| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
Environ Eng Res > Volume 31(2); 2026 > Article
Yang, Xiao, Long, and He: Rice hull powder-derived porous carbon for CO2 capture: Dual-doping engineering and adsorption behavior

Abstract

In the present work, a type of N, P co-doped porous carbons (CMs-N/P-n) was prepared for the analysis of CO2 adsorption behavior using breakthrough experiments. CMs-N/P-n was successfully synthesized through pyrolysis of rice hull powder and melanine polyphosphate precursors. The amorphous carbon matrices were partially graphitized, as evidenced by Raman spectra with ID/IG ratios of 1.13, 1.09, 1.00, 0.99 and 0.97. N species were predominantly incorporated as pyridinic and pyrrolic configurations, while P was atomically dispersed through P-C, P-O, and P=O bonding states. Kinetic analysis verified Bangham model compliance, indicating surface diffusion-controlled adsorption processes. In addition, the isosteric heat of CMs-N/P-850 was higher than that of other adsorbents, which was due to the higher content of N and P in CMs-N/P-850. The optimized CMs-N/P-850 adsorbent achieved exceptional CO2 capture performance, exhibiting a capacity of 5.2 mmol/g at 25°C under a flow rate of 50 mL/min.

Graphical Abstract

/upload/thumbnails/eer-2025-292f7.gif

1. Introduction

The global energy demand remains primarily met by fossil fuels despite sustainability concerns [1]. Excessive reliance on these resources has caused a significant rise in atmospheric CO2 concentrations, with the resultant greenhouse effect being universally acknowledged as a critical environmental challenge [2, 3]. To combat this issue, CO2 adsorption is chose to reduce CO2 emissions [2].
The feature of CO2 adsorption is closely dependent on the development of solid adsorbents, such as carbon materials [49], metal oxides [10, 11], silica-based molecular sieves [12, 13], metal-organic framework materials (MOFs) [14, 15] and lithium salts [16, 17]. Porous carbons are good agents for CO2 adsorption due to the adjustable pore structure. For example, AC-PA with a large cavity volume of 0.575 cm3/g exhibited a great capture value of 130 mmol/g at 15°C and 100 kPa [4]. To obtain a higher adsorption amount, organic amines have been immobilized in the pores of porous carbons [5, 6]. Compared with the support of HMC, TEPA loaded HMC (HMC-30TEPA) displayed a high uptake of 62.48 mmol/g at 60°C. However, the capacity retained only 90.15% after 10 cycles, because organic amines were not immobilized on porous carbons via chemical bonds and tended to decompose from the surface from the surface [6]. To address this limitation, heteroatoms doped carbons have been explored [79]. In these materials, heteroatoms bond with C atoms through chemical bonds, resulting in the stable alkaline species and adsorption capacity. Although N is currently the most widely used dopant, little research has been conducted on carbon materials co-doped with multiple heteroatoms for CO2 adsorption. The existence of multiple impurities may induce synergistic effects on CO2 capture. Furthermore, the structure and adsorption mechanism of polyatomic doped materials remain unclear. Hence, it is essential to develop porous carbons with multiple heteroatoms and elucidate their structure-adsorption relationships.
CO2 adsorption performance has been demonstrated to be closely linked to solid adsorbents. Carbon-based adsorbents co-doped with multiple heteroatoms have been identified as effective candidates for CO2 capture. Several advantages of these materials are highlighted: (1) the pore structure can be precisely controlled, which facilitates selective gas storage through optimized diffusion pathways; (2) surface chemical properties can be systematically modified, potentially inducing structural defects that enhance CO2 adsorption capacity. In this study, N, P co-doped porous carbons of CMs-N/P-n were developed based on three rational considerations: (1) N heteroatoms could react with CO2, causing the generation of CO2 chemisorption [7]; (2) P atoms are chemically analogous to N due to their shared classification in Group VA and similar electronic configurations; (3) previous experimental evidence has confirmed that both N and P could be effectively incorporated into carbon matrices through stable chemical bonding [79]. The CO2 capture performance was systematically evaluated using a simulated flue gas containing 20% CO2. Comprehensive analysis of adsorption behavior was conducted through combined analysis, including in situ infrared spectroscopy, surface adsorption kinetics and thermodynamics.

2. Experimental

2.1. Synthesis of CMs-N/P-n

The CMs-N/P-n composite materials were synthesized utilizing ammonium fluoride (NH4F), rice hull powder, and melamine polyphosphate in a 4:1:1 weight ratio. NH4F functioned as a pore-forming agent, while rice hull powder served as the carbon source and melamine polyphosphate provided N and P components. Initially, the mixed precursors were subjected to calcination under an argon atmosphere. The thermal treatment commenced with a heating rate of 2°C/min until reaching 400°C, at which point the materials were maintained for 30 min. Subsequently, the temperature was elevated to predetermined targets at a ramp rate adjusted to 5°C/min, followed by a 2 h isothermal treatment. The resulting carbonized products were then chemically activated through immersion in 0.1 M KOH under a vigorous agitation for 2 h. Final processing involved extensive washing with deionized water until neutral pH was achieved, followed by drying at 100°C for 24 h. The nomenclature CMs-N/P-n reflects the synthesis method, where n denotes the final annealing temperature (650, 750, 850, 950 or 1050). The weights of CMs-N/P-650, CMs-N/P-750, CMs-N/P-850, CMs-N/P-950 and CMs-N/P-1050 are about 0.331 g, 0.309 g, 0.282 g, 0.246 g and 0.202 g. In addition, the average particle size of them are about 34.8 μm, 31.2 μm, 25.7 μm, 29.6 μm and 33.4 μm, respectively.

2.2. Characterization

The average particle size of CMs-N/P-n was obtained using a laser particle size analyzer (Malvern Mastersizer 2000, Britain). The phase composition was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Panalytical X’Pert3 Powder, Netherlands, 10 ~ 80°). Bonding configurations were analyzed through Infrared spectroscopy (IR, Thermo Fisher Scientific Nicolet iS20, America, 400–4000 cm−1), Raman spectroscopy (RS, WITec alpha300R, Germany) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo Scientific K-Alpha, America). Porosity parameters were quantified via N2 adsorption-desorption at −196°C (Tristar II 3020, America). Morphological and microstructural features were resolved by scanning electron microscope (SEM, ZEISS Sigma 300, Germany) and transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEM-F200, Japan), respectively, with elemental composition determined via energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS, JEM-F200, Japan) and cross-validated by XPS. Notably, XPS served dual roles in chemical state deconvolution and elemental quantification.

2.3. CO2 Adsorption

In this investigation, CO2 adsorption measurements were done over a penetration test apparatus which was verified by lots of previous reports [2,18,19]. First, about 10 mm of CMs-N/P-n powers (~ 0.2 g) were filled into the sample chamber (~ 30 mL). The impurities were cleaned out by placing the adsorbents to pure argon (60 mL/min). Then, CO2 adsorption was completed by changing Ar to be 20% CO2. Finally, CMs-N/P-n materials regeneration was achieved through purging them in Ar flow (60 mL/min) at 100°C. CO2 adsorption capacities are achieved based on Eg. (1), where N stands for CO2 uptake (mmol/g), F represents gas flow rate (mL/min), t and te are integral time and actual time (s), M is the mass of CMs-N/P-n materials, c0 and ce are CO2 concentrations at the inlet and outlet of adsorption device.
(1)
N=F×0te(c0-ce)dtM×44

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structure and Composition of CMs-N/P-n

The XRD patterns presented in Fig. 1(a) demonstrate the structural characteristics of CMs-N/P-n. Broad diffraction peaks centered at 25.5° are observed, which correspond to the (002) crystallographic planes of carbon materials. These broadened peaks are indicative of amorphous structural features in the synthesized adsorbents. Consistent with previous studies [3], weak diffraction signals at 45.1° are additionally detected and attributed to partial graphitization processes and preferential orientation growth along the (100) planes. No additional peaks appears on the diffraction patterns, indicating that all of samples are carbon materials without impurities. Notably, enhanced diffraction intensities of the (100) plane are observed in CMs-N/P-850, CMs-N/P-950 and CMs-N/P-1050 compared with CMs-N/P-650 and CMs-N/P-750, demonstrating improved graphitic ordering at elevated synthesis temperatures [20]. The XRD analysis reveals that the majority of carbon atoms in CMs-N/P-n exist in long-range disordered configurations. However, localized graphitic domains are confirmed to be present, characterized by well-ordered atomic arrangements in specific crystalline regions.
The IR characterization of CMs-N/P-n presented in Fig. 1(b) reveals distinct structural features through vibrational mode analysis. Two broad absorption bands are observed at 3432 cm−1 and 1113 cm−1, accompanied by six absorption peaks at 2927 cm−1, 2856 cm−1, 1624 cm−1, 1446 cm−1, 732 cm−1, 603 cm−1 and along with a weak shoulder spanning 811 ~ 935 cm−1. The broad vibrational feature at 3432 cm−1 is attributed to overlapping N-H and O-H stretching modes [3]. The absorption band at 1113 cm−1 is associated with the vibrations of P=O, aromatic P-C linkages and P-O-C structural units [21,22]. The weak peaks at 2927 cm−1 and 2851 cm−1 is identified as symmetric and asymmetric C-H stretching vibrations [3]. The prominent absorption features at 1624 cm−1 and 1446 cm−1 are correlated with conjugated C=C/C=O stretching modes and covalent C-N bonding configurations [1,3]. The characteristic peaks at 732 cm−1 and 603 cm−1 are assigned to P-C and P=O vibrational modes in the P-containing framework [21]. Additionally, the faint shoulder observed between 811 ~ 935 cm−1 is interpreted as the evidence of P-OH bond formation [21]. The coexistence of N-H, C-N, P-C, P-O-C, and P-OH functional groups is confirmed through IR analysis, demonstrating that N and P heteroatoms derived from melamine polyphosphate are integral components of the carbon matrix. This comprehensive spectral evidence establishes the successful incorporation of both N and P species into the carbonaceous framework through high temperature annealing.
The Raman features of CMs-N/P-n, as illustrated in Fig. 1(c) ~ Fig. 1(h), are systematically analyzed through peak deconvolution. The spectral profiles are deconvoluted into four characteristic components. The prominent peaks observed between 1200–1610 cm−1 (D band) and 1390–1800 cm−1 (G band) are associated with disordered carbon structures (sp3 hybridization) and graphitic domains (sp2 hybridization), respectively (Fig. 1(c) ~ Fig. 1(g)) [1,23]. The D band intensity is correlated with the symmetrical decomposition of graphitic C species, while the G band corresponds to in-plane vibrational motions of sp2-hybridized carbon atoms in graphitic layers [23]. The intensity ratio (ID/IG) is conventionally employed as a critical indicator for evaluating structural ordering in graphitic systems [23]. Calculated values of 1.13, 1.09, 1.00, 0.99 and 0.97 are obtained for CMs-N/P-650, CMs-N/P-750, CMs-N/P-850, CMs-N/P-950 and CMs-N/P-1050, respectively (Fig. 1(h)). The progressive decrease in ID/IG ratios with increasing pyrolysis temperature demonstrates enhanced graphitization degree and structural ordering in CMs-N/P-850, CMs-N/P-950 and CMs-N/P-1050 compared to CMs-N/P-650 and CMs-N/P-750. This thermal evolution trend is consistent with XRD observations, which is attributed to both of high-temperature activation and heteroatom incorporation [20,23]. The peaks at 1196 cm−1, 1216 cm−1, 1218 cm−1 and 1204 cm−1 are identified as vibrational modes arising from C-C, C=C and their alternating configurations in carbon frameworks [2,23]. Additionally, the low-intensity peaks observed at 1493 cm−1, 1485 cm−1, and 1484 cm−1 are attributed to symmetry-breaking perturbations in aromatic rings induced by the doping of N and P species [23]. These spectral modifications provide direct evidence for structural distortions caused by heteroatom integration into the carbon lattice.
The XPS survey of CMs-N/P-n is presented in Fig. 1(i) ~ Fig. 1(n). In the full spectrum (Fig. 1(i)), C, O, N, P and O elements are detected. Quantitative elemental compositions are summarized in Fig. 1(j), where C is identified as the predominant constituent in all samples. A progressive increase in C content is observed with elevated annealing temperatures, correlated with enhanced carbonization degree during thermal treatment. Concurrently, reductions in O, N and P concentrations are detected, which could be explained by the thermal decomposition of melamine polyphosphate precursors and elimination of volatile impurities. Deconvolution of the C 1s core-level spectrum (Fig. 1(k)) reveals four distinct components at 284.7 eV (C-C/C=C), 286.3 eV (C-O/C-N/C-P), 288.6 eV (C=O/C=N), and 292.6 eV (ππ* transitions) [21,24,25]. The characteristic ππ* satellite peak at 292.6 eV provides direct evidence for sp2-hybridized carbon domains within the material [24,25]. N speciation analysis demonstrates four chemical states (Fig. 1(l)): pyridinic N (398.6 eV) and pyrrolic N (400.6 eV) configurations where N atoms adopt sp2 hybridization within hexagonal and pentagonal C rings, respectively, along with graphitized N (401.6 eV) and oxidized N (403.4 eV) species [26]. The P 2p spectrum (Fig. 4(m)) is resolved into two components corresponding to P-C (132.9 eV) and P-O/P=O (134.1 eV) bonds [21]. The O 1s spectral profile is deconvoluted into four contributions (Fig. 4(n)): C=O/P=O (530.8 eV), C-O/P-O-C (532.3 eV), C-OH/P-OH (533.9 eV) and O-H (535.1 eV) [21,26]. These spectral features collectively confirm effective heteroatom incorporation, with N and P species being successfully integrated into the carbon matrix through covalent bonding and functional groups. The comprehensive XPS analysis provides conclusive evidence for the structural modification of carbon frameworks through simultaneous N and P doping.
The SEM and TEM results of CMs-N/P-n are presented in Fig. 2(a) ~ Fig. 2(d). In SEM imaging (Fig. 2(a)), numerous voids are observed, confirming the porous nature of CMs-N/P-n. The TEM analysis (Fig. 2(b) ~ Fig. 2(d)) reveals characteristic diffraction rings along with seven parallel lattice stripes, which are associated with partial graphitization in the carbon framework. These structural features are found to align with XRD and Raman data, indicating a predominantly amorphous carbon matrix with localized graphitized domains.
The N2 adsorption/desorption characteristics of CMs-N/P-n are systematically analyzed in Fig. 2(e), Fig. 2(f) and Table 1. A sharp increase in adsorption capacity at P/P0 values of 0 ~ 0.1, combined with pronounced hysteresis loops in the 0.45 ~ 1.0 range, is observed for all samples (Fig. 2(e)). These type II isotherms with distinct hysteresis loops are identified as characteristic of porous materials, where capillary condensation is confirmed to occur in the narrow pore channels. These findings are further supported by aperture distribution analysis displayed in Fig. 2(f) and Table 1. The pore structure is determined to be dominated by micropores and mesopores. For CMs-N/P-850, the pore diameters are within 1.5 ~ 42 nm (Fig. 2(f)) and the ratios of micropores and mesopores are 18.3% and 81.7% (Table 1). The CMs-N/P-850 sample possesses a remarkable specific surface area (SBET) of 877 m2/g and a pore volume (Vpore) of 0.554 cm3/g (Table 1). The phenomenon is similar to the results of the present work[26], which is attributed to the formation of carbon skeleton and the collapse of pores. When the annealing temperature is lower than 850°C, more and more rice husk powders are decomposed. In this process, carbon atoms are recombined and form porous frameworks. Hence, the SBET is obviously enhanced. When the temperature is beyond 850°C, partial pore structure collapses, leading to the blockage and disappearance of pores. Therefore, the SBET is decreased. This hierarchical micro-mesoporous architecture is demonstrated to facilitate gas molecule accommodation within nanoscale voids. The synergistic effects of high surface area and multimodal pore distribution are proposed to underlie CO2 adsorption capabilities.
Based on the above information and prior researches[21], it is proposed that N atoms are bound to the carbon framework through four primary bonding configurations: C-NH, C=N, N+, and C-N-O. Concurrently, P species are incorporated into the carbon matrix via P-C, P=O, P-OH, and P-O-C bonds. The synthesis pathway for CMs-N/P-n is schematically illustrated in Scheme 1.

3.2. CO2 Adsorption

In the present work, all of the capacities are obtained by eliminating the impact of Ar. The adsorption results shown in Fig. 3(a) tell us that CO2 and Ar exhibit different adsorption behaviors on the CMs-N/P-n adsorbents. For Ar adsorption, Ar penetrates immediately when the gas molecules contact with the adsorbents and then reaches the saturation adsorption quickly. Therefore, the breakthrough and saturation points are zero and 70 s, respectively. However, all of CO2 molecules are caught within 180 s and then penetrate through the CMs-N/P-850 material, leading to the achievement of large breakthrough time (180 s) and saturation point (400 s). The phenomenon has something to do with different adsorption mechanisms on CMs-N/P-n materials. Ar, a monatomic noble gas, is difficult to be adsorbed on the porous carbon. However, CO2 is an active gas with quadrupole moment, which is easy to form electron delocalization. Hence, CO2 could be easily caught through the reactions between gas molecules and N and P defects, leading to the better adsorption feature on CMs-N/P-n.
Compared with CMs-N/P-850, other adsorbents exhibit a poor CO2 adsorption feature (Fig. 3(b) and Fig. 3(c)). The low values of SBET and Vpore of CMs-N/P-750 declare that the adsorbent could only provide a limited sites and space for the accommodation and storage of adsorbates [27]. Moreover, the existence of plentiful micropores displays a huge hindrance for the diffusion of adsorbates and the contact with heteroatoms [27]. For CMs-N/P-950, the decrease of Vpore and heteroatoms number is the main reason for the reduced adsorption performance [27,28]. Therefore, both CMs-N/P-750 and CMs-N/P-950 show a low penetration time, saturation time and CO2 adsorption capacity.
In order to further confirm the adsorption behavior on the CMs-N/P-n materials, situ IR tests on the CMs-N/P-850 sample were performed (Fig. 3(d)). Obviously, the peaks intensity increases significantly with the prolongation of contact time. Moreover, the signals: 1) at 749 cm−1 are connected with P-C bonds [21]; 2) at 1456 cm−1, 1521 cm−1 and 1728 cm−1 are related to C-N, COO- and C=O stretching vibrations in NCOO skeleton [21]; 3) at 2257 cm−1 and 2426 cm−1 correspond to NH2+ species; Moreover, NH2+ deformation peaks are also detected at 1640 cm−1 [2]; 4) located at 2342 cm−1 is relevant to the stretching of CO2 molecules exist in the pore channels of CMs-N/P-n materials. Based on the in situ results and the previous reports [3,21,29,30], CO2 could be adsorptiond on the surface of CMs-N/P-n materials through zwitterionic or base catalyzed hydration mechanisms (Scheme 2): 1) CO2 molecules react with N defects to form zwitterionic intermediates and then the products react with other amine groups, resulting in the generation of carbamates; 2) Adsorbates bind to P defects directly through electrostatic attraction and van der Walls forces, leading to the formatin of P-C bonds. Consequently, N and P defects show a co-adsorption phenomenon on CMs-N/P-n materials.
According to Scheme 2, a chemical adsorption process originating from N and P heteroatoms occurs on the CMs-N/P-n materials. Usually, gas chemisorption will be affected by the sweeping of temperature. Therefore, CO2 adsorption performance of CMs-N/P-850 at different temperatures was also analyzed. In Fig. 3(e), one can see that the breakthrough and the saturation points decline with the rise of system temperature within 25 ~ 100°C. Corresponding to these, CO2 uptake declines from 3.5 mmol/g to 2.5 mmol/g (Fig. 3(f)). When the temperature is 100°C, CO2 uptake is approximately 71% of that at 25°C. This phenomenon suggests that temperature is a propelling factor for the decrement of adsorption value. According to Scheme 2, an exothermic equilibrium is set up between CO2 molecules and N and P defects. Compared with the reaction at low temperature, the equilibrium with a reverse movement is formed at high temperature [31,32]. Therefore, a low adsorption value is obtained at 100°C. CMs-N/P-850 has a cavity space of 0.554 cm3/g. Moreover, the pore diameters are larger than that of CO2 (0.33 nm) molecules, which is very beneficial for the accommodation of adsorbates. Hence, the holes play a significant part in CO2 physical adsorption. When the temperature is improved, the exothermic physical adsorption process will weaken gradually [27]. Based on the above information, the total adsorption amount declines with the rise of temperature on account of the decrement of both physical and chemical adsorption capacities.
In Fig. 3(f), adsorption rate enhances with the improvement of temperature. In general, adsorption speed before the saturation point could be expressed by the ratio of CO2 adsorption value/spent time (N/te). The change of temperature will cause the variation of adsorption amount and CO2 diffusion speed. According to Fig. 3(e) and Fig. 3(f), both of adsorption amount and the contact time between CO2 and CMs-N/P-n decrease with the enhancement of temperature. However, the change of used time is slightly higher than that of adsorption level because of the significant accelerated diffusion rate and faster reaction speed between basic defects and adsorbates. Therefore, an improvement of adsorption rate is foreseeable.
The influence of gas flow rate on CO2 adsorption should not be ignored, because it will cause the change of CO2 concentration in the adsorption system (C), mass transfer efficiency of adsorbates in the pore channels (η) and the contact time between gas molecules and CMs-N/P-n particles (T’) [33]. Moreover, these factors will play a leading role in different stages of CO2 adsorption. In Fig. 3(g), both of the breakthrough and saturation points declines rapidly as the improvement of CO2 stream, revealing that the contact time between CMs-N/P-850 and CO2 molecules decreases dramatically. As seen in Fig. 3(h), the adsorption amount elevates dramatically as the improvement of CO2 stream from 10 mL/min to 50 mL/min, whereas it declines when the stream exceeds 50 mL/min. Moreover, the optimized CO2 uptake of 5.2 mmol/g is achieved. The phenomenon is closely correlated with the variation of C, η and T’. According to the previous reports [10,33,34], the adsorption process is decided by C under low flow rate, whereas it is dominated by η and T’ at high CO2 stream. The enhancement of gas stream promotes the elevation of C, causing a positive shift of adsorption equilibrium (Scheme 2). Therefore, more and more CO2 are bonded to N and P defects, resulting in the enhancement of CO2 uptake. In Fig. 3(g), T’ decreases dramatically when CO2 stream exceeds 50 mL/min, causing the generation of incomplete adsorption. Excepting from this, the decrement of η will also lead to the identical change of adsorption feature. In general, η is characterized by mass transfer length (L) that is displayed in the Eq. (2), where Le is the length of filled CMs-N/P-n, te and tb are the time corresponding to CCO2,outlet/CCO2,inlet are 0.95 and 0.5, respectively [35]. The larger the L, the higher the η. According to equation (8) and Fig. 3(i), the value of L increases with the variation of CO2 stream. Moreover, the variation amplitude within 50 ~ 70 mL/min is much higher than that range from 10 mL/min to 50 mL/min. The results suggest that the η levels at 50 ~ 90 mL/min are low in comparison with that within 10 ~ 50 mL/min. Consequently, CO2 adsorption value decreases with the decrement of η and T’. Based on these, both CO2 uptake and contact time decrease gradually. Moreover, the former changes less than the latter. Therefore, the adsorption speed defined as the slop of adsorption curve is positively correlated with gas stream (Fig. 3(i)).
(2)
L=Le[2(te-tb)te+tb]
The impact of N2 and O2 on CO2 adsorption should also be performed, because they are the major component in air and both of them could be adsorbed in the porous materials. Usually, NCO2/NN2 and NCO2/NO2 proportions are used to estimate the impact of these impurities [36]. The greater the proportions, the better the selective trapping performance. In Fig. 3(j), great breakthrough and saturation points for CO2 adsorption are obtained in comparison with that of N2 and O2 adsorption. Moreover, CO2 uptake is greater than the relevant values of N2 and O2 (Fig. 3(k)). The vastly different adsorption feature is attributed to the distinct mechanisms. 1) According to Fig. 6, the pore diameters of the CMs-N/P-850 particles are within 1.5 ~ 42 nm. Moreover, the diameter of CO2 is smaller than the size of N2 and O2. Therefore, the CMs-N/P-850 particles are more favourable to the entry of CO2 molecules, leading to the higher CO2 storage. 2) Both N2 and O2 are inactive gases that could not react with N and P defects. Hence, N2 and O2 could only be caught in the pores of CMs-N/P-850 through physical adsorption method. CO2, an acidic gas with a quadrupole moment, could be easily attracted on account of the great polarity created by N and P sites [36]. As seen in Scheme 2, CO2 molecules react with N and P heteroatoms, leading to CO2 chemical adsorption. Different from N2 and O2, CO2 can be caught by CMs-N/P-n materials through both physical and chemical adsorption. Therefore, high NCO2/NN2 and NCO2/NO2 values are achieved.
An excellent adsorbent should exhibit both good CO2 adsorption feature at different conditions and cyclical adsorption feature. In this investigation, the CMs-N/P-850 material was used to accomplish the cyclical adsorption experiments at 25°C and 75°C. In Fig. 3(l), the fluctuations of CO2 adsorption amount are less than 1.0% and 1.5%, suggesting that CO2 uptake keeps stable at 25°C and 75°C. Consequently, the CMs-N/P-n materials possess a superior cyclical adsorption feature.
In order to confirm CO2 adsorption behavior on the CMs-N/P-n materials, four models displayed in Eqs. (3) ~ (6) were used for the simulation of adsorption results, where QT and Qe represent real-time adsorption value and maximum capacity, T is adsorption time, Qe, exp is the maximum uptake in the experiments, k1 and k2 represent capture speed constants, αE and βE are speed constants for initial adsorption/desorption, k and z are dynamic constants, R2 is correlation factor [27,31,37].
  1. Quasi 1st-order kinetic model

    (3)
    ln(Qe-QT)=lnQe-k1T
  2. Quasi 2nd-order kinetic model

    (4)
    TQT=1k2Qe2+TQe
  3. Elovich model

    (5)
    QT=1βEln(αEβE)+1βEln(T)
  4. Bangham model

    (6)
    QT=QE-QEekTZ
In Fig. 4(a), the correlation coefficient of R2 for the spent formulas are 0.9777, 0.9705, 0.9114 and 0.9984, respectively. The information suggests that: 1) CO2 adsorption process is not decided by single physisorption or chemisorption because of low R2 values for Quasi 1st-order and Quasi 2nd-order kinetic formulas [27,31]; 2) CO2 adsorption behavior could be characterized using Bangham model on account of the high R2 value (0.9984). Therefore, the adsorption process including two steps: CO2 diffusion and CO2 adsorption. CMs-N/P-n samples are porous materials. Moreover, the pore diameters are larger enough to accommodate CO2 molecules. The presence of N and P defects promotes the proximity of acidic molecules to the adsorbents. When adsorbates reach the outer surface of CMs-N/P-n particles, they could pass through the gas film and then diffuse rapidly. In this step, CO2 is caught via Van der Waals force [37]. Then, some of adsorbates react with the heteroatoms, leading to the chemisorption and the formation of CO2-N or CO2-P species [37]. Therefore, CO2 uptake is dramatically enhanced due to the simultaneous physical and chemisorption behaviors. After the rapid growth period, most of spaces are occupied and the majority of N and P defects are consumed. Consequently, no significant enhancement is observed.
To confirm the universality, the adsorption results achieved under different environments were also simulated with Bangham model. In Fig. 4(b), Fig. 4(c) and Table 2, the fitting curves have a high matching degree with experimental results and the R2 values are higher than 99.6%, providing further evidence for the co-action of physisorption and chemisorption at different temperatures and gas streams.
In this study, isosteric heat (Qst, KJ/mol) was evaluated for the analysis of the strength between CO2—CMs-N/P-n, because it plays a great role in the reflection of energy distribution of porous carbon functionalized with different heteroatoms. According to the relevant investigations [37,38], isosteric heat on porous CMs-N/P-n materials could be calculated following the Clausius-Clapeyron equation expressed in Eq. (7), where N is CO2 uptake (mmol/g), R, P and T are the ideal gas constant (J/(mmol·K)), system pressure (kPa), Kelvin temperature, respectively. In Fig. 4(d) ~ Fig. 4(h), the slopes based on lnP and 1/T could be used to afford the calculation of Qst within 0 ~ 3.2 mmol/g. For CMs-N/P-850, the heat declines gradually as the function of CO2 uptake. Moreover, the slop before 1.6 mmol/g is higher apparently than that beyond 1.6 mmol/g (Fig. 4(i)). The phenomenon is closely associated with the porous characteristics and N and P multiple defects. CMs-N/P-850 is a porous material with 18.3% of micropores, 81.7% mesopores, 0.554 cm3/g of void spaces, 6.2% of N and 2.6% of P species. Both pore volume and diameters are high enough for the storage of CO2. Based on these information, CO2 could easily diffuse in the pore channels and contact with N and P defects. Therefore, Qst must be analyzed based upon both CO2—CMs-N/P-850 and CO2—CO2 interactions [39]. In the initial stage, CO2 diffuses easily and react with N and P defects. As the adsorption progresses, most of holes and basic sites are consumed. Hence, the adsorption amount increases rapidly and the Qst value decreases dramatically. The Qst value at the beginning is high (33.7 kJ/mol), which is associated with the bi-functionalization of N and P heteroatoms. When CO2 uptake is larger than 1.6 mmol/g, most of N and P defects are consumed and the chemisorption behavior is gradually weakened. Hence, adsorbates could only interact with weak affinity sites, causing the significant decrement of Qst value. With the further enhancement of adsorption value, CO2—CO2 interaction force improves gradually and it becomes the dominant factor [40]. However, its growth is not enough to offset the decrement of CO2—CMs-N/P-850 force. Thus, a slow decrement appears at the adsorption amount arrange from 1.6 to 3.2 mmol/g.
Similar to CMs-N/P-850, other adsorbents decrease gradually with the enhancement of CO2 adsorption value, which are also related to the change of CO2 adsorption amount at different adsorption stages. Compared with CMs-N/P-850, other samples have a low Qst value. CMs-N/P-650 and CMs-N/P-750 have a low void space and a large percentage of micropores, which has a great negative effect on the accommodation, diffusion and chemisorption of CO2. CMs-N/P-950 and CMs-N/P-1050 have a low content of N and P defects, causing the weak chemisorption in the pore channels. Therefore, the Qst level of them are less than that of CMs-N/P-850.
(7)
Qst=-R[dlnPd(1T)]N

4. Conclusions

N,P modified carbons designated as CMs-N/P-n were successfully fabricated through a co-adulteration strategy and subsequently utilized for CO2 adsorption applications. The carbon frameworks of them were characterized by amorphous structures with localized graphitization regions. All CMs-N/P-n materials had porous architectures predominantly composed of micropores and mesopores. Particularly in the optimized CMs-N/P-850 sample, a high cavity volume of 0.554 cm3/g was achieved, with micropore and mesopore proportions measured at 18.3% and 81.7% respectively. Polar environments were established through the incorporation of N and P heteroatoms. Under standardized evaluation conditions at 25°C with a CO2 flow rate of 50 mL/min, a CO2 adsorption capacity of 5.2 mmol/g was recorded for the CMs-N/P-850 adsorbent. The outstanding CO2 capture performance was governed by the synergistic interplay between the multilevel pore configurations and heteroatom functionalities, which collectively enhanced both CO2 diffusion kinetics and surface adsorption thermodynamics.

Notes

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [Fan-Ming Yang], upon reasonable request.

Author contributions

FM Yang (Associate Professor) conducted the scheme design and characterization, as well as the writing and response of the manuscript. Y Xiao (graduate student) completed the electrochemical performance experiments. S Long (graduate student) completed the materials and data supplementation work during the manuscript revision process. GW He (Professor) provided financial support and participated in materials characterization and manuscript revision work.

Acknowledgments

The project was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (No. 2025JJ70380). Thanks to the key laboratory of low carbon and environmental functional materials for providing financial and analytical methods for this project.

References

1. Feng YH, Chen SH, Wang J, Lu B. Carbon foam with microporous structure for high performance symmetric potassium dual-ion capacitor. J. Energy Chem. 2020;43:129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2019.08.013
crossref

2. Al Mesfer MK, Danish M. Breakthrough adsorption study of activated carbons for CO2 separation from flue gas. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018;45:4514–4524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.06.042
crossref

3. Maklavany DM, Rouzitalab Z, Amini AM, et al. One-step approach to quaternary (B, N, P, S)-doped hierarchical porous carbon derived from quercus brantii for highly selective and efficient CO2 capture: a combined experimental and extensive DFT study. Chem. Eng. J. 2023;453:139950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.139950
crossref

4. Sarwar A, Ali M, Khoja AH, et al. Synthesis and characterization of biomass-derived surface-modified activated carbon for enhanced CO2 adsorption. J. CO2 Util. 2021;46:101476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2021.101476
crossref

5. Wang J, Adelodun AA, Oh JM, Jo YM. TEPA impregnation of electrospun carbon nanofibers for enhanced low-level CO2 adsorption. Nano Convergence. 2020;7:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40580-020-0217-y
crossref pmid pmc

6. Wang YX, Guo T, Hu XD, Hao J, Guo QJ. Mechanism and kinetics of CO2 adsorption for TEPA-impregnated hierarchical mesoporous carbon in the presence of water vapor. Powder Technol. 2020;368:227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2020.04.062
crossref

7. Ma XC, Su CQ, Liu BG, et al. Heteroatom-doped porous carbons exhibit superior CO2 capture and CO2/N2 selectivity: understanding the contribution of functional groups and pore structure. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021;259:118065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.118065
crossref

8. Wang YH, Wang MH, Wang ZW, Wang SM, Fu JW. Tunable-quaternary (N, S, O, P)-doped porous carbon microspheres with ultramicropores for CO2 capture. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020;507:145130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019
crossref

9. Ma CD, Bai JL, Demir M, Hu X, Liu SF, Wang LL. Water chestnut shell-derived N/S-doped porous carbons and their applications in CO2 adsorption and supercapacitor. Fuel. 2022;326:125119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125119
crossref

10. Yan XY, Li YJ, Ma XT, Bian ZG, Zhao JL, Wang ZY. CeO2-modified CaO/Ca12Al14O33 bi-functional material for CO2 capture and H2 production in sorption-enhanced steam gasification of biomass. Energy. 2020;192:116664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116664
crossref

11. Cardenas-Arenas A, Cortes HS, Bailón-Garcia E, Davo-Quiuonero A, Lozano-Castello D, Bueno-Lopez A. Active, selective and stable NiO-CeO2 nanoparticles for CO2 methanation. Fuel Process. Technol. 2021;212:106637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106637
crossref

12. Oliveira DEF, Chagas JAO, Lima ALD, Mota CJA. CO2 Capture over MCM-41 and SBA-15 mesoporous silicas impregnated with chitosan. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2022;61:10522–10530. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.2c00385
crossref

13. Cheng SY, Liu YZ, Qi GS. Experimental study of CO2 capture enhanced by coal fly ash-synthesized NH2-MCM-41 coupled with high gravity technology. Chem. Eng. J. 2020;400:125946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.125946
crossref

14. Ding YD, Ma LJ, Zeng FQ, et al. Synthesis and CO2 adsorption kinetics of aluminum fumarate MOFs pellet with high recovery. Energy. 2023;263:125723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125723
crossref

15. Du XB, Feng SC, Luo JQ, et al. Pebax Mixed matrix membrane with bimetallic CeZr-MOFs to enhance CO2 separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023;322:124251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2023.124251
crossref

16. Zhang CP, Li CG, Li WJ, Guo X. High-performance Li4SiO4 sorbents prepared from solid waste for CO2 capture. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023;326:124730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2023.124730
crossref

17. Tsuchiya B, Kodera T, Miyaoka H, Ichikawaa T, Kojima Y. Thermal desorption processes of H2 and CH4 from Li2ZrO3 and Li4SiO4 materials absorbed H2O and CO2 in Air at room temperature. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2023;48:8830–8836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.217
crossref

18. Brea P, Delgodo JA, Agueda VI, Gutierrez P, Uguina MA. Multicomponent adsorption of H2, CH4, CO and CO2 in zeolites NaX, CaX and MgX. evaluation of performance in PSA cycles for hydrogen purification. Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 2019;286:187–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2019.05.021
crossref

19. Raganati F, Alfe M, Gargiulo V, Chirone R, Ammendola P. Kinetic study and breakthrough analysis of the hybrid physical/chemical CO2 adsorption/desorption behavior of a magnetite-based sorbent. Chem. Eng. J. 2019;372:526–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.04.165
crossref

20. Gang BJ, Zhang F, Li XL, Zhai B, Wang XY, Song Y. A ulva lactuca-derived porous carbon for high-performance electrode aterials in supercapacitor: synergistic effect of porous structure and graphitization degree. J. Energy Storage. 2021;33:102132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2020.102132
crossref

21. Patel MA, Luo F, Khoshi MR, Rabie E, Zhang Q, Flach CR. P-doped porous carbon as metal free catalysts for selective aerobic oxidation with an unexpected mechanism. ACS Nano. 2016;10:2305–2315. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b07054
crossref pmid

22. Qian Y, Jiang S, Li Y, et al. In situ revealing the electroactivity of P-O and P-C bonds in hard carbon for high-capacity and long-life Li/K-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019;9:1901676. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201901676
crossref

23. Liu Z, Xiao KK, Guo H, et al. Nitrogen-doped worm-like graphitized hierarchical porous carbon designed for enhancing area-normalized capacitance of electrical double layer supercapacitors. Carbon. 2017;117:163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.02.087
crossref

24. Blume R, Rosenthal D, Tessonnier JP, Li H, Knop-Gericke A, Schlogl RR. Characterizing graphitic carbon with X-Ray photo-electron spectroscopy: a step-by-step approach. ChemCatChem. 2015;7:2871–2881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.02.087
crossref

25. Ayiania M, Smith M, Hensley AJR, Scudiero L, McEwen JS, Garcia-perez M. Deconvoluting the XPS spectra for nitrogen-doped chars: an analysis from first principles. Carbon. 2020;162:528–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.02.065
crossref

26. Yang FM, Xiong ZG, He GW. The excellent rate capacitive features and competent CO2 capture performance of porous N-doped C(N) material. Appl. Energy. 2024;367:123426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123426
crossref

27. Liao M, Sheng L, Zou P, et al. Carbon dioxide adsorption performance and the kinetic properties of zirconium and poly(ethyleneimine) bi-functionalized molecular sieve of KIT-6. Energy Fuel. 2023;37:15867–15878. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c02304
crossref

28. Yan X, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Yang G, Yan Z. Aminemodified SBA-15: effect of pore structure on the performance for CO2 capture. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011;50:3220–3226. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie101240d
crossref

29. Foo GS, Lee JJ, Chen CH, Hayes SE, Sievers C. Elucidation of surface species through in situ FTIR spectroscopy of carbon dioxide adsorption on amine-grafted SBA-15. ChemSusChem. 2017;10:266–276. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201600809
crossref pmid

30. Ahmed S, Ramli A, Yusup S. CO2 adsorption study on primary, secondary and tertiary aminefunctionalized Si-MCM-41. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control. 2016;51:230–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.05.021
crossref

31. Li XY, Li RH, Peng K, et al. Interlayer functionalization of vermiculite derived silica with hierarchical layered porous structure for stable CO2 adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 2022;435:134875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.134875
crossref

32. Rehman A, Heo YJ, Nazir G, Park SJ. Solvent-free, One-pot synthesis of nitrogen-tailored alkali-activated microporous carbons with an efficient CO2 adsorption. Carbon. 2021;72:71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.09.088
crossref

33. Song G, Zhu X, Chen R, Liao Q, Ding YD, Chen L. An investigation of CO2 adsorption kinetics on porous magnesium oxide. Chem. Eng. J. 2016;283:175–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.07.055
crossref

34. Aghel B, Heidaryan E, Sahraie S, Nazari M. Optimization of monoethanolamine for CO2 absorption in a microchannel eactor. J. CO2 Util. 2018;28:264–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2018.10.005
crossref

35. Zhao Y, Shen YM, Bai L, Ni SQ. Carbon dioxide adsorption on polyacrylamide-impregnated silica gel and breakthrough modeling. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012;261:708–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.08.085
crossref

36. Wilson SMW, Al-Enzi F, Gabriel VA, Tezel FH. Effect of pore size and heterogeneous surface on the adsorption of CO2, N2, O2, and Ar on carbon aerogel, RF aerogel, and activated carbons. Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 2021;322:111089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111089
crossref

37. Garces SI, Villarroel-Rocha J, Sapag K, Korili SA, Gil A. Comparative study of the adsorption equilibrium of CO2 on microporous commercial materials at low pressures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013;52:6785–6793. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie400380w
crossref

38. Watabe T, Yogo K. Isotherms and isosteric heats of adsorption for CO2 in amine-functionalized mesoporous silicas. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013;120(120)20–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2013.09.011
crossref

39. Simmons JM, Wu H, Zhou W, Yildirim T. Carbon capture in metal-organic frameworks-a comparative study. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011;4:2177–185. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0EE00700E
crossref

40. He JJ, To JWF, Psarras PC, et al. Tunable polyaniline-based porous carbon with ultrahigh surface area for CO2 capture at elevated pressure. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016;6:1502491. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201502491
crossref

Fig. 1
XRD, IR, Raman and XPS results of CMs-N/P-n. (a): XRD patterns; (b): IR spectra; (c)~(g): Raman spectra of CMs-N/P-650, CMs-N/P-750, CMs-N/P-850, CMs-N/P-950 and CMs-N/P-1050; (h): ID/IG value; (i): XPS full spectrum; (j): Element content; (k): XPS of C 1s in CMs-N/P-850; (l): XPS of N 1s in CMs-N/P-850; (m): XPS of P 2s in CMs-N/P-850; (n): XPS of O 1s in CMs-N/P-850
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2025-292f1.gif
Fig. 2
SEM, TEM and N2 adsorption/desorption results. (a): SEM of CMs-N/P-850; (b): diffraction ring; (c): particle morphology in TEM; (d): lattice fringes; (e): N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms; (f): aperture distribution
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2025-292f2.gif
Fig. 3
CO2 adsorption results. (a) Ar and CO2 breakthrough curves of CMs-N/P-850 at 25°C; (b), (c): CO2 breakthrough curves and CO2 adsorption capacities of CMs-N/P-n at 25°C; (d): in situ IR results of CMs-N/P-850 in a CO2 stream; (e): breakthrough curves of CMs-N/P-850 at different temperatures; (f) adsorption capacities of CMs-N/P-850 at different temperatures; (g): breakthrough curves at different CO2 flow rates; (h): adsorption capacities at different CO2 flow rates; (i): adsorption rate/mass transfer zone of CMs-N/P-850 at different CO2 flow rates; (j): CO2, N2 and O2 breakthrough curves of CMs-N/P-850; (k): CO2, N2 and O2 adsorption capacities of CMs-N/P-850; (l): Recyclability of CMs-N/P-850 at 25°C and 75°C.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2025-292f3.gif
Fig. 4
Dynamics and thermodynamics analysis results. (a): simulation results of CMs-N/P-850 with different models; (b): simulation results of CMs-N/P-850 with Bangham model at different temperatures; (c): simulation results of CMs-N/P-850 with Bangham model at different flow rates; (d)~(h): relationship between lnP and 1/T for CMs-N/P-650, CMs-N/P-750, CMs-N/P-850, CMs-N/P-950 and CMs-N/P-1050; (i): isosteric heats of CMs-N/P-n
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2025-292f4.gif
Scheme 1
Schematic diagram for the preparation of N, P co-doped CMs-N/P-n
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2025-292f5.gif
Scheme 2
CO2 chemisorption mechanism of N, P co-doped CMs-N/P-n
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2025-292f6.gif
Table 1
N2 adsorption/desorption results of CMs-N/P-n
Materials SBET (m2/g) Vpore (cm3/g) Content (%)

Micro Meso
CMs-N/P-650 188 0.132 29.7 70.3
CMs-N/P-750 312 0.173 28.8 71.2
CMs-N/P-850 877 0.554 18.3 81.7
CMs-N/P-950 506 0.258 25.4 74.6
CMs-N/P-1050 233 0.143 32.4 67.6
Table 2
Kinetic parameters of CMs-N/P-n with Bangham model
Conditions Qe,exp1 Kinetic parameters

Qe,cal2 k z R2
25°, 10 mL/min 3.5 3.7 0.00017 1.6295 0.9984
50°, 10 mL/min 3.2 3.3 0.00019 1.6452 0.9970
75°, 10 mL/min 2.9 3.0 0.00032 1.6819 0.9970
100°, 10 mL/min 2.5 2.5 0.00068 1.6871 0.9975
25°, 30 mL/min 4.4 4.6 0.00039 1.6015 0.9972
25°, 50 mL/min 5.2 5.3 0.00051 1.6327 0.9968
25°, 70 mL/min 4.6 4.7 0.00017 1.6687 0.9991
25°, 90 mL/min 4.0 4.1 0.00014 1.7453 0.9993
TOOLS
PDF Links  PDF Links
PubReader  PubReader
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
  Print
Share:      
METRICS
0
Crossref
0
Scopus
1,839
View
53
Download
Editorial Office
464 Cheongpa-ro, #726, Jung-gu, Seoul 04510, Republic of Korea
FAX : +82-2-383-9654   E-mail : eer@kosenv.or.kr

Copyright© Korean Society of Environmental Engineers.        Developed in M2PI
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers