.292
crossref

59. Ambigadevi J, Kumar PS, Vo D-VN, Haran SH, Raghavan TS. Recent developments in photocatalytic remediation of textile effluent using semiconductor based nanostructured catalyst: A review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2021;9(1)104881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104881
crossref

60. Bukhtiyarova M. A review on effect of synthesis conditions on the formation of layered double hydroxides. Journal of Solid State Chemistry. 2019;269:494–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2018.10.018
crossref

61. Zhao Y, Jia X, Waterhouse GI, et al. Layered double hydroxide nanostructured photocatalysts for renewable energy production. Advanced Energy Materials. 2016;6(6)150. 1974;https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201501974
crossref

62. Jijoe PS, Yashas SR, Shivaraju HP. Fundamentals, synthesis, characterization and environmental applications of layered double hydroxides: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 2021;19(3)2643–2661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-021-01200-3
crossref

63. Wu M, Wu J, Zhang J, et al. A review on fabricating heterostructures from layered double hydroxides for enhanced photocatalytic activities. Catalysis Science & Technology. 2018;8(5)1207–1228. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CY02314F
crossref

64. Mohapatra L, Parida K. A review on the recent progress challenges and perspective of layered double hydroxides as promising photocatalysts. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2016;4(28)10744–10766. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA01668E
crossref

65. Bobde P, Sharma A, Panchal D, et al. Layered double hydroxides (ldhs)-based photocatalysts for dye degradation: A review. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2023;20(5)5733–5752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04007-z
crossref

66. Janani B, Sre VV, Syed A, et al. Engineering defects and lattice disorientation in layered double hydroxides by coupling 2d-co (oh) 2 platelets via pn heterojunction for enhanced photocatalytic degradation chloramphenicol. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2025. 705:135674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.135674
crossref

67. Xie M, Liu C, Liang M, et al. A review of the degradation of antibiotic contaminants using advanced oxidation processes: Modification and application of layered double hydroxides based materials. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2024;31(12)18362–18378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32059-w
crossref pmid

68. Daniel S, Thomas S. Layered double hydroxides: Fundamentals to applications. Layered double hydroxide polymer nanocomposites. 2020. Elsevier; p. 1–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101903-0.00001-5
crossref

69. Xu M, Wei M. Layered double hydroxide-based catalysts: Recent advances in preparation, structure, and applications. Advanced Functional Materials. 2018;28(47)1802943. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201802943
crossref

70. Bobde P, Patel RK, Panchal D, et al. Utilization of layered double hydroxides (ldhs) and their derivatives as photocatalysts for degradation of organic pollutants. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021;28(42)59551–59569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16296-x
crossref pmid

71. Li C, Wei M, Evans DG, Duan X. Layered double hydroxide-based nanomaterials as highly efficient catalysts and adsorbents. Small. 2014;10(22)4469–4486. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201401464
crossref pmid

72. Taoufik N, Sadiq MH, Abdennouri M, et al. Recent advances in the synthesis and environmental catalytic applications of layered double hydroxides-based materials for degradation of emerging pollutants through advanced oxidation processes. Materials Research Bulletin. 2022;11. 1924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2022.111924
crossref

73. Evans DG, Slade RC. Structural aspects of layered double hydroxides. Layered double hydroxides. 2006;1–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/430_005
crossref

74. Mishra G, Dash B, Pandey S. Layered double hydroxides: A brief review from fundamentals to application as evolving biomaterials. Applied Clay Science. 2018;153:172–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2017.12.021
crossref

75. Zhao M, Zhao Q, Li B, Xue H, Pang H, Chen C. Recent progress in layered double hydroxide based materials for electrochemical capacitors: Design, synthesis and performance. Nanoscale. 2017;9(40)15206–15225. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7nr04752e
crossref pmid

76. Zümreoglu-Karan B, Ay A. Layered double hydroxides—multifunctional nanomaterials. Chemical Papers. 2012;66(1)1–10. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11696-011-0100-8
crossref

77. Janani F, Taoufik N, Khiar H, et al. Nanostructured layered double hydroxides based photocatalysts: Insight on synthesis methods, application in water decontamination/splitting and antibacterial activity. Surfaces and Interfaces. 2021;25:101263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2021.101263
crossref

78. Silva CG, Bouizi Y, Fornés V, García H. Layered double hydroxides as highly efficient photocatalysts for visible light oxygen generation from water. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2009;131(38)13833–13839. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja905467v
crossref pmid

79. Wang Q, O’hare D. Recent advances in the synthesis and application of layered double hydroxide (ldh) nanosheets. Chemical reviews. 2012;112(7)4124–4155. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200434v
crossref pmid

80. Mohapatra L, Patra D. Multifunctional hybrid materials based on layered double hydroxide towards photocatalysis. Photocatalytic Functional Materials for Environmental Remediation. 2019;215–241. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119529941.ch7
crossref

81. Zhang G, Zhang X, Meng Y, Pan G, Ni Z, Xia S. Layered double hydroxides-based photocatalysts and visible-light driven photodegradation of organic pollutants: A review. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2020;392:123684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.123684
crossref

82. Pang H, Wu Y, Wang X, Hu B, Wang X. Recent advances in composites of graphene and layered double hydroxides for water remediation: A review. Chemistry – An Asian Journal. 2019;14(15)2542–2552. https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.201900493
crossref pmid

83. Karim AV, Hassani A, Eghbali P, Nidheesh P. Nanostructured modified layered double hydroxides (ldhs)-based catalysts: A review on synthesis, characterization, and applications in water remediation by advanced oxidation processes. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science. 2022;26(1)100965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cossms.2021.100965
crossref

84. He S, An Z, Wei M, Evans DG, Duan X. Layered double hydroxide-based catalysts: Nanostructure design and catalytic performance. Chemical Communications. 2013;49(53)5912–5920. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cc42137f
crossref pmid

85. Prasad C, Tang H, Liu QQ, Zulfiqar S, Shah S, Bahadur I. An overview of semiconductors/layered double hydroxides composites: Properties, synthesis, photocatalytic and photo-electrochemical applications. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2019;289:111114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111114
crossref

86. Qu J, Sha L, Wu C, Zhang Q. Applications of mechanochemically prepared layered double hydroxides as adsorbents and catalysts: A mini-review. Nanomaterials. 2019;9(1)80. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9010080
crossref pmid pmc

87. Xie Z-H, Zhou H-Y, He C-S, Pan Z-C, Yao G, Lai B. Synthesis, application and catalytic performance of layered double hydroxide based catalysts in advanced oxidation processes for wastewater decontamination: A review. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2021;414:128713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.128713
crossref

88. Janani B, Sre VV, Syed A, et al. Engineering defects and lattice disorientation in layered double hydroxides by coupling 2d-co(oh)2 platelets via p-n heterojunction for enhanced photocatalytic degradation chloramphenicol. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2025. 705:135674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.135674
crossref

89. Bansal M, Pal B. Synergy of adsorption and visible light-induced photocatalytic degradation of doxycycline by cellulose modified cual layered double hydroxide binary composite. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2025;285:138329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.138329
crossref pmid

90. Batool I, Aroob S, Anwar F, et al. Synergistic effect of nial-layered double hydroxide and cu-mof for the enhanced photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange and antibacterial properties. Catalysts. 2024;14(10)719. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14100719
crossref

91. Bharali D, Saikia S, Devi R, Choudary BM, Gour NK, Deka RC. Photocatalytic degradation of phenol and its derivatives over znfe layered double hydroxide. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry. 2023. 438:114509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2022.114509
crossref

92. Wang Y-J, Zhang J-Y, Hou S-S, et al. Novel coal-ldh nanosheets/bipo4 nanorods composites for boosting photocatalytic degradation of phenol. Petroleum Science. 2022;19(6)3080–3087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2022.01.007
crossref

93. Lestari PR, Takei T, Kumada N. Novel znti/c3n4/ag ldh heterojunction composite for efficient photocatalytic phenol degradation. Journal of Solid State Chemistry. 2021;294:12. 1858;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2020.121858
crossref

94. Nayak S, Parida K. Comparison of nife-ldh based heterostructure material towards photocatalytic rhodamine b and phenol degradation with water splitting reactions. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2021. 35:243–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.332
crossref

95. Tripathi A, Hussain CM. Znal-ldh and b-impregnated polymeric semiconductor (g-c3n4) for solar light-driven photocatalysis to treat phenolic effluent. Sustainable Materials and Technologies. 2021. 28:e00266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2021.e00266
crossref

96. Wang H, Zhang Z, Jing M, Tang S, Wu Y, Liu W. Synthesis of cunisn ldhs as highly efficient fenton catalysts for degradation of phenol. Applied Clay Science. 2020;186:105433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2019.105433
crossref

97. Lestari PR, Takei T, Yanagida S, Kumada N. Facile and controllable synthesis of zn-al layered double hydroxide/silver hybrid by exfoliation process and its plasmonic photocatalytic activity of phenol degradation. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2020;250:122988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.122988
crossref

98. Liao Z, Zhu J, Jawad A, Muzi J, Chen Z, Chen Z. Degradation of phenol using peroxymonosulfate activated by a high efficiency and stable comgal-ldh catalyst. Materials. 2019;12(6)968. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12060968
crossref pmid pmc

99. Grosu E-F, Cârjă G, Froidevaux R. Development of horseradish peroxidase/layered double hydroxide hybrid catalysis for phenol degradation. Research on Chemical Intermediates. 2018;44(12)7731–7752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-018-3583-x
crossref

100. Mureseanu M, Radu T, Andrei R-D, Darie M, Carja G. Green synthesis of g-c3n4/cuonp/ldh composites and derived g-c3n4/mmo and their photocatalytic performance for phenol reduction from aqueous solutions. Applied Clay Science. 2017;141:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2017.02.012
crossref

101. Mancipe S, Tzompantzi F, Rojas H, Gómez R. Photocatalytic degradation of phenol using mgalsn hydrotalcite-like compounds. Applied Clay Science. 2016;129:71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2016.05.005
crossref

102. Mendoza-Damián G, Tzompantzi F, Mantilla A, Pérez-Hernández R, Hernandez-Gordillo A. Improved photocatalytic activity of sno2–znal ldh prepared by one step sn4+ incorporation. Applied Clay Science. 2016;121:127–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015.12.007
crossref

103. Seftel E, Niarchos M, Mitropoulos C, Mertens M, Vansant E, Cool P. Photocatalytic removal of phenol and methylene-blue in aqueous media using tio2@ ldh clay nanocomposites. Catalysis Today. 2015;252:120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2014.10.030
crossref

104. Prince J, Tzompantzi F, Mendoza-Damián G, Hernández-Beltrán F, Valente JS. Photocatalytic degradation of phenol by semiconducting mixed oxides derived from zn (ga) al layered double hydroxides. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2015. 163:352–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.08.019
crossref

105. De Almeida MF, Bellato CR, Mounteer AH, Ferreira SO, Milagres JL, Miranda LDL. Enhanced photocatalytic activity of tio2-impregnated with mgznal mixed oxides obtained from layered double hydroxides for phenol degradation. Applied Surface Science. 2015;357:1765–1775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.10.009
crossref

106. Paredes SP, Valenzuela MA, Fetter G, Flores SO. Tio2/mgal layered double hydroxides mechanical mixtures as efficient photocatalysts in phenol degradation. Journal of physics and Chemistry of solids. 2011;72(8)914–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2011.03.017
crossref

107. Seftel E, Puscasu M, Mertens M, Cool P, Carja G. Assemblies of nanoparticles of ceo2–znti-ldhs and their derived mixed oxides as novel photocatalytic systems for phenol degradation. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2014. 150:157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.12.019
crossref

108. Hadnadjev-Kostic M, Vulic T, Marinkovic-Neducin R. Solar light induced rhodamine b degradation assisted by tio2–zn–al ldh based photocatalysts. Advanced Powder Technology. 2014;25(5)1624–1633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2014.05.015
crossref

109. Valente JS, Tzompantzi F, Prince J. Highly efficient photocatalytic elimination of phenol and chlorinated phenols by ceo2/mgal layered double hydroxides. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2011;102(1–2)276–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.12.009
crossref

110. Valente JS, Tzompantzi F, Prince J, Cortez JG, Gomez R. Adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of phenol and 2, 4 dichlorophenoxiacetic acid by mg–zn–al layered double hydroxides. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2009;90(3–4)330–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.03.019
crossref

111. Stenner C, Shao LH, Mameka N, Weissmüller J. Piezoelectric gold: Strong charge-load response in a metal-based hybrid nanomaterial. Advanced functional materials. 2016;26(28)5174–5181. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201600938
crossref

112. Nie G, Yao Y, Duan X, Xiao L, Wang S. Advances of piezoelectric nanomaterials for applications in advanced oxidation technologies. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering. 2021;33:100693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2021.100693
crossref

113. Tu S, Guo Y, Zhang Y, et al. Piezocatalysis and piezo-photocatalysis: Catalysts classification and modification strategy, reaction mechanism, and practical application. Advanced Functional Materials. 2020;30(48)2005158. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202005158
crossref

114. Yan X, Li G, Wang Z, Yu Z, Wang K, Wu Y. Recent progress on piezoelectric materials for renewable energy conversion. Nano Energy. 2020;77:105180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105180
crossref

115. Zhu L, Wang ZL. Recent progress in piezo-phototronic effect enhanced solar cells. Advanced Functional Materials. 2019;29(41)1808214. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201808214
crossref

116. Mohapatra H, Kleiman M, Esser-Kahn AP. Mechanically controlled radical polymerization initiated by ultrasound. Nature Chemistry. 2017;9(2)135–139. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.2633
crossref

117. Zhu P, Chen Y, Shi J. Piezocatalytic tumor therapy by ultrasound-triggered and batio3-mediated piezoelectricity. Advanced Materials. 2020;32(29)200. 1976;https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202001976
crossref pmid pmc

118. You H, Wu Z, Zhang L, et al. Harvesting the vibration energy of bifeo3 nanosheets for hydrogen evolution. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2019;131(34)11905–11910. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201906181
crossref pmid

119. Kubota K, Pang Y, Miura A, Ito H. Redox reactions of small organic molecules using ball milling and piezoelectric materials. Science. 2019;366(6472)1500–1504. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay8224
crossref pmid

120. Su R, Hsain HA, Wu M, et al. Nano-ferroelectric for high efficiency overall water splitting under ultrasonic vibration. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2019;58(42)15076–15081. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201907695
crossref pmid

121. Chen Y, Deng X, Wen J, Zhu J, Bian Z. Piezo-promoted the generation of reactive oxygen species and the photodegradation of organic pollutants. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2019. 258:118024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118024
crossref

122. Han X, Zhou SJ, Tan YZ, et al. Crystal structures of saturn-like c50cl10 and pineapple-shaped c64cl4: Geometric implications of double-and triple-pentagon-fused chlorofullerenes. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2008;47(29)5340–5343. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200800338
crossref pmid

123. Zhou X, Shen B, Lyubartsev A, Zhai J, Hedin N. Semiconducting piezoelectric heterostructures for piezo-and piezophotocatalysis. Nano Energy. 2022;107141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107141
crossref

124. Starr MB, Shi J, Wang X. Piezopotential-driven redox reactions at the surface of piezoelectric materials. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2012;124(24)6064–6068. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201201424
crossref pmid

125. Hong K-S, Xu H, Konishi H, Li X. Piezoelectrochemical effect: A new mechanism for azo dye decolorization in aqueous solution through vibrating piezoelectric microfibers. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2012;116(24)13045–13051. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp211455z
crossref

126. Hong K-S, Xu H, Konishi H, Li X. Direct water splitting through vibrating piezoelectric microfibers in water. The journal of physical chemistry letters. 2010;1(6)997–1002. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz100027t
crossref

127. Liang Z, Yan C-F, Rtimi S, Bandara J. Piezoelectric materials for catalytic/photocatalytic removal of pollutants: Recent advances and outlook. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2019. 241:256–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.09.028
crossref

128. Liu J, Tian H, Lucas E, et al. Monolithic piezoelectric control of soliton microcombs. Nature. 2020;583(7816)385–390. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2465-8
crossref pmid

129. Zhu Y, Chen H, Wang L, et al. Piezoelectric materials for pollutants degradation: State-of-the-art accomplishments and prospects. Chinese Chemical Letters. 2024;35(4)108884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2023.108884
crossref

130. Chu X, Jiang X, Zhang H, et al. Microstructure engineering of al doped srtio3/tio2 heterostructure nanorod arrays boosting piezo-photocatalytic performances. Advanced Materials Technologies. 2022;7(12)2200390. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202200390
crossref

131. Kuru T, Sarilmaz A, Aslan E, Ozel F, Patir IH. Rational design of zno/srtio3 s-scheme heterojunction for photo-enhanced piezocatalytic hydrogen production. Applied Surface Science. 2025;682:161704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2024.161704
crossref

132. Cheng Y, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Guo R, You J, Zhang H. Review of bi-based catalysts in piezocatalytic, photocatalytic and piezo-photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants. Nanoscale. 2023;15(46)18571–18580. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3nr05016e
crossref pmid

133. Amiri O, Salar K, Othman P, Rasul T, Faiq D, Saadat M. Purification of wastewater by the piezo-catalyst effect of pbtio3 nanostructures under ultrasonic vibration. Journal of hazardous materials. 2020;394:122514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122514
crossref pmid

134. Guo Q, Li F, Xia F, et al. High-performance sm-doped pb (mg1/3nb2/3) o3-pbzro3-pbtio3-based piezoceramics. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2019;11(46)43359–43367. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b15424
crossref pmid

135. Jiang Y, Xie J, Lu Z, Hu J, Hao A, Cao Y. Insight into the effect of oh modification on the piezo-photocatalytic hydrogen production activity of srtio3. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2022;612:111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2021.10.170
crossref pmid

136. Zhang X, Yuan J, Xia P, et al. Controllable synthesis of linbo3 micro-octahedrons and micro-cubes via a molten-salt process. Ceramics International. 2018;44(18)22874–22879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.080
crossref

137. Yu D, Liu Z, Zhang J, et al. Enhanced catalytic performance by multi-field coupling in knbo3 nanostructures: Piezo-photocatalytic and ferro-photoelectrochemical effects. Nano Energy. 2019;58:695–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.01.095
crossref

138. Liu Q, Zhao W, Ao Z, An T. Photo-piezoelectric synergistic degradation of typical volatile organic compounds on batio3. Chinese Chemical Letters. 2022;33(1)410–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2021.06.059
crossref

139. Meng J, Lan Z, Lin Q, et al. Cubic-like bazro3 nanocrystals with exposed {001}/{011} facets and tuned electronic band structure for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production. Journal of Materials Science. 2019;54(3)1967–1976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2995-8
crossref

140. Qiao Z, Li S, Li Y, Xu N, Xiang K. Structure, mechanical properties, and thermal conductivity of bazro3 doped at the ab site. Ceramics International. 2022;48(9)12529–12536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.01.120
crossref

141. Sharma A, Sreenivasulu N, Thomas T, Bhattacharya S. Multicomponent equiatomic lead strontium calcium titanate (pb sr ca) ti o3 prepared by reverse co-precipitation. Materialia. 2020;9:100571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2019.100571
crossref

142. Lan S, Feng J, Xiong Y, Tian S, Liu S, Kong L. Performance and mechanism of piezo-catalytic degradation of 4-chlorophenol: Finding of effective piezo-dechlorination. Environmental science & technology. 2017;51(11)6560–6569. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06426
crossref pmid

143. Djellabi R, Ordonez MF, Conte F, Falletta E, Bianchi CL, Rossetti I. A review of advances in multifunctional xtio3 perovskite-type oxides as piezo-photocatalysts for environmental remediation and energy production. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2022;421:126792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126792
crossref pmid

144. Liu H, Wang C, Wang G. Photocatalytic advanced oxidation processes for water treatment: Recent advances and perspective. Chemistry – An Asian Journal. 2020;15(20)3239–3253. https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.202000895
crossref pmid

145. Chen F, Huang H, Guo L, Zhang Y, Ma T. The role of polarization in photocatalysis. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2019;58(30)10061–10073. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201901361
crossref pmid

146. Zhu Q, Zhang K, Li D, et al. Polarization-enhanced photocatalytic activity in non-centrosymmetric materials based photocatalysis: A review. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2021;426:131681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.131681
crossref

147. Ahmed HAA, El-Atawy M. Synthesis, mesomorphic and geometrical approaches of new non-symmetrical system based on central naphthalene moiety. Liquid Crystals. 2021;48(14)1940–1952. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678292.2021.1909764
crossref

148. Dai B, Feng H, Li Z, Xie Y. Field enhanced photocatalytic disinfection. Sci Bull. 2022;67(8)779–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2022.01.007
crossref pmid

149. Huang H, Scott JF. Ferroelectric materials for energy applications. 2018. John Wiley & Sons; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527807505


150. Dong W, Xiao H, Jia Y, et al. Engineering the defects and microstructures in ferroelectrics for enhanced/novel properties: An emerging way to cope with energy crisis and environmental pollution. Advanced Science. 2022;9(13)2105368. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202105368
crossref pmid pmc

151. Uthra B, Sinha R, Agarwal PB. Cmos compatible pyroelectric materials for infrared detectors. Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing. 2022;140:106375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2021.106375
crossref

152. Jin Z, Jiang A, Shen L, Shi M, Zeng T. Synergistic piezo-photocatalysis enabled by batio3/pdeb hybrids for efficient organic pollutant degradation. Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2025;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2025.05.050
crossref

153. Zhou J, Chen W, Chen Q, et al. Construction of batio3/g-c3n4 heterojunction for promoting atrazine degradation of hydraulic-driven piezocatalytic ozonation. Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy. 2025. 362:124702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124702
crossref

154. Wang H, Zhang X, Hu C, Cai H, Tu S, Huang H. Layered perovskite piezoelectric bi3tinbo9 as a piezo-photocatalyst: Synergistically enhanced catalytic activity and mechanism. Applied Surface Science. 2024;650:159214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.159214
crossref

155. Chen Z, Li G, Zheng X, et al. Facile synthesis of advanced batio3/cupbsbs3 heterostructure photocatalyst with enhanced piezo-photocatalytic degradation performance. Nano Energy. 2024;124:109463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2024.109463
crossref

156. Xiong S, Zeng H, Deng Y, et al. Insights into the dual z-scheme and piezoelectricity co-driven photocatalyst for ultra-speed degradation of nitenpyram. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2023;451:138399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.158399
crossref

157. Jia P, Li Y, Zheng Z, Wang Y, Liu T, Duan J. Piezoelectricity-enhanced photocatalytic degradation performance of srbi4ti4o15/ag2o pn heterojunction. Separation and Purification Technology. 2023;305:122457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122457
crossref

158. Wu T, Liang Q, Tang L, et al. Construction of a novel s-scheme heterojunction piezoelectric photocatalyst v-bioio3/ftcn and immobilization with floatability for tetracycline degradation. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2023. 443Pt B130251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130251
crossref pmid

159. Wu Y, Gao Z, Jiao S, Zhou G. Piezo-photo coupling effect and extended optical absorption of piezoelectric-based hybrids for efficient bisphenol a degradation. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2023;452:139456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.139456
crossref

160. Wang S, Li Q, Ge K, et al. Ferroelectric nano-heterojunctions for piezoelectricity-enhanced photocatalysis. Separation and Purification Technology. 2023;305:122433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122433
crossref

161. Jia P, Li Y, Zheng Z, Wang Y, Liu T. Achieving excellent photocatalytic degradation of pollutants by flower-like srbi4ti4o 15/biocl heterojunction: The promotion of piezoelectric effect. Separation and Purification Technology. 2022;299:121769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121769
crossref

162. Ma H, Yang W, Gao S, et al. Superior photopiezocatalytic performance by enhancing spontaneous polarization through post-synthesis structure distortion in ultrathin bi2wo6 nanosheet polar photocatalyst. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2022;140471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.140471
crossref

163. Bai J, Xiang J, Chen C, Guo C. Piezoelectric-effect-enhanced photocatalytic performance in cr/nb modified bi4ti3o12 /g-c3n4 z-scheme system. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2022;141095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.141095
crossref

164. Yang X, Wang J, El-Sherbeeny AM, Alhammadi AA, Park W-H, Abukhadra MR. Insight into the adsorption and oxidation activity of a zno/piezoelectric quartz core-shell for enhanced decontamination of ibuprofen: Steric, energetic, and oxidation studies. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2022;431:134312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.134312
crossref

165. Li ZQ, Fu HC, Wang XH, et al. Promoting photocatalytic organic pollutant degradation of bioio3/basic bismuth (iii) nitrate by dual field effect: Built-in electric field and piezoelectric field effect. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2022. 652:129820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129820
crossref

166. Sun G, Li N, Zuo S, et al. Piezo-photocatalysis over phase-engineered mose2 modified bi2wo6 hierarchical microspheres: Utilizing piezoelectric effect to enhance photocatalytic performance. Ceramics International. 2022;48(24)37242–37252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.08.302
crossref

167. Dursun S, Akyildiz H, Kalem V. Pmn-pt nanoparticle/sno2 nanofiber heterostructures: Enhanced photocatalytic degradation performance by ultrasonic wave induced piezoelectric field. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2021;889:161769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.161769
crossref

168. Zhang Y, Shen G, Sheng C, Zhang F, Fan W. The effect of piezo-photocatalysis on enhancing the charge carrier separation in batio3/knbo3 heterostructure photocatalyst. Applied Surface Science. 2021;562:150164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150164
crossref

169. Fu Y, Wang Y, Zhao H, et al. Synthesis of ternary zno/zns/mos2 piezoelectric nanoarrays for enhanced photocatalytic performance by conversion of dual heterojunctions. Applied Surface Science. 2021;556:149695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149695
crossref

170. Zhong H, Dong W, Xiao H, Huangfu G, Guo Y. Highly piezoelectric lead-free ceramic powder: An efficient and eco-friendly multifunctional photocatalyst. Ceramics International. 2020;46(16)25266–25272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.06.319
crossref

171. Zheng Y, Jia Y, Li H, Wu Z, Dong X. Enhanced piezo-electro-chemical coupling of batio 3/gc 3 n 4 nanocomposite for vibration-catalysis. Journal of Materials Science. 2020;55:14787–14797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05001-x
crossref

172. Laurenti M, Garino N, Canavese G, HernandéZ S, Cauda V. Piezo-and photocatalytic activity of ferroelectric zno: Sb thin films for the efficient degradation of rhodamine-β dye pollutant. ACS applied materials & interfaces. 2020;12(23)25798–25808. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c03787
crossref pmid

173. Wang P, Li X, Fan S, et al. Impact of oxygen vacancy occupancy on piezo-catalytic activity of batio3 nanobelt. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2020. 279:119340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119340
crossref

174. Xiang D, Liu Z, Wu M, et al. Enhanced piezo-photoelectric catalysis with oriented carrier migration in asymmetric au–zno nanorod array. Small. 2020;16(18)1907603. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201907603
crossref pmid

175. Qian W, Zhao K, Zhang D, Bowen CR, Wang Y, Yang Y. Piezoelectric material-polymer composite porous foam for efficient dye degradation via the piezo-catalytic effect. ACS applied materials & interfaces. 2019;11(31)27862–27869. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b07857
crossref pmid

176. Jin C, Liu D, Hu J, et al. The role of microstructure in piezocatalytic degradation of organic dye pollutants in wastewater. Nano Energy. 2019;59:372–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.02.047
crossref

177. Ma J, Ren J, Jia Y, et al. High efficiency bi-harvesting light/vibration energy using piezoelectric zinc oxide nanorods for dye decomposition. Nano Energy. 2019;62:376–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.05.058
crossref

178. Feng J, Sun J, Liu X, Zhu J, Xiong Y, Tian S. Enhancement and mechanism of nano-batio 3 piezocatalytic degradation of tricyclazole by co-loading pt and ruo 2. Environmental Science: Nano. 2019;6(7)2241–2252. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EN00367C
crossref

179. Lin E, Wu J, Qin N, Yuan B, Bao D. Silver modified barium titanate as a highly efficient piezocatalyst. Catalysis Science & Technology. 2018;8(18)4788–4796. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CY01127C
crossref

180. Wu J, Qin N, Bao D. Effective enhancement of piezocatalytic activity of batio3 nanowires under ultrasonic vibration. Nano Energy. 2018;45:44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.034
crossref

181. Wang H, Li Q, Zhang S, et al. Visible-light-driven n2-g-c3n4 as a highly stable and efficient photocatalyst for bisphenol a and cr (vi) removal in binary systems. Catalysis Today. 2019;335:110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2018.09.037
crossref

182. Zhu W, Yue Y, Wang H, et al. Recent advances on energy and environmental application of graphitic carbon nitride (g-c3n4)-based photocatalysts: A review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2023;11(3)110164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2023.110164
crossref

183. Molaei MJ. Graphitic carbon nitride (g-c3n4) synthesis and heterostructures, principles, mechanisms, and recent advances: A critical review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2023;48(84)32708–32728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.066
crossref

184. Liu X, Ma R, Zhuang L, et al. Recent developments of doped g-c3n4 photocatalysts for the degradation of organic pollutants. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 2021;51(8)751–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2020.1734433
crossref

185. Pattanayak DS, Pal D, Mishra J, Thakur C, Wasewar KL. Doped graphitic carbon nitride (g-c3n4) catalysts for efficient photodegradation of tetracycline antibiotics in aquatic environments. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2023;30(10)24919–24926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19766-y
crossref pmid

186. Patnaik S, Sahoo DP, Parida K. Recent advances in anion doped g-c3n4 photocatalysts: A review. Carbon. 2021;172:682–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.10.073
crossref

187. Zhang S, Gu P, Ma R, et al. Recent developments in fabrication and structure regulation of visible-light-driven g-c3n4-based photocatalysts towards water purification: A critical review. Catalysis Today. 2019;335:65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2018.09.013
crossref

188. Alaghmandfard A, Ghandi K. A comprehensive review of graphitic carbon nitride (g-c3n4)–metal oxide-based nanocomposites: Potential for photocatalysis and sensing. Nanomaterials. 2022;12(2)294. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12020294
crossref pmid pmc

189. Yang Y, Yan J, Zhang Y, et al. S/p co-doped g-c3n4 with secondary calcination for excellent photocatalytic performance. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2024;51:962–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.09.083
crossref

190. Kang X, Liu S, Dai Z, He Y, Song X, Tan Z. Titanium dioxide: From engineering to applications. Catalysts. 2019;9(2)191. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9020191
crossref

191. Bakbolat B, Daulbayev C, Sultanov F, et al. Recent developments of tio2-based photocatalysis in the hydrogen evolution and photodegradation: A review. Nanomaterials. 2020;10(9)1790. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10091790
crossref pmid pmc

192. Fujishima A, Honda K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature. 1972;238(5358)37–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/238037a0
crossref pmid pmc

193. Ijaz M, Zafar M. Titanium dioxide nanostructures as efficient photocatalyst: Progress challenges and perspective. International Journal of Energy Research. 2021;45(3)3569–3589. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.6079
crossref

194. Li R, Li T, Zhou Q. Impact of titanium dioxide (tio2) modification on its application to pollution treatment—a review. Catalysts. 2020;10(7)804. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10070804
crossref

195. Armaković SJ, Savanović MM, Armaković S. Titanium dioxide as the most used photocatalyst for water purification: An overview. Catalysts. 2022;13(1)26. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13010026
crossref

196. Ani I, Akpan U, Olutoye M, Hameed B. Photocatalytic degradation of pollutants in petroleum refinery wastewater by tio2-and zno-based photocatalysts: Recent development. Journal of cleaner production. 2018;205:930–954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.189
crossref

197. Nabi I, Ahmad F, Zhang L. Application of titanium dioxide for the photocatalytic degradation of macro-and micro-plastics: A review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2021;9(5)105964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105964
crossref

198. Todorova N, Giannakopoulou T, Pomoni K, Yu J, Vaimakis T, Trapalis C. Photocatalytic nox oxidation over modified zno/tio2 thin films. Catalysis Today. 2015;252:41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2014.11.008
crossref

199. Paumo HK, Dalhatou S, Katata-Seru LM, et al. Tio2 assisted photocatalysts for degradation of emerging organic pollutants in water and wastewater. Journal of Molecular Liquids. 2021;331:115458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2021.115458
crossref

200. Pawar TJ, Contreras López D, Olivares Romero JL, Vallejo Montesinos J. Surface modification of titanium dioxide. Journal of Materials Science. 2023;58(16)6887–6930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-08439-x
crossref

201. Abdi J, Yahyanezhad M, Sakhaie S, Vossoughi M, Alemzadeh I. Synthesis of porous tio2/zro2 photocatalyst derived from zirconium metal organic framework for degradation of organic pollutants under visible light irradiation. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2019;7(3)103096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.103096
crossref

202. Haruna A, Chong F-K, Ho Y-C, Merican ZMA. Preparation and modification methods of defective titanium dioxide-based nanoparticles for photocatalytic wastewater treatment—a comprehensive review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2022;29(47)70706–70745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22749-8
crossref pmid

203. Alias SS, Harun Z, Azhar FH, Ibrahim SA, Johar B. Comparison between commercial and synthesised nano flower-like rutile tio2 immobilised on green super adsorbent towards dye wastewater treatment. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;251:119448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119448
crossref

204. Nunzi F, De Angelis F. Modeling titanium dioxide nanostructures for photocatalysis and photovoltaics. Chemical Science. 2022;13(33)9485–9497. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2sc02872g
crossref pmid pmc

205. Chen D, Cheng Y, Zhou N, et al. Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants using tio2-based photocatalysts: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;268:121725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121725
crossref

206. Wei K, Faraj Y, Yao G, Xie R, Lai B. Strategies for improving perovskite photocatalysts reactivity for organic pollutants degradation: A review on recent progress. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2021;414:128783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.128783
crossref

207. Zhang M, Sun W, Lv H, Zhang ZH. Syntheses and applications of perovskite-based photocatalysts in light-driven organic reactions. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry. 2021;27:100390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2020.100390
crossref

208. Ren K, Yue S, Li C, et al. Metal halide perovskites for photocatalysis applications. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2022;10(2)407–429. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TA09148D
crossref

209. Kamata K. Perovskite oxide catalysts for liquid-phase organic reactions. Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan. 2019;92(1)133–151. https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.20180260
crossref

210. Kumar A, Kumar A, Krishnan V. Perovskite oxide based materials for energy and environment-oriented photocatalysis. Acs Catalysis. 2020;10(17)10253–10315. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c02947
crossref

211. Zhang H, Ji X, Xu H, Zhang R, Zhang H. Design and modification of perovskite materials for photocatalytic performance improvement. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2023;11(1)109056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.109056
crossref

212. Kong J, Yang T, Rui Z, Ji H. Perovskite-based photocatalysts for organic contaminants removal: Current status and future perspectives. Catalysis Today. 2019;327:47–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2018.06.045
crossref

213. Malevu TD, Ocaya RO, Soonmin H, Nhlapo TA. Metal halide perovskite photocatalysts: Recent progress challenges, and future directions. Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences. 2024;49(3)464–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408436.2023.2225238
crossref

214. Roudgar-Amoli M, Abedini E, Alizadeh A, Shariatinia Z. Understanding double perovskite oxides capabilities to improve photocatalytic contaminants degradation performances in water treatment processes: A review. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 2024;129:579–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2023.09.016
crossref

215. Masri M, Hezam A, Alkanad K, et al. Metal halide perovskite-based photocatalysts for organic pollutants degradation: Advances, challenges, and future directions. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2024. 133387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.133387
crossref

216. Mai H, Chen D, Tachibana Y, Suzuki H, Abe R, Caruso RA. Developing sustainable, high-performance perovskites in photocatalysis: Design strategies and applications. Chemical Society Reviews. 2021;50(24)13692–13729. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1cs00684c
crossref pmid

217. Huang L, Huang X, Yan J, et al. Research progresses on the application of perovskite in adsorption and photocatalytic removal of water pollutants. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2023;442:130024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130024
crossref pmid

218. Rojas-Cervantes ML, Castillejos E. Perovskites as catalysts in advanced oxidation processes for wastewater treatment. Catalysts. 2019;9(3)230. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9030230
crossref

219. Mahlaule-Glory LM, Hintsho-Mbita NC. Green derived zinc oxide (zno) for the degradation of dyes from wastewater and their antimicrobial activity: A review. Catalysts. 2022;12(8)833. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12080833
crossref

220. Khan SH, Pathak B. Zinc oxide based photocatalytic degradation of persistent pesticides: A comprehensive review. Environmental nanotechnology, monitoring & management. 2020. 13:100290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2020.100290
crossref

221. Bagheri M, Najafabadi NR, Borna E. Removal of reactive blue 203 dye photocatalytic using zno nanoparticles stabilized on functionalized mwcnts. Journal of King Saud University-Science. 2020;32(1)799–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2019.02.012
crossref

222. Bhattacharjee N, Som I, Saha R, Mondal S. A critical review on novel eco-friendly green approach to synthesize zinc oxide nanoparticles for photocatalytic degradation of water pollutants. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry. 2024;104(3)489–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2021.2022130
crossref

223. Hasanah AU, Gareso PL, Rauf N, Tahir D. Photocatalytic performance of zinc oxide and metal-doped zinc oxide for various organic pollutants. ChemBioEng Reviews. 2023;10(5)698–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/cben.202300004
crossref

224. Vaiano V, Matarangolo M, Murcia J, Rojas H, Navío JA, Hidalgo M. Enhanced photocatalytic removal of phenol from aqueous solutions using zno modified with ag. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2018. 225:197–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.11.075
crossref

225. Abdullah F, Bakar NA, Bakar MA. Current advancements on the fabrication, modification, and industrial application of zinc oxide as photocatalyst in the removal of organic and inorganic contaminants in aquatic systems. Journal of hazardous materials. 2022. 424Pt B127416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127416
crossref pmid

226. Mirzaeifard Z, Shariatinia Z, Jourshabani M, Rezaei Darvishi SM. Zno photocatalyst revisited: Effective photocatalytic degradation of emerging contaminants using s-doped zno nanoparticles under visible light radiation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2020;59(36)15894–15911. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c03192
crossref

227. Singh R, Dutta S. The role of ph and nitrate concentration in the wet chemical growth of nano-rods shaped zno photocatalyst. Nano-Structures & Nano-Objects. 2019. 18:100250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoso.2019.01.009
crossref

228. Khan MS, Li Y, Li D-S, Qiu J, Xu X, Yang HY. A review of metal–organic framework (mof) materials as an effective photocatalyst for degradation of organic pollutants. Nanoscale Advances. 2023;5(23)6318–6348. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3na00627a
crossref pmid pmc

229. Xia T, Lin Y, Li W, Ju M. Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants by mofs based materials: A review. Chinese Chemical Letters. 2021;32(10)2975–2984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2021.02.058
crossref

230. Qian Y, Zhang F, Pang H. A review of mofs and their composites-based photocatalysts: Synthesis and applications. Advanced Functional Materials. 2021;31(37)2104231. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202104231
crossref

231. Tang C, Rao H, Li S, She P, Qin JS. A review of metal–organic frameworks derived hollow-structured photocatalysts: Synthesis and applications. Small. 2024;20(48)2405533. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202405533
crossref pmid

232. Chen P, Zhai Y, Bao Y, Zhu S. Recent advances and applications of modified-semiconductor photocatalyst in pollutant degradation. Advances in Catalysts Research. 2024;171–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49108-5_6
crossref pmid

233. Zhang X, Liu Z, Shao B, et al. Porphyrin-based metal-organic framework photocatalysts: Structure, mechanism and applications. Small Methods. 2025;9(7)2402096. https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.202402096
crossref pmid

234. Singh V, Gautam S, Kaur S, Kajal N, Kaur M, Gupta R. Highly functionalized photo-activated metal–organic frameworks for dye degradation: Recent advancements. Materials Today Communications. 2023;34:105180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.105180
crossref

235. Ma W, Yu L, Kang P, Chu Z, Li Y. Modifications and applications of metal-organic-framework-based materials for photocatalysis. Molecules. 2024;29(24)5834. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29245834
crossref pmid pmc

236. Wang Q, Gao Q, Al-Enizi AM, Nafady A, Ma S. Recent advances in mof-based photocatalysis: Environmental remediation under visible light. Inorganic Chemistry Frontiers. 2020;7(2)300–339. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9QI01120J
crossref

237. Ye C, Liao H, Zhang L, et al. Harnessing metal-organic framework composites for improved photocatalytic performance. Small Structures. 2025;2500383. https://doi.org/10.1002/sstr.202500383
crossref

238. Ahmad N, Khan AR, Siddiqui MR, et al. Advanced porphyrin-integrated cu-mof/semiconductor hybrids for high-efficiency removal of micropollutant via photocatalytic and adsorptive pathways. Journal of Water Process Engineering. 2025;77:108447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.108447
crossref

239. Sitt A, Hadar I, Banin U. Band-gap engineering, optoelectronic properties and applications of colloidal heterostructured semiconductor nanorods. Nano Today. 2013;8(5)494–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2013.08.002
crossref

240. Guo X, Liu L, Xiao Y, Qi Y, Duan C, Zhang F. Band gap engineering of metal-organic frameworks for solar fuel productions. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 2021;435:213785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2021.213785
crossref

241. Marcelino RB, Amorim CC. Towards visible-light photocatalysis for environmental applications: Band-gap engineering versus photons absorption—a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2019;26:4155–4170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3117-5
crossref pmid

242. Hu Z, Lin Z, Su J, Zhang J, Chang J, Hao Y. A review on energy band-gap engineering for perovskite photovoltaics. Solar Rrl. 2019;3(12)1900304. https://doi.org/10.1002/solr.201900304
crossref

243. Kennehan ER, Munson KT, Grieco C, et al. Influence of ligand structure on excited state surface chemistry of lead sulfide quantum dots. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2021;143(34)13824–13834. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c06248
crossref pmid

244. Wu S, Wang J, Xie Z, Du C. Self-doping synthesis of nano-tio2 with outstanding antibacterial properties under visible light. Heliyon. 2024;https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32356
crossref pmid

245. Kumawat A, Misra KP, Chattopadhyay S. Band gap engineering and relationship with luminescence in rare-earth elements doped zno: An overview. Materials Technology. 2022;37(11)1595–1610. https://doi.org/10.1080/10667857.2022.2082351
crossref

246. Sun N, Si X, He L, Zhang J, Sun Y. Strategies for enhancing the photocatalytic activity of semiconductors. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2024;58:1249–1265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.01.319
crossref

247. Jabbar ZH, Graimed BH. Recent developments in industrial organic degradation via semiconductor heterojunctions and the parameters affecting the photocatalytic process: A review study. Journal of Water Process Engineering. 2022;47:102671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102671
crossref

248. Abebe B, Murthy HA, Amare E. Enhancing the photocatalytic efficiency of zno: Defects, heterojunction, and optimization. Environmental nanotechnology, monitoring & management. 2020. 14:100336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2020.100336
crossref

249. He X, Kai T, Ding P. Heterojunction photocatalysts for degradation of the tetracycline antibiotic: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 2021;19(6)4563–4601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-021-01295-8
crossref pmid pmc

250. Xie L, Du T, Wang J, et al. Recent advances on heterojunction-based photocatalysts for the degradation of persistent organic pollutants. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2021;426:130617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.130617
crossref

251. Paul T, Das D, Das BK, Sarkar S, Maiti S, Chattopadhyay KK. Cspbbrcl2/g-c3n4 type ii heterojunction as efficient visible range photocatalyst. Journal of hazardous materials. 2019;380:120855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.120855
crossref pmid

252. Jiang X, Wang M, Luo B, et al. Magnetically recoverable flower-like sn3o4/snfe2o4 as a type-ii heterojunction photocatalyst for efficient degradation of ciprofloxacin. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2022;926:166878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.166878
crossref

253. Ren X, Wu K, Qin Z, Zhao X, Yang H. The construction of type ii heterojunction of bi2wo6/biobr photocatalyst with improved photocatalytic performance. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2019;788:102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.02.211
crossref

254. Wang Z, Lin Z, Shen S, Zhong W, Cao S. Advances in designing heterojunction photocatalytic materials. Chinese Journal of Catalysis. 2021;42(5)710–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(20)63698-1
crossref

255. Singh S, Parveen S, Clarizia L, Kumar P. An insight into photo-catalytic degradation mechanism of persistent pollutants with transition metal oxides and their composites: Photocatalysis mechanism, rate affecting parameters, and removal pathways. Catalysis Reviews. 2025;1–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/01614940.2024.2440664
crossref

256. Soni V, Singh P, Khan AaP, et al. Photocatalytic transition-metal-oxides-based p–n heterojunction materials: Synthesis, sustainable energy and environmental applications, and perspectives. Journal of Nanostructure in Chemistry. 2022;1–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40097-021-00462-1
crossref

257. Malefane ME, Mafa PJ, Managa M, Nkambule TT, Kuvarega AT. Understanding the principles and applications of dual z-scheme heterojunctions: How far can we go? The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters. 2023;14(4)1029–1045. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c03387
crossref pmid

258. Wang L, Bie C, Yu J. Challenges of z-scheme photocatalytic mechanisms. Trends in Chemistry. 2022;4(11)973–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trechm.2022.08.008
crossref

259. Lai Y-J, Lee DJ. Solid mediator z-scheme heterojunction photocatalysis for pollutant oxidation in water: Principles and synthesis perspectives. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. 2021;125:88–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2021.05.049
crossref

260. Yi P, Li Y, Wu X-L, Duan X. Z-scheme single-atom photocatalyst for advanced oxidation processes. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering. 2024;45:101028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2024.101028
crossref

261. Wang Z, Yue X, Xiang Q. Mofs-based s-scheme heterojunction photocatalysts. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 2024;504:215674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2024.215674
crossref

262. Zhong Y, Peng C, He Z, et al. Interface engineering of heterojunction photocatalysts based on 1d nanomaterials. Catalysis Science & Technology. 2021;11(1)27–42. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CY01847C
crossref

263. Ghasemi S, Parastesh A, Padervand M, et al. Recent progress on z-and s-scheme photocatalysis: Mechanistic understanding toward green applications. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering. 2025;47:101059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2024.101059
crossref

264. Gao M, Li W, Su X, et al. A regenerable cu2o/biobr s-scheme heterojunction photocatalysts for efficient photocatalytic degradation of mixed organic pollutants. Separation and Purification Technology. 2023;313:123447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2023.123447
crossref

265. Wang B, Liu J, Yao S, et al. Vacancy engineering in nanostructured semiconductors for enhancing photocatalysis. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2021;9(32)17143–17172. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TA03895H
crossref

266. Bai S, Zhang N, Gao C, Xiong Y. Defect engineering in photocatalytic materials. Nano Energy. 2018;53:296–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.08.058
crossref

267. Zu D, Wei H, Lin Z, et al. The role of point defects in heterojunction photocatalysts: Perspectives and outlooks. Advanced Functional Materials. 2024;34(48)2408213. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202408213
crossref

268. Ding Y, Maitra S, Wang C, et al. Vacancy defect engineering in semiconductors for solar light-driven environmental remediation and sustainable energy production. Interdisciplinary Materials. 2022;1(2)213–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/idm2.12025
crossref

269. Maarisetty D, Baral SS. Defect engineering in photocatalysis: Formation, chemistry, optoelectronics, and interface studies. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2020;8(36)18560–18604. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TA04297H
crossref

270. Xiong J, Di J, Xia J, Zhu W, Li H. Surface defect engineering in 2d nanomaterials for photocatalysis. Advanced Functional Materials. 2018;28(39)180. 1983;https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201801983
crossref

271. Ai M, Zhang JW, Wu YW, Pan L, Shi C, Zou JJ. Role of vacancies in photocatalysis: A review of recent progress. Chemistry– An Asian Journal. 2020;15(22)3599–3619. https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.202000889
crossref pmid

272. Zafar Z, Yi S, Li J, et al. Recent development in defects engineered photocatalysts: An overview of the experimental and theoretical strategies. Energy & Environmental Materials. 2022;5(1)68–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/eem2.12171
crossref

273. Zhang N, Gao C, Xiong Y. Defect engineering: A versatile tool for tuning the activation of key molecules in photocatalytic reactions. Journal of Energy Chemistry. 2019;37:43–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2018.09.010
crossref

274. Zhang Q, Zhao X, Duan L, Shen H, Liu R. Controlling oxygen vacancies and enhanced visible light photocatalysis of ceo2/zno nanocomposites. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry. 2020. 392:112156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.112156
crossref

275. Li M, Wang P, Ji Z, et al. Efficient photocatalytic oxygen activation by oxygen-vacancy-rich ceo2-based heterojunctions: Synergistic effect of photoexcited electrons transfer and oxygen chemisorption. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2021. 289:120020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120020
crossref

276. Bi X, Du G, Kalam A, et al. Tuning oxygen vacancy content in tio2 nanoparticles to enhance the photocatalytic performance. Chemical Engineering Science. 2021;234:116440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2021.116440
crossref

277. Miao Z, Wang G, Zhang X, Dong X. Oxygen vacancies modified tio2/ti3c2 derived from mxenes for enhanced photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants: The crucial role of oxygen vacancy to schottky junction. Applied Surface Science. 2020;528:146929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146929
crossref

278. Katal R, Masudy-Panah S, Sabbaghan M, Hossaini Z, Farahani MHDA. Photocatalytic degradation of triclosan by oxygen defected cuo thin film. Separation and Purification Technology. 2020;250:117239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117239
crossref

279. Dong L, Chu H, Wang X, Li Y, Zhao S, Li D. Enhanced broadband nonlinear optical response of tio2/cuo nanosheets via oxygen vacancy engineering. Nanophotonics. 2021;10(5)1541–1551. https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2020-0649
crossref

280. Zhu L, Li H, Liu Z, Xia P, Xie Y, Xiong D. Synthesis of the 0d/3d cuo/zno heterojunction with enhanced photocatalytic activity. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2018;122(17)9531–9539. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b01933
crossref

281. He Y, Tian N, An Y, Sun R, Zhang Y, Huang H. Morphology regulation and oxygen vacancy construction synergistically boosting the piezocatalytic degradation and pure water splitting of srtio3. Small. 2024;20(52)2407624. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202407624
crossref pmid

282. Li J-J, Zhang M, Weng B, Chen X, Chen J, Jia HP. Oxygen vacancies mediated charge separation and collection in pt/wo3 nanosheets for enhanced photocatalytic performance. Applied Surface Science. 2020;507:145133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.145133
crossref

283. Zhang Y, Zheng M, Feng Y, Yu Z, Wu M, Tang L. Novel synthesis method of oxygen vacancy wo3 and its photocatalytic performance for degradation of rhodamine b. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology. 2023;98(6)1542–1550. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.7379
crossref

284. Liu L, Liu Q, Wang Y, et al. Nonradical activation of peroxydisulfate promoted by oxygen vacancy-laden nio for catalytic phenol oxidative polymerization. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 2019. 254:166–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.04.094
crossref

285. Luo H, Zhan C, Uddin A, et al. Oxygen vacancy-mediated unraveling active species sources in bio2-x catalysts: The significance of lattice and molecular oxygen in catalytic reaction in aqueous solution. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2024;483:149144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.149144
crossref

286. Huang L, Liu J, Li Y, et al. Enhancement of photocatalytic activity of z-scheme bio2-x/bioi heterojunction through vacancy engineering. Applied Surface Science. 2021;555:149665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149665
crossref

287. Zhao J, Wang Y, Li N, Wang S, Yu J, Li X. Efficient degradation of ciprofloxacin by magnetic γ-fe2o3–mno2 with oxygen vacancy in visible-light/peroxymonosulfate system. Chemosphere. 2021;276:130257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130257
crossref pmid

288. Zou H, Liu Y, Ni L, et al. Enhanced degradation of tetracycline via visible-light-assisted peroxymonosulfate activation over oxygen vacancy rich fe2o3-cofe2o4 heterostructures. Separation and Purification Technology. 2023;314:123586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2023.123586
crossref

289. Meng F, Yu L, Song B, et al. Insights into the mechanism of redox pairs and oxygen vacancies of fe2o3@ cofe2o4 hybrids for efficient refractory organic pollutants degradation. Chemosphere. 2022;291:133069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133069
crossref pmid

290. Yu H, Ge D, Liu Y, et al. One-pot synthesis of biocl microflowers co-modified with mn and oxygen vacancies for enhanced photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline under visible light. Separation and Purification Technology. 2020;251:117414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117414
crossref

291. Cai Y, Li D, Sun J, et al. Synthesis of biocl nanosheets with oxygen vacancies for the improved photocatalytic properties. Applied Surface Science. 2018;439:697–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.089
crossref

292. Bi T, Du Z, Chen S, He H, Shen X, Fu Y. Preparation of flower-like zno photocatalyst with oxygen vacancy to enhance the photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange. Applied Surface Science. 2023;614:156240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.156240
crossref

293. Jaafar N, Najman A, Marfur A, Jusoh N. Strategies for the formation of oxygen vacancies in zinc oxide nanoparticles used for photocatalytic degradation of phenol under visible light irradiation. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry. 2020. 388:112202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.112202
crossref

294. Hailili R, Ji H, Wang K, et al. Zno with controllable oxygen vacancies for photocatalytic nitrogen oxide removal. ACS Catalysis. 2022;12(16)10004–10017. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.2c02326
crossref

295. Gowthaman K, Gowthaman P, Venkatachalam M, Saroja M, Kutraleeswaran M, Dhinesh S. Design and synthesis of tio2/zno nanocomposite with enhanced oxygen vacancy: Better photocatalytic removal of mb dye under visible light-driven condition. Inorganic Chemistry Communications. 2022;146:110197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2022.110197
crossref

296. Deka TG, Nair R. Recent advancements in surface plasmon resonance and schottky junction assisted photocatalytic water splitting of noble metal decorated titania: A review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2024;59:322–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.02.002
crossref

297. Kavitha R, Nithya PM, Girish Kumar S. Noble metal deposited graphitic carbon nitride based heterojunction photocatalysts. Applied Surface Science. 2020;508:145142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.145142
crossref

298. Wang M, Ye M, Iocozzia J, Lin C, Lin Z. Plasmon-mediated solar energy conversion via photocatalysis in noble metal/semiconductor composites. Advanced Science. 2016;3(6)1600024. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201600024
crossref pmid pmc

299. Upadhyaya A, Rincó G. Visible-light-active noble-metal photocatalysts for water disinfection: A review. Journal of Water Resource and Protection. 2019;11(10)1207–1232. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2019.1110070
crossref

300. Liu M, Kang Q, Xie Z, Lu L, Dai K, Dawson G. Heterostructure nanocomposite with local surface plasmon resonance effect enhanced photocatalytic activity—a critical review. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2021;55(4)043002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ac2cac
crossref

301. Zada A, Muhammad P, Ahmad W, et al. Surface plasmonic-assisted photocatalysis and optoelectronic devices with noble metal nanocrystals: Design, synthesis, and applications. Advanced Functional Materials. 2020;30(7)1906744. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201906744
crossref

302. Nazir A, Huo P, Wang H, Weiqiang Z, Wan Y. A review on plasmonic-based heterojunction photocatalysts for degradation of organic pollutants in wastewater. Journal of Materials Science. 2023;58(15)6474–6515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-023-08391-w
crossref pmid pmc

303. Chen Z, Meng Z, Zhang Z, Ma W. Mxene-polymer nanocomposites for high-efficiency photocatalytic antibiotic degradation review: Microstructure control, environmental adaptability and future prospects. Polymers. 2025;17(19)2630. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17192630
crossref pmid pmc

304. Kong T, Liao A, Xu Y, et al. Recent advances and mechanism of plasmonic metal–semiconductor photocatalysis. RSC advances. 2024;14(24)17041–17050. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ra02808b
crossref pmid pmc

305. Bhuskute BD, Ali-Löytty H, Honkanen M, Salminen T, Valden M. Influence of the photodeposition sequence on the photocatalytic activity of plasmonic ag–au/tio 2 nanocomposites. Nanoscale Advances. 2022;4(20)4335–4343. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NA00440B
crossref pmid pmc

306. Wajid N, Rafiq K, Abid MZ, et al. Dual role of au-nps for schottky effect and spr electron injection over cds surfaces for photocatalytic applications. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2023;306:128062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.128062
crossref

307. Mishra K, Devi N, Siwal SS, Gupta VK, Thakur VK. Hybrid semiconductor photocatalyst nanomaterials for energy and environmental applications: Fundamentals, designing, and prospects. Advanced Sustainable Systems. 2023;7(8)2300095. https://doi.org/10.1002/adsu.202300095
crossref

308. Porcu S, Secci F, Ricci PC. Advances in hybrid composites for photocatalytic applications: A review. Molecules. 2022;27(20)6828. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27206828
crossref pmid pmc

309. He S, Chen Y, Li X, Zeng L, Zhu M. Heterogeneous photocatalytic activation of persulfate for the removal of organic contaminants in water: A critical review. Acs Es&T Engineering. 2022;2(4)527–546. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.1c00330
crossref

310. Ali H, Ajmal Z, Alzahrani AYA, et al. Defect-driven innovations in photocatalysts: Pathways to enhanced photocatalytic applications. InfoMat. 2025. 79e70040. https://doi.org/10.1002/inf2.70040
crossref

311. Rehman A, Iqbal MA, Haider MT, Majeed A. Artificial intelligence-guided supervised learning models for photocatalysis in wastewater treatment. AI. 2025;6(10)258. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai6100258
crossref

312. Amdeha E. Recovery of nanomaterials from agricultural and industrial wastes for water treatment applications. Waste recycling technologies for nanomaterials manufacturing. 2021. Springer; p. 385–417.
crossref pmid

313. Pavel M, Anastasescu C, State R-N, Vasile A, Papa F, Balint I. Photocatalytic degradation of organic and inorganic pollutants to harmless end products: Assessment of practical application potential for water and air cleaning. Catalysts. 2023;13(2)380. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13020380
crossref

314. Bahadoran A, De Lile JR, Masudy-Panah S, et al. Photocatalytic materials obtained from e-waste recycling: Review, techniques, critique, and update. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing. 2022;6(4)69. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp6040069
crossref

315. Paul Guin J, Sullivan JA, Thampi KR. Challenges facing sustainable visible light induced degradation of poly-and perfluoroalkyls (pfa) in water: A critical review. ACS Engineering Au. 2022;2(3)134–150. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsengineeringau.1c00031
crossref

316. Rasool BS, Abbas AK, Haddad R. Photocatalytic innovations in environmental remediation: Mechanisms, materials, and challenges for persistent organic pollutant removal. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2025;197(10)1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-025-14531-3
crossref pmid

317. Mueses MA, Colina-Márquez J, Machuca-Martínez F, Puma GL. Recent advances on modeling of solar heterogeneous photocatalytic reactors applied for degradation of pharmaceuticals and emerging organic contaminants in water. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry. 2021;30:100486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2021.100486
crossref

318. Molinari R, Severino A, Lavorato C, Argurio P. Which configuration of photocatalytic membrane reactors has a major potential to be used at an industrial level in tertiary sewage wastewater treatment? Catalysts. 2023;13(8)1204. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13081204
crossref

319. Li W, Guo L, Xie B, et al. Membrane-based persulfate activation for wastewater treatment: A critical review of materials, mechanisms and expectation. Water. 2025;17(8)1233. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17081233
crossref

320. Zhang F, Sui M. Progress of persulfate-based advanced oxidation process (ps-aops) coupled with ultrafiltration membrane to alleviate membrane fouling: A review. Environmental Engineering Research. 2025. 302https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2024.244
crossref

321. Xin Y, Wang Y, Jiang Z, Deng B, Jiang ZJ. Advances in the removal of organic pollutants from water by photocatalytic activation of persulfate: Photocatalyst modification strategy and reaction mechanism. ChemSusChem. 2024. 1720e202400254. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202400254
crossref pmid

322. Mozia S. Photocatalytic membrane reactors (pmrs) in water and wastewater treatment. A review. Separation and purification technology. 2010;73(2)71–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2010.03.021
crossref

323. Argurio P, Fontananova E, Molinari R, Drioli E. Photocatalytic membranes in photocatalytic membrane reactors. Processes. 2018;6(9)162. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr6090162
crossref

324. Castellanos HG, Aryanfar Y, Mohtaram S, et al. The efficacy of nano-cellulose-based composites in heavy metal removal from wastewater: A comprehensive review. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology. 2025;100(2)291–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.7775
crossref

325. Binazadeh M, Rasouli J, Sabbaghi S, Mousavi SM, Hashemi SA, Lai CW. An overview of photocatalytic membrane degradation development. Materials. 2023;16(9)3526. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16093526
crossref pmid pmc

326. Awasthi P, Agrahari GK, Patel A, Singh A. Hybrid membrane technology with renewably derived biological and photocatalytic systems for wastewater treatment. Biodegradation. 2025;36(4)77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-025-10173-x
crossref pmid

327. Wang G, Wang D, Dong X, Zhang X, Ma H. Sodium persulfate based pvdf membrane for concurrent advanced oxidation and ultrafiltration of ofloxacin in water. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2017;315:509–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.01.059
crossref

328. Zhang Q, Wu Y, Zuo T. Green recovery of titanium and effective regeneration of tio2 photocatalysts from spent selective catalytic reduction catalysts. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 2018;6(3)3091–3101. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03038
crossref

329. Pesqueira JF, Pereira MFR, Silva AM. A life cycle assessment of solar-based treatments (h2o2, tio2 photocatalysis, circumneutral photo-fenton) for the removal of organic micropollutants. Science of The Total Environment. 2021;761:143258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143258
crossref pmid

330. Qian X, Ao W, Ding H, Wang X, Sun S. A review on resource utilization of spent vw-ti based selective catalytic reduction catalysts. Materials. 2022;15(22)7984. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15227984
crossref pmid pmc

331. Cheng K, Yu Y, Mei B, Li Y, Xu L. Efficient recovery of v, w, and regeneration of tio2 photocatalysts from waste-scr catalysts. Sustainability. 2022;14(16)10284. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610284
crossref

332. Yan X, Tang Y, Ma C, Liu Y, Xu J. Deactivation and regeneration of photocatalysts: A review. Desalination and Water Treatment. 2018;124:160–176. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2018.22743
crossref

Fig. 1
(a) Illustrates the photocatalytic degradation mechanism of the semiconductor photocatalyst, and (b) Demonstrates the mass transfer mechanism in the photocatalysis technique.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2025-435f1.gif
Fig. 2
(a) Presents the identification of articles, (b) Depicts annual scientific production, and (c) Features a Sankey diagram that clarifies the complex relationships among highly cited references (CR), key authors (AU), and dominant keywords (KW_Merged). Source: Authors
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2025-435f2.gif
Fig. 3
(a) Most relevant sources, (b) Sources’ production over time, (c) Most relevant authors, and (d) keyword cloud. Source: Authors
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2025-435f3.gif
Fig. 4
(a) Illustration of layered double hydroxide (LDH) structure, (b) Schematic illustration of different types of layered double hydroxide with advantages and characteristics to improve.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2025-435f4.gif
Fig. 5
(a) Schematic illustration of a photocatalytic mechanism for piezoelectric materials and the production of reactive oxygen species, (b) Symmetry of crystalline structure and different types of piezoelectric materials.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2025-435f5.gif
Fig. 6
Illustrates light-directed noble metal deposition on a semiconductor catalyst, exhibiting SPR.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2025-435f6.gif
Table 1
Summary of different LDHs-based composites used for organic pollutant photodegradation.
Photocatalyst Synthesis Method Photocatalysts (Cp) & Pollutant (Co) concentration Experimental conditions Degradation % achieved Comments Ref.
Co(OH)2/MgFe LDH Defect engineering Cp: 15 mg/L
Co: 15 mg/L, H2O2: 10 μL
Visible light irradiation
T: Room temperature
pH: 7
95.9%, 180 min, Chloramphenicol Co(OH)2/MgFe-LDH heterojunction of platelets with defect engineering enabled 95.9% chloramphenicol photodegradation. [88]
CuAl-LDH/CL Hydrothermal technique Cp: 15 mg
Co: 100 ppm
λ > 360 nm
Light: 50 W LED lamp
Ambient conditions
96.2%, 120 min, Doxycycline (DOX) Co(OH)2/MgFe LDH enhances both adsorption and photocatalytic degradation when exposed to visible light, resulting in efficient decontamination. [89]
NiAl-LDH/Cu-MOF Impregnation/thermal technique Cp: 25 mg
Co: 5 ppm
H2O2 addition
Visible light
pH: 3
Ambient conditions
99%, 80 min, Methyl orange (MO) NiAl-LDH/Cu-MOF heterojunction enhances charge mobility through the establishment of a built-in electric field, leading to improved degradation. [90]
ZnFe-CO3LDH Co-precipitation technique Cp: 10 mg
Co: 5 mM
Visible light: 250W
Room temperature
100 %, 120 min, Phenol LDH utilizes its layered structure to enhance charge separation and light absorption, thereby improving the degradation of pollutants. [91]
CoAl-LDH /BiPO4 Hydrothermal method and chemical absorption Cp: 0.25 g/L
Co: 5 ppm
UV
λ : 254 nm
pH: 7
T: 25 °C
99%, 30 min, Phenol The interaction effect between CoAl-LDH and BiPO4 significantly enhanced the separation of photoactivated charge carriers in the system. [92]
ZnTi/C3N4/Ag LDH Self-assembly method Cp: 3 g/L
Co: 50 mL, 20 mg/L
Xe-lamp: 300 W
λ > 380 nm
pH: 7.35
76.6%, 180 min, phenol The presence of Ag nanoparticles significantly enhances the transfer and separation efficacy of photoactive carriers in wastewater treatment. [93]
Ag@Ag3PO4/g-C3N4/NiFe-LDH Co-precipitation and in-situ hydrothermal technique Cp: 0.02 g
Co: 20 mL, 20 ppm
Hg-lamp: 125 W
λ ≥ 400 nm
pH: 10
T: 283 K
90%, 120 min, phenol The exceptional photoactivity of the LDH-based heterostructure in degrading organic contaminants under UV-visible light can be attributed to a synergistic effect. [94]
ZnAl-LDH/g-C3N4 Thermal condensation method C: 700 mg/L (H2O2) Solar light
pH: 5
Flow rate: 5 L/h
86.31%, 270 min, phenol The inclusion of a chemical oxidant (H2O2) in the composite materials improved photodegradation performance. [95]
CuNiSn LDHs Co-precipitation method Cp: 0.1 g, H2O2: 30 wt%
Co: 100 mL, 100 mg/L
UV-Light λ : 280 nm
pH: 6.4
T: 50 °C
92.8%, 60 min, phenol Cu+ serves as active sites for the Fenton to degrade phenol efficiently. [96]
ZnAl-LDH/Ag Exfoliation method Cp: 3 g/L
Co: 50 mL, 20 mg/L
Xe-lamp: 300 W
λ > 340 nm
pH: 7.35
80%, 210 min, phenol The hybridizing procedure for Ag nanoparticles is influenced by the strategy employed within the interlayer space of LDH. [97]
PMS/CoMgAl-LDH Peroxymonosulfate (PMS) Hydrothermal method Cp: 0.3 g/L (LDH), 3 mM (PMS)
Co: 20 mL, 0.1 mM
UV-light
pH: 6
T: 30 °C
100%, 60 min, phenol The inclusion of scavengers in LDH-based composites resulted in enhanced performance for the degradation of organic contaminants. [98]
ZnAl-LDH & ZnGr-LDH (MMOs) Co-precipitation and calcination technique Cp: 0.1 g, 1 g/L
Co: 265 μ M
Solar light
pH: 7
95%, 420 min, phenol The produced composites containing mixed metal oxides exhibit enhanced photoactivation through the utilization of solar light. [99]
ZnAlMMO/g-C3N4 Calcination method Cp: 1 g/L
Co: 100 mL, 20 mg/L
UV-light: 125 W
λ : 365 nm
Vis-light: 400 W
λ : 365 nm
UV: 100%, 240 min, phenol
Vis-light: 75%, 24 h, phenol
The photocatalytic process demonstrates enhanced reactivity with g-C3N4 and mixed metal oxides (MMO) due to an increase in electron transfer. [100]
MgAlSn Co-precipitation method Gp: 0.1 g
Co: 200 mL, 0.425mmol/L
Pen-Ray-Lamp: λ :254 nm
T: Room temp
80%, 180 min, phenol Co-precipitated LDH from solid-containing materials improves solution phenol reduction. [101]
SnO2-ZnAl LDH Co-precipitation method Cp: 0.2 g, 1 g/L
Co: 40 ppm, 4.2 × 10−4 mol/L
UV-light Pen-Ray
λ : 254 nm
91%, 120 min, phenol The composites enhanced photoactivity by reducing the re-combination of photoexcited carriers throughout the process. [102]
TiO2 @ZnFe-LDH Anatase crystal phase Cp: 1 g/L
Co: 10 mg/L
UV-light: 100 W
λ : 290 nm
pH: 10
~90%, UV, 300 min, phenol and 55%, Vis, methylene blue (MB) The produced nanocomposites (TiO2@LDH) demonstrated effective phenol degradation in the kinetic investigation. [103]
ZnAl-LDH Co-precipitation and Calcination technique Cp: 200 mg
Co: 0.42 mmol, 40 ppm
UV-light
λ : 254 nm
80%, 360 min, phenol Photocatalysis employing semiconducting mixed oxides derived from layered double hydroxides demonstrates effective outcomes in the decomposition of phenol. [104]
TiO2/MgZnAl-LDH> Co-precipitation method Cp: 300 mg
Co: 300 mL, 50 mg/L
Mercury vapor-lamp:125 W
UV-vis
λ > 300 nm
T: 30± 2 °C
80%, 360 min, phenol The synergistic bonds among the particles in composite materials improved photoactivity. [105]
TiO2/MgAl Sol-gel method Co: 50 ppm UV-Philips: 8 W
λmax: 365 nm
T: 25 °C
72%, 480 min, phenol The layered structure of the catalyst enhances photocatalytic treatment efficiency by preventing the recombination process, influencing charge carriers, and inhibiting nanoparticle agglomeration. [106]
CeO2/ZnTi-LDH Co-precipitation method Cp: 0.5 g/L
Co: 50 mg/L
UV Pen-Ray
T: 25 °C
90%, 420 min, phenol The composition of the brucite layer type in the treatment significantly influences the outcome of the system. [107]
TiO2 -ZnAl-LDH Calcination method Cp: 50 mg
Co: 100 mL, 10.02 μ mol/L
Solar light
T: 33 °C
65%, 300 min, Rhodamine B (RhB) The bonding between the components of Zn2TiO4 and ZnO enhances the absorption capacity for solar light exposure. [108]
CeO2/MgAl-LDH Calcination method Cp: 200 mg
Co: 0.85 mmol/L, 80ppm
UV-light: 115 V, λ : 254 nm ~50%, 420 min, phenol The path of photoactive charge transfer is crucial in the photocatalytic elimination of phenol in this reaction. [109]
Mg-Zn-Al LDH Coprecipitation method Cp: 0.2 g
Co: 40 ppm
UV
λ : 254 nm
pH: 6
T: 298 K
70%, 360 min, phenol and 99%, 540 min, 2,4 dichlorophenoxiacetic acid The incorporation of a minor amount of Zn into a MgAl layered double hydroxide markedly altered the bandgap energy and light absorption abilities. [110]

Note: Photocatalysts Loading=Cp, Pollutant Concentration=Co, Time mentioned in minutes (min), Degradation in percentages (%)

Table 2
Photocatalytic activity of piezo-based photocatalysts for the degradation of different organic pollutants.
Photocatalyst Synthesis Technique Photocatalysts (Cp) and Pollutant (Co) concentration Experimental conditions Degradation Performance Comments Ref.
BaTiO3/pDEB Polymerization technique Cp: 25 mg
Co: 10 mg/ L
Visible light
Xe-lamp: 200W
λ ≥ 420 nm ultrasonic vibration
100%, 30 min, bisphenol A (BPA) BaTiO3/pDEB hybrids segregate light-created charge carriers and enhance piezo-photocatalysis and degradation efficiency. [152]
BaTiO3/g-C3N4/O3 Ultrasonic method Cp: 0.2 g/L
Co: 10 mg/ L
T: 278 K
Ultrasonic stimulation
90.1%, Atrazine (ATZ) The BTO/CN/O3 exhibited enhanced piezoelectric ozonation efficiency in the photodegradation of ATZ. [153]
Bi3TiNbO9 Hydrothermal technique Cp: 25 mg
Co: 10 mg/ L
Visible light: 300 W Xe lamp (420 nm filter)
T: Room temperature
Stress: Mechanical
64.5%, 30 min, Tetracycline Hydrochloride (TH) Piezoelectric characteristics improve photoactivity under visible light irradiation and mechanical stress by increasing charge migration and reducing recombination. [154]
BaTiO3/CuPbSbS3 Heterostructure Facile combination technique Cp: 300 mg
Co: 05 mg/ L
Visible light
Ultrasonic stimulation
90.56%, 30 min, Rhodamine B (RhB) BTO presence enhances charge mobility; thereby, the piezoelectric effect significantly improves the photodegradation rate of RhB. [155]
AgI/Ag3PO4/BaTiO3 Coprecipitation Cp: 10 mg
Co: 05 mg/ L
Xe-lamp: 200W
λ > 420 nm
Ultrasonic power: 40 kHz, 200W
T: Room temperature
pH: 6.11
77.8%, 10 min, Nitenpyram (NTP) To prevent Ag3PO4 from acute light corrosion, BaTiO3, and AgI were employed to create an efficient heterojunction. [156]
SrBi4Ti4O15/Ag2O Chemical precipitation method Cp: 50 mg
Co: 50 mL, 05 mg/L
Xe-lamp: 300W Ultrasonic power: 180W
pH: Acidic conditions
T: Room temperature
99.54%, 06 min, Rhodamine B (RhB) The simultaneous exposure of the piezophotocatalyst to ultrasonic vibration and light illumination resulted in the efficient degradation of contaminants. [157]
V-BiOIO3/FTCN (Fish scale tubular carbon nitride) Sonication method Cp: 10 mg
Co: 50 mL, 10 mg/L
Xe-lamp: 300W
λ > 420 nm
Ultrasonic power: 200W pH: alkaline conditions
75%, 60 min, Tetracycline hydrochloride (TCH) The application of ultrasonic force enhanced the degradation of tetracycline hydrochloride significantly. [158]
ZIF-67N@BiFeO3@CdS Two-step procedures Visible light λ ≥ 420 nm
Infrared light λ ≥ 700 nm
Ultrasonic power: 40 kHz
~85%, 160 min, Bisphenol A (BPA) The proposed piezoelectric-based photocatalyst demonstrates superior performance in solar-driven chemical reactions with improved charge separation. [159]
BaTiO3/g-C3N4 Ultrasonication Cp: 10 mg
Co: 100 mL, 20mg/ L
Xe-lamp: 300W Ultrasonic power: 100W
λ > 380 nm
pH: 7.0
77.4%, 20 min, Levofloxacin (LVF) The degradation rate of contaminants by piezo-based (BTO/CN) composite heterojunctions during ultrasonication significantly exceeded that observed without external stress. [160]
SrBi4Ti4O15/BiOCl(SBTO/BOC) Hydrothermal method Cp: 50 mg
Co: 50 mL, 05 mg/L
Xe-lamp: 300W Ultrasonic power: 180W
pH: Acidic conditions
T: Room temperature
99%, 15 min, Rhodamine B (RhB) Under ultrasonic vibration and light irradiation, the photocatalyst exhibits outstanding degrading efficiency during direct current electric field polarization. [161]
Bi2WO6 nanosheets Hydrothermal method Cp: 20 mg
Co: 20 mL, 25 ppm
Xe-lamp: 300W Ultrasonic power: 53 kHz
λ : 400 – 700 nm
~86%, 40 min, Sulfamethoxazole (SMX) Nanosheets exhibited increased efficiency in charge carrier transfer and separation, which improved the photocatalytic action of the catalyst. [162]
Cr/Nb modified Bi4Ti3O12/g-C3N4 Co-doping and molten salt method Cp: 30 mg
Co: 50 mL, 10 mg/L
Xe-lamp: 300W Ultrasonic power: 45 kHz
T: 25 (±2) °C
Sacr. agent: 0.15M (Na2S)
98.7%, 45 min, Rhodamine B (RhB) Doping Ba4Ti3O12 with pair of Cr/Nb creating hetero-junctions increased its absorption and piezoelectric potential. [163]
ZnO/natural quartz (GZn/PQz) Cp: 0.5 g/L
Co: 100 mL, 50 mg/ L
Metal halide lamp: 400W
λ : 490 nm
pH: 6
T: 25 °C
100%, 40 min, Ibuprofen (IBF) During the oxidation of ibuprofen via piezo-photocatalyst, superoxide radicals and hydroxyl radicals were important oxidizing species. [164]
BiOIO3/BBN One-pot hydrothermal method Cp: 50 mg
Co: 50 mL, 10 mg/ L, 10 ppm
Xe-lamp: 300W Ultrasonic power: 40 kHz, 100W 100%, 03 min, Rhodamine B (RhB) The kinetic constant of piezo-electric photocatalyst is larger than that of single photocatalyst or piezoelectricity. [165]
MoSe2/Bi2WO6 Impregnation method Cp: 10 mg
Co: 30 mL
Xe-lamp: 35W Ultrasonic power: 40 kHz, 240W 99.9%, 60 min, Diclofenac (DCF) A high polarization electric field is generated by the composite, which could operate as a strong driving factor to expedite the separation of charge carrier and hence accelerate piezo-photocatalytic activity. [166]
PMN-PT@SnO2 Colloidal coating and electrospinning methods Cp: 50 mg
Co: 100 mL, 20mg/ L
visible light: 250W
Ultrasonic power: 45 kHz, 200W
pH: 10
94.3%, 120 min, Methylene blue (MB) The degradation of contaminants in the presence of photocatalysts was investigated through the application of ultrasonic stress and/or magnetic stirring under visible light irradiation. [167]
BaTiO3/KNbO3 Hydrothermal method Cp: 0.1 g/L
Co: 100 mL
Xe-lamp: 300W Ultrasonic power: 45 kHz
pH: 6.5
93.3%, 180 min, Direct Lake blue 5B dye (DLB 5B) The synergistic effects of photoactivity and piezo-catalysis render the photocatalyst an effective method for the degradation of organic contaminants. [168]
ZnO/ZnS/MoS2 Two-step hydrothermal method Cp: 10 mg
Co: 50 mL, 10 mg/ L
Xe-lamp: 300W
Mech. agitator: 0–1000 rpm
~87.14%, 50 min, Methylene blue (MB) The combined effect of dual heterojunction and piezo-photocatalysis enhances the separation of charges. [169]
0.96(K0.48Na0.52) NbO3-(Bi0.5Na0.5) ZrO3 ceramic Calcination Cp: 30 mg
Co: 100 ppm
UV-vis
Xe-lamp: 300W
92.3%, 120 min, Dibenzothiophene (DBT) Solid-state synthetic lead-free piezoelectric ceramic powder performs effectively under UV-vis light illumination. [170]
BTiO3/ g-C3N4 Mixed calcining method Cp: 0.05 g
Co: 50 mL, 05 mg/L
Ultrasonic power: 40 kHz, 120W 82%, 120 min, Rhodamine B (RhB) The vibration-catalytic combination process enhanced the photoactivity of the synthesized piezoelectric composite material. [171]
ZnO:Sb Thin film Wet and dry chemical preparation technique Cp: 03 mg
Co: 10 mL, 2.5 mg/L
UV: 350–450 nm
Ultrasonic power: 01 MHz
pH: 5.8
66%, 60 min, Rhodamine B (RhB) The adsorption of electrically activated charged species was enhanced by the notable ferroelectric polarization observed in this environment. [172]
BTiO3 nanobelt Two-step hydrothermal technique Cp: 0.05 g
Co: 50 mL, 10 mg/L
Ultrasonic power: 50 kHz, 100W ~90%, 70 min, Rhodamine B (RhB) The addition of oxygen vacancy was observed in the reduction of BTO piezoelectric responses and piezo-catalytic activity. [173]
Au-ZnO NR Array Modified seed-assisted hydrothermal technique Cp: 10*10 mm
Co: 30 mL, 05 mg/L
Xe-lamp: 300W
λ : 325 nm
Ultrasonic power: 40 kHz, 80W
T: 25 °C
95%, 75 min, Rhodamine B (RhB) Under the ultrasonic actuation and light irradiation of all-spectrum, the ZnO-based nanorod array demonstrated high-efficiency degradation. [174]
BTiO3-PDMS Electrospinning method Co: 40 mL, 05 mg/L Ultrasonic power: 40 kHz, 400W 95%, 120 min, Rhodamine B (RhB) Piezoelectric catalyst develop charge carriers separation that interacts with oxygen molecules and hydroxyl ions to produce hydroxyl radicals and superoxide ions for the decomposition of organic dyes. [175]
BtiO3 Nanowires Sol-gel based electrospinning technique Cp: 0.1 g
Co: 100 mL, 05mg/L
UV-vis
Ultrasonic power: 40 kHz, 120W
100%, 160 min, Methyl orange (MO) The surface area and crystal structure of BTO NWs in the photocatalytic process are important to develop piezo catalytic interaction. [176]
ZnO Nanorods Modified hydrothermal technique Cp: 0.05 g
Co: 50 mL, 10 mg/L
UV: 24W
λ : 365 nm
Ultrasonic power: 40 kHz, 150W
T: Room Temp.
81%, 100 min, Azo dye acid orange (AO7) The enhanced decomposition of dye in photo/piezo catalysis can be credited to the improved photoexcited charge carriers separation and piezoelectric potential to develop a synergy effect. [177]
RuO2/t-BTiO3/Pt Two-step loading method Co: 50 mL, 10 mg/L Ultrasonic power: 40 kHz, 110W
pH: 6.5
T: 25 °C
86%, 60 min, Tricyclazole (TC) The piezo potential in photochemical processes drive the oxidation/reduction reaction of contaminants and water in situ, either directly or indirectly. [178]
Ag- BTiO3 Surface modification technique Cp: 0.1 g
Co: 100 mL, 05 mg/L
Ultrasonic power: 40 kHz, 120W 81%, 120 min, Methyl orange (MO) A sufficient quantity of silver deposition results in the maximum piezo-catalytic activity, whereas a relatively high loading results in lower piezo-catalytic activity [179]
BTiO3 Nanowires Two-step hydrothermal technique Cp: 0.1 g
Co: 100 mL, 05mg/L
UV-Vis: 460 nm
Ultrasonic power: 40 kHz, 80W
~90%, 160 min, Methyl orange (MO) By controlling the charge carriers density in the photocatalyst, the piezoelectric crystallites intrinsic charge carriers contribute to the process of photocatalysis charge transfer. [180]
t- BTiO3 Hydrothermal technique Cp: 0.05 g
Co: 25 mL, 25mg/L
Ultrasonic power: 40 kHz, 80W
pH: 6.5
T: 30 °C
71%, 120 min, 4-chlorophenol (4-Cp) Piezo catalysis, rather than sonic catalysis, was found to be responsible for the dechlorination and degradation. [142]

Note: Photocatalysts loading=Cp, Pollutant Concentration=Co, Time mentioned in minutes (min), Degradation in percentages (%)

Editorial Office
464 Cheongpa-ro, #726, Jung-gu, Seoul 04510, Republic of Korea
FAX : +82-2-383-9654   E-mail : eer@kosenv.or.kr

Copyright© Korean Society of Environmental Engineers.        Developed in M2PI
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers