AbstractPlant species diversity is an important factor affecting nitrogen (N) removal in constructed wetlands (CWs), but these effects are poorly understood for the cold season. The potential effect of plant density on ecosystem function is also understudied. This study set up a two-factor experiment to explore the effects of plant species diversity and density on N removal and plant growth in CWs during the cold season. The results showed that: (1) Plant species richness positively affected plant aboveground N pool but had no significant effect on N removal efficiency or plant aboveground biomass. (2) Across plant density treatments, Acorus calamus monocultures had significantly higher plant belowground biomass and N pools than Reineckea carnea monocultures. (3) The increase in plant planting density not only increased plant biomass and plant N pool of R. carnea monoculture, but also improved the removal efficiency of nitrate nitrogen (NO3−-N) and total inorganic nitrogen (TIN) in R. carnea monoculture. These results showed that plant species diversity had a limited effect on N removal in CWs during the cold season, but more N could be removed by increasing planting density and harvesting specific plants, such as A. calamus.
Graphical Abstract1. IntroductionThe application development of constructed wetlands (CWs) has quickly spread worldwide in recent years as a sustainable wastewater management option [1, 2]. One of the main services provided by CWs is nitrogen (N) removal, mainly through nitrification, denitrification, plant uptake, and sediment adsorption [3–7]. Among these, plant uptake and microbial transformation of N through nitrification or denitrification are both directly and indirectly affected by climatic conditions, such as temperature [8–10]. Low temperature may limit plant growth and uptake; it may also inhibit the growth and activity of microbes, resulting in low N purification efficiency of CWs [10–12]. Therefore, improving the N removal efficiency of CWs during the cold season is a challenge.
Plant species diversity has been widely studied, as it is a key driver of community biomass and N removal of CWs [13–15]. Most studies reported that high plant species richness increased community biomass [16, 17], plant N pool [18–20], and N removal efficiency [21, 22]. However, some studies found that plant species richness did not affect these metrics [23–25]. Furthermore, plant species composition also affects plant biomass, plant N pool and N removal [21, 24, 25]. For example, the effluent N concentration of Canna indica mesocosms was significantly lower than Phragmites australis mesocosms and unplanted controls [26]. Ammophila breviligulata monocultures can produce 50% more biomass than Koeleria pyramidata monocultures [27]. In addition, aboveground plant biomass can increase by 137% in the four-species mixture compared with monocultures [20]. However, most previous studies were conducted in warm seasons and at a set plant density, ignoring these potential effects on ecosystem function.
Plant density is one of the key factors that determines the competition intensity and degree of resource utilization among plants, and it has a great effect on plant traits and growth [28–30]. Plant density can affect ecosystem functioning and biodiversity by altering plant interactions [31, 32]. In grasslands, increased plant density enhanced the positive effect of plant species diversity on productivity [31, 32]. In CWs, it was also proposed that plant density enhances the effects of plant species diversity on ecosystem functions; however, there has only been one study of this kind [25]. Additionally, this experiment was carried out in the warm season on floating CWs, so the effects of plant species diversity and plant density on the ecosystem functioning of CWs in the cold season are still unknown.
In this study, CW microcosms were established and fed with high N wastewater in the cold season. Two cold-resistant aquatic species were planted in three species compositions at three densities. Our objectives were to explore the effects of plant species diversity and density during the cold season on (1) N removal efficiency and (2) plant biomass and N pool to (3) determine which plant species compositions exhibited high N removal efficiency in CWs in the cold season.
2. Materials and Methods2.1. Experiment DesignThe experiment was established in a semi-open greenhouse on the campus of Wenzhou University (28°01′N, 120°65e;E, Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China). A greenhouse with a transparent plastic roof and no walls was used; this kept off rainwater while ensuring that light intensity, air temperature, and humidity inside the greenhouse were similar to those of outside. According to meteorological data from the Zhejiang Provincial Bureau of Statistics, the average temperature in Wenzhou in October was 21.1°C, and the average minimum temperature was 17°C. The average temperature in November was 18.3°C, and the average minimum temperature was 14°C. The average temperature in December was 11°C, the average minimum temperature was 7°C. The microcosms were constructed using PVC (51 cm length × 38 cm width × 29 cm height) and filled with sand to a depth of 25 cm in October 2020 (Fig. 1).
We selected two common local aquatic plants that could grow in the cold season: Acorus calamus L. and Reineckea carnea (Andrews) Kunth. The experiment was a two-factor study of plant species diversity and density. Plant species diversity includes two species richness levels (1 or 2) and three plant community compositions: two monocultures and one two-species mixture. Each composition was tested at three densities: 4, 8, and 12 individuals per microcosm (Fig. 1). The experiment used a randomized complete block design with three replicates. In total, 27 microcosms were constructed, and seedlings were transplanted into the microcosms in October 2020.
Wastewater was simulated by the Hoagland nutrient solution [33] with a minor modification (Table 1). Due to the high nitrogen concentration of the simulated catering wastewater, the experimental total inorganic nitrogen (TIN) concentration was 336 mg L−1 [20, 25]. Before each irrigation event, all microcosms were emptied of water. Then, each microcosm was supplied with 6 L of simulated wastewater every seven days for eleven weeks, simulating the batch watering of CWs [34].
2.2. Sampling and MeasurementsWater samples were collected weekly over the 11-week experiment. The microcosms were drained at each sampling. Effluent samples (250 ml) were collected weekly from each microcosm and stored at −20°C. Before analysis, the water samples were thawed at 4°C and filtered using a membrane syringe filter (pore size 0.45 μm). The concentrations of ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N) and nitrate nitrogen (NO3−-N) were determined by Nessler’s reagent spectrophotometry and ultraviolet spectrophotometry, respectively. Total inorganic nitrogen (TIN) concentration was calculated as the sum of these concentrations.
All plants were harvested by species after the final effluent collection. The aboveground and belowground biomass were measured after the plant samples were dried at 65°C for 72 hours and summed to determine the total biomass. Then, the aboveground and belowground plant samples were dried and ground into powder, and the N concentration was measured by isotope mass spectrometry (Flash HT2000, Thermo Finnigan, Bremen, Germany). The plant N pool was calculated as the plant biomass of each species multiplied by the plant N concentration.
2.3. Parameter CalculationsThe N removal efficiency (RE) in the CWs system was calculated as follows:
where Ci is the influent N concentration of each microcosm (mg L−1) and Ce is the effluent N concentration of each microcosm (mg L−1).
The contribution efficiency of plant uptake to N removal (CE) was calculated by:
where Np is the N uptake by plants (mg), Ni is the influent microcosm N (mg), and Ne is the effluent microcosm N (mg).
2.4. Statistical AnalysisTwo-way ANOVA was used to test the effects of plant species diversity (species richness and composition) and plant density on N removal efficiency, plant biomass, and plant N pool. One-way ANOVA was used to detect differences in various parameters between plant species combinations and planting densities. If there were significant differences, multiple additional comparisons were carried out (Turkey method). Before statistical analysis, the data were analyzed for normality (Kolmogorov–Smirnov test) and equality of variance (Levene’s test). All statistical analyses were conducted using software R 4.1.1 with a statistical significance level 0.05.
3. Results and Discussion3.1. Effects of Plant Species Diversity and Density on Plant Growth in the Cold SeasonPlant density is one of the key factors affecting ecosystem functioning and plays an important role in plant productivity [28, 29]. In this study, plant density had a significant effect on plant aboveground, belowground, and total biomass (Table 2). The aboveground biomass of R. carnea in monoculture and mixed cultures were significantly higher under high-density treatment than those of low densities (Fig. 2). Both the belowground biomass and total biomass of A. calamus and R. carnea monocultures under high-density treatment were significantly higher than those of low density (Fig. 2). This may be because the increase of plant density can increase plant biomass. However, exceedingly high density may increase competition among species and decrease the biomass of individual plants [35], which may explain the lack of significant differences between biomass at medium density and high density.
Over the past few decades, the number of studies on the relationship between plant species diversity and ecosystem function has increased. Most of these studies have shown that high plant species diversity improves plant productivity in CWs [36]. However, in this study, plant species richness had no significant effect on plant aboveground, belowground, and total biomass across plant density treatments (Table 2). Different plant species prefer different forms of N, resulting in a positive effect of plant species diversity on productivity [37,38]. Existing studies were mainly carried out in high ammonium or high nitrate systems, but this study was carried out under a NH4+/NO3−-N ratio of 1:1. Previous studies also showed no significant difference in plant biomass and species richness under the mixed NH4+/NO3−-N treatments [21]. Beyond this possible explanation, temperature can affect the photosynthetic and metabolic activities of plants [39]. Under low-temperature stress, the enzymatic activity of plants decreases significantly, resulting in slow uptake of external substances [40]. The data from the Plant Science Data Center indicates that Acorus calamus prefers a warm and humid environment, with the most optimum temperature for growth being 20–25°C and stopping growing below 10°C; Reineckea carnea has good cold resistance, with the most optimum temperature for growth being 15–28°C. Since this experiment was conducted in the cold season, plants were inhibited by low temperature, which may have prevented plant species richness from affecting plant biomass. In addition, this study only sets two richness levels, which limited the effect of species richness to a certain extent.
As an important part of plant species diversity, species composition affects plant biomass [20–23]. Our results showed that plant species composition significantly affected plant belowground and total biomasses (Table 2). Under medium and high-density conditions, the plant belowground and total biomasses of A. calamus monoculture were significantly higher than those of R. carnea monoculture (Fig. 2). Studies have shown that the growth of A. calamus depends on the application dose of N [41]. Under field conditions such as nutrient-rich wetland habitats, A. calamus grows vigorously [42]. In this experiment, simulated wastewater with high N concentration met the needs of A. calamus and permitted a greater biomass accumulation. These results indicate that the effect of plant species diversity on productivity was limited in the cold season, but appropriately increasing plant density can promote growth, and N can be removed by harvesting specific plants, such as A. calamus.
3.2. Effects of Plant Species Diversity and Density on N Removal in the Cold SeasonAs a key factor of ecosystem functioning, temperature plays an important role in plant growth and microbial activity in CW systems [43]. Studies have shown that along with increased plant growth, the average N removal efficiency of CWs in the warm season is 6–11% higher than in the cold season [9–11]. In this study, the average removal efficiencies of NO3−-N, NH4+-N and TIN in the CWs in the cold season were 83.02%, 79.27%, and 80.21%, respectively. These values are equivalent to the N removal efficiency of the CWs in the warm season [44,45], indicating that high N efficiency can be maintained by selecting appropriate cold-tolerant plants.
Previous studies have shown that plant species diversity has a positive effect on N removal efficiency in CWs, and these effects can be enhanced by increased plant density [22, 24, 25]. This study focused on the effects of plant species diversity and density on N removal of CWs. We found that plant density has a significant impact on the removal efficiencies of NO3−-N and TIN from CWs (Table 3). NO3−-N removal efficiency of R. carnea monoculture under high and medium density is significantly higher than at a low density (Fig. 3a). TIN removal efficiency of R. carnea monoculture at medium density was significantly higher than at a low density (Fig. 3c). Plant uptake is a main form of N removal in CWs [46–48], so the improved N removal at medium and high densities may be due to its increased uptake by R. carnea monoculture. Plant biomass was negatively correlated with effluent N concentration in CWs (Fig. 5). At medium and high densities, the belowground N pools of R. carnea monoculture were significantly higher than at a low density (Fig. 4b). N is additionally removed through nitrification and denitrification [49]. Higher plant density can increase root length density and provide more microbial attachment sites, which improves the N removal efficiency of CWs [29].
N removal often increases in systems with higher plant species richness [50]. Many studies have shown that species composition has a significant effect on N removal efficiency in CWs [21,24,25]. However, in this experiment, plant species richness and composition had no significant effect on N removal efficiency (Table 3). A common form of N removal is plant uptake. Plant N uptake is related to biomass and N concentration [51]. In this study, plant species diversity did not affect plant aboveground biomass or N pool (Fig. 2, Fig. 4a). In this study, the average contribution efficiency of plant uptake was 5.39%. This is far below 100%, indicating that other N removal pathways played a large role; this likely included microbial nitrification and denitrification. There was also no difference in plant N removal between the two species at medium and high density (Fig. 4d). Some studies have shown that nitrification and denitrification intensity differ by species [52]. Future research into nitrification and denitrification intensities is required.
3.3. Application SuggestionsN removal is the main purpose of CWs [44]. This experiment illustrated that plant density significantly affected the N removal efficiency of CWs in the cold season; this cold season N removal efficiency could be improved by increasing plant density. There is no significant N removal efficiency difference between A. calamus and R. carnea; both are excellent species for N removal in the cold season. Plant biomass is an important index of plant growth, and biomass accumulation also accumulates N in plants. After harvesting, plants can be used as a sustainable form of bio-energy [53]. In this experiment, the biomass and N pool of A. calamus were significantly higher than that of R. carnea. Therefore, A. calamus is a better choice for N removal in CWs. In the future we can improve the N removal efficiency of CWs in the cold season by increasing plant density and sowing specific plants, such as A. calamus.
4. ConclusionsThis project explores the effects of plant species diversity and density on N removal, plant biomass, and plant N pool in the cold season in CWs. It also assesses the contribution efficiency of plant uptake to N removal. The results show that higher plant density could improve N removal efficiency by increasing the N uptake of plants in the cold season. Specific plant species, such as A. calamus, can improve the biomass and N pool of the system, increasing the N removed by harvesting plants. However, this experiment did not determine the contributions of microorganisms to N removal. To develop a more robust model of the ways in which plant diversity and density influence N removal in CWs during the cold season, it will be necessary to determine the microbial community structure.
AcknowledgmentsWe are grateful to Xueyi Wu and Jingqi Yu for sampling. We would like to thank Dr. Joseph Elliot at the University of Kansas for his assistance with English language and grammatical editing of the manuscript.
This research was funded by the Major Projects of Study on National Social Science Foundation of China, grant number 21ZDA028; the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, grant number LY22C030003.
NotesAuthor Contributions W.J.H. (Associate Professor) provided conceptualization. L.P.Y. (Master student) and L.Q.S. (Undergraduate student) and W.J.H. (Associate Professor) conducted formal analysis and wrote the original manuscript. J.W.T. (Master student), L.Q.S. (Undergraduate student), Q.N.S. (Undergraduate student), and Y.Y.W. (Undergraduate student) conducted investigation. W.J.H. (Associate Professor), D.R.X. (Professor), X.Y.Z. (Professor), and M.Z. (Professor) wrote and revised the manuscript. M.Z. (Professor) and W.J.H. (Associate Professor) provided funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. References1. Ilyas H, Masih I. The performance of the intensified constructed wetlands for organic matter and nitrogen removal: a review. J. Environ. Manage. 2017;198:372–383.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.098
2. Lu JX, Guo ZZ, Kang Y, Fan JL, Zhang J. Recent advances in the enhanced nitrogen removal by oxygen-increasing technology in constructed wetlands. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 2020;205:111330.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111330
3. Ma B, Wang S, Cao S, Miao Y, Jia F, Du R, Peng Y. Biological nitrogen removal from sewage via anammox: recent advances. Bioresour. Technol. 2016;200:981–990.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.074
4. Wang H, Zhong HY, Bo GZ. Existing forms and changes of nitrogen inside of horizontal subsurface constructed wetlands. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018;25:771–781.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0477-1
5. Liu F, Fan J, Du J, Shi X, Zhang J, Shen Y. Intensified nitrogen transformation in intermittently aerated constructed wetlands: removal pathways and microbial response mechanism. Sci. Total. Environ. 2019;650(2)2880–2887.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.037
6. Huang M, Wang Z, Qi R. Enhancement of the complete auto-trophic nitrogen removal over nitrite process in a modified single-stage subsurface vertical flow constructed wetland: effect of saturated zone depth. Bioresour. Technol. 2017;233:191–199.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.02.100
7. Zhou X, Jia L, Liang C, Feng L, Wang R, Wu H. Simultaneous enhancement of nitrogen removal and nitrous oxide reduction by a saturated biochar-based intermittent aeration vertical flow constructed wetland: effects of influent strength. Chem. Eng. J. 2018;334:1842–1850.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.066
8. Pang Y, Zhang Y, Yan X, Ji G. Cold temperature effects on long-term nitrogen transformation pathway in a tidal flow constructed wetland. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015;49(22)13550–13557.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04002
9. Tunçsiper B, Drizo A, Twohig E. Constructed wetlands as a potential management practice for cold climate dairy effluent treatment-VT, USA. Catena. 2015;135:184–192.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2015.07.028
10. Wang M, Zhang DQ, Dong JW, Tan SK. Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in cold climate – A review. J. Environ. Sci. 2017;57:293–311.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2016.12.019
11. Mahesh V, Ashok KG, Partha SG, Abhradeep M. A review on performance of constructed wetlands in tropical and cold climate: Insights of mechanism, role of influencing factors, and system modification in low temperature. Sci. Total. Environ. 2021;755:142540.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142540
12. Ji B, Zhao YQ, Vymazal J, Qiao SX, Wei T, Li J, Mander Ülo. Can subsurface flow constructed wetlands be applied in cold climate regions? A review of the current knowledge. Ecol. Eng. 2020;157:105992.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105992
13. Du YY, Niu SD, Jiang H, Luo B, Wang Q, Han WJ, Liu Y, Chang J, Ge Y. Comparing the effects of plant diversity on the nitrogen removal and stability in floating and sand-based constructed wetlands under ammonium/nitrate ratio disturbance. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021;28:69354–69366.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14829-y
14. Sun HY, Xin QW, Ma ZH, Lan SR. Effects of plant diversity on carbon dioxide emissions and carbon removal in laboratory-scale constructed wetland. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019;26:5076–5082.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3988-5
15. Zheng YC, Yang D, Dzakpasu M, Yang Q, Liu Y, Zhang HF, Zhang L, Wang XCC, Zhao YQ. Effects of plants competition on critical bacteria selection and pollutants dynamics in a long-term polyculture constructed wetland. Bioresour. Technol. 2020;316:123927.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123927
16. Wang H, Chen ZX, Zhang XY, Zhu SX, Ge Y, Chang SX, Zhang CB, Huang CC, Chang J. Plant species richness increased belowground plant biomass and substrate nitrogen removal in a constructed wetland. Clean– Soil, Air, Water. 2013;41(7)657–664.
https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201200348
17. Han WJ, Chang J, Fan X, Du YY, Chang SX, Zhang C, Ge Y. Plant species diversity impacts nitrogen removal and nitrous oxide emissions as much as carbon addition in constructed wetland microcosms. Ecol. Eng. 2016;93:144–151.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.05.030
18. Wang XX, Dong SK, Sherman R, Liu QR, Liu SL, Li YY, Wu Y. A comparison of biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships in alpine grasslands across a degradation gradient on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau. Rangeland J. 2015;37:45–55.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/RJ14081
19. Fargione J, Tilman D, Dybzinski R, Lambers JHR, Clark C, Harpole WS, Knops JMH, Reich PB, Loreau M. From selection to complementarity: shifts in the causes of biodiversity–productivity relationships in a long-term biodiversity experiment. Proc. R. Soc. B. 2007;274:871–876.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.0351
20. Han WJ, Chang J, Jiang H, Niu SD, Liu Y, Xu JM, Wu JZ, Ge Y. Plant species diversity affects plant nutrient pools by affecting plant biomass and nutrient concentrations in high-nitrogen ecosystems. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2021;56:213–225.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2021.08.002
21. Ge Y, Han WJ, Huang CC, Wang H, Liu D, Chang SX, Gu BH, Zhang CB, Gu BH, Fan X, Du YY, Chang J. Positive effects of plant diversity on nitrogen removal in microcosms of constructed wetlands with high ammonium loading. Ecol. Eng. 2015;82:614–623.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.05.030
22. Geng Y, Ge Y, Luo B, Chen ZX, Min Y, Schmid B, Gu BH, Chang J. Plant diversity increases N removal in constructed wetlands when multiple rather than single N processes are considered. Ecol. Appl. 2019;29(7)e01965.
https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1965
23. Han WJ, Ge Y, Ren Y, Luo B, Du YY, Chang J, Wu JZ. Removal of metals and their pools in plant in response to plant diversity in microcosms of floating constructed wetlands. Ecol. Eng. 2018;113:65–73.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.01.012
24. Han WJ, Luo GY, Luo B, Yu CC, Wang H, Chang J, Ge Y. Effects of plant diversity on greenhouse gas emissions in microcosms simulating vertical constructed wetlands with high ammonium loading. J. Environ. Sci. 2019;77:229–237.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2018.08.001
25. Han WJ, Sheng XL, Shao JN, Jiang J, He QR, Lin Y. Effects of plant diversity and plant density on ecosystem functions in floating constructed wetlands. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2020;231:544.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-04913-3
26. Chen X, Zhu H, Yan BX, Shutes B, Xing DF, Banuelos G, Cheng R, Wang XY. Greenhouse gas emissions and wastewater treatment performance by three plant species in subsurface flow constructed wetland mesocosms. Chemosphere. 2020;239:124795.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124795
27. Crawford KM, Rudgers JA. Plant species diversity and genetic diversity within a dominant species interactively affect plant community biomass. J. Ecol. 2012;100:1512–1521.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2012.02016.x
28. Xue W, Bezemer TM, Berendse F. Density-dependency and plant-soil feedback: former plant abundance influences competitive interactions between two grassland plant species through plant-soil feedbacks. Plant Soil. 2018;428:441–452.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-3690-x
29. Hecht VL, Temperton VM, Nagel KA, Pude RR, Postma JA. Plant density modifies root system architecture in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) through a change in nodal root number. Plant Soil. 2019;439:179–200.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-3764-9
30. Wang P, Wang ZK, Sun XC, Mu XH, Chen H, Chen FJ, Yuan LX, Mi GH. Interaction effect of nitrogen form and planting density on plant growth and nutrient uptake in maize seedlings. J. Integr. Agric. 2019;18(5)1120–1129.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(18)61977-X
31. He JS, Wolfe-Bellin KS, Schmid B, Bazzaz FA. Density may alter diversity-productivity relationships in experimental plant communities. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2015;6:505–517.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2005.04.002
32. Marquard E, Weigelt A, Roscher C, Gubsch M, Lipowsky A, Schmid B. Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship due to increased plant density. J. Ecol. 2009;97:696–704.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01521.x
33. Hoagland DR, Arnon DJ. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agric. 1950;347:1–32.
34. Faulwetter JL, Gagnon V, Sundberg C, Chazarenc F, Burr MD, Brisson J, Camper AK, Stein OR. Microbial processes influencing performance of treatment wetlands: a review. Ecol. Eng. 2009;35:987–1004.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2008.12.030
35. Li A, Niu K, Du G. Resource availability, species composition and sown density effects on productivity of experimental plant communities. Plant Soil. 2011;344:177–186.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-0738-6
36. Tilman D, Isbell F, Cowles MJ. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2014;45:471–493.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-120213-091917
37. Gherardi LA, Sala OE, Yahdjian L. Preference for different inorganic nitrogen forms among plant functional types and species of the Patagonian steppe. Oecologia. 2013;173(3)1075–1081.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2687-7
38. Nakamura M, Nakamura T, Tsuchiya T. Advantages of NH4
+ on growth, nitrogen uptake and root respiration of Phragmites australis
. Plant Soil. 2010;331:463–470.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0267-8
39. Yamori W, Hikosaka K, Way DA. Temperature response of photosynthesis in C3, C4, and CAM plants: temperature acclimation and temperature adaptation. Photosynth Res. 2014;119:101–117.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-013-9874-6
40. Glass ADM. Nitrogen use efficiency of crop plants: physiological constraints upon nitrogen absorption. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2003;22(5)453–470.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680390243512
41. Zhao YJ, Liu B, Zhang WG, Kong WJ, Hu CW, An SQ. Comparison of the treatment performances of high-strength wastewater in vertical subsurface flow constructed wetlands planted with Acorus calamus and Lythrum salicaria
. J. Health Sci. 2009;55(5)757–766.
https://doi.org/10.1248/jhs.55.757
42. Vojtíšková L, Munzarová E, Votrubová O, Řihová A, Juřicová B. Growth and biomass allocation of sweet flag (Acorus calamus L.) under different nutrient conditions. Hydrobiologia. 2004;518:9–22.
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025052.81373.f3
43. Zhou QW, Zhu H, Bañuelos G, Yan BX, Liang YX, Yu XF, Cheng XW, Chen LJ. Effects of vegetation and temperature on nutrient removal and microbiology in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands for treatment of domestic sewage. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2017;228:95.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-017-3280-1
44. Vymazal J. Removal of nutrients in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment through plant harvesting – Biomass and load matter the most. Ecol. Eng. 2020;155:105962.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105962
45. Vymazal J. Emergent plants used in free water surface constructed wetlands: A review. Ecol. Eng. 2013;61:582–592.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.06.023
46. Gottschall N, Boutin C, Crolla A, Kinsley C, Champagne P. The role of plants in the removal of nutrients at constructed wetland treating agricultural (dairy) wastewater, Ontario, Canada. Ecol. Eng. 2007;29:154–163.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.06.004
47. Brix H. Do macrophytes play a role in constructed treatment wetlands? Water Sci. Technol. 1997;35(5)11–17.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1997.0154
48. Hallin S, Hellman M, Choudhury MI, Ecke F. Relative importance of plant uptake and plant associated denitrification for removal of nitrogen from mine drainage in sub-arctic wetlands. Water Res. 2015;85:377–383.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.08.060
49. Sánchez O. Constructed Wetlands Revisited: Microbial Diversity in the –omics Era. Microb. Ecol. 2017;73:722–733.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-016-0881-y
50. Choudhury MI, McKie BG, Hallin S, Ecke F. Mixtures of macrophyte growth forms promote nitrogen cycling in wetlands. Sci. Total Environ. 2018;635:1436–1443.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.193
51. Kamiji Y, Pang JY, Milroy SP, Palta JA. Shoot biomass in wheat is the driver for nitrogen uptake under low nitrogen supply, but not under high nitrogen supply. Field Crops Res. 2014;165:92–98.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.04.009
52. Wang JW, Long YN, Yu GL, Wang GL, Zhou ZY, Li PY, Zhang YM, Yang K, Wang ST. A Review on Microorganisms in Constructed Wetlands for Typical Pollutant Removal: Species, Function, and Diversity. Front. Microbiol. 2022;13:854725.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.845725
53. Liu D, Wu X, Chang J, Gu B, Min Y, Ge Y, Shi Y, Xue H, Peng C, Wu J. Constructed wetlands as biofuel production systems. Nature Clim Change. 2012;2:190–194.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1370
Table 1Table 2 |
|