| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
Environ Eng Res > Volume 31(3); 2026 > Article
Lee, Lee, Bae, Choe, Cho, Weon, Cho, and Lee: Chemical oxidation and reduction technologies for water and wastewater treatment: Current status, challenges, and future directions

Abstract

Chemical oxidation and reduction technologies have been extensively explored as effective approaches for degrading recalcitrant contaminants in water and wastewater, with several methods already adopted commercially and implemented in real-world applications. This review presents a comprehensive evaluation of the current progress, obstacles, and future prospects of principal redox-based processes, encompassing ozone-and UV-based oxidation, persulfate activation, zero-valent iron reduction, noble metal-catalyzed reduction, electrochemical methods, and photocatalysis. These processes utilize highly reactive oxidizing and reducing agents, which facilitate broad-spectrum contaminant elimination due to robust redox potentials and adaptability to various water matrices. Nevertheless, widespread adoption on a large-scale is still limited by considerable energy consumption, elevated material expenses, and the production of undesirable secondary byproducts. Through systematic analysis of advantages and drawbacks, this review identifies strategies to advance chemical redox technologies toward scalable, energy-efficient, and robust water treatment systems. Ultimately, chemical oxidation and reduction methods demonstrate significant promise for supplementing or exceeding conventional treatment solutions, thus supporting the preservation of clean and safe water resources for generations to come.

Graphical Abstract

/upload/thumbnails/eer-2025-584f6.gif

1. Introduction

Water and wastewater treatment plays a vital role in contemporary environmental management, safeguarding both human health and aquatic ecosystems while fostering sustainable use of water resources. Ongoing industrialization, urbanization, and expansion of agricultural activities have resulted in serious contamination of water bodies worldwide by organic pollutants, heavy metals, pathogens, and emerging contaminants, such as pharmaceuticals, personal care products (PPCPs), and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) [16]. Conventional approaches, including biological and physical processes, are commonly employed to manage water pollution. However, the poor removal performance of established treatment for recalcitrant contaminants, combined with increasingly strict water quality regulations, has stimulated the development and advancement of alternative treatment technologies.
Among these approaches, chemical oxidation and reduction processes have attracted significant interest due to their capability to break down recalcitrant contaminants efficiently. These processes include a variety of technologies that utilize chemical reactions to convert hazardous pollutants into less harmful or more biodegradable substances. Chemical oxidation relies on potent oxidants such as ozone (O3), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), persulfates, and UV-assisted systems to decompose organic contaminants [79]. On the other hand, chemical reduction methods employ zero-valent iron (ZVI) and other metal-based reductants or catalysts, often with additional reducing agents, to eliminate or modify pollutants including nitrates, halogenated organics, and compounds resistant to oxidation [1013].
Chemical oxidation and reduction methods generally utilize reactive oxidizing or reducing species for the effective decomposition of recalcitrant contaminants (Table 1). Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), such as O3 and UV-based oxidation and persulfate-based oxidation, produce highly reactive species like hydroxyl radicals (OH) and sulfate radical anions (SO4•−) [8,9,14,15]. These radicals possess strong oxidative strength, allowing for the rapid and non-selective degradation of a wide range of contaminants. Although AOPs have shown high effectiveness, and some (e.g., O3- and UV-based processes and Fenton(-like) processes) are commercialized, challenges regarding operational expenses and energy requirements demand further improvements and integration with complementary treatment techniques. In parallel, reduction technologies—especially those based on ZVI or noble metal catalysts—have been investigated for the removal of heavy metals, halogenated organics, and PFAS [12,16]. These systems function via direct electron transfer or the generation of highly reactive reducing species to facilitate contaminant degradation. While ZVI is extensively applied for reductive elimination of organic contaminants in field applications (particularly for reductive dechlorination in groundwater remediation) [10,11], most alternative reduction technologies have not advanced beyond the laboratory setting, likely because of cost-effectiveness limitations associated with the materials.
Recent development of electrochemical and photocatalytic treatment technologies has further expanded the scope of chemical oxidation and reduction approaches [1719]. Electrochemical methods offer precise manipulation of redox reactions, allowing contaminant degradation with minimal need for added chemicals. Photocatalysis, meanwhile, uses photon energy (including solar energy) to activate oxidation and reduction reactions over semiconductor materials such as titanium dioxide (TiO2) [19]. These emerging technologies are particularly promising for decentralized water treatment, especially in areas where access to traditional treatment infrastructure is restricted.
Despite substantial progress in the development of chemical oxidation and reduction technologies, several unresolved issues persist. Critical considerations such as high energy requirements, economic viability, and scalability must still be resolved. Furthermore, regulatory frameworks and societal acceptance are significant factors influencing the large-scale implementation of these technologies. Ongoing research efforts are crucial for addressing these challenges and refining oxidation- and reduction-based treatment strategies.
This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of chemical oxidation and reduction technologies utilized in water and wastewater treatment. Upcoming sections provide discussions of O3 and UV-based oxidation processes, persulfate-based oxidation, chemical reduction using ZVI and related metal compounds, catalytic reduction employing noble metal catalysts, electrochemical processes, and photocatalysis. Additionally, the review identifies key obstacles to the deployment of these methods and investigates future pathways to enhance chemical treatment regimes in the pursuit of sustainable water resource management.

2. Ozone- and UV-based Oxidation Processes

AOPs are integral to contemporary water and wastewater treatment, especially for the elimination of micropollutants and emerging contaminants such as endocrine-disrupting compounds, pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and industrial chemicals [20]. These approaches generate extremely reactive oxidants, predominantly OH, which possess strong oxidative potential and non-selective reactivity, enabling the degradation of a diverse array of organic pollutants. O3-based and UV-based processes have become widely established among AOPs because of their high contaminant removal efficiency, seamless integration with existing treatment systems, and effectiveness in complying with stricter water quality standards [7,8].
O3 has been employed in drinking water treatment for disinfection and chemical oxidation for many years. Although it was initially utilized primarily for wastewater effluent disinfection, its use has broadened to include wastewater reclamation, potable reuse processes, and advanced effluent treatment for regulating organic micropollutants [14]. In contrast, the implementation of UV-AOPs in water and wastewater applications is a more recent development. Techniques such as UV/H2O2 and UV/Cl2 are now commonly adopted for drinking water treatment and potable reuse systems, providing effective removal of trace organic contaminants [21,22]. Given escalating concerns about water availability, pollution, and regulatory pressures, the utilization of these AOPs is expected to increase, further promoting water security and sustainable management. Possible implementation points across the urban water cycle involve drinking water processing, advanced treatment of wastewater effluents, direct (potable) reuse, as well as decentralized solutions for residential or industrial purposes (Fig. 1).

2.1. Principles and Applications

2.1.1. Ozone-based AOPs

O3 has been extensively utilized as a disinfectant and oxidant in water treatment, demonstrating efficacy against a broad spectrum of biological and chemical contaminants. Although O3 itself acts as a selective oxidant, primarily targeting electron-rich functional groups such as double bonds, amines, and activated aromatic rings, its oxidative capability can be markedly increased by facilitating the formation of OH. These radicals, produced through O3 decomposition under certain conditions, possess considerably higher reactivity and induce non-selective oxidation, thereby making ozonation an effective AOP for the degradation of resistant contaminants.
The performance of O3-based AOPs depends on various key parameters, including pH, characteristics of the water matrix, and the existence of other oxidants or catalysts [14]. Under basic pH conditions, hydroxide ions enhance the decomposition of O3, leading to elevated OH generation. The influence of these factors on O3-based AOPs, especially regarding OH formation and subsequent pollutant removal, can be accurately predicted using computational modeling and machine learning techniques that use such parameters as variables [2325]. Enhancing OH production is often achieved through the peroxone process (O3/H2O2), wherein O3 reacts with H2O2 [26,27]. This process is commonly applied in drinking water treatment to facilitate the oxidation of micropollutants [28]. In contrast, for wastewater treatment (or some drinking water systems with elevated dissolved organic matter), where O3 decomposes rapidly, the application of O3/H2O2 is less widespread. Nevertheless, it is explored as a method to reduce bromate formation, an ozonation byproduct that presents regulatory issues [29].
Catalytic ozonation, which employs materials such as metal oxides or activated carbon, serves to promote O3 decomposition and radical production [30,31]. This technique has shown promise in boosting O3 process efficiency and decreasing O3 demand. However, adoption at the full scale in municipal water treatment is still restricted, owing to challenges with catalyst recovery, maintenance of catalyst stability, and long-term effectiveness within complex water matrices [32].
A notable example of extensive ozonation practice is found in Switzerland, where a nationwide policy requires the incorporation of advanced treatment technologies into wastewater treatment facilities to address micropollutant issues [33]. Enacted in 2016, the Water Protection Ordinance mandates select wastewater treatment plants to use processes such as ozonation or activated carbon adsorption, aiming for an 80% reduction in designated micropollutants. Comparable ozonation systems for wastewater have also been adopted in several other European countries, such as France and Germany [34].

2.1.2. UV-based AOPs

UV-based AOPs employ high-energy UV radiation to either directly degrade contaminants via photolysis or to activate chemical oxidants that produce OH and other reactive species [8]. A key advantage of UV-based AOPs is their capacity to degrade a wide spectrum of organic contaminants while minimizing the formation of residual byproducts, making them especially suitable for applications demanding strict water quality standards. Another notable advantage is their effectiveness in treating nitrosamines, such as N-nitrosodimethylamine, through direct photolysis [35]. Moreover, UV-AOPs typically have a compact system footprint, facilitating straightforward integration into existing treatment trains without the need for substantial infrastructure changes.
Among various UV-based AOPs, UV/H2O2 has achieved the most widespread implementation. This process relies on the photolytic cleavage of H2O2 under UV irradiation to generate OH. Traditionally, low- and medium-pressure mercury lamps have served as UV sources, yet newer options such as light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and far-UVC excimer lamps are drawing increasing interest owing to their enhanced energy efficiency and environmental advantages [36,37]. UV/H2O2 has found broad application in drinking water treatment and potable reuse systems, functioning as a critical barrier for the elimination of trace organic contaminants. In potable reuse contexts, UV/H2O2 is particularly significant because it ensures the thorough degradation of micropollutants prior to the treated water’s return to supply reservoirs or groundwater recharge systems [38]. In addition to UV/H2O2, processes including UV/Cl2 and UV/NH2Cl have recently been applied in both drinking water and potable reuse treatment trains, offering additional pathways for chemical oxidation [39].
Other UV-based AOPs, such as UV/O3 and UV/persulfate, have also been examined for their capacity to enhance radical generation and increase treatment efficiency [40,41]. Nevertheless, their adoption in municipal water treatment is still relatively limited due to operational complexities, higher energy demands, and questions regarding overall cost-effectiveness.
With the ongoing advancement of UV-based AOPs, current research increasingly targets the optimization of process efficiency, minimization of energy usage, and the combination of UV with advanced filtration and electrochemical oxidation processes. These advances are intended to improve contaminant removal performance and increase the sustainability of treatment operations. Consequently, UV-based AOPs are anticipated to take on a more prominent role in both drinking water and wastewater treatment, particularly for applications where high contaminant removal and strict regulatory adherence are required.
One of the most prominent examples of UV/H2O2 AOPs implementation is the Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) in Orange County, California. Recognized as the world’s largest indirect potable reuse facility, GWRS treats secondary effluent through microfiltration, reverse osmosis, and UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation, resulting in high-quality water that is subsequently injected into the local aquifer [42,43]. This integrated treatment serves both as a water supply augmentation measure and a seawater intrusion barrier, supporting sustainable groundwater management in a region with pronounced water scarcity. Comparable full-scale treatment trains for potable reuse have also been established at various sites globally [38].

2.2. Future Research Directions

2.2.1. Ozone-based AOPs

Future research on O3-based AOPs will address advancements in energy efficiency, radical generation enhancement, byproduct minimization, and the combination of O3 processes with other advanced treatment technologies.
A primary research focus involves developing adaptive O3 dosing strategies supported by real-time control systems. The incorporation of computational modeling, artificial intelligence, and ongoing water quality monitoring will facilitate more accurate O3 dosing, thereby optimizing energy consumption without compromising contaminant removal performance [4446]. These innovations are expected to curb unnecessary O3 usage, thereby reducing operational expenses and supporting long-term process sustainability.
A further research emphasis will center on novel hybrid treatment schemes. Upcoming studies are expected to examine the synergistic combination of O3-based AOPs with biological filtration, membrane processes, and adsorption technologies. Improved biofiltration designs, which target the removal of oxidation byproducts, are anticipated to play a significant role in optimizing treatment efficiency and achieving compliance with regulatory standards [47]. Research into innovative catalytic ozonation methods utilizing advanced catalysts (such as carbon-based nanomaterials) will also advance O3 decomposition efficacy and encourage selective radical generation [48].
Electrochemical O3 generation presents a rapidly emerging field with substantial implications for improved O3 production efficiency and reduced energy consumption. Research will emphasize the refinement of electrode materials and reactor architectures to maximize O3 yield and suppress undesired side reactions [4951]. Additionally, the development of electrochemical O3 generators tailored to decentralized applications—such as small-scale water reuse and industrial wastewater treatment—may considerably widen the scope of practical applications for this approach.
Effectively managing byproduct formation continues to be a major challenge in ozonation processes. The use of advanced analytical techniques and thorough toxicological assessments, such as high-resolution mass spectrometry for both targeted and untargeted analyses coupled with high-throughput bioassays, will provide more comprehensive insights into transformation products and their associated health risks [52]. Computational methods, including predictive models for degradation pathways, are expected to assist in identifying compounds that require further investigation [53]. While current computer-based models are capable of estimating reaction pathways for O3 and OH, further improvements are essential to increase their accuracy and expand their applicability to additional oxidants. Combining quantum chemical simulations with machine learning offers considerable promise for deepening our understanding of reaction kinetics and byproduct formation, especially when complemented by experimental validation [54].
In summary, continual progress in O3-based AOP technologies is enhancing energy efficiency, reducing costs, and expanding the spectrum of treatable contaminants. These technological advancements will facilitate the wider implementation of O3-AOPs in both drinking water and wastewater treatment systems

2.2.2. UV-based AOPs

Future research in UV-based AOPs is expected to target improvements in radical generation efficiency, reductions in energy demands, decreased byproduct generation, and the integration of UV processes with complementary treatment technologies.
A particularly promising avenue involves developing alternative UV light sources. While UV-LEDs have distinct advantages compared to conventional mercury-based lamps, future studies will focus on optimizing emission spectra for specific radical formation pathways, refining reactor configurations, and promoting scalability for full-scale applications. For far-UVC radiation, further research is needed to enhance lamp reliability and efficiency while gaining a deeper understanding of byproduct formation and developing effective control strategies [55,56].
Refining the selection and dosage of oxidants is another essential research priority. Optimization efforts will further develop UV-based AOPs by strategically adjusting combinations of oxidants such as H2O2, chlorine, and persulfate to increase the yields of OH and SO4•− production [57]. Additionally, innovations in reactor design that provide more controlled oxidant dosing and improved UV penetration will be critical for achieving optimal treatment outcomes [58].
Progress in process automation and real-time monitoring will significantly enhance the operational performance of UV-based AOPs. The application of machine learning and real-time analytics will allow dynamic adjustment of UV intensity, oxidant levels, and reactor variables in response to fluctuations in water quality. The adoption of automated control technologies will improve operational efficiency, lower energy requirements, and bolster process stability [59].
Overall, continuous advancements in UV-based AOPs are expected to drive the development of treatment solutions that are more energy-efficient, cost-effective, and adaptable for drinking water, potable reuse, and wastewater applications.

3. Persulfate-based Oxidation Processes

3.1. Mechanisms Behind Persulfate Activation

Persulfate activation represents physicochemical strategies aimed at increasing the oxidizing capability of persulfate (collectively referring to peroxymonosulfate (PMS) and peroxydisulfate (PDS); E0(PMS) = +1.82 VNHE; E0(PDS) = +2.08 VNHE) via electron and energy transfer pathways (Fig. 2) [9]. Reduced transition metals with a high electron-donating capacity transform persulfate into SO4•− by inducing the reductive dissociation of the peroxide bond in persulfate, similar to how Fe2+ catalyzes the one-electron reduction of H2O2 to OH in the Fenton reaction [15]. Photolysis [60] and thermolysis [61] of persulfate can also generate SO4•− through homolytic cleavage of the peroxide bond. It is widely acknowledged that SO4•− is effective in oxidatively degrading a wide range of organic pollutants due to its strong oxidation power, which is comparable to OH. However, in contrast to OH considered a non-selective oxidant, the substrate specificity of SO4•− for organic compounds arises in part because these two radical oxidants primarily rely on distinct oxidation mechanisms for organic transformation [62]. Specifically, the H-atom abstraction by which OH oxidizes saturated hydrocarbons at the diffusion-limited reaction rates is not the preferred reaction mode for SO4•− [63]. Alternatively, SO4•− typically oxidizes both organic and inorganic substrates through electron-transfer reactions. This is supported by the frequent detection of phenyl radical cations that recombine to yield dimeric products, inorganic anion radicals (e.g., Cl) that behave as secondary oxidants, and decarboxylation intermediates originating from aromatic and aliphatic carboxylates [9]. Although the reactions of SO4•− with organic macromolecules (e.g., natural organic matters) are kinetically retarded due to steric hindrance [64], the anionic character of SO4•− favors the oxidative degradation of positively-charged target substrates, such as alkylammonium cations [65].
Persulfate activation can also occur via mechanisms independent of homolytic or heterolytic cleavage of the peroxide bond and subsequent SO4•− generation, facilitating non-radical organic transformation through (i) high-valent metal-induced oxygen-atom transfer, (ii) singlet oxygenation, and (iii) mediated electron transfer [9]. Reduced transition metals, whether present in isolated or supported states, oxidatively transform into the high-valent oxo intermediates (e.g., Co(IV)=O and Fe(IV)=O) upon exposure to persulfate, as evidenced by the indication reaction using PMSO as a probe (i.e., sulfoxide-to-sulfone conversion) and 18O isotope-labeling technique [66]. Singlet oxygen (1O2) as a non-radical oxidant is generated through the disproportionation of superoxide radical (O2•−) during redox reactions of PDS or via the self-decomposition of PMS, a process accelerated under alkaline conditions or when carbonyl and hydroxyl moieties are present [9]. Certain metallic and carbonaceous materials promote electron transfer from organic electron donors to the persulfate acceptor, as substantiated by the chronoamperometric current response upon successive addition of organic substrate followed by persulfate [67]. The mediated electron transfer ultimately enables oxidative degradation of organic compounds without the involvement of radical species.

3.2. Homogeneous Redox Reactions for Persulfate Activation

The 3d transition and noble metal ions, including Mn2+, Co2+, Fe2+, and Ru3+, demonstrate selective reactivity in the activation of PMS with an asymmetric structure [68]. The major degradative pathway in transition metal-induced PMS activation varies depending on the electron configuration. In particular, certain 3d transition metals like Co and Fe form high-spin PMS complexes containing unpaired electrons, which facilitate radical generation via single-electron transfer processes. Conversely, low-spin PMS complexes, which are strongly bonded to metals possessing partially filled d-subshells (e.g., Cr and Mn with d-orbitals holding up to 4 electrons), promote electron transfer from organic compounds to persulfate, thereby initiating a non-radical oxidation pathway [69]. Non-radical degradation mechanisms are supported by (i) the negligible inhibitory effects observed when using alcohol-based radical scavengers, (ii) treatment efficiencies and distributions of intermediates that depend on the substrate and diverge from expected SO4•− reactivity patterns, and (iii) the absence of electron paramagnetic resonance signals typically associated with radical formation [9].
Energy transfer processes such as photolysis and thermolysis are particularly effective for activating PDS, given its low peroxide bond dissociation energy [70]. PDS demonstrates a higher quantum yield for radical generation than PMS during UV photolysis [60], and increasing the temperature above 40 °C results in substantial SO4•− production from PDS, while only marginally promoting the homolytic cleavage of the peroxide bond in PMS [61]. Persulfate is considered a promising alternative to H2O2 for photochemical activation, due to (i) its activation under longer-wavelength UV irradiation, (ii) possessing a radical quenching activity two orders of magnitude lower than other agents, and superior resistance to the inhibitory effects of natural organic matter, which serve as natural radical scavengers [9]. Homogeneous persulfate activation can be performed with excess persulfate dosage, owing to its significantly reduced radical scavenging characteristics; this allows for the oxidative degradation of organic contaminants that are otherwise poorly reactive with oxidizing radicals (with bimolecular reaction rate constants in the range of 106 to 107 M−1s−1). Under realistic treatment conditions, heat-assisted activation leads to a preference shift in the persulfate precursor from PDS to PMS. This is because common background anions such as Cl, HCO3, and HPO42−/H2PO4 act as radical scavengers for PDS but function as nucleophiles towards the positively charged peroxide oxygen atom in PMS, resulting in the generation of secondary non-radical oxidants [9]. Furthermore, as the nucleophilic addition mechanism is facilitated by increased temperature, raising the temperature—even when below the threshold for direct peroxide bond cleavage—kinetically enhances the formation of anion-derived oxidants (via oxygen-atom transfer pathways), such as HOCl [71]. The complexation between PMS and inorganic nucleophiles (e.g., HPO42−/H2PO4) weakens the strength of the peroxide bond, making it more susceptible to thermally induced dissociation and thereby increasing SO4•− production [72].

3.3. Heterogeneous Catalysis for Persulfate Activation

Heterogeneous metal-based materials, existing either as standalone entities or as supported structures in diverse chemical states such as zero-valent metal, oxide, sulfide, and phosphide, are capable of degrading organics through both radical and non-radical activation mechanisms of persulfate [15,7375]. Co- and Fe-based activators (e.g., CoO, Fe0, and FexP) facilitate redox reactions with PMS that involve heterolytic cleavage of the peroxide bond, thereby initiating radical-induced organic oxidation. Transition and noble metals significantly contribute to organic degradation irrespective of the persulfate precursor used, functioning as electron-transfer mediators that enable non-radical organic oxidation by enhancing electron exchanges between the target organic substrates and persulfate [76]. High-valent metal species function as non-radical oxidants whose efficacy in organic degradation varies significantly depending on the substrate during heterogeneous persulfate activation by metallic catalysts. Metal-oxo intermediates, frequently recognized as principal oxidants during Co- and Fe-mediated persulfate activation, facilitate the oxidative removal of organics via the oxygen-atom transfer pathway [66]. Alternatively, catalysts derived from Cu (e.g., CuO) produce non-oxo Cu(III) species exhibiting relatively high oxidizing power (E0 = +2.20, +2.3–1.57, and +1.68 VNHE for Fe(VI) [77], Cu(III) [78], and Mn(VII) [77]) upon persulfate introduction, which then initiate electron-transfer oxidation of non-phenolic organics [79, 80]. The primary oxidant and the dominant degradative pathway in catalytic persulfate activation can shift based on the structural features of the metal-based activators and the type of persulfate precursor employed. Metal catalysts at molecular or atomic scale (i.e., single-atom catalysts) can generate SO4•− from persulfate at the nanoscale and subsequently undergo oxidative transformation into high-valent species, enabling organic treatment without the involvement of radicals [82]. The transformation of Ni(II) to Ni(IV) as a high-valent form of Ni, whose reactivity is largely independent of substrate type, occurs during PMS activation by NiO and Ni(OH)2, while Ni(III), acting as a selective non-radical oxidant, forms exclusively when PDS is introduced instead [79].
Carbonaceous materials, such as carbon nanotubes, graphene, and their analogues, which are composed of sp2-hybridized carbon atoms, have been shown to facilitate non-radical persulfate activation [9,83]. In particular, the redox reactions of persulfate over nanocarbons produce O2•− as the precursor of 1O2, while surface functionalities (e.g., carboxyl and hydroxyl groups) either inherently present or intentionally introduced onto the carbon surface accelerate the self-decay of PMS, thereby increasing 1O2 yield [9]. Alternatively, carbocatalytic persulfate activation enables selective degradation of phenolic organics without radical generation, similar to specific metal oxides; electrically conductive carbon-based activators enhance the electron transfer from organic electron donors to persulfate [84]. Nanodiamond, characterized as an sp3-hybridized carbon material with high mechanical and chemical stability, shows promise as a carbon-based persulfate activator by undergoing thermal annealing to induce carbon graphitization [85]. The integration of metal nanoparticles into carbon matrices significantly enhances persulfate activation through several mechanisms: inner metal cores boost the electron-donating capacity of outer carbon layers, both metal and carbon phases offer dual-active sites that contribute to persulfate activation, and the carbon phase encapsulates the metal components, thereby preventing metal dissolution [86].

3.4. Challenges and Opportunities for Persulfate Activation

Heterogeneous catalysis, designed to facilitate easy catalyst recovery and simultaneously reduce secondary contamination, often enables non-radical organic oxidation via persulfate activation, except when certain transition metals such as Co and Fe act as the catalytic centers. Due to the selective nature of non-radical degradation pathways, catalytic persulfate activation can achieve more efficient targeting of emerging contaminants at trace concentrations within complex water matrices, suppress the formation of undesirable toxic byproducts, and reduce persulfate consumption. Moreover, recent research has highlighted the potential of non-radical persulfate activation processes to generate polymeric products through the recombination of phenyl radical cations, which are then removed by adsorption [87]. Nonetheless, considering that non-radical persulfate activation deviates from the core technical advantage of AOPs—specifically, substrate-insensitive treatment efficiency—it is necessary to systematically evaluate the limitations of heterogeneous persulfate activation for non-radical oxidation. This evaluation should focus on the treatability of persistent organics, the adverse biological impacts of partially oxidized intermediates, and the feasibility of hybrid materials or processes capable of simultaneously triggering both radical and non-radical persulfate activation pathways to compensate for each approach’s technical limitations.
Transition metals, widely recognized as effective technical choices for catalytic water treatment, exhibit selective reactivity towards PMS activation. Although carbonaceous materials demonstrate treatment efficiency that is generally insensitive to persulfate precursors, they are particularly effective for the oxidative degradation of electron-rich organic contaminants when persulfate is added. Given that metal-mediated redox reactions can accomplish the heterolytic cleavage of peroxide bonds in a range of peroxides, such as H2O2, PMS, PDS, and peracetate, followed by the generation of oxidizing radicals, the judicious selection of redox-active metals and subsequent development of bimetallic or carbon-based composites has the potential to yield adaptable peroxide activators that can facilitate radical-induced oxidation upon introduction of any peroxide.
It is well established that persulfate activation processes facilitate the oxidative treatment of organic pollutants through multiple pathways that include SO4•−, 1O2, high-valent metals, and electron exchange between electron donor-acceptor pairs. Despite this recognition, significant uncertainties remain regarding the relative reactivity of radical and non-radical oxidants involved in persulfate activation. In particular, high-valent metal-oxo species, which have often been assumed to function as the key oxidants in metal-activated persulfate systems, attack specific classes of organics through oxygen-atom transfer—a mechanism that differs from the electron-transfer oxidation characteristic of non-oxo species’ interactions with organics. The variation in oxidizing strength among high-valent metals, determined by their distinct redox potentials, indicates that their effectiveness toward organic substrates depends on the particular metal employed as the persulfate activator. Both metal- and carbon-based materials can interact with persulfate to generate surface persulfate complexes, which play a central role as intermediates in the non-radical oxidation route, specifically the mediated electron transfer pathway. The reactivity of these surface persulfate complexes towards organic electron donors appears to be highly dependent on the choice of activator, as substantiated by comparative studies using metal oxides and CNTs to evaluate substrate-specific oxidizing capabilities. To bridge the knowledge gap linked to inconsistencies among persulfate studies regarding oxidant reactivity, it is essential to conduct comparative assessments of various persulfate activation processes, emphasizing differences in organic transformation rates and distributions of intermediates/products.

4. Chemical Reduction using ZVI and Related Metal Compounds

Various pollutants, such as heavy metals, halogenated organics, and emerging contaminants, persist in aquatic environments due to their considerable chemical stability and low biodegradability [10]. Numerous redox and catalytic treatment strategies have been investigated to treat wastewater and groundwater, resulting in the development of advanced materials exhibiting enhanced redox capabilities [88]. Among these, nanoscale ZVI (NZVI) has been identified as an effective material for the reductive removal of diverse water contaminants, primarily due to its strong reducing power that enables the transformation of contaminants into less toxic and more mobile forms in water matrices (Table 2) [16]. In particular, NZVI has demonstrated great potential for the reductive removal of various organic compounds (e.g., chlorinated aliphatic and aromatic compounds) [8991], inorganic pollutants (e.g., heavy metals [92], and radioactive nuclides [93]) in both anaerobic and anoxic environments. This effectiveness is associated with its core (Fe0)-shell (Fe oxides and hydroxides) structure, wherein the Fe0 core serves as the source of electrons, and the Fe oxide/hydroxide shell offers effective adsorption sites. This review examines NZVI from a material-oriented perspective, focusing on contaminant removal in wastewater and groundwater by addressing its underlying reaction mechanisms and the subsequent reactions following NZVI oxidation. A comprehensive understanding of these processes can facilitate the advancement of next-generation technologies for wastewater and groundwater treatment that are more efficient and sustainable.

4.1. NZVI-induced Removal Mechanisms in Various Decontamination Processes

As outlined previously, NZVI offers considerable potential for the reductive transformation and remediation of contaminants. NZVI (Fe0) exhibits a standard reduction potential of E0 = −0.44 VNHE (Fe2+ + 2e → Fe0), enabling the electron transfer to aqueous contaminants. The predominant reductive decontamination mechanisms of NZVI involve complex surface reactions, typically beginning with the migration of contaminants toward the outer FeII-FeIII oxide or hydroxide shell, and proceeding with electron transfer from the inner Fe0 core to this shell. A principal direct reduction pathway for NZVI is the dechlorination of chlorinated organic compounds (e.g., trichloroethylene (TCE) [94], perchloroethylene (PCE) [95], and carbon tetrachloride (CT) [96]).
These compounds are converted into non-toxic end products, including acetylene, ethene, and ethane, via β-elimination and hydrogenolysis pathways. To improve dechlorination efficiency, researchers have developed bimetallic NZVI particles with Pd or Ni, which catalyze H2 transformation into reactive hydrogen species [97]. This is facilitated by NZVI’s interaction with water in anoxic and anaerobic conditions through the “anaerobic corrosion process” (Fe0 + 2H2O → Fe2+ + H2 + 2OH), producing hydrogen available to drive additional reductive decontamination steps. The generated H2 can participate in further reductive decontamination processes when H-active sites such as Pd and Ni are present. Venkateshaiah et al. demonstrated that Pd@NZVI exhibited the fastest dechlorination kinetics for PCE removal, followed sequentially by Ni@NZVI, Ag@NZVI, Cu@NZVI, and NZVI alone, attributable to additional catalytic surface reactions involving adsorbed atomic hydrogen [97].
For the removal of heavy metal, cations such as Cu2+, possessing more positive standard reduction potentials than Fe, are effectively and rapidly reduced (Fe0 + 2Cu2+ + H2O → Fe2+ + Cu2O + 2H+). Oxyanions like arsenate and chromate are also reduced by NZVI, as chemical reduction is thermodynamically favored over precipitation or adsorption in these cases [98]. In contrast, metal cations with standard potentials that are negative or similar to Fe, such as Zn(II) and Ni(II), are predominantly removed via electrostatic attraction, chemical adsorption, and precipitation [99].
Nitrogen and phosphorus are fundamental nutrients for living organisms, yet their excessive discharge can lead to severe water eutrophication. Recently, research has increasingly emphasized the removal of nitrate and phosphate from wastewater with the intention of resource recovery. For nitrate removal in aqueous systems, NZVI reduces nitrate primarily to ammonia gas as the final product (4Fe0 + NO3 + 10H+ → 4Fe2+ + NH4+ + 3H2O ΔGo = −997.71 kJ) due to the ammonia stripping at high pH caused by H+ consumption and OH formation during anaerobic corrosion [100]. For phosphate removal from aqueous solutions, the estimated maximum adsorption capacity of NZVI approaches 245 mg/g, indicating robust phosphate uptake, which occurs primarily via adsorption and co-precipitation rather than by chemical redox reaction [101].
Although there has been a global increase in the need and demand for renewable energy sources, nuclear energy continues to be considered an economical and efficient energy option in recent years. However, the recycling and recovery of spent fuel can generate a variety of radioactive nuclides (such as Pu, U, Np, and other fission products like 99Tc, 137Cs, and 90Sr), and there remains a significant risk of catastrophic nuclear accidents, exemplified by the Fukushima Daiichi accident in 2011. Notably, NZVI has demonstrated a fast adsorption rate for various radioactive nuclides, along with high removal efficiency and stable immobilization of radionuclides [102]. Hua et al. reported that aqueous uranium ions (U(VI)) are initially attracted to the NZVI surface through negatively charged surface (OH groups), leading to the formation of surface complexes with the Fe shell and U(VI) ions. Subsequently, U(VI) diffuses across the surface layer, readily obtaining electrons from the inner Fe0, which facilitates its rapid reduction to U(IV) forms [103]. For both Pu and U, NZVI reduces Pu aqueous phases (Pu(V) and Pu(VI)) to PuO2 (Pu(IV)) and converts U(VI) to U(IV), such as UO2, confirming the chemical reduction of sorbed Pu and U by NZVI [101].
Overall, the removal mechanisms of contaminants by NZVI are highly complex due to the core-shell structure, which provides effective FeII-FeIII adsorption sites and serves as a potential Fe0 electron reservoir. This distinctive property of NZVI alters the removal pathways for different contaminants, emphasizing the necessity to thoroughly examine NZVI behavior during and after decontamination processes for achieving efficient and cost-effective environmental applications.

4.2. NZVI Oxidation and Secondary Fe-containing Minerals after Reductive Decontamination Processes

In the process of contaminant adsorption and reduction, Fe0 undergoes the surface oxidation (Fe0 → FeII or FeIII), precipitation (in the forms of FeII, FeIII, and FeII/FeIII oxides and hydroxides) and coprecipitation with anionic species such as Cl, SO42− and CO32− [11]. Consequently, various Fe-containing minerals can be fully or partially formed during the decontamination process, including vivianite (FeII3(PO4)2), Fe(OH)2, green rust (FeII–FeIII hydroxides containing interlayer anions (e.g., Cl, SO42− and CO32−)), ferrihydrite, magnetite (FeII1III2O4), lepidocrocite (γ-FeIIIOOH), goethite (α-FeIIIOOH), mackinawite (FeIIS), and siderite (FeIICO3) (Table 2) [11]. Since secondary Fe-containing minerals are capable of further removing various aqueous pollutants through reduction reactions (for FeII-containing minerals) as well as adsorption [105,106], both the direct reduction of pollutants and their secondary removal must be considered in NZVI applications. For example, FeII-containing minerals such as magnetite, vivianite, and green rust have demonstrated effective removal of organic (e.g., chlorinated compounds, halogenated compounds, and phenolic compounds) as well as inorganic (e.g., heavy metals, and radioactive nuclides) contaminants [107110]. FeIII-containing minerals (e.g., maghemite (γ-FeIII2O3), goethite and hematite) have been employed for the removal of heavy metals and phosphate primarily via adsorption processes [111,112].
The oxidation of NZVI during reductive decontamination can also reveal a noteworthy natural reaction mediated by dissimilatory iron reducing bacteria (DIRB). DIRB are subsurface microorganisms capable of transferring electrons to extracellular objects (e.g., FeIII-containing minerals), utilizing electrons acquired through intracellular organic metabolism [113]. This biological reaction is critically important in the geochemical Fe cycle and influences the environmental fate of contaminants. For example, FeIII-containing minerals such as magnetite, lepidocrocite, and goethite were biologically reduced by Shewanella putrefaciens CN32 in the presence of phosphate ions, resulting in the formation of biogenic Fe-P containing mineral (i.e., vivianite) [114]. When compared experiments with individual minerals, mixed cultures containing CN32 and each mineral exhibited a substantial enhancement in CT dechlorination, with magnetite in combination with CN32 yielding the highest formation of biogenic vivianite [114]. Additionally, biogenic FeII mineral phases (i.e., magnetite, green rust, siderite, and vivianite) showed effective U(VI) removal, with biogenic green rust achieving the most significant U(VI) reduction, followed by magnetite and siderite [115]. These experimental findings provide valuable perspective on the significance of NZVI passivation byproducts for the behavior and movement of environmental contaminants in wastewater and groundwater systems.

4.3. Challenges and Future Directions for NZVI

Declining activity and concerns about long-term stability remain major barriers to the practical deployment of NZVI. Weak vander Waals force and intrinsic interactions promote aggregation, reducing accessible surface area and overall performance. Surface passivation further diminishes reducing capacity. Although certain passivation products can contribute to secondary contaminant removal, heavily passivated NZVI provides insufficient electron transfer capacity for efficient reduction. The nature and extent of passivation depend strongly on the composition of the water matrix, complicating mechanistic interpretation and process design.
Future work should prioritize improving reductivity and durability to enable treatment of refractory contaminants and expand application scope. Promising strategies include immobilizing NZVI on solid supports or encapsulating it within porous hosts to suppress aggregation and improve stability, as well as applying surface-protection chemistries that preserve active sites during operation. In parallel, deeper mechanistic studies of passivation are needed to enable rational depassivation approaches and to better leverage Fe-containing secondary phases.

5. Catalytic Reduction using Noble Metal Compounds

Reduction processes have shown substantial promise for degrading oxyanions, halogenated organics, and PFAS via two mechanistically distinct reactive species: (i) reactive H (Hads, E0 = −2.3 VNHE) facilitated by noble metal catalysts such as Pd, Pt, Ru, Rh, Au, and Ag, [12] and (ii) hydrated electron (eaq, E0 = −2.9 VNHE) generated through UV irradiation of photosensitizers [13]. These highly reactive species enable efficient cleavage of recalcitrant chemical bonds, including C-F, C-I, C-Br, C-Cl, C-N, etc. [116], thereby disrupting the intrinsic chemical inertness of target contaminants. However, the reductive cleavage efficiency of C-F bonds varies significantly among functional groups (e.g., aryl-CF3, alkyl-F, aryl-OCF3, (CF2)n-CF3, etc.), which generally exhibit increased resistance to degradation and reduced selectivity in comparison to other halogenated structures. The increased detection of PFAS and organofluorine compounds in water has driven major progress in reductive treatment methods over recent decades. Accordingly, this section focuses on reviewing recent progressions in reduction processes involving these two reactive species: (i) noble metal catalysis and (ii) advanced reduction process (ARP).
Reactive H has become recognized as a strong reducing agent for the reductive conversion of both inorganic anions and organic contaminants commonly found in environmental and engineered water systems. However, its reactivity is highly influenced by the choice of metal catalyst, which drives the dissociative adsorption of H2 to yield Hads-M (M = metal). Although transition metals such as Fe, Cu, Co, and Ni are capable of H2 activation to form Hads, the required activation energy on their surfaces is notably higher than on noble metals [117]. As a result, effective H2 dissociation on transition metals typically requires higher operating temperatures and pressures. These stringent conditions are generally unsuitable for water treatment applications. In addition, their substantial affinity for O2 frequently results in surface passivation via oxidation, further diminishing their catalytic activity [116].
In contrast, noble metals are capable of readily dissociating H2 under ambient conditions due to their significantly lower activation barriers and high resistance to oxidative deactivation [118]. This superior performance has made noble metal-based catalysts highly effective in facilitating a range of reduction reactions, such as hydrogenation [119127], hydrodechlorination [128132], hydrodefluorination [133,134], hydrodeiodination [135], and hydrodebromination [136], which are critical for the reductive degradation of recalcitrant PPCPs. Unlike AOPs and other oxidative treatments, catalytic reduction processes uniquely enable hydrogenation of a wide spectrum of pollutants, including oxyanions like NO3, BrO3, and ClO3, thereby converting them to benign byproducts. Such reductive transformations are not achievable through oxidative methods.
For instance, bimetallic catalysts combining Pd with promoter metals (denoted as M), such as Cu, Sn, or In, have been extensively studied for NO3 reduction to N2 or NH3 [120122,126,127,137160]. The reaction mechanism encompasses: (i) the initial reduction of NO3 to NO2 by M(0), with M(0) being subsequently oxidized to MO or MO2, (ii) rejuvenation of MO or MO2 back to M(0) via Hads-Pd, and (iii) further reduction of NO2 to N2 or NH3 by Hads-Pd [159]. In order to maximize N2 selectivity during catalytic NO3 reduction, various factors have been investigated, including the choice of promoter metal, support material, solution pH, flow rates of H2 and CO2, and the application of alternative reductants such as NaBH4 and formic acid [138,158,161]. Bradu et al. (2019) synthesized a Pd-Cu catalyst on an anion exchange resin through sequential metal doping, showing 92% N2 selectivity even in the presence of competing chlorinated substances [137]. Shen et al. (2021) incorporated Pd-In into a chelating resin and reported >98% N2 selectivity with high NO3 removal efficiency utilizing NaBH4 as the reductant [162]. Similarly, noble metal catalysts are capable of promoting the reductive transformation of BrO3 to Br [163165] and ClO3 to Cl [166,167]. Gao et al. (2023) developed a bimetallic Ru-Pd/activated carbon catalyst for ClO3 reduction, demonstrating substantially higher activity than monometallic analogues [167]. Mechanistic study confirmed a stepwise redox sequence involving (i) reduction of ClO3 by Ru(0) and (ii) restoration of oxidized Ru to Ru(0) by Hads-Pd(0) [167].
In contrast to oxyanions, halogenated organics are not converted into innocuous products via reduction; however, noble metal catalysts can dehalogenate these compounds and thereby destabilize their structures. Zhao et al. (2024) investigated the hydrodechlorination of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid using Pd nanoparticles, demonstrating that the Pd catalyst efficiently enables hydrodechlorination, hydrosaturation, and hydrolysis [131]. Similarly, Wu et al. (2024) deposited Pd nanoparticles on a membrane to facilitate the hydrodebromination of tetrabromobisphenol A, achieving a debromination efficiency of 99.9% [168]. Consequently, Pt-group metals are generally recognized for their high reactivity and selectivity in catalyzing reductive cleavage of C-Cl, C-Br, and C-I bonds, but they are less effective for hydrodefluorination.
The significant resistance of the C-F bond to nucleophilic attack, compared to other C-X bonds (X = Cl, Br, and I), aligns with the observed sequence in bond energies: C-F (485 kJ/mol) > C-Cl (327 kJ/mol) > C-Br (276 kJ/mol) > C-I (240 kJ/mol) [169,170]. With the rapid increase in the variety of organofluorine compounds, recent progress in catalytic reduction technologies has concentrated on achieving efficient cleavage of the C-F bond (Fig. 3). Hydrodefluorination of fluorinated compounds utilizing noble metal catalysts has been thoroughly investigated, with research advancing from simple molecules to those with more complex systems (Fig. 3). Despite the longstanding recognition of Rh catalysts’ potential for defluorination, initial reactions were generally limited to high temperatures (60–100 °C) and elevated H2 pressures [133,171173]. In contrast, Baumgartner et al. (2012) were the first to demonstrate hydrodefluorination of fluorobenzene using Rh/Al2O3 under environmentally relevant conditions (212 °C) in the presence of H2 (1 atm) [172]. Under these conditions, fluorobenzene rapidly underwent hydrodefluorination, followed by hydrogenation, producing cyclohexane and fluoride ion (F) [172]. These results highlight the suitability of noble metal catalysts for reductive defluorination. It was additionally shown that the hydrodefluorination of fluorobenzene and polyfluorinated benzenes mediated by Rh catalyst is irreversible, with degradation rates similar to those observed for other halogenated benzenes, signifying a high affinity of Rh toward fluorine removal [133,172]. However, the more complex molecular frameworks of fluorinated pharmaceuticals, herbicides, and personal care products imply that their catalytic reduction mechanisms may differ significantly from those of fluorobenzene. For example, Park et al. (2019) examined the catalytic reduction of fluorinated pharmaceuticals (i.e., levofloxacin, fluoxetine, and sitagliptin) using both monometallic (Rh, Ru, Pd, Pt/Al2O3) and bimetallic catalysts (Rh-Ru, Rh-Pd, Rh-Pt, Ru-Pd, Ru-Pt, Pd-Pt/Al2O3) under a continuous H2 flow [174]. Although monometallic catalysts displayed limited defluorination and low reactivity toward fluorinated functional groups in structurally complex molecules (Fig. 3a) [174,175], bimetallic catalysts showed greater degradation rates and higher defluorination efficiencies than their monometallic analogues (Fig. 3b). Notably, Rh-Pt/α-Al2O3 and Rh-Pd/α-Al2O3 exhibited enhanced reactivity relative to other catalytic systems [174]. Hydrodefluorination, hydrogenation, and C-O bond cleavage were identified as the predominant reaction pathways [174], establishing the feasibility of bimetallic Pt-group catalysts for the reductive cleavage of C-F bonds in PPCPs.
Additional studies have substantiated these findings, emphasizing that the synergistic effect between two noble metals is essential for efficient hydrodefluorination. Long et al. (2021) fabricated a membrane catalyst-film reactor (MCfR) doped with Pd(0) to facilitate the reductive degradation of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) under H2-fed conditions (2.36 atm) [176]. While Pd successfully mediated the exchange of C-F with C-H via Hads, complete defluorination was not achieved (585 % within 45 h), indicating the insufficiency of Pd alone for full reductive defluorination. In a subsequent study, Long et al. (2024) developed Rh-Pd bimetallic catalysts immobilized on the MCfR, which demonstrated superior defluorination efficiencies for PFOA in comparison to either the Pd or Rh monometallic systems [177]. Their results indicated that Rh predominantly facilitates the dissociation of C-F bond, while Pd exhibits greater affinity for PFOA adsorption [177]. In parallel, Park et al., (2023) reported that a Rh-Pd/TiO2 catalyst achieved enhanced defluorination of fluconazole compared to either Rh/TiO2 or Pd/TiO2 alone [175]. This observed increase in reactivity may be due to interactions between Rh and Pd on the TiO2 surface, as evidenced by H2-TPR analysis [175]. Moreover, Gong et al., (2024) identified a synergistic effect between Rh and Pd during the hydrodefluorination of 4-fluorophenol, suggesting that Pd promotes the spillover of Hads from Pd to Rh, which accelerates the overall hydrodefluorination process [178]. Collectively, these investigations underscore the potential of noble metals in bimetallic systems. Nonetheless, even with Rh-Pd catalysts, complete defluorination of trifluoromethylated compounds and both short- and long-chain PFAS remains unattainable, highlighting the necessity of integrating additional processes such as AOPs, photocatalysis, and photochemical methods with catalytic reduction to surmount these challenges.
Alternatively, photochemical processes utilizing eaq have been extensively investigated for the complete destruction of PFAS. eaq can be generated through the photolysis of various photosensitizers, including sulfite [179182], iodide [181,183], and indole-derivative [169,184186], under 254 nm UV irradiation in alkaline conditions (e.g., pH 9–13). The absorption of UV light by sulfite and iodide leads to the formation of eaq, as described in Eq. (1) and (2) [187].
(1)
SO32-+hνSO3·-+eaq-
(2)
I-+hνI·+eaq-
(3)
CnF2n+1SO3-+eaq-CnF2n+1SO3·2-
(4)
CnF2n+1SO3·2-CnF2nSO3·-+F-
(5)
CnF2n+1SO3·2-CnF2n+1-+SO3·-
Subsequently, PFAS (e.g., PFOS, CnF2n+1SO3) accepts eaq, leading to the generation of a radical anion (CnF2n+1SO3•2−), as described in Eq. (3). This radical anion undergoes spontaneous cleavage of C–S and C–F bonds (Eq. (4) and Eq. (5)), both of which are thermodynamically favorable [188]. Subsequent defluorination and chain shortening reactions result in the formation of short-chain PFAS, ultimately leading to near-complete defluorination (>90%) [183].
To improve the generation efficiency of eaq, recent studies have examined dual photosensitizer systems, including UV/sulfite + iodide [181,183,189] and UV/sulfite + indole [184]. The synergistic effect between both sensitizers greatly enhances the degradation and defluorination kinetics, with report of up to a threefold increase [183]. However, it is important to note that eaq is a highly reactive species that can be readily scavenged by other substances present in water. Scavengers including H+, dissolved oxygen, nitrate, nitrite, and diverse organic matter compete for eaq, which may significantly reduce both degradation and defluorination rates and potentially increase the energy required for effective remediation. Therefore, future investigations should aim to increase the availability of eaq to further optimize PFAS degradation and defluorination in complex water matrices.

6. Electrochemical Processes

Electrochemical redox processes that utilize electrical energy to facilitate the removal of aqueous contaminants have become increasingly prominent in both drinking water and wastewater treatment applications (Fig. 4a). The principal advantage of these approaches lies in employing electrons as a “clean reagent”, thereby enabling a wide range of chemical transformations and even permitting energy or resource recovery during the treatment of recalcitrant aqueous pollutants. Importantly, this approach minimizes risks and costs associated with the storage and handling of chemical reagents. Although energy requirements and the associated costs of catalysts currently constrain large-scale commercialization, rapid advancements in electrode materials, reactor configuration, and system integration (e.g., coupling with renewable energy sources) are substantially enhancing viability. Such technological developments, combined with the urgent demand for improved water purification and energy harvesting, suggest a growing role for electrochemical technologies. Herein, we summarize the underlying principles, types of electrocatalysts, recent technological advancements, and directions for future research; description on individual research reports can be found in more comprehensive reviews [17,18,190,191].

6.1. Principles and Relevant Electrocatalysts

6.1.1. Direct oxidation/reduction

Direct electron transfer (DET) to or from the inner sphere electrode surface facilitates the redox transformation of aqueous pollutants (Fig. 4b) [17,191,192]. Essential prerequisites for DET include direct contact between pollutants and the active motif (presumably determined by orbital structure), along with an applied potential bias that alters the Fermi levels of both the electrode surface and redox couples in electrolyte. Pt is the most extensively studied DET metal electrode [193], while Pd and metal oxides such as IrO2 [194,195], PbO2 [196], Ir-TiO2, and Ru-TiO2 have also demonstrated significant DET activity. Synthetic boron-doped diamond (BDD) [197199], which features a wide potential window without water discharge and high stability due to its sp3 carbon structure, has emerged as a promising candidate for DET applications. The kinetics of DET is strongly influenced by the mass transfer of target pollutants from the bulk solution to the electrode surface, as governed by the Nernst-Planck equation (migration, diffusion and convection). DET-based processes are relatively weak to deactivation (catalyst poisoning) by adsorbed intermediates and products that can even form a polymeric passivation layer on the electrode surface [200]. Notably, direct oxidation can be misidentified as a heterogeneous indirect reaction mediated by species bound to the electrode surface, frequently originating from water dissociation into H+ and OH followed by their redox transformations. DET is thus feasible only within potential region that maintain water stability. Mechanistic distinction may be made using appropriately designed voltammetric electroanalytical methods.

6.1.2. Mediation by reactive oxygen species

The H2O, which constitutes a dominant component in wastewater electrolytes, can undergo sequential oxidation to form OH, H2O2 (O), OOH, O2, and O3 (Fig. 4b). While the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) has been extensively investigated for electrochemical water splitting, the other reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated may also facilitate indirect (mediated) oxidation of pollutants. Additionally, oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) at the cathode can further contribute to ROS production. Notably, OH serves as a highly potent oxidant with a standard redox potential of 2.8 VNHE, exceeding that of O2, but is also regarded as an OER intermediate due to the lower electron transfer number, as indicated by the Nernst equation. The readily occurring and relatively nonselective reactions between OH and recalcitrant pollutants underpin the effectiveness of electrochemical AOPs (EAOPs) [201], and OH functions as an intermediate in the formation of other oxidants (e.g., OCl, SO4•−).
The OH species are generally considered to be physi-sorbed onto the electrode surface [17,18,191], since producing free OH requires a potential that is difficult to achieve due to the ohmic drop. Achieving a high OER overpotential is typically seen as necessary (but not sufficient) for OH mediated oxidation [201]. Consequently, so-called (OER) inactive anodes such as BDD, Sb-doped SnO2, Nb-doped TiO2, and PbO2 have found widespread application [201204]. In recent developments, sub-stoichiometric TiO2 has been widely adopted as a more cost-effective alternative to BDD. Specifically, Magneli phases (TinO2n-1, 4 ≤ n ≤ 10, represented by Ti4O7) have attracted significant attention because of their excellent electrical conductivity [205], and have been commercialized as Ebonex®. The OH bond strength influences whether it transforms into a chemisorbed O atom (higher oxide) [190] or OOH, though the oxidant roles of the latter remain poorly understood [204]. Research on ORR-based ROS generation mainly emphasizes H2O2 production at functionalized carbon cathodes [206], while combinations with metals or metal oxides can generate additional ROS such as OH. Bulk ROS are also capable of performing Fenton(-like) reactions (the electro-Fenton process) with in-situ generated Fe species [207].

6.1.3. Mediation by reactive chlorine species

Free chlorine (Cl2, HOCl, and OCl) has long served as the most conventional oxidant/disinfectant [17], easily produced by the electrochemical oxidation of Cl, which is prevalent in wastewater (Fig. 4c). In addition, the intermediates formed during the chlorine evolution reaction (ClER), such as bound Cl, facilitate heterogeneous oxidation, while free radicals (such as Cl2•− and OCl) and free chlorine enable homogeneous oxidation [208]. These reactive chlorine species (RCS) play a central role as oxidants in mediated electrochemical treatment of saline wastewaters, including industrial wastewater, reverse osmosis concentrate, landfill leachate, and human waste [190]. IrTaOx- and RuTiOx-based dimensionally stable anodes have been traditionally employed [17,18,191], yet their high costs have prompted the exploration of anodes based on earth-abundant elements. For metal oxide anodes, intermediates from the OER can also function as active sites for ClER, potentially compromising selectivity in RCS production.
The speciation of RCS varies strongly with pH and the Cl-binding affinity of active sites, both of which directly influence oxidation kinetics. This relationship exists because the standard redox potentials follow the sequence: Cl (2.4 VNHE) > Cl2•− (2.0 VNHE) > HOCl ~ OCl (1.49 VNHE) > Cl2 (1.36 VNHE) > OCl (0.89 VNHE) [209,210]. In heterogeneous oxidation, mass transport limitations often result in slower kinetics compared to the faster, homogeneously mediated oxidation, which helps explain recent evidence supporting OCl as a predominant oxidant despite its moderate oxidation potential. However, a major concern associated with RCS-mediated processes is the potential formation of hazardous chlorinated byproducts, such as chlorinated organics and (per)chlorate [211].

6.1.4. Reductive mediation

The cathodes in EAOP typically function in the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), promoting the reduction of H2O or H+ and leading to an increase in local pH. Hydrogen produced during this process is often applied for the separation of fine particles (electroflotation) or collected for energy conversion purposes. Additionally, the HER intermediate, specifically the surface-bound H atom, plays an important role in facilitating the reductive degradation of aqueous contaminants (Fig. 4d). For example, halogenated organic pollutants and halogen oxyanions can be cathodically dehalogenated; electron injection via potential bias breaks C-X bonds, resulting in the release of halide anions and the formation of less toxic residues that degrade more readily. Toxic metal ions (e.g., CrO4) may also undergo reductive transformation to generate precipitates (e.g., Cr(OH)3) suitable for further separation. In recent studies, electrochemical NO3 reduction (to N2 or NH3) is being actively explored both to mitigate nutrient pollution in surface and groundwater and to produce valuable energy carriers. From a mechanistic perspective, careful distinction is needed between the contributions of DET and mediators (H atom, H2O2, O2•−). Pt group metals (Pd, Ir, Ru) and their derivatives (such as oxides and chalcogenides) are known for high catalytic activity, although current research aims to reduce material costs and enhance faradaic efficiency while minimizing losses from concurrent HER.

6.2. Recent Advances and Future Research Direction

With the broadening of the AOPs concept, investigations are increasingly focused on radicals beyond OH, like SO4•−, which offer unique kinetics for targeting specific contaminants. To this end, anodes capable of generating OH, such as BDD, can also yield peroxy-species including peroxyacetate, peroxodiphosphate (P2O84−), peroxodicarbonate (C2O62−), and peroxodisulfate (S2O82−) [212214], which act both as redox mediators and as sources of various radicals. For instance, anodically generated S2O82− (produced by oxidizing SO42−) can be further activated at the cathode to form SO4•−. Moreover, the concurrent generation of ROS at both the anode and cathode has the potential to significantly enhance degradation processes at a fixed current density (Fig. 4e).
Electrocatalyst development should aim to maximize the current efficiency (CE) for DET or the targeted generation of mediators. For metal oxide electrocatalysts, the metal-oxygen binding strength serves as a useful descriptor for selectivity. According to Sabatier’s principle, there is an optimal O adsorption energy described by a volcano relationship for each ROS. Implementing nonprecious electrocatalysts could expand the range of applications, but their long-term stability in the wastewater matrix must be verified. From a process engineering perspective, the CE of chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal is a key determinant of energy efficiency [215]. In mediated processes, CE values should be independently measured for both mediator generation and COD removal to identify possible side reactions. With increasing emphasis on the management of total organic carbon (TOC) and recalcitrant micropollutants like PFAS, it is essential to establish appropriate figures-of-merit to evaluate the effectiveness of electrochemical processes in degrading TOC and micropollutants.

7. Photocatalysis

7.1. Mechanistic Insights on Photocatalytic Water Treatment

Heterogeneous semiconductor photocatalysis provides a means of advanced oxidation by absorbing photons, which results in the generation of charge carriers. When photons with energies equal to or greater than the bandgap of the photocatalyst are absorbed, electrons are excited from the valence band (VB) to the conduction band (CB), leaving holes in the VB. Although the majority of electron-hole pairs recombine before reaching the surface, a limited portion successfully migrates and participates in pollutant degradation at the surface [19]. Electrons located at the catalyst surface react with dissolved oxygen (E0 = −0.33 VNHE for O2/O2•−), producing O2•−, while holes facilitate the oxidation of water to OH (E0 = 2.8 VNHE for H2O/OH) [216,217]. Owing to its high oxidative potential, OH is widely recognized as the predominant oxidant in photocatalytic water treatment (Fig. 5a). These ROS exhibit a strong oxidation potential, promoting the decomposition of complex organic pollutants into smaller intermediates, which are subsequently mineralized to CO2, H2O, or other less harmful byproducts. The heterogeneous nature of this catalytic process eliminates the need for continuous addition of precursor chemicals, which is particularly beneficial for use in remote or resource-constrained environments. While optimizing operational conditions such as light intensity, wavelength, pH, temperature, and the effects of competing aqueous species can improve the performance of photocatalytic water treatment, the advancement of the technology is chiefly dependent on improving photon utilization through materials innovation.

7.2. Advances in Photocatalytic Materials

Among various photocatalytic materials, TiO2 is considered the benchmark commercial semiconductor material due to its structural stability, cost-effectiveness (~$1/kg), and relatively low toxicity [218]. TiO2, with its 3.2 eV bandgap, requires UV irradiation for excitation, making it applicable for solar-driven and LED systems to generate ROS via both hole- and electron-mediated processes. Nonetheless, its practical use is constrained by two significant drawbacks: limited light utilization and a high propensity for charge carrier recombination. Various enhancement strategies have therefore been developed to expand light absorption properties and increase charge separation efficiency (Fig. 5b). Metal (e.g., Fe, Pt, Mn, Cr, V) and nonmetal (e.g., N, F, C, S) dopants can be introduced into the TiO2 crystal lattice to extend its light absorption region [219]. Nonmetal doping leads to the formation of oxygen vacancies, which serve as additional active sites for dissolved oxygen activation [220]. Surface hydrogenation introduces disorder-induced mid-gap states that enhance light absorption, allowing the material to utilize the visible and infrared regions more efficiently [221]. Additionally, sensitization using organic chromophores further extends light absorption into the visible spectrum [222]. To promote efficient charge separation, noble metal cocatalysts are commonly deposited on the TiO2 surface, functioning as electron-withdrawing centers through the creation of a rectifying Schottky barrier [223]. Carbon-based cocatalysts, such as graphene oxide, are efficient electron reservoirs due to their excellent electrical conductivity [224]. Current strategies are increasingly emphasizing sustainability by minimizing noble metal usage. The employment of single-atom catalysts as cocatalysts has arisen as a promising approach, as these materials both improve charge separation and drastically lower noble metal requirements [225,226]. Architectural modifications, including the development of nanotube and hierarchical porous structures, result in organized open channels that facilitate effective charge-carrier mobility and mass transfer for aqueous reactants and products [227].
Beyond modifications to TiO2, alternative semiconductor materials have been explored as substitutes, with their respective bandgap positions and variations presented in Fig. 5a. Distinct bandgap ranges and band positions result in each photocatalyst possessing characteristic properties. As the bandgap narrows, visible-light response is improved; however, this generally exacerbates charge carrier recombination, highlighting the inherent trade-off between increased light harvesting and shorter charge carrier lifetimes. WO3 exhibits excellent oxidative capability attributable to its VB position, but its performance depends on efficient utilization of residual electrons to suppress charge recombination [228]. BiVO4 offers both strong oxidative potential and visible-light absorption, yet electron mobility is relatively low, which restricts efficient charge transport. C3N4, a metal-free photocatalyst with tunable band structures, predominantly drives reduction reactions but shows limited oxidizing ability. CdS provides high visible-light absorption but is susceptible to photocorrosion, necessitating robust stabilization approaches. Covalent organic frameworks (COFs), featured by their porous architectures, strong π-bridges, and 1D open channels, facilitate superior charge transport properties and demonstrate significant promise for photocatalytic degradation of emerging contaminants [229]. Similar modification strategies used for TiO2 can also be applied to other semiconductor photocatalysts to enhance both light absorption and charge separation, contributing to improved ROS generation. Heterojunctions comprising multiple semiconductors and operating via Z-scheme or S-scheme charge transfer mechanisms preserve high redox potential (Fig. 5c) [230]. Such heterostructured systems support selective ROS production under visible-light irradiation, thereby enabling comprehensive degradation of persistent micropollutants in water matrices [231].

7.3. Toward Selective Photocatalysis for Emerging Micropollutants

Emerging micropollutants, including PPCPs, PFAS, and microplastics (MPs) are increasingly recognized as significant environmental concerns because of their persistence in aquatic environments and their potential long-term health impacts. These contaminants often demonstrate resistance to conventional oxidation processes in contrast to traditional organic pollutants. Selective photocatalytic strategies are thus required for effective elimination. The fabrication of Bi2MoO6/CoWO4 Z-scheme heterojunctions has demonstrated superior photocatalytic activity for norfloxacin degradation under visible light irradiation [232]. The Z-scheme heterojunction facilitates more efficient charge carrier separation, enabling the preservation of highly reductive electrons and oxidative holes. These strong oxidative holes preferentially cleave the C-N bond linking the piperazine and benzene rings, while ROS such as OH, O2•−, and 1O2 subsequently drive further mineralization. Furthermore, in high-salinity wastewater, activated chloride ions can yield chloride radicals that selectively interact with electron-rich moieties in trimethoprim derivatives [233]. The exceptional recalcitrance of PFAS arises from the high bond strength of the C-F bond (~485 kJ/mol), rendering them largely unreactive to conventional oxidation methods. During photocatalysis, ROS tend to attack more labile bonds, such as C–H, C–O, and C–C, rather than the robust C–F bond, which limits the degradation efficiency for PFAS [234]. Alternatively, photocatalytic reductive processes have demonstrated promise for PFAS defluorination, wherein photogenerated electrons function as the principal reductive agents (Fig. 5d) [235,236]. To address the inherently slow kinetics of photocatalysis, a combined approach involving adsorption followed by solid-phase degradation, as exemplified by Bi/TNTs@AC for GenX treatment, has been proposed [237]. Nevertheless, carbon-based adsorbents are vulnerable to degradation from ROS, leading to the proposal of inorganic adsorbents, such as layered double hydroxides, for use in advanced adsorbent–photocatalyst hybrid systems (Fig. 5e) [238]. MPs, which are solid, non-dissolved micropollutants, are most commonly separated via membrane filtration. Photocatalytically generated ROS have been shown to attack the C-C and C-H bonds within polymeric structures, inducing chain scission and generating molecular fragments [239]. Despite this, achieving total mineralization of MPs is still a considerable challenge. Contemporary studies have examined SO4•−-mediated photocatalytic reactions as supplementary strategies. In this system, SO4•− is generated by activating PMS and PDS with photoexcited conduction band electrons. Compared with OH, which are less selective and readily scavenged by background constituents, SO4•− shows greater selectivity for the degradation of target polymeric materials and maintains activity in complex water matrices [240].

8. Conclusions and Perspectives

Chemical oxidation and reduction technologies offer a robust and adaptable toolkit for addressing urgent issues in water and wastewater treatment. O3- and UV-based oxidation processes are among the most widely implemented, exhibiting proven capability for the elimination of trace organic contaminants. Despite their effectiveness, these technologies are limited by substantial energy demands and byproduct concerns, notably the production of bromate. Persulfate-based oxidation facilitates both radical and non-radical reaction pathways, although uncertainties regarding detailed mechanistic pathways and catalyst durability remain outstanding challenges. Chemical reduction methods employing ZVI and related metals are effective for removing chlorinated organics, heavy metals, and radioactive components; however, the gradual loss of reactivity due to passivation and unresolved questions about the fate of secondary iron minerals present ongoing obstacles. Catalytic reduction involving noble metals delivers high activity and selectivity but is hindered by expensive catalysts and insufficient durability. Electrochemical processes, which utilize direct electron transfer in lieu of chemical reagents, present a sustainable alternative, but practical adoption is challenged by the need to optimize electrode materials, improve current efficiency, and manage reaction byproducts. Photocatalysis is especially appealing given its potential for solar energy utilization and inherently sustainable nature, yet widespread application is held back by limited light absorption capacity and fast electron-hole recombination.
Taken together, processes such as O3- and UV-based oxidation, persulfate-based oxidation, ZVI reduction, noble metal-catalyzed reduction, electrochemical treatments, and photocatalysis have each demonstrated distinctive strengths for degrading a broad range of contaminants, including persistent organics, heavy metals, and emerging pollutants. Collectively, these redox-based chemical technologies underscore their capability to supplement or even exceed the efficiency, adaptability, and performance of conventional treatment approaches, meeting contemporary water quality requirements.
Despite notable advancements, all technologies continue to encounter intrinsic constraints, and numerous obstacles must be resolved prior to achieving broad-scale implementation. Key challenges include significant energy and cost requirements, the need for effective byproduct management, limited stability of catalysts and materials, and decreased performance in the presence of complex real-water matrices.
Future research is projected to address existing barriers through several fundamental approaches. First, the advancement of catalyst and electrode design, alongside enhanced understanding of underlying mechanisms, will be essential for improving operational performance and durability. Second, progress in hybrid and integrated process development that synergistically combines oxidation and reduction pathways, rather than employing isolated technologies, is anticipated to increase both efficiency and treatment adaptability. Additionally, the incorporation of intelligent process control utilizing artificial intelligence and real-time monitoring will enable the development of customized treatment frameworks tailored to the variable profiles of contaminants, while supporting reduced energy input.
Ultimately, the transition of these technologies from laboratory innovation to field-scale application will demand not only scientific and engineering progress, but also rigorous evaluation of regulatory constraints, comprehensive life-cycle assessments, and the promotion of public trust. By integrating advances in chemical oxidation and reduction with sustainability and circular economy principles, these technologies could make a significant contribution toward ensuring access to clean and reliable water resources for future generations.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea Government (MSIT) (RS-2024-00406500) and an R&D project established by the Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI; Localization Technology for Core Equipment and Materials to Strengthen Competitiveness in the Water/Air Environmental Industry Project), funded by the Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE; RS-2023-00216216).

Conflict-of-interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author Contributions

Y.L., J.L., S.B., J.K.C., K.C., and S.W. (Professors) wrote the manuscript. J.C. (Ph.D. candidate) revised the manuscript. C.L. (Professor) supervised the project and revised the manuscript.

References

1. Wołowicz A, Munir HMS. Emerging organic micropollutants as serious environmental problem: A comprehensive review. Sci. Total Environ. 2025;958:177948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177948
crossref pmid

2. Yang Y, Zhang X, Jiang J, et al. Which micropollutants in water environments deserve more attention globally? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022;56(1)13–29. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04250
crossref pmid

3. Evich MG, Davis MJB, McCord JP, Acrey B, Awkerman JA, Knappe DRU, et al. Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the environment. Science. 2022;375(6580)416–422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg9065
crossref pmid pmc

4. Richardson SD, Manasfi T. Water analysis: emerging contaminants and current issues. Anal. Chem. 2024;96(20)8184–8219. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.4c01423
crossref pmid

5. Zou S, Liu P, Wang J, et al. Characterizing and tracing the heavy metals’ spatial distribution in karst surface river affected by acid mine drainage. Environ. Eng. Res. 2025;30(2)240180. https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2024.180
crossref

6. Jeong C, Jang H, Jeon J. Distribution and seasonal variations of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in streams within the Changwon region. Environ. Eng. Res. 2025;30(2)240367. https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2024.367
crossref

7. von Sonntag C, von Gunten U. Chemistry of ozone in water and wastewater treatment: From basic principles to applications. London, UK: IWA Publishing; 2012. https://doi.org/10.2166/9781780400839


8. Stefan MI. Advanced oxidation processes for water treatment: Fundamentals and applications. London, UK: IWA Publishing; 2017. https://doi.org/10.2166/9781780407197


9. Lee J, von Gunten U, Kim JH. Persulfate-based advanced oxidation: Critical assessment of opportunities and roadblocks. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020;54(6)3064–3081. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b07082
crossref pmid

10. Liu M, Chen G, Xu L, He Z, Ye Y. Environmental remediation approaches by nanoscale zero valent iron (nZVI) based on its reductivity: a review. RSC Adv. 2024;14(33)21118–21138. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ra02789b
crossref pmid pmc

11. Bae S, Collins RN, Waite TD, Hanna K. Advances in surface passivation of nanoscale zerovalent iron: A critical review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018;52(21)12010–12025. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01734
crossref pmid

12. Li X, Liu G, Fang J, et al. Efficient reductive dechlorination of monochloroacetic acid by sulfite/UV process. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012;46(13)7342–7349. https://doi.org/10.1021/es3008535
crossref pmid

13. Elg DT, Delgado HE, Martin DC, et al. Recent advances in understanding the role of solvated electrons at the plasma-liquid interface of solution-based gas discharges. Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc. 2021;186:106307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2021.106307
crossref

14. Lim S, Shi JL, von Gunten U, McCurry DL. Ozonation of organic compounds in water and wastewater: A critical review. Water Res. 2022;213:118053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118053
crossref pmid

15. Oh WD, Dong ZL, Lim TT. Generation of sulfate radical through heterogeneous catalysis for organic contaminants removal: Current development, challenges and prospects. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2016;194:169–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.04.003
crossref

16. Choi M, Bae S. Assessment of the mass production of Ni/Fe bimetallic composite supported by natural zeolites for in-situ TCE degradation. J. Soil Groundwater Environ. 2024;29(6)94–106. https://doi.org/10.7857/JSGE.2024.29.6.094
crossref

17. Panizza M, Cerisola G. Direct and mediated anodic oxidation of organic pollutants. Chem. Rev. 2009;109(12)6541–6569. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr9001319
crossref pmid

18. Sires I, Brillas E, Oturan MA, Rodrigo MA, Panizza M. Electrochemical advanced oxidation processes: today and tomorrow. A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2014;21(13)8336–8367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2783-1
crossref pmid

19. Park H, Kim H, Moon G, Choi W. Photoinduced charge transfer processes in solar photocatalysis based on modified TiO2 . Energy Environ. Sci. 2016;9(2)411–433. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EE02575C
crossref

20. von Gunten U. Oxidation processes and me. Water Res. 2024;253:121148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.121148
crossref pmid

21. Mackey E, Hofmann R, Festger A, et al. UV-chlorine advanced oxidation for potable water reuse: A review of the current state of the art and research needs. Water Res. X. 2023;19:100183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wroa.2023.100183
crossref pmid pmc

22. Wang C, Moore N, Bircher K, Andrews S, Hofmann R. Full-scale comparison of UV/H2O2 and UV/Cl2 advanced oxidation: The degradation of micropollutant surrogates and the formation of disinfection byproducts. Water Res. 2019;161:448–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.06.033
crossref pmid

23. Cha D, Park S, Kim MS, et al. Prediction of hydroxyl radical exposure during ozonation using different machine learning methods with ozone decay kinetic parameters. Water Res. 2024;261:122067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.122067
crossref pmid

24. Cha D, Park S, Kim MS, et al. Prediction of oxidant exposures and micropollutant abatement during ozonation using a machine learning method. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021;55(1)1953–1962. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05836
crossref pmid

25. Kim MS, Cha D, Lee KM, Lee HJ, Kim T, Lee C. Modeling of ozone decomposition, oxidant exposures, and the abatement of micropollutants during ozonation processes. Water Res. 2020;169:115230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.115230
crossref pmid

26. Merényi G, Lind J, Naumov S, Von Sonntag C. Reaction of ozone with hydrogen peroxide (peroxone process): A revision of current mechanistic concepts based on thermokinetic and quantum-chemical considerations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010;44(9)3505–3507. https://doi.org/10.1021/es100277d
crossref pmid

27. Choi J, Cha D, Cho J, Lee HJ, Lee C. Understanding the impacts of oxidant doses and dissolved organic carbon concentration on ozone and hydroxyl radical exposures in the peroxone process. Environ. Eng. Res. 2025;30(3)240521. https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2024.521
crossref

28. Bourgin M, Borowska E, Helbing J, et al. Effect of operational and water quality parameters on conventional ozonation and the advanced oxidation process O3/H2O2: Kinetics of micropollutant abatement, transformation product and bromate formation in a surface water. Water Res. 2017;122:234–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.05.018
crossref pmid

29. Lee W, Choi S, Kim H, et al. Efficiency of ozonation and O3/H2O2 as enhanced wastewater treatment processes for micropollutant abatement and disinfection with minimized byproduct formation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023;454:131436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131436
crossref pmid

30. Chen W, He H, Liang J, et al. A comprehensive review on metal based active sites and their interaction with O3 during heterogeneous catalytic ozonation process: Types, regulation and authentication. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023;443:130302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130302
crossref pmid

31. Wang J, Chen H. Catalytic ozonation for water and wastewater treatment: Recent advances and perspective. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;704:135249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135249
crossref pmid

32. Miklos DB, Remy C, Jekel M, Linden KG, Drewes JE, Hübner U. Evaluation of advanced oxidation processes for water and wastewater treatment – A critical review. Water Res. 2018;139:118–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.042
crossref pmid

33. Bourgin M, Beck B, Boehler M, et al. Evaluation of a full-scale wastewater treatment plant upgraded with ozonation and biological post-treatments: Abatement of micropollutants, formation of transformation products and oxidation by-products. Water Res. 2018;129:486–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.10.036
crossref pmid

34. Pistocchi A, Andersen HR, Bertanza G, et al. Treatment of micropollutants in wastewater: Balancing effectiveness, costs and implications. Sci. Total Environ. 2022;850:157593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157593
crossref pmid

35. Lee C, Choi W, Yoon J. UV photolytic mechanism of N-nitrosodimethylamine in water: Roles of dissolved oxygen and solution pH. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005;39(24)9702–9709. https://doi.org/10.1021/es051235j
crossref pmid

36. Fujioka T, Kodamatani H, Yoshikawa T, Inoue D, Ikehata K. Assessment of 265-nm UV-LED for direct photolysis and advanced oxidation of N-nitrosamines and 1,4-dioxane. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2020;20:101147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101147
crossref

37. Zhao J, Gong W, Yin R, Shang C, Mitch WA. Control of aromatic disinfection byproducts in potable reuse water by the UV222/H2O2 vs UV254/H2O2 advanced oxidation processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024. 583515846–15854. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c05181
crossref pmid pdf

38. Gerrity D, Pecson B, Trussell RS, Trussell RR. Potable reuse treatment trains throughout the world. J. Water Supply Res. Technol.-Aqua. 2013;62(6)321–338. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2013.041
crossref

39. Mangalgiri KP, Patton S, Wu L, Xu S, Ishida KP, Liu H. Optimizing potable water reuse systems: Chloramines or hydrogen peroxide for UV-based advanced oxidation process? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019;53(22)13323–13331. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03062
crossref pmid

40. Wacławek S, Lutze HV, Grübel K, Padil VVT, Černík M, Dionysiou DD. Chemistry of persulfates in water and wastewater treatment: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2017;330:44–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.132
crossref

41. Scheideler J, Lekkerkerker-Teunissen K, Knol T, Ried A, Verberk J, van Dijk H. Combination of O3/H2O2 and UV for multiple barrier micropollutant treatment and bromate formation control - an economic attractive option. Water Pract. Technol. 2011;6(4)20110063. https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2011.0063
crossref

42. Kwon M, Royce A, Gong Y, Ishida KP, Stefan MI. UV/chlorine: vs. UV/H2O2 for water reuse at Orange County Water District, CA: A pilot study. Environ. Sci.-Water Res. 2020;6(8)2416–2431. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ew00316f
crossref

43. GWRS. Purification process. [Internet]. GWRS; 2024. [cited 2025 Feb 24]. Available from: https://www.ocwd.com/gwrs/the-process/


44. Wang D, Li S, Zhou X. Control-oriented modeling and real-time control for the ozone dosing process of drinking water treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013;47(5)2197–2203. https://doi.org/10.1021/es303408q
crossref pmid

45. Zhang T, Zheng L, Yang X, Demeestere K, Van Hulle SWH. Integrated spectral based monitoring, optimization and control of the combined ozonation and powdered activated carbon adsorption process to remove organic micropollutants from secondary effluent. Water Res. 2025;268:122588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.122588
crossref pmid

46. Walpen N, Houska J, Salhi E, Sander M, von Gunten U. Quantification of the electron donating capacity and UV absorbance of dissolved organic matter during ozonation of secondary wastewater effluent by an assay and an automated analyzer. Water Res. 2020;185:116235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116235
crossref pmid

47. Gulde R, Clerc B, Rutsch M, et al. Oxidation of 51 micropollutants during drinking water ozonation: Formation of transformation products and their fate during biological post-filtration. Water Res. 2021;207:117812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117812
crossref pmid

48. Liu Y, Chen C, Duan X, Wang S, Wang Y. Carbocatalytic ozonation toward advanced water purification. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2021;9(33)18994–19024. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ta02953c
crossref

49. Rodríguez-Peña M, Barrios Pérez JA, Llanos J, Sáez C, Rodrigo MA, Barrera-Díaz CE. New insights about the electrochemical production of ozone. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2021;27:100697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2021.100697
crossref

50. Lee W, Kim S, Cho K. Quantitative evaluations on ozone evolution electrocatalysts by scanning electrochemical microscopy for oxidative water treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023;57(47)18529–18537. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c05290
crossref pmid

51. Liu J, Peng X, Wang X, Zhong X, Wang J. Electrochemical ozone production: from fundamental mechanisms to advanced applications. EES Catalysis. 2024;5:170–204. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ey00204k
crossref

52. Neale PA, Escher BI. In vitro bioassays to assess drinking water quality. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health. 2019;7:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2018.06.006
crossref

53. Lee M, Blum LC, Schmid E, Fenner K, von Gunten U. A computer-based prediction platform for the reaction of ozone with organic compounds in aqueous solution: kinetics and mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Process Impacts. 2017;19(3)465–476. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6em00584e
crossref pmid

54. Tentscher PR, Lee M, Von Gunten U. Micropollutant oxidation studied by quantum chemical computations: Methodology and applications to thermodynamics, kinetics, and reaction mechanisms. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019;52(3)605–614. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00610
crossref pmid

55. Xu J, Kann RJ, Mohammed D, Huang CH. Far-UVC 222 nm treatment: Effects of nitrate/nitrite on disinfection byproduct formation potential. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024;58(34)13943–13952. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c04258
crossref pmid pmc

56. Zhao J, Payne EM, Liu B, et al. Making waves: Opportunities and challenges of applying far-UVC radiation in controlling micropollutants in water. Water Res. 2023;241:120169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2023.120169
crossref pmid

57. Lee Y, Lutze HV, Allard S. Photochemistry of water treatment oxidants for advanced oxidation processes BT- Springer Handbook of Inorganic Photochemistry. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. 1685–1718. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63713-2_58


58. Alpert SM, Knappe DRU, Ducoste JJ. Modeling the UV/hydrogen peroxide advanced oxidation process using computational fluid dynamics. Water Res. 2010;44(6)1797–1808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.12.003
crossref pmid

59. Yu HW, Park M, Wu S, et al. Strategies for selecting indicator compounds to assess attenuation of emerging contaminants during UV advanced oxidation processes. Water Res. 2019;166:115030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.115030
crossref pmid

60. Guan YH, Ma J, Li XC, Fang JY, Chen LW. Influence of pH on the formation of sulfate and hydroxyl Radicals in the UV/peroxymonosulfate system. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011;45(21)9308–9314. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2017363
crossref pmid

61. Sonawane S, Rayaroth MP, Landge VK, Fedorov K, Boczkaj G. Thermally activated persulfate-based advanced oxidation processes-Recent progress and challenges in mineralization of persistent organic chemicals: A review. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2022;37:100839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2022.100839
crossref

62. Neta P, Huie RE, Ross AB. Rate constants for reactions of inorganic radicals in aqueous solution. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data. 1988;17(3)1027–1284. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.555808
crossref

63. Huie RE, Clifton CL. Rate constants for hydrogen abstraction reactions of the sulfate radical, SO4 •− Alkanes and ethers. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 1989;21(8)611–619. https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.550210802
crossref

64. Zhang SN, Hao ZN, Liu JF, Gutierrez L, Croué JP. Molecular insights into the reactivity of aquatic natural organic matter towards hydroxyl and sulfate radicals using FT-ICR MS. Chem. Eng. J. 2021;425:130622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.130622
crossref

65. Choi W, Min D, Kim M, et al. Potential of homogeneous persulfate activation as a strategy for the oxidative treatment of tetramethylammonium hydroxide: Superiority of sulfate radical over hydroxyl radical in the oxidation of methylammoniums. Chem. Eng. J. 2024;500:157439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.157439
crossref

66. Zong Y, Guan XH, Xu J, et al. Unraveling the overlooked involvement of high-valent cobalt-oxo species generated from the cobalt( II)-activated peroxymonosulfate process. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020;54(24)16231–16239. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c06808
crossref pmid

67. Yun ET, Lee JH, Kim J, Park HD, Lee J. Identifying the nonradical mechanism in the peroxymonosulfate activation process: Singlet oxygenation versus mediated electron transfer. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018;52(12)7032–7042. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00959
crossref pmid

68. Anipsitakis GP, Dionysiou DD. Radical generation by the interaction of transition metals with common oxidants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004;38(13)3705–3712. https://doi.org/10.1021/es035121o
crossref pmid

69. Zhao Y, Chen SX, Qie H, et al. Selective activation of peroxymonosulfate govern by B-site metal in delafossite for efficient pollutants degradation: Pivotal role of d orbital electronic configuration. Water Res. 2023;236:119957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2023.119957
crossref pmid

70. Waclawek S, Lutze HV, Grübel K, Padil VVT, Cerník M, Dionysiou DD. Chemistry of persulfates in water and wastewater treatment: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2017;330:44–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.132
crossref

71. Ahn YY, Choi J, Kim M, et al. Chloride-mediated enhancement in heat-induced activation of peroxymonosulfate: New reaction pathways for oxidizing radical production. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021;55(8)5382–5392. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07964
crossref pmid

72. Duan PJ, Liu XN, Liu BH, et al. Effect of phosphate on peroxymonosulfate activation: Accelerating generation of sulfate radical and underlying mechanism. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2021;298:120532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120532
crossref

73. Cai WJ, Zhou ZY, Tan XY, et al. Magnetic iron phosphide particles mediated peroxymonosulfate activation for highly efficient elimination of sulfonamide antibiotics. Chem. Eng. J. 2020;397:125279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.125279
crossref

74. Ali J, Guo S, Chen YN, Shahzad A, Ullah MW, Chen FX. Metal sulfides as emerging materials for advanced oxidation of wastewater: Recent developments, challenges, and prospects. Coordin. Chem. Rev. 2024;509:215765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2024.215765
crossref

75. Zhang Z, Huang Y, Chen X, Zheng H, Li X. In situ synthesis of Co-MOF@BC hybrid catalyst for enhanced BPA degradation via sulfite activation. Environ. Eng. Res. 2025;30(5)240572. https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2024.572
crossref

76. Ahn YY, Bae H, Kim HI, et al. Surface-loaded metal nanoparticles for peroxymonosulfate activation: Efficiency and mechanism reconnaissance. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2019;241:561–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.09.056
crossref

77. Sharma VK. Potassium ferrate(VI): an environmentally friendly oxidant. Adv. Environ. Res. 2002;6(2)143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1093-0191(01)00119-8
crossref

78. Popova TV, Aksenova NV. Complexes of copper in unstable oxidation states. Russ. J. Coord. Chem. 2003;29:743–765. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RUCO.0000003432.39025.cc
crossref

79. Oh H, Kim JY, Chae KH, et al. Oxyanion-sensitive catalytic activity of Ni(II)/oxyanion systems for heterogeneous organic degradation: Differential oxidizing capacity of Ni(III) and Ni(IV) as high-valent intermediates. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024;58(37)16642–16655. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c07457
crossref pmid

80. Hu L, Martin HM, Strathmann TJ. Oxidation kinetics of antibiotics during water treatment with potassium permanganate. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010;44(16)6416–6422. https://doi.org/10.1021/es101331j
crossref pmid

81. Chen N, Lee DH, Kim MS, et al. Activation of molecular oxygen by tenorite and ascorbic acid: Generation of high-valent copper species for organic compound oxidation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022;440:129839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129839
crossref

82. Li X, Wen X, Lang JY, et al. CoN1O2 single-atom catalyst for efficient peroxymonosulfate activation and selective cobalt( IV)=O generation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023;62(24)e202303267. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202303267
crossref pmid

83. Duan XG, Sun HQ, Wang SB. Metal-free carbocatalysis in advanced oxidation reactions. Accounts Chem. Res. 2018;51(3)678–687. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00535
crossref pmid

84. Ren W, Xiong LL, Yuan XH, et al. Activation of peroxydisulfate on carbon nanotubes: Electron-transfer mechanism. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019;53(24)14595–14603. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b05475
crossref pmid

85. Duan XG, Ao ZM, Zhang HY, et al. Nanodiamonds in sp2/sp3 configuration for radical to nonradical oxidation: Core-shell layer dependence. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2018;222:176–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.10.007
crossref

86. Yun ET, Park SW, Shin HJ, Lee H, Kim DW, Lee J. Peroxymonosulfate activation by carbon-encapsulated metal nanoparticles: Switching the primary reaction route and increasing chemical stability. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2020;279:119360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119360
crossref

87. Zhang PP, Yang YY, Duan XG, Wang SB. Oxidative polymerization versus degradation of organic pollutants in heterogeneous catalytic persulfate chemistry. Water Res. 2024;255:121485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.121485
crossref pmid

88. Parvulescu VI, Epron F, Garcia H, Granger P. Recent progress and prospects in catalytic water treatment. Chem. Rev. 2022;122(3)2981–3121. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00527
crossref pmid

89. Mangayayam MC, Perez JPH, Alonso-de-Linaje V, Dideriksen K, Benning LG, Tobler DJ. Sulfidation extent of nanoscale zerovalent iron controls selectivity and reactivity with mixed chlorinated hydrocarbons in natural groundwater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022;431:128534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128534
crossref pmid

90. Wang MQ, Wu B, Zheng QJ, Yang P, Hu JQ, Zheng S. Highly effective removal of 4-chloroaniline in water by nano zero-valent iron cooperated with microbial degradation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024;470:134235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134235
crossref pmid

91. Zhang S, Wang T, Guo X, Chen S, Wang L. Fabrication and characterization of bimetal sulfide hybrid Ag/S-ZVI for dechlorination of trichloroethylene. Environ. Eng. Res. 2023;28(4)220379. https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2022.379
crossref

92. Liang L, Li X, Guo Y, Lin Z, Su X, Liu B. The removal of heavy metal cations by sulfidated nanoscale zero-valent iron (S-nZVI): The reaction mechanisms and the role of sulfur. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021;404:124057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124057
crossref pmid

93. Tang H, Wang J, Zhang S, et al. Recent advances in nanoscale zero-valent iron-based materials: Characteristics, environmental remediation and challenges. J. Clean Prod. 2021;319:128641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128641
crossref

94. Yang X, Zhang C, Liu F, Tang J. Groundwater geochemical constituents controlling the reductive dechlorination of TCE by nZVI: Evidence from diverse anaerobic corrosion mechanisms of nZVI. Chemosphere. 2021;262:127707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127707
crossref pmid

95. Kim HJ, Leitch M, Naknakorn B, Tilton RD, Lowry GV. Effect of emplaced nZVI mass and groundwater velocity on PCE dechlorination and hydrogen evolution in water-saturated sand. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017;322:136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.04.037
crossref pmid

96. Bae S, Lee W. Influence of riboflavin on nanoscale zero-valent iron reactivity during the degradation of carbon tetrachloride. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014;48(4)2368–2376. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4056565
crossref pmid

97. Venkateshaiah A, Silvestri D, Wacławek S, et al. A comparative study of the degradation efficiency of chlorinated organic compounds by bimetallic zero-valent iron nanoparticles. Environ. Sci.-Water Res. 2022;8(1)162–172. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ew00791b
crossref

98. Li S, Wang W, Liang F, Zhang WX. Heavy metal removal using nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI): Theory and application. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017;322:163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.01.032
crossref pmid

99. Yan W, Lien HL, Koel BE, Zhang WX. Iron nanoparticles for environmental clean-up: Recent developments and future outlook. Environ. Sci. Process Impacts. 2013;15(1)63–77. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2em30691c
crossref pmid

100. Hwang YH, Kim DG, Shin HS. Mechanism study of nitrate reduction by nano zero valent iron. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011;185(3)1513–1521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.10.078
crossref pmid

101. Wen Z, Zhang Y, Dai C. Removal of phosphate from aqueous solution using nanoscale zerovalent iron (nZVI). Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2014;457:433–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.06.017
crossref

102. Ishag A, Li Y, Zhang N, et al. Environmental application of emerging zero-valent iron-based materials on removal of radionuclides from the wastewater: A review. Environ. Res. 2020;188:109855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109855
crossref pmid

103. Hua Y, Wang W, Hu N, Gu T, Ling L, Zhang WX. Enrichment of uranium from wastewater with nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI). Environ. Sci. Nano. 2021;8(3)666–674. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0en01029d
crossref

104. Crane RA, Dickinson M, Scott TB. Nanoscale zero-valent iron particles for the remediation of plutonium and uranium contaminated solutions. Chem. Eng. J. 2015;262:319–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.09.084
crossref

105. Yan J, Li R. Simple and low-cost production of magnetite/graphene nanocomposites for heavy metal ions adsorption. Sci. Total Environ. 2022;813:152604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152604
crossref pmid

106. Bae S, Lee W. Inhibition of nZVI reactivity by magnetite during the reductive degradation of 1,1,1-TCA in nZVI/magnetite suspension. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2010;96(1–2)10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.01.028
crossref

107. Zhang Z, Yan W, Messan O, Fang J, Jackson WA. Abiotic reduction of nitrate and chlorate by green rust. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2021;5(8)2042–2051. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00121
crossref

108. Lee W, Batchelor B. Abiotic reductive dechlorination of chlorinated ethylenes by iron-bearing soil minerals. 2. Green rust. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002;36(24)5348–5354. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0258374
crossref pmid

109. Pan Z, Roebbert Y, Beck A, et al. Persistence of the isotopic signature of pentavalent uranium in magnetite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022;56(3)1753–1762. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c06865
crossref pmid pmc

110. Bae S, Sihn Y, Kyung D, et al. Molecular identification of Cr(VI) removal mechanism on vivianite surface. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018;52(18)10647–10656. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01614
crossref pmid

111. Mäkie P, Persson P, Österlund L. Adsorption of trimethyl phosphate and triethyl phosphate on dry and water pre-covered hematite, maghemite, and goethite nanoparticles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013;392:349–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2012.10.012
crossref pmid

112. Yin H, Tan N, Liu C, et al. The associations of heavy metals with crystalline iron oxides in the polluted soils around the mining areas in Guangdong Province, China. Chemosphere. 2016;161:181–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.07.018
crossref pmid

113. Zhong H, Lyu H, Wang Z, Tian J, Wu Z. Application of dissimilatory iron-reducing bacteria for the remediation of soil and water polluted with chlorinated organic compounds: Progress, mechanisms, and directions. Chemosphere. 2024;352:141505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141505
crossref pmid

114. Bae S, Lee W. Enhanced reductive degradation of carbon tetrachloride by biogenic vivianite and Fe(II). Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2012;85:170–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2012.02.023
crossref

115. O’Loughlin EJ, Kelly SD, Kemner KM. XAFS investigation of the interactions of UVI with secondary mineralization products from the bioreduction of FeIII oxides. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010;44(5)1656–1661. https://doi.org/10.1021/es9027953
crossref pmid

116. Ran W, Zhao H, Zhang X, et al. Critical review of Pd-catalyzed reduction process for treatment of waterborne pollutants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024;58(7)3079–3097. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c09198
crossref pmid

117. Robinson PJ, Holbrook KA. Why gold is the noblest of all the metals. Nature. 1995;376(6537)238–240. https://doi.org/10.1038/376238a0
crossref

118. Righi G, Magri R, Selloni A. H2 dissociation on noble metal single atom catalysts adsorbed on and doped into CeO2(111). J. Phys. Chem. C. 2019;123(15)9875–9883. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b00609
crossref

119. Zhang L, Jiang J, Shi W, Xia S, Ni Z, Xiao X. Insights into the hydrogenation mechanism of nitrobenzene to aniline on Pd3/Pt(111): A density functional theory study. RSC Adv. 2015;5(43)34319–34326. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra02389k
crossref

120. Hirayama J, Kamiya Y. Tin-palladium supported on alumina as a highly active and selective catalyst for hydrogenation of nitrate in actual groundwater polluted with nitrate. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2018;8(19)4985–4993. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cy00730f
crossref

121. Yoshinaga Y, Akita T, Mikami I, Okuhara T. Hydrogenation of nitrate in water to nitrogen over Pd-Cu supported on active carbon. J. Catal. 2002;207(1)37–45. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.2002.3529
crossref

122. Pintar A, Batista J, Muševič I. Palladium-copper and palladium-tin catalysts in the liquid phase nitrate hydrogenation in a batch-recycle reactor. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2004;52(1)49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.02.019
crossref

123. Marchesini FA, Irusta S, Querini C, Miró E. Spectroscopic and catalytic characterization of Pd-In and Pt-In supported on Al2O3 and SiO2, active catalysts for nitrate hydrogenation. Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2008;348(1)60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2008.06.026
crossref

124. Marchesini FA, Irusta S, Querini C, Miro E. Nitrate hydrogenation over Pt, In/Al2O3 and Pt, In/SiO2. Effect of aqueous media and catalyst surface properties upon the catalytic activity. Catal. Commun. 2008;9(6)1021–1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2007.09.037
crossref

125. Arino MD, Pinna F, Strukul G. Nitrate and nitrite hydrogenation with Pd and Pt/SnO2 catalysts: the effect of the support porosity and the role of carbon dioxide in the control of selectivity. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2004;53(3)161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.05.015
crossref

126. Gavagnin R, Biasetto L, Pinna F, Strukul G. Nitrate removal in drinking waters: The effect of tin oxides in the catalytic hydrogenation of nitrate by Pd/SnO2catalysts. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2002;38(2)91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-3373(02)00032-2
crossref

127. Nakamura K, Yoshida Y, Mikami I, Okuhara T. Selective hydrogenation of nitrate in water over Cu-Pd/mordenite. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2006;65(1–2)31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2005.12.012
crossref

128. De Corte S, Hennebel T, Fitts JP, et al. Biosupported bimetallic Pd-Au nanocatalysts for dechlorination of environmental contaminants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011;45(19)8506–8513. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2019324
crossref pmid

129. Nutt MO, Hughes JB, Wong MS. Designing Pd-on-Au bimetallic nanoparticle catalysts for trichloroethene hydrodechlorination. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005;39(5)1346–1353. https://doi.org/10.1021/es048560b
crossref pmid

130. Huang Q, Liu W, Peng P, Huang W. Reductive dechlorination of tetrachlorobisphenol A by Pd/Fe bimetallic catalysts. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013;262:634–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.09.015
crossref pmid

131. Cai Y, Luo YH, Long X, et al. Reductive dehalogenation of herbicides catalyzed by Pd0NPs in a H2-based membrane catalyst-film reactor. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022;56(24)18030–18040. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c07317
crossref pmid pdf

132. Wiltschka K, Neumann L, Werheid M, et al. Hydrodechlorination of hexachlorobenzene in a miniaturized nano-Pd(0) reaction system combined with the simultaneous extraction of all dechlorination products. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2020;275:119100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119100
crossref

133. Baumgartner R, Stieger GK, McNeill K. Complete hydrodehalogenation of polyfluorinated and other polyhalogenated benzenes under mild catalytic conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013;47(12)6545–6553. https://doi.org/10.1021/es401183v
crossref pmid

134. An S, Ji H, Park J, Choi Y, Choe JK. Influence of chemical structures on reduction rates and defluorination of fluoroarenes during catalytic reduction using a rhodium-based catalyst. Chemosphere. 2024;362:142755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142755
crossref pmid

135. Liu H, Yu Q, Fu H, et al. Pt supported on ordered microporous carbon as highly active catalyst for catalytic hydrodeiodination of iodinated X-ray contrast media. Appl Catal B. 2018;222:167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.10.006
crossref

136. Wu Y, Chen L, Sun P, Zhang Q, Chen Y, Zheng X. Heterogeneous catalytic reactions of in-situ generated bromide ions via hydrodehalogenation of tetrabromobisphenol A in advanced oxidation processes over palladium nanoparticles. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2024;340:123213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.123213
crossref

137. Bradu C, Căpăţ C, Papa F, et al. Pd-Cu catalysts supported on anion exchange resin for the simultaneous catalytic reduction of nitrate ions and reductive dehalogenation of organochlorinated pollutants from water. Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2019;570:120–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2018.11.002
crossref

138. Mikami I, Sato Y, Tohara S. Rapid removal of nitrate with high nitrogen selectivity using formic acid as reductant over Pd-In catalyst: effect of catalyst composition and reaction conditions on activity and selectivity. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025;22:9103–9112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-06285-1
crossref

139. Witońska I, Karski S, Rogowski J, Krawczyk N. The influence of interaction between palladium and indium on the activity of Pd-In/Al2O3 catalysts in reduction of nitrates and nitrites. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2008;287(1–2)87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2008.01.044
crossref

140. Gao Z, Zhang Y, Li D, Werth CJ, Zhang Y, Zhou X. Highly active Pd-In/mesoporous alumina catalyst for nitrate reduction. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015;286:425–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.01.005
crossref pmid

141. Jung S, Bae S, Lee W. Development of Pd-Cu/hematite catalyst for selective nitrate reduction. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014;48(16)9651–9658. https://doi.org/10.1021/es502263p
crossref pmid

142. Jung J, Bae S, Lee W. Nitrate reduction by maghemite supported Cu-Pd bimetallic catalyst. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2012;127:148–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.08.017
crossref

143. Guo S, Heck K, Kasiraju S, et al. Insights into nitrate reduction over indium-decorated palladium nanoparticle catalysts. ACS Catal. 2018;8(1)503–515. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b01371
crossref

144. Trawczyński J, Gheek P, Okal J, Zawadzki M, Gomez MJI. Reduction of nitrate on active carbon supported Pd-Cu catalysts. Appl Catal A: Gen. 2011;409–410:39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2011.09.020


145. Hamid S, Bae S, Lee W. Novel bimetallic catalyst supported by red mud for enhanced nitrate reduction. Chem. Eng. J. 2018;348:877–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.016
crossref

146. Liou YH, Lin CJ, Weng SC, Ou HH, Lo SL. Selective decomposition of aqueous nitrate into nitrogen using iron deposited bimetals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009;43(7)2482–2488. https://doi.org/10.1021/es802498k
crossref pmid

147. Hamid S, Bae S, Lee W, Amin MT, Alazba AA. Catalytic nitrate removal in continuous bimetallic Cu-Pd/nanoscale zerovalent iron system. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015;54(24)6247–6257. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b01127
crossref

148. Durkin DP, Ye T, Choi J, et al. Sustainable and scalable natural fiber welded palladium-indium catalysts for nitrate reduction. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2018;221:290–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.09.029
crossref

149. Soares OSGP, Marques L, Freitas CMAS, et al. Mono and bimetallic NaY catalysts with high performance in nitrate reduction in water. Chem. Eng. J. 2015;281:411–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.06.093
crossref

150. Pérez-Coronado AM, Calvo L, Baeza JA, Rodriguez JJ, Gilarranz MA. Control of selectivity in the reduction of nitrate by shielding of Pd–Cu/C catalysts with AOT. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2020;82:42–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2019.09.039
crossref

151. Park J, Hwang Y, Bae S. Nitrate reduction on surface of Pd/Sn catalysts supported by coal fly ash-derived zeolites. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019;374:309–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.04.051
crossref pmid

152. Gao W, Guan N, Chen J, et al. Titania supported Pd-Cu bimetallic catalyst for the reduction of nitrate in drinking water. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2003;46(2)341–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-3373(03)00226-1
crossref

153. Al Bahri M, Calvo L, Gilarranz MA, Rodriguez JJ, Epron F. Activated carbon supported metal catalysts for reduction of nitrate in water with high selectivity towards N2 . Appl Catal B: Environ. 2013;138–139:141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.02.048


154. Soares OSGP, Órfão JJM, Ruiz-martínez J, Silvestre-albero J, Sepúlveda-escribano A, Pereira MFR. Pd–Cu/AC and Pt–Cu/AC catalysts for nitrate reduction with hydrogen: Influence of calcination and reduction temperatures. Chem. Eng. J. 2010;165(1)78–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.08.065
crossref

155. Wada K, Hirata T, Hosokawa S, Iwamoto S, Inoue M. Effect of supports on Pd–Cu bimetallic catalysts for nitrate and nitrite reduction in water. Catal. Today. 2012;185(1)81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2011.07.021
crossref

156. Hamid S, Golagana S, Han S, Lee G, Babaa M, Lee W. Stability of Sn-Pd-Kaolinite catalyst during heat treatment and nitrate reduction in continuous flow reaction. Chemosphere. 2020;241:125115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125115
crossref pmid

157. Hamid S, Kumar MA, Han J, Kim H, Lee W. Nitrate reduction on the surface of bimetallic catalysts supported by nano-crystalline beta-zeolite (NBeta). Green Chem. 2017;19(4)853–866. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6gc02349e
crossref

158. Tokazhanov G, Ramazanova E, Hamid S, Bae S, Lee W. Advances in the catalytic reduction of nitrate by metallic catalysts for high efficiency and N2 selectivity: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2020;384:123252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.123252
crossref

159. Hamid S, Kumar MA, Lee W. Highly reactive and selective Sn-Pd bimetallic catalyst supported by nanocrystalline ZSM-5 for aqueous nitrate reduction. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2016;187:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.01.035
crossref

160. Chaplin BP, Roundy E, Guy KA, Shapley JR, Werth CI. Effects of natural water ions and humic acid on catalytic nitrate reduction kinetics using an alumina supported Pd-Cu catalyst. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006;40(9)3075–3081. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0525298
crossref pmid

161. Bae S, Hamid S, Jung J, Sihn Y, Lee W. Effect of promoter and noble metals and suspension pH on catalytic nitrate reduction by bimetallic nanoscale Fe catalysts. Environ. Technol. 2016;37(9)1077–1087. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2015.1101166
crossref pmid

162. Shen Z, Peng G, Gao Y, Shi J. Pd-In bimetallic nanoparticles supported on chelating resin for nitrate removal from water: High efficiency and low NH4 + selectivity. Environ. Sci.-Water Res. 2021;7(3)1078–1089. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ew00028d
crossref

163. Troutman JP, Restivo J, Ha H, et al. Mechanisms of aqueous bromate reduction activity enhancement with well-defined bimetallic palladium-based catalysts. Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2024;676:119654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2024.119654
crossref

164. Cerrillo JL, Lopes CW, Rey F, Agostini G, Kiwi-Minsker L, Palomares AE. Nature and evolution of Pd catalysts supported on activated carbon fibers during the catalytic reduction of bromate in water. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2020;10(11)3646–3653. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cy00606h
crossref

165. Cerrillo JL, Lopes CW, Rey F, Palomares AE. The influence of the support nature and the metal precursor in the activity of Pd-based catalysts for the bromate reduction reaction. ChemCatChem. 2021;13(4)1230–1238. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.202001797
crossref

166. Ren C, Yang P, Gao J, et al. Catalytic reduction of aqueous chlorate with MoOx immobilized on Pd/C. ACS Catal. 2020;10(15)8201–8211. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c02242
crossref

167. Gao J, Xie S, Liu F, Liu J. Preparation and synergy of supported Ru0 and Pd0 for rapid chlorate reduction at pH 7. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023;57(9)3962–3970. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c00415
crossref pmid pmc

168. Wu Y, Chen L, Sun P, Zhang Q, Chen Y, Zheng X. Heterogeneous catalytic reactions of in-situ generated bromide ions via hydrodehalogenation of tetrabromobisphenol A in advanced oxidation processes over palladium nanoparticles. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2024;340:123213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.123213
crossref

169. Kugler A, Dong H, Li C, et al. Reductive defluorination of Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) by hydrated electrons generated upon UV irradiation of 3-Indole-acetic-acid in 12-Aminolauric-Modified montmorillonite. Water Res. 2021;200:117221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117221
crossref pmid

170. Biswas K, Chattopadhyay S, Jing Y, et al. Polyionic resins Pd/Fe2O3 nanohybrids for catalytic hydrodehalogenation: Improved and versatile remediation for toxic pollutants. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019;58(6)2159–2169. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b04464
crossref

171. Buil ML, Esteruelas MA, Niembro S, et al. Dehalogenation and hydrogenation of aromatic compounds catalyzed by nanoparticles generated from rhodium bis(imino)pyridine complexes. Organometallics. 2010;29(19)4375–4383. https://doi.org/10.1021/om1003072
crossref

172. Baumgartner R, McNeill K. Hydrodefluorination and hydrogenation of fluorobenzene under mild aqueous conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012;46(18)10199–10205. https://doi.org/10.1021/es302188f
crossref pmid

173. Yang H, Gao H, Angelici RJ, Brown SD, Richmond TG. Hydrodefluorination of fluorobenzene and 1,2-difluorobenzene under mild conditions over rhodium pyridylphosphine and bipyridyl complexes tethered on a silica-supported palladium catalyst. Organometallics. 1999;18(12)2285–2287. https://doi.org/10.1021/om990151e
crossref

174. Park J, An S, Jho EH, Bae S, Choi Y, Choe JK. Exploring reductive degradation of fluorinated pharmaceuticals using Al2O3-supported Pt-group metallic catalysts: Catalytic reactivity, reaction pathways, and toxicity assessment. Water Res. 2020;185:116242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116242
crossref pmid

175. Park J, Bae S, Choi Y, Choe JK. Rh-Pd/TiO2 as bilateral catalysts for reductive and oxidative degradation of fluorinated pharmaceutical contaminants. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2023;322:122089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.122089
crossref

176. Long M, Donoso J, Bhati M, et al. Adsorption and reductive defluorination of perfluorooctanoic acid over palladium nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021;55(21)14836–14843. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c03134
crossref pmid

177. Long M, Zhou C, Elias WC, et al. Auto-assembled Pd-Rh nanoalloys catalyzed faster and deeper hydrodefluorination of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in environmental conditions. ACS EST Eng. 2024;4(5)1073–1080. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.3c00548
crossref

178. Gong X, Qin S, Li T, et al. Novel insight into the synergistic mechanism for Pd and Rh promoting the hydro-defluorination of 4-fluorophenol over bimetallic Rh-Pd/C catalysts. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2024;16(23)28526–28537. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.4c06180
crossref pmid

179. Tenorio R, Liu J, Xiao X, Maizel A, et al. Destruction of per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) with UV-sulfite photoreductive treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020;54(11)6957–6967. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00961
crossref pmid

180. Song Z, Tang H, Wang N, Zhu L. Reductive defluorination of perfluorooctanoic acid by hydrated electrons in a sulfite-mediated UV photochemical system. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013;262:332–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.08.059
crossref pmid

181. Yu K, Li X, Chen L, et al. Mechanism and efficiency of contaminant reduction by hydrated electron in the sulfite/iodide/UV process. Water Res. 2018;129:357–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.11.030
crossref pmid

182. Abusallout I, Wang J, Hanigan D. Emerging investigator series: Rapid defluorination of 22 per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in water using sulfite irradiated by medium-pressure UV. Environ. Sci.-Water Res. 2021;7(7)1552–1562. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ew00221j
crossref

183. Liu Z, Chen Z, Gao J, et al. Accelerated degradation of perfluorosulfonates and perfluorocarboxylates by UV/sulfite + iodide: Reaction mechanisms and system efficiencies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022;56(6)3699–3709. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c07608
crossref pmid pmc

184. Fang Y, Devon J, Rao D, Liu J, Schaefer C. Destruction of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) in gas sparging incorporated UV-indole reductive treatment system – Benefits and challenges. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024;480:135935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135935
crossref pmid

185. Tian H, Gao J, Li H, Boyd SA, Gu C. Complete defluorination of perfluorinated compounds by hydrated electrons generated from 3-indole-acetic-acid in organomodified montmorillonite. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:32949. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32949
crossref pmid pmc

186. Wang Z, Jin X, Hong R, et al. New indole derivative heterogeneous system for the synergistic reduction and oxidation of various per-/polyfluoroalkyl substances: Insights into the degradation/defluorination mechanism. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023;57(50)21459–21469. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c05940
crossref pmid

187. Gu Y, Liu T, Wang H, Han H, Dong W. Hydrated electron based decomposition of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) in the VUV/sulfite system. Sci Total Environ. 2017;607–608:541–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.197
crossref pmid

188. Gao J, Liu Z, Bentel MJ, Yu Y, Men Y, Liu J. Defluorination of omega-hydroperfluorocarboxylates (ω-HPFCAs): Distinct reactivities from perfluoro and fluorotelomeric carboxylates. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021;55(20)14146–14155. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04429
crossref pmid

189. Zhai Z, Zhang C, Chu L, Zhao Y, Zhou X, Zhang Y. Effective defluorination of novel hexafluoropropylene oxide oligomer acids under mild conditions by UV/sulfite/iodide: mechanisms and ecotoxicity. Water Res. 2024;258:121804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.121804
crossref pmid

190. Martínez-Huitle CA, Brillas E. Decontamination of wastewaters containing synthetic organic dyes by electrochemical methods: A general review. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2009;87(3–4)105–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.09.017
crossref

191. Martinez-Huitle CA, Ferro S. Electrochemical oxidation of organic pollutants for the wastewater treatment: direct and indirect processes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006;35(12)1324–1340. https://doi.org/10.1039/B517632H
crossref pmid

192. Mandal P, Dubey BK, Gupta AK. Review on landfill leachate treatment by electrochemical oxidation: Drawbacks, challenges and future scope. Waste Management. 2017;69:250–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.08.034
crossref pmid

193. Comninellis C, Pulgarin C. Anodic oxidation of phenol for waste water treatment. J. Appl. Electrochem. 1991;21(8)703–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01034049
crossref

194. Martínez-Huitle CA, Quiroz MA, Comninellis C, Ferro S, De Battisti A. Electrochemical incineration of chloranilic acid using Ti/IrO2, Pb/PbO2 and Si/BDD electrodes. Electrochim Acta. 2004;50(5)949–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2004.07.035
crossref

195. Bock C, MacDougall B. The anodic oxidation of p-benzoquinone and maleic acid. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1999;146(8)2925–2932. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1392030
crossref

196. Bonfatti F, Ferro S, Lavezzo F, Malacarne M, Lodi G, De Battisti A. Electrochemical incineration of glucose as a model organic substrate. I. Role of the electrode material. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1999;146(6)2175–2179. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1391909
crossref

197. Bellagamba R, Michaud PA, Cerisola G, Comninellis C, Vatistas N. Electro-combustion of polyacrylates with boron-doped diamond anodes. Electrochem. Commun. 2002;4(2)171–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2481(01)00302-2
crossref

198. Panizza M, Michaud PA, Cerisola G, Comninellis C. Anodic oxidation of 2-naphthol at boron-doped diamond electrodes. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2001;507(1–2)206–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0728(01)00398-9
crossref

199. Polcaro AM, Vacca A, Palmas S, Mascia M. Electrochemical treatment of wastewater containing phenolic compounds: oxidation at boron-doped diamond electrodes. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2003;33(10)885–892. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025815828503
crossref

200. Rodgers JD, Jedral W, Bunce NJ. Electrochemical oxidation of chlorinated phenols. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999;33(8)1453–1457. https://doi.org/10.1021/es9808189
crossref

201. Moreira FC, Boaventura RAR, Brillas E, Vilar VJP. Electrochemical advanced oxidation processes: A review on their application to synthetic and real wastewaters. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2017;202:217–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.08.037
crossref

202. Comninellis C. Electrocatalysis in the electrochemical conversion/combustion of organic pollutants for waste water treatment. Electrochim. Acta. 1994;39(11–12)1857–1862. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4686(94)85175-1
crossref

203. Chaplin BP. Critical review of electrochemical advanced oxidation processes for water treatment applications. Environ. Sci. Process Impacts. 2014;16(6)1182–1203. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3em00679d
crossref pmid

204. Marselli B, Garcia-Gomez J, Michaud P-A, Rodrigo MA, Comninellis C. Electrogeneration of hydroxyl radicals on boron-doped diamond electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2003;150(2)D79–D83. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1553790
crossref

205. Walsh FC, Wills RGA. The continuing development of Magnéli phase titanium sub-oxides and Ebonex® electrodes. Electrochim. Acta. 2010;55(22)6342–6351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2010.05.011
crossref

206. Appleby AJ, Marie J. Kinetics of oxygen reduction on carbon materials in alkaline solution. Electrochim. Acta. 1979;24(2)195–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4686(79)80024-9
crossref

207. Liu H, Li Z, Kong D, Chen X. Fabrication of nitrogen-doped MXene composite electrode for efficient removal of sulfadiazine in homogeneous electro-Fenton system. Environ. Eng. Res. 2025;30(3)240441. https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2024.441
crossref

208. Bonfatti F, Ferro S, Lavezzo F, Malacarne M, Lodi G, De Battisti A. Electrochemical Incineration of Glucose as a Model Organic Substrate. II. Role of Active Chlorine Mediation. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2000;147(2)540–544. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1393238
crossref

209. Bard AJ. Standard potentials in aqueous solution. New York: Dekker; 1985. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203738764


210. Wayner DDM, Griller D. Oxidation and reduction potentials of transient free radicals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988;110(1)132–137. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00209a021
crossref

211. Martínez-Huitle CA, Brillas E. Electrochemical alternatives for drinking water disinfection. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008;47(11)1998–2005. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200703621
crossref pmid

212. Cristina S, ARM , Pablo C. Electrosynthesis of ferrates with diamond anodes. AIChE J. 2008;54(6)1600–1607. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.11492
crossref

213. Cotillas S, Sánchez-Carretero A, Cañizares P, Sáez C, Rodrigo MA. Electrochemical synthesis of peroxyacetic acid using conductive diamond electrodes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011;50(19)10889–10893. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie2009422
crossref

214. Canizares P, Saez C, Sanchez-Carretero A, Rodrigo MA. Synthesis of novel oxidants by electrochemical technology. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2009;39(11)2143–2149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-009-9792-7
crossref

215. Panizza M, Cerisola G. Electrocatalytic materials for the electrochemical oxidation of synthetic dyes. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2007;75(1–2)95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.04.001
crossref

216. Weon S, He F, Choi W. Status and challenges in photocatalytic nanotechnology for cleaning air polluted with volatile organic compounds: visible light utilization and catalyst deactivation. Environ. Sci. Nano. 2019;6(12)3185–3214. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EN00891H
crossref

217. Wardman P. Reduction potentials of one-electron couples involving free radicals in aqueous solution. J Phys. Chem. Ref Data. 1989;18(4)1637–1755. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.555843
crossref

218. Loeb SK, Alvarez PJJ, Brame JA, et al. The technology horizon for photocatalytic water treatment: Sunrise or sunset? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019;53(6)2937–2947. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05041
crossref pmid

219. Basavarajappa PS, Patil SB, Ganganagappa N, Reddy KR, Raghu AV, Reddy CV. Recent progress in metal-doped TiO2, non-metal doped/codoped TiO2 and TiO2 nanostructured hybrids for enhanced photocatalysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2020;45(13)7764–7778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.07.241
crossref

220. Li S, Jiang C, Zhang Y, et al. Synergistic effect of N doping and oxygen vacancies over TiO2 nanosheets with enhanced photocatalytic removal of tetracycline. Catal Today. 2024;440:114830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2024.114830
crossref

221. Chen X, Liu L, Yu PY, Mao SS. Increasing solar absorption for photocatalysis with black hydrogenated titanium dioxide nanocrystals. Science. 2011;331(6018)746–750. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200448
crossref pmid

222. Youssef Z, Colombeau L, Yesmurzayeva N, et al. Dye-sensitized nanoparticles for heterogeneous photocatalysis: Cases studies with TiO2, ZnO, fullerene and graphene for water purification. Dyes and Pigments. 2018;159:49–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.06.002
crossref

223. Weon S, Kim J, Choi W. Dual-components modified TiO2 with Pt and fluoride as deactivation-resistant photocatalyst for the degradation of volatile organic compound. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2018;220:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.08.036
crossref

224. Moon G, Kim D, Kim H, Bokare AD, Choi W. Platinum-like behavior of reduced graphene oxide as a cocatalyst on TiO2 for the efficient photocatalytic oxidation of arsenite. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2014;1(2)185–190. https://doi.org/10.1021/ez5000012
crossref

225. Weon S, Huang D, Rigby K, Chu C, Wu X, Kim J-H. Environmental materials beyond and below the nanoscale: Single-atom catalysts. ACS EST Eng. 2021;1(2)157–172. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.0c00136
crossref

226. Bhavani P, Kumar DP, Yoo JS, et al. Dual-Atomic-Site-Integrated photocatalysts for green energy synthesis. Chem. Eng. J. 2023;467:143429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.143429
crossref

227. Jo S, Im S, Weon S, Shin H, Lim J. Reduced TiO2 nanotube arrays as environmental catalysts that enable advanced oxidation processes: A mini review. Chem. Eng. J. 2023;477:147031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.147031
crossref

228. Kim J, Lee CW, Choi W. Platinized WO3 as an environmental photocatalyst that generates OH radicals under visible light. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010;44(17)6849–6854. https://doi.org/10.1021/es101981r
crossref pmid

229. Hou Y, Liu F, Zhang B, Tong M. Thiadiazole-based covalent organic frameworks with a donor–acceptor structure: Modulating intermolecular charge transfer for efficient photocatalytic degradation of typical emerging contaminants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022;56(22)16303–16314. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c06056
crossref pmid

230. Chen L, Chen C-W, Dong C-D. Direct Z-Scheme heterostructures based on MoSSe quantum dots for visible light-driven photocatalytic tetracycline degradation. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021;4(2)1038–1047. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.0c02551
crossref

231. Ouyang Y, Jiang H, Zhong H, et al. Construction of g-C3N4 with N2C-type defects/MoO3 Z-scheme photocatalyst: Effective mineralization and toxicity reduction of microcystin-LR by multiple free radical degradation pathways. Chem. Eng. J. 2023;464:142542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.142542
crossref

232. Yang H, Li J, Su Q, et al. Construction of Bi2MoO6/CoWO4 Z-scheme heterojunction for high-efficiency photocatalytic degradation of norfloxacin under visible light: Performance and mechanism insights. Chem. Eng. J. 2023;470:144139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.144139
crossref

233. Chen C-X, Yang S-S, Ding J, et al. Existence of chloride ions in high salinity wastewater accelerates the removal of micropollutants over light-driven catalysts. Appl. Cat. B: Environ. 2023;334:122823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.122823
crossref

234. Guin JP, Sullivan JA, Thampi KR. Challenges facing sustainable visible light induced degradation of poly- and perfluoroalkyls (PFA) in water: A critical review. ACS Eng. Au. 2022;2:134–150. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsengineeringau.1c00031
crossref

235. Wang W, Chen Y, Li G, Gu W, An T. Photocatalytic reductive defluorination of perfluorooctanoic acid in water under visible light irradiation: the role of electron donor. Environ. Sci.-Water Res. 2020;6:1638–1648. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EW00205D
crossref

236. Weon S, Suh M-J, Chu C, Huang D, Stavitski E, Kim J-H. Site-selective loading of single-atom Pt on TiO2 for photocatalytic oxidation and reductive hydrodefluorination. ACS EST Eng. 2021;1(3)512–522. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestengg.0c00210
crossref

237. Zhu Y, Ji H, He K, Blaney L, Xu T, Zhao D. Photocatalytic degradation of GenX in water using a new adsorptive photocatalyst. Water Res. 2022;220:118650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118650
crossref pmid

238. Suh M-J, Weon S, Li R, Wang P, Kim J-H. Enhanced pollutant adsorption and regeneration of layered double hydroxide-based photoregenerable adsorbent. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020;54:9106–9115. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c01812
crossref pmid

239. Du H, Wang Q, Chen G, Wang J. Photo/electro-catalytic degradation of micro- and nano-plastics by nanomaterials and corresponding degradation mechanism. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2022;157:116815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2022.116815
crossref

240. Wan Y, Wang H, Liu J, et al. Enhanced degradation of polyethylene terephthalate plastics by CdS/CeO2 heterojunction photocatalyst activated peroxymonosulfate. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023;452:131375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131375
crossref pmid

Fig. 1
Potential locations for the application of O3- and UV-based AOPs throughout the urban water cycle.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2025-584f1.gif
Fig. 2
Mechanisms of PMS/PDS activation via heterogeneous and homogeneous pathways.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2025-584f2.gif
Fig. 3
Fluorinated contaminants, which include both simple and complex molecular structures, present substantial obstacles in environmental remediation because of the robust C-F bond. (a) Monometallic catalysts consisting of noble metals such as Pd, Pt, Ru, Rh, Au, or Ag have demonstrated catalytic activity in hydrodefluorination by activating H2 and promoting the C-F bond cleavage. However, these catalysts often suffer from reduced reactivity and selectivity, particularly when addressing structurally complex fluorinated substances. (b) Bimetallic catalysts, which incorporate two distinct noble metals, can display improved reactivity through synergistic effects between the metals.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2025-584f3.gif
Fig. 4
Overview of the principles and applications of electrochemical processes in water and wastewater treatment. (a) Potential of electrochemical redox processes as alternatives to conventional chemical treatments, (b) mechanisms of anodic direct oxidation and ROS generation, (c) production of reactive chlorine species at the anode, (d) representative reactions occurring at the cathode, (e) depiction of the reaction network involving paired anode and cathode operations.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2025-584f4.gif
Fig. 5
(a) Bandgaps and band edge positions of selected semiconductor photocatalysts. (b) Schematic representations of principal photocatalyst modification strategies. (c) Illustration of the Z-scheme pathway for photocatalytic degradation. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [230] (d) Single atom Pt-catalyzed photocatalytic hydrodefluorination. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [236] (e) Composite material comprising inorganic adsorbent and photocatalyst. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [238]
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2025-584f5.gif
Table 1
Standard reduction potentials of reactive species generated in chemical oxidation and reduction processes
Reactive species Redox couple Standard redox potential (VNHE) Reference
OH OH/H2O +2.8 [209]
O3 O3/O2 +2.08 [209]
H2O2 H2O2/H2O +1.78 [209]
SO4•− SO4•−/SO42− +2.6–3.1 [9]
PMS (HSO5) HSO5/HSO4 +1.82 [9]
PDS (S2O82−) S2O82−/HSO4 +2.08 [9]
Fe(VI) Fe(VI)/Fe(III) +2.2–0.7 [77]
Cu(III) Cu(III)/Cu(II) +2.3–1.57 [78]
Mn(VII) Mn(VII)/Mn(II) +1.68 [80]
Fe0 Fe2+/Fe0 −0.44 [10]
Reactive H (Hads) H2/Hads −2.3 [116]
Hydrated electron (eaq) H2O/eaq −2.9 [13]
Cl Cl/Cl +2.4 [209]
Cl2•− Cl2•−/Cl +2.0 [209]
HOCl HOCl/Cl +1.49 [209]
Cl2 Cl2/Cl +1.36 [209]
OCl OCl/Cl +0.89 [209]
O2 O2/O2•− −0.33 [217]
Table 2
NZVI application for reductive decontamination and passivation byproducts
NZVI type Contaminant Passivation Fe-by product Removal mechanism O2 condition Experimental condition Ref.
Synthesized by FeCl3+NaBH4 Nitrate Fe3O4 Denitrification to ammonia Ar purged 1.25 g/L NZVI [100]
Nanofer Star TCE Fe3O4/γ-Fe2O3, FeCO3 Dechlorination to dichloroethene DO < 1 mg/L 5 g/L NZVI, 900 mg/L Ca hardness, nitrate 45 mg/L [94]
Synthesized by FeCl3+NaBH4 Phosphate (Fe3(PO4)2•8H2O pH dependent adsorption/precipitation Ambient 1 g/L NZVI [101]
Synthesized by FeCl3 +NaBH4 Heavy metals Fe3(AsO4)2 Reduction/Sorption/Precipitation N2 purged 1–10 g/L NZVI, 9520 m3 wastewater treated with 4400 kg NZVI during 28-day [98]
S-NZVI synthesized by FeCl3 +Na2S+NaBH4 Heavy metals γ-FeOOH/ Fe3O4 Ksp dependent adsorption/complexation N2 purged 2.5 g/L NZVI [92]
Synthesized by FeCl3+NaBH4 Uranium FeO and MnFe2O4 U encapsulation, reduction, adsorption and precipitation Ambient U tailings wastewater (U = 0.31 mg/L, Mn = 30.81 mg/L, Ni = 2.38 mg/L) treated by CSTRs [103]
Synthesized by FeSO4+NaBH4 Uranium and plutonium Fe(II) and Fe(III) phases Adsorption and reduction N2 purged 0.07 g/L NZVI, pH = 6, [104]
Editorial Office
464 Cheongpa-ro, #726, Jung-gu, Seoul 04510, Republic of Korea
FAX : +82-2-383-9654   E-mail : eer@kosenv.or.kr

Copyright© Korean Society of Environmental Engineers.        Developed in M2PI
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers