| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
Environ Eng Res > Volume 27(2); 2022 > Article
Judith and Vasudevan: Synthesis of nanomaterial from industrial waste and its application in environmental pollutant remediation


Increased productions of waste from industries have persuaded in sustainable and naturally stable methods to reuse the waste. Utilization of wastes for the synthesis of nanomaterial is of significant importance due to its extensive variety of uses in various industrial sectors. This review focuses on potential options available for nanomaterial synthesis from waste produced by industrial activities and manufacturing processes. Possible application of industrial waste derived nanomaterial for the expulsion of organic and inorganic contaminants is discussed. Furthermore, the future opportunities and challenges in this emerging research area of converting industrial waste to nanomaterials are addressed.

1. Introduction

Industrialization and urbanization has led to billion tons of toxic waste generation annually by creating significant burden on the environment [1]. Therefore effective treatment technology development and finite resources conservation is essential when the limiting resources of the earth, the limited land availability for waste disposal and its adverse impact on environment is taken into account [2]. In the waste generated from various industrial sector, there exist large quantities of secondary raw materials that could be used in wide range of applications [3]. In order to safeguard the environment, waste minimization, separation and recycling processes should be developed [4]. However industrial wastes released from different manufacturing processes exhibit hazardous characteristics and are mostly composed of heavy metals such as lead, cadmium, copper, arsenic, nickel, chromium, zinc and mercury creating significant burden on the environment. In particular, the main contributors for the release of toxic heavy metals in the waste streams include Mining, electroplating, metal processing, textile, battery manufacturing, tanneries, paint manufacturing, paper and pulp industry [5, 6]. The industrial wastes with heavy metals, toxic chemicals, and dyes and has the ability to accumulate in human bodies and cause serious diseases and physical disorders. Among which, heavy metals were considered as the most hazardous. For example, short term exposure to high dosage of chromium causes irritation at the site of contact, affects nasal mucosa and cause ulcers on the skin. Chromium utilizing industries such as paint pigment and paper industries, mining, electroplating, leather tanning, metal processing, textile, dyeing and steel fabrication are some of sources of chromium pollution. Lead pollution is caused from steel waste, battery waste and petrol where, lead gets accumulated in the kidney, brain, muscles, and bones causing hypertension, kidney and brain damage [7]. Nanomaterial synthesis from industrial waste is an effective way for treatment and recycle of waste which conforms to the concepts of minimum waste generation and wealth from waste [8]. Since, nanoparticles present unique properties like high specific surface area and reactivity, it helps in detection and removal of diverse targets, including chemicals, pollutant gases, organic pollutants, and biological substrates (e.g., bacteria, virus, antibiotics). Currently, industrial waste utilization as starting material for synthesizing nanomaterial has gained interest due to attractive economic returns and its path towards sustainable development [9]. Electroplating industrial waste is one of the highly used waste for the synthesis of waste derived nanomaterials due to high level enrichment with organic matter and metals (Fe, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Mn, Sn, Ag etc.) in various forms such as mixed oxides, hydroxides, sulfates, silicates and phosphates, that are potential precursors to advanced catalysts [10]. At present, the conventional treatment methods for electroplating waste are landfill, brick making, stabilization with cement matrix etc. [11]. In like manner, fly ash produced during coal combustion in thermal power plants is one of the complex and abundant solid waste comprising major portion of Si and Al and small amounts of Fe, Ca, Na, P, K, Ti, and S. Fly ash are primarily in metal oxides forms which can easily agglomerate to form microspheres. Still another, Red mud produced during alumina generation from bauxite ores composed primarily of fine particles containing iron, aluminium, silicon, titanium oxides and hydroxides. Calcium is the main element of paper making industry with small number of other elements, including Si, Al, Mg, K, Na, Mn, and Cr [12].
Without proper treatment, the industrial waste can damage both environment and human. Conventional methods that are currently used for the treatment or disposal of industrial waste include landfill, incineration, curing and stabilization. However, all these technologies have certain disadvantages. For example, leakage of heavy metal and organics from the landfill potentially contaminates soil and groundwater; waste incineration reduces only the volume of waste polluting the air; high waste stabilization costs. According to the “3R” rules (Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle), it is urgently necessary to find a method for the utilization of industrial waste [13]. From a long term perspective, landfill is not environmentally benign method and may cause loss in huge amount of valuable resources and leaching of metals resulting serious secondary pollution. Thus the promising option for industrial waste treatment is to maximize the recovery and reusing of resource economically [14]. Many research works has been done to convert Industrial waste materials into valuable products such as ceramic [15], pigment [1618], catalyst [14] etc. Recently it has gained interest in nanomaterial synthesis from waste and its application in pollutant removal due to its large surface area and properties. A survey of literature demonstrates that, this area is starting to attract more approach. The use of waste derived nanomaterials for the industrial application in pollution removal not only resolves the waste disposal problems but also helps in managing natural resource exploitation. Moreover, substituting the waste derived materials instead of virgin materials helps in improving the process economy, where the valuable materials are exploited in the production process. Therefore a great research interest is developing in usage of waste derived nanoparticle as an efficient and inexpensive material for the removal of pollutants from the environment. Previously, Yuan and Dai [19] has published a review paper which explains about the development of functional nanomaterials from sewage sludge and its applications. This review focuses on the nanomaterial synthesis from industrial waste streams highlighting the applicability of waste derived nanomaterial in pollution remediation.

2. Recovery/Synthesis of Nanomaterial from Industrial Waste

Conversion of regularly generated waste product into useful nanomaterial generally comes under the sustainable development [20]. A broad range of industrial waste has been thermo-chemically treated to recover valuable nanomaterials (Table 1). Different manufacturing techniques have been employed for the synthesis of nanomaterial with various morphology and size. Conventional technologies use a top-down method for construction of materials, where bulk materials are broken into smaller pieces using mechanical, chemical or other forms of energy. On the other hand, in bottom-up approach the ions are chemically combined together to form the particles [21, 22]. Industrial waste derived nanomaterials synthesis technique by bottom up approach includes co-precipitation [2327], hydrothermal method [17, 2833], Microwave irradiation [34] and by top down approach include ball milling technique [3539]. The metal and their oxides recovered from industrial wastes include Cr, Cu, Fe, Ni, Ti, Al, Ni and the nanomaterials have been regenerated from electroplating waste, picking waste, tannery waste, fly ash, steel industry waste, paper mill sludge, phosphogypsum waste etc. A few examples of recovered nanomaterials are MFe2O4 (M: Mn, Cu, Zn, Fe, Ni, Ag), magnetic biochar, magnetic chitosan, TiO2 modified fly ash and zeolite [40, 41]

2.1. Pre-treatment of Industrial Waste

Industrial waste pre-treatment is a vital step for the production of nanomaterial from waste. Based on the composition of waste sample, preparation methods are categorized into physical treatment and chemical treatment methods. The chemical composition of the waste and the treatment method affect the physicochemical properties and surface functional group of synthesized nanomaterial. The process variables that has effect on synthesis include temperature, acid used for treatment and the chemicals used for activation [19, 42]. Initially industrial waste was directly used as catalyst without any pretreatment. The catalytic behaviour of Red mud and iron waste was studied for sulfadiazine degradation using H2O2 and persulfate with the generation of OH and SO4 . Then pretreatment of waste by physical and chemical activation was used to enhance the activity [12]. Ball milling of industrial waste is one of the physical treatment method which reduces the particle size to obtain homogenous mixture for further application [43, 44]. Lee et al. [45] studied the ball milling effect on particle size and its influence in calcium extraction from steelmaking slag. The finer the particle size, the reaction between the components becomes easier [46]. The efficiency of calcium extraction increased by ball milling effect (360 rpm for 72 h) [11]. Subsequently, the basic aim of chemical pre-treatment is to remove any contaminants present in the waste sample that can be made soluble by heating or treating with chemicals. The presence of soluble salts such as chlorides, sulfates, and carbonates in the waste can cause defects because of their dissociation thereby damaging the products during firing at high temperatures. Abreu et al. [47] reported that the particle size distribution of waste influenced the salt extraction due to the demand of great quantities of water and long exposure time. Strong acid hydrolysis is a kind of chemical pre-treatment where concentrated strong acids (e.g., HNO3, HCl, H2SO4) have been commonly applied for treating waste materials [48, 49]. For example, to prepare γ- and α-Al nanopowder from waste aluminum foils, waste materials were initially dissolved into aqua regia, after which an ammonia solution was added for maintaining the solution pH in the alkaline range [50].

2.2. Methods for Nanomaterial Synthesis

Several thermo chemical methods can be used to synthesize industrial waste derived nanoparticles such as co-precipitation, hydrothermal, carbothermal, solvothermal and microwave assisted methods [21]. The synthesis of waste derived nanoparticles is a complex process because of their characteristics. For pollutant removal applications, surface modification of nanoparticles is considered as a critical aspect regarding both selectivity and aqueous stability [51]. A brief description of the most widely used methods for preparing nanomaterials with advantages and disadvantages are discussed below.

2.2.1. Co-precipitation method

Co-precipitation method is one of the most common wet chemical methods for obtaining waste derived nanoparticle. This method is widely used among other methods due to its simple operation and high yield of nanomaterials [12]. The metal content in the industrial waste was leached with acids (HNO3, HCl, H2SO4). The acid extracted metal solutions are treated with alkali (NaOH, MgO,) to increase the pH ranging from 7 to 12 [52]. The size and shape of the nanoparticle depends on the type of extractant, molar ratio of the metal, reaction temperature, PH and other reaction parameters, e.g., stirring rate, dropping speed of basic solution [23, 26, 27]. Liang et al. [53] synthesised silica nano-particles by precipitating silica where, alkali extraction and acid treatment was done to bring up the pH to 7 and aging it for 12 h thereby dried at 100oC. The purity of the nanoparticles obtained by precipitating silica from biomass flyash ranged from 44.42 to 93.63%. The only disadvantage in precipitation method is, the products obtained seems to be less pure compared to the products obtained from other methods.

2.2.2. Hydrothermal method

Hydrothermal processing can convert waste to value added products by heating at high temperature (120–550°C) and pressure (20–150 bar) with oxygen or an inert gas such as nitrogen. [54]. Solvothermal method is similar to hydrothermal method, but the only difference is in this method different solvents are used instead of water [55]. The materials prepared by this method contains many oxygen containing functional groups like C=O, C–O and O–H groups. Herein, C=O could generate oxygen (1O2) species which degrades the organic pollutant by solving the environmental problem of carbon rich waste [56]. Ferrite catalyst from electroplating sludge [14], Mganetic biochar from ferric sludge and biological sludge [33], sludge carbon/ TiO2 nanocomposite from anaerobic sludge [32], TiO2–FA nano-composites [30] and Tungsten oxide-FA nanocomposite [29] was prepared by hydrothermal method. It is considered to be an efficient method in treating wet solid waste rich in carbon, because it has more advantages than high temperature pyrolysis. The energy consumptions are low and the reaction conditions are mild and it has no requirement on the moisture content of the raw materials. So there is no need to dry the waste before hydrothermal treatment [56]. Importantly, the advantage of hydrothermal method is, it can be used to control material size, particle morphology, crystalline phase, and surface chemistry by controlling the reaction temperature, pressure and solvent properties and the main disadvantage is its high reaction temperature and pressure [55].

2.2.3. Microwave assisted synthesis

Microwave assisted synthesis method have been used in the synthesis of diverse inorganic materials such as metallic nanoparticles, amorphous and nanoporous materials, core-shell particles, semiconductors, bioceramics, pure and mixed metal oxides [57]. During synthesis process microwave energy strikes the material through molecular and ionic interaction of the precursor solvents and reducing agents [58]. Microwave radiation has also been used to detoxify sediment sludge and immobilization of metal ion within the sediment [59]. This method has many advantages over other techniques which includes, rapid heating, fast reaction, high yield and excellent thermal stability thus being one of the most effective method for nanoparticle synthesis [34]. Duan et al. [60] synthesized magnetic biochar from iron sludge and cotton stalk for the removal of Cr(VI) using microwave chemical reactor. Zhang et al. [34] successfully synthesized hydroxyapatite nanoparticles from phosphogypsum waste produced from phosphorus fertilizer factory and checked its application for fluoride removal from aqueous solution. This method is upright compared to other synthesis methods due to their low temperature operation and its quick method of producing crystalline nanomaterials [55].

2.2.4. Pyrolysis

Pyrolysis is one of the most effective methods which helps to produce materials with satisfactory surface area, stable structure, great ion exchange capacity and value added surface functional groups like −OH, −COOH, C-O/C=O [61]. Pyrolysis temperature and reaction time plays a major role in altering the surface chemistry of the material. It affects the surface affinity to adsorb water, which proves to be an important factor in adsorption reaction. In a study conducted by Bandosz [62], temperature increase from 650 to 950oC resulted in increase of surface pH. Thus, the surface properties, such as porosity, selectivity, or catalytic activity can be modified by changing the pyrolysis conditions. The catalytic activity of the product is directly related to the new surface chemistry formed by solid-state reactions during pyrolysis. The disadvantages of this method are release of toxic gas release during material synthesis process and high energy consumption [12].

2.2.5. Sol-Gel method

Sol-gel method is in existence since 1800s and is applied in the development of materials for catalysis, chemical sensors, membranes, fibres and used in scientific and engineering fields. In this technique, a colloidal suspension is formed from the precursors by hydrolysis, polycondensation, aging, drying and thermal decomposition. The materials synthesized by Sol-gel method were highly crystalline with smaller crystallite size when compared to materials prepared by hydrothermal method under similar reaction conditions [63, 64]. Inorganic metal salts or metal organic compounds are the mostly used precursors in this method. Concerning the gel formation, the factors that impact the properties include solvent type, water content, acid or base content, precursor concentration and temperature [55]. The most important advantage of this method is that, the nanomaterial with high surface area and stable surfaces are formed at the end of the process [65]. As in, single phase chromium doped α-alumina nanoparticles was synthesized using sol-gel method by recycling chromium containing tannery waste using an initial solution pH of 4.0 and calcined at 1,100°C [66]. Similarly, coral like hierarchical magnesium oxide incorporated fly ash composite is formed by agglomeration by sol-gel method and is used as an adsorbant for Reactive Black 5 azo dye from aqueous solution.

2.2.6. Calcination

Calcination is done for the structural transformation of waste, which focuses on final product of oxide and mixed oxide. When the calcination temperature is below 400°C, the simple metal oxide was formed. However, at calcination temperature higher than 600°C spinel oxide was formed. By controlling the calcination temperature interesting functional materials were potentially obtained. When the precursor is calcined at lower temperature it gets transformed into layered double hydroxide. And, when this product was immersed in water or placed in moist gas, it reconstructed and the process is called “memory effect.” Conversely, if the calcination temperature was too high, the spinel will become unrecoverable [13].

3. Application for Pollutant Remediation

Different types of nanocatalysts such as semiconductors and metal oxides are used for wastewater treatment herein the photocatalysts, electrocatalysts and Fenton-based catalysts are used to improve chemical oxidation of organic pollutants and antimicrobial actions [127]. Recently various research was carried out for the removal of organic and inorganic contaminants by the nanomaterials obtained through processing of industrial waste. In this part the application of industrial waste derived nanomaterial for pollutant remediation is discussed. Table 2 summarizes the method of removal of pollutant and their removal capacities using industrial waste based nanomaterial.

3.1. Heterogeneous Phototcatalytic Degradation

Heterogeneous photocatalysis is recognized as a very potential technology for the removal of organic contaminants from water [128]. Heterogeneous photocatalysis takes place on the surface of catalyst and the pre-adsorption of pollutants are essential for their degradation. This is attained by using large surface area supports for adsorption and high adsorption capacity for target material. Adsorption strength of the substrate should be fair enough for its diffusion into the loaded TiO2. Many support materials such as activated carbon, stainless steel, silica, zeolites or clay materials were used to prepare hybrid photocatalysts [129]. Recently, utilization of waste material as surface support of TiO2 based photocatalyst has paid attention.

3.1.1. Photocatalytic activity of Fly ash/TiO2 nanocomposites

Fly ash serves as adsorption substrate along with TiO2 photocatalyst which represents an efficient and environmental friendly solution. The nanocomposites simultaneously removes two pollutants with different chemical structure and is accounted for the treatment of wastewaters loaded with heavy metals, dyes and surfactants [28, 127]. Fly ash is a mixture of unburned carbon and metal oxides in which Fe2O3 and MnO can act as in situ Fenton-systems and TiO2 being likely active in photocatalysis. Waste fly ash are promising support materials because of their surface composition, charge and morphology [80]. The photo-degradation and adsorption of Methylene blue, Bemacid Blau and Bemacid Rot, surfactant SDBS, Cd and Cu by Fly ash/TiO2 nanocomposites was extensively studied by Visa et al. [30, 79, 80, 82] The alkali activation can develop new active site (≡≡SiO) and (≡≡AlO) on FA surface which allows metals to be complexes at the surface. The change in chemical and structural property induce surface modification resulting in difference in surface affinity for Cd2+ and Cu2+ before and after treating with 2N NaOH [81]. Yang et al. [84] investigated the degradation effeciency of Rhodamine B by Zeolites fly ash bead (ZFAB)/TiO2 composite and benzene by Ag@TiO2/ZFAB. The composite was prepared by alkali activation by NaOH and mixing with TiO2 nanomaterial. The degradation efficiency of RhB dye reaches 83.8% after five cycles. This indicates that the prepared material has a good recyclability for RhB degradation. The removal rate of benzene gas reached 96.3% after three cycles, indicating the Ag@TiO2/ZFAB modified photocatalytic cementitious material exhibits constancy.

3.1.2. Photocatalytic activity of other nanocomposites

Photocatalytic mechanism involves the generation of electron - hole pairs upon irradiation of light which results in the formation of oxidizing and reducing agents on the surface of semiconductors. These oxidizing and reducing agents favour the degradation of organic pollutants in the presence of photons. Several semiconductor metal oxide photocatalysts including CdO-SnO2, ZnO-Cu2O, Cu2O/ TiO2, SnO2-TiO2, SnO2-Graphene, SnS2-SnO2, TiO2/CuS, NaNbO3/ CdS etc., have been developed, which can extend the absorption range to the visible region thereby suppressing the recombination of electron-hole pairs to improve the photocatalytic efficiency of the photocatalyst [132]. The zeta potential value of Magnetic iron oxide nanomaterial derived from industrial waste was positively charged at pH 2 and 3 and negatively charged from pH 5 to 10. The catalyst surface adsorbed H+ ions in the acidic medium and the basic medium due to the presence of OH ion thus two anionic dye (Methylene blue and Congo Red) and cationic dye (Rhodamine B) were degraded. The photocatalytic degradation of magnetic iron oxide nanopowder showed a better recyclable capacity of 78% upto 10 cycles [67].
Tungsten oxide (WO3), a semiconductor photocatalyst with 2.8 eV band gap, is activated by a portion of the visible light irradiation (λ < 442 nm). It has drawn interest as an alternative for TiO2. The tandem’s concept could be extended by mixing WO3 with other semiconductors, with suitably aligned band gap. As fly ash (FA) contains traces of a TiO2, it is used as photocatayst along with Fenton precursors (Fe2O3, MnO) which can participate in the hydroxyl generation process. Visa et.al., explored novel composite based on tungsten oxide and fly ash by hydrothermal synthesis and used as a substrate to treat Bemacid Blau - BB and Bemacid Rot – BR dye and Cu2+ heavy metal ion [29]. Zeolites fly ash bead/TiO2 composite was prepared by Alkali activation and mixing with TiO2 and is used for Rhodamine B dye degradation [84]. Additionally, Carbon based nanomaterial prepared from anaerobic sludge impregnated with TiO2 serves as a catalyst to degrade Bisphenol A. TiO2 addition on the surface of sludge carbon increase the mobility of charges, electro negativity and electro affinities, which in turn enhances photocatalytic activity [32].

3.2. Heterogeneous Fenton and Photo-Fenton Degradation

Fenton’s reagent is a mixture of ferrous ions and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), which forms active oxygen species capable of oxidizing organic contaminants. Photo-Fenton process combines the effect of the Fenton’s reaction and UV-Vis to produce hydroxyl radicals along with the photo-reduction of the ferric ions to form ferrous ions, which in turn contribute to the Fenton’s reaction. This creates more hydroxyl radicals compared to the classical Fenton and hence accelerates the oxidation process, which is considered as an advantage of this process [133].
Hydrothermal synthesis of Ferric sludge and biological sludge derived from the dyeing wastewater treatment process yielded magnetic biochar and degradation efficiency Methylene blue was catalyzed by Fenton process (Fig. 2). Dyeing wastewater was treated with Magnetic biochar, removal efficiency of Methylene blue was 98% and the catalytic efficiency was stable upto 4th cycle. The COD removal rate was 47 ± 3.3% and TOC removal was observed to be 49 ± 2.7% [33]. Previously Zhou at al. [76] synthesized magnetic biochar, a heterogeneous catalyst derived from paper mill sludge for the Fenton-like degradation of methylene blue with 93.3% removal efficiency. For the degradation of Bisphenol A, ferric sludge was used as catalyst source along with calcium peroxide and the ability of chelating agents, such as citric acid, oxalic acid, ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid and tartaric acid to hasten the BPA degradation and to reduce the Fe3+ dosage was assessed [88]. Meanwhile, Kong et al. [68] reported the conversion of iron rich sludge into Fe-SC hybrid Fenton-like catalyst by carbothermal process for the degradation of AOII. The efficiency AOII degradation achieved within 20 min at 30oC temperature and pH 7. Magnetic separable MnFe2O4 nanoparticle and CuFe2O4 was obtained from synthesised by co precipitation of heavy metal containing pickling waste liquor (PWL) and electroplating wastewater (EPW). The fenton like degradation of Rhodamine B removed up to 99% of dye and remained unchanged upto 8 cycles [23]. Similarly, Huang et al. [26] reported removal fenton like degradation of Bisphenol A, close to 100% and TOC 45%, by Fe3O4 nanoparticles from steel pickling waste liquor.
A zinc ferrite catalyst was prepared by the calcination of electroplating sludge (ES) for efficient degradation of methylene blue. The catalyst displayed 88.3% decolourization efficiency of methylene blue in the presence of H2O2 combined with UV irradiation. The small amount Al and Mg present in the sludge might also contribute to the catalysis[11]. The ferrite based fenton catalyst synthesized from industrial waste proves to be efficient in removing dye from wastewater and stable after recycling.

3.3. Catalytic Degradation

Waste as raw material for the synthesis of catalyst has gained interest due to the demand of catalyst in various industrial sectors. Catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol to aminophenols is investigated in the study conducted by Cunha et al. [66]. The chromium waste from tannery industry is doped with Alumina to synthesize catalyst to reduce 4-nitrophenol to aminophenols, which has wide application in the synthesis of industrial dyes, pharmaceuticals, and other biologically active compounds. The kinetics of the catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol was very fast, varying from 45 s to 40 min that are strongly influenced by the concentration of chromium ions in the α-alumina matrix. The efficiency of the recycled wastes in reducing 4-nitrophenol was dependent on their purity, with the conversion rates for the wastes varying from 55% to 98%. The catalytic capacity of waste derived catalyst is similar to those reported for high-purity catalyst [66]. Recently Sulfate radicals and hydroxyl radicals are commonly used as oxidizing agents for degradation of organic compounds. Usually, SO4 are produced by the activation of peroxymonosulfate (PMS). Zhang et al. [56] fabricated sludge-based biochar material doped with Fe3O4 by hydrothermal carbonization and activated by peroxymonosulfate for degradation of Rhodamine B of 50 ppm in 10 min. Catalytic oxidation of Volatile organic compound employing propane as a model gas was explored by Sushil et al. [6]. Wastes from the aluminium industry, the tannery industry and the electroplating industry were tested as precursors for catalysts. The quantity of ferrite in red mud and chromite in tannery shavings governs in determining the catalytic reduction of propane. By adding chromium containing waste to red mud, the catalytic activity increased. A 50% conversion of propane was achieved in the range 320–380oC. Much less studies were reported that deals with the catalytic conversion by pollutants by utilizing waste derived materials as catalyst.

3.4. Electrocatalysis

Electrocatalysis is accompanied by charge transfer processes that play important role in sustainable development and technological advancement. The major electrochemical processes include, electrochemical reduction of CO2 into synthetic liquid fuels, water splitting to generate molecular hydrogen from water, energy recovery in fuel cells and solar cells. The development of nanomaterials for electrocatalysis is a vibrant research field [134]. Waste containing high organic content as well as low content of metals is generally used to synthesize electrocatalyst, since metal dopant played an important role in enhancing electrocatalytic activity. The sludge with complex organics are possibly used as a low cost precursor to synthesize electrocatalysts for H2O2 generation. Using high organic content porous carbon electrode was formed. The components present in waste such as N, S and P are transformed to heteroatoms on the electrode surface [13]. The performance of electrocatalysts and its efficiency depend upon its structure, components and surface characteristics, which depend on the method of synthesis. Catalyst derived from thermally treated electroplating sludge is used in the electrochemical reduction of CO2 with a peak potential of −0.3 V, as measured using a linear sweep voltammogram proves to pocess good electrocatalytic activity. Additionally, it is used in a microbial electrolysis cell in converting CO2 to methane, ethylene, carbon monoxide and acetate with faraday efficiencies of 37.3%, 25.9%, 7.8% and 6.8% at an external potential of 0.6 V, respectively [10].

3.5. Adsorption of Pollutant

Pollution was recognized as one of the significant threat to human-kind; in this manner an ever increasing number of examinations are committed to executing the idea of expelling waste by utilizing squanders [130]. To avoid the environmental pollution many methods were developed for removing contaminants. Adsorption is widely considered to be an important physicochemical process and its practical application relies upon recovering and reusing the spent adsorbents [135]. Non-conventional adsorbents usage is getting importance and several low cost materials including wood dust, neem bark, rice bran, leaf dust, agricultural wastes, biological wastes, clarified sludge, flyash, kaolinite clay and zeolite are used [78]. Utilization of waste as an adsorbent to remove the pollutants from the environment has gained interest in recent years. It has gained much attention because it simultaneously solves two problems: pollutant removal and application of waste as adsorbent [79]. Nano-sized particles are attracting considerable interest as adsorbent due to their high surface area and thus enhancing the adsorption of pollutant on their surface [136]. Many researches have been carried out to remove heavy metal and dyes using industrial waste derived nanomaterials as an adsorbent. Removal of Cr(VI) by tea waste/ Fe3O4 nanocomposite [24] and Fe loaded magnetic biochar [60], As(V) removal by alum based adsorbent [73], Pb(II) removal by Calcium hydroxyapatite nanomaterial [75] and Fe2O3 in red mud and Cr2O3 in tannery shavings [61], Pb(II) and Cu(II) removal by Magnetic chitosan sludge composite [41] Methylene blue and Congo red removal by Fe3O4 [70], Fremoval by Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles (nHAp) [34] and H2S removal by sludge based nanocomposite [62,86]. Steel slag has potential to adsorb Ni(II) from aqueous solutions due to its high concentration of magnetite and its adsorption rate increased with initial concentration but decreased with increase in temperature, due to competition by other ions dissolved from steel slag [127].
The adsorption mechanism of pollutants on the nanocomposite denotes to physical adsorption, electrostatic interaction, reduction, ion exchange, surface complexation, etc. Tu et al. [48] studied the adsorption behaviour of As(III) and Pb on to copper ferrite nanomaterial synthesized from the sludge of printed circuit board (PCB) industry. He found that higher the pH value decreased the adsorption capacity of copper ferrite due to enhanced repulsion between As(III) and the adsorbent surface [48, 69]. Manna et al. [98] synthesized graphene oxide coated over pre-treated carbonaceous industrial for the separation of phenol which sowed better separation performance than that of the graphene oxide. Similarly, meso-macropore adsorbents were prepared from hybrid of biological sludge and chemical sludge that showed higher adsorption than that of the commercial activated carbon due to the well-developed mesopore and macropore structure, as well as abundant acidic surface functional groups [87]. While, Cation adsorption involves mainly electrostatic forces therefore the surface energy of the substrate strongly influences the adsorption process [131]. The pH is one of important parameter which significantly affect the adsorption capacity by influencing (1) the surface charge of the adsorbent, (2) the degree of ionization of the adsorbate and (3) extent of dissociation of functional groups [70]. The maximum adsorption capacity of As(III) was found to be 41.2 mg/g at pH 4.2, much higher than most of the adsorbents. Subsequently, over 90% of lead was removed at pH 4.5 using copper ferrite nanoparticle [48, 69]. Visa, 2016 investigated zeolite as adsorbents for the simultaneous removal of heavy metals (Cd2+, Cu2+, Ni2+, Zn2+ and Pb2+). The increase in the substrate amount creates more active centres favourable for adsorption of heavy metals. New active centres (≡ SiO−) and (≡AlO−) has developed on zeolite surface forming complex structures with metal cations thereby replacing the exchangeable Na+, K+ cations [31]. Increased ion exchange capacity was observed by S.Fan et al. [24] when the Cr(VI) was removed by the Tea Waste/Fe3O4 nanocomposite.

3.6. Disinfection Using Industrial Waste Derived Nanomaterial

Antibacterial agents are compounds that kill bacteria or slow down their growth and have been used in many fields, such as, textile industry, water disinfection, food packaging, and medicine [137]. Antibacterial activity of Ag-Fe3O4 nanoparticle synthesized from iron ore tailing was carried out by using spot inoculation method using Escherichia coli, a gram-negative bacterium cultured in agar media and compared with Fe3O4, hydrophobic and hydrophilic Ag-Fe3O4 nanomaterials. The result revels that Fe3O4 does not show any zone of inhibition area whereas hydrophobic and hydrophilic Ag-Fe3O4 exhibit significant zone of inhibition area from 60–120 minutes confirming the role of Ag. Silver and its compounds are shown to be effective against both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria by precipitating bacterial cellular proteins and by blocking the microbial respiratory chain system. Hence, magnetite nanoparticles derived from iron ore tailings can act as a good support for silver nanoparticles to use it effectively in the water disinfection [35]. Similarly, Boruah et al. [67] studied about the inactivation of biological contaminants by photocatalytic method under irradiation of natural sunlight in an aqueous medium. Magnetic mixed metal oxide nanomaterial synthesized from industrial waste showed 96% inactivation of E.coli bacteria within 120 min at pH 5 with the catalytic loading rate of 1 g/L and E.coli concentration 200 mg/L.
Cell membrane+OHLiquid peroxidation (Membrane distraction)
Exposed cellular constituentsdegradation products
The above equation explains the inactivation mechanism, where, •OH formed during the reaction acts as an oxidizing agent. Hydroxyl radical is responsible for the oxidation of polyunsaturated phospholipids as well as destruction of bacterial cell membrane resulting cell death [67].

4. Conclusions and Recommendations

The increasing generation of industrial waste has forced the researchers to work on effective utilization of waste to achieve the concept of treatment of waste and wealth from waste. As nano-technology is the fast growing field and by considering its applications in various field, nanomaterial synthesis from waste is considered to be an effective way which offers valuable recovery of elements and economic advantages. However, to solve the problem arising due to increased generation of waste and exploitation of primary resources research needs to be done to improve and develop the recovery process. Industrial waste such as Tannery waste, electroplating industry waste, papermill waste, steel industry waste, fly ash, jute mill industrial waste, silicon waste etc., have been utilized in synthesizing waste derived nanomaterials and each method of synthesis has its own advantage. More specifically, the pretreatment of waste influences the properties of the nanomataerial by affecting the surface chemistry. It is clear that the physical and chemical factors during synthesis process affect the formation of nanomaterial. Therefore, the practicability of synthesis methods, for large scale production of waste derived materials should be taken in to consideration. Specifically, further studies needs to be carried to manage the toxic gases that are released during the thermal synthesis method. The waste derived nanomaterial synthesized by physico chemical methods have wide application in environmental remediation. The nanomaterials synthesized from industrial waste include Fe3O4, MFe2O4 (M− Mn, Cu, Zn, Ag), magnetic biochar, MgCr2O4, Cr2O3, CuO, Copper ferrite, etc., Among which iron rich waste is widely used and has been proven to be effective in removal of pollutant by fenton degradation, photocatalytic degradation and adsorption method. Despite the application in pollutant remediation, it is important to study the hazard that may cause by the by-products during reaction or leaching back of original pollutants. However, for further large application of waste derived nanomaterials, LCA needs to be done by focusing on energy consumption, pollution reduction and cost efficiency. Additionally, by increasing stability and activity of the nanomaterials, sustainable zero waste can be achieved.


Author Contributions

J.V.J. (Research Scholar) wrote the manuscript. N.V. (Professor) revised the manuscript.


1. Zhang T, Gao PP, Gao PP, Wei J, Yu Q. :Effectiveness of novel and traditional methods to incorporate industrial wastes in cementitious materials - An overview. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2013;74:134–143.

2. Tang Y, Chan SW, Shih K. :Copper stabilization in beneficial use of waterworks sludge and copper-laden electroplating sludge for ceramic materials. Waste Manag. 2014;34:1085–1091.

3. Schwarz M, Veverka M, Michalkova E, Lalik V, Veverkova D. :Utilization of industrial waste for ferrite pigments production. Chem Pap. 2012;66:248–258.

4. Koolivand A, Mazandaranizadeh H, Binavapoor M, Mohammadtaheri A, Saeedi R. :Hazardous and industrial waste composition and associated management activities in Caspian industrial park, Iran. Environ Nanotechnology. Monit Manag. 2017;7:9–14.

5. Ahmaruzzaman M. :Industrial wastes as low-cost potential adsorbents for the treatment of wastewater laden with heavy metals. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2011;166:36–59.

6. Sushil S, Scholz P, Pollok K, Ondruschka B, Batra VS. :Application of industrial waste based catalysts for total oxidation of propane. Chem Eng J. 2011;166:568–578.

7. Soliman NK, Moustafa AF. :Industrial solid waste for heavy metals adsorption features and challenges; a review. J Mater Res Technol. 2020;9:10235–10253.

8. Biswas A, Patra AK, Sarkar S, Das D, Chattopadhyay D, De S. :Synthesis of highly magnetic iron oxide nanomaterials from waste iron by one-step approach. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2020;589:124420

9. Dutta T, Kim K-H, Deep A, et al. :Recovery of nanomaterials from battery and electronic wastes: A new paradigm of environmental waste management. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2018;82:3694–3704.

10. Yuan H, Deng L, Cai X, et al. :Recycling electroplating sludge to produce sustainable electrocatalysts for the efficient conversion of carbon dioxide in a microbial electrolysis cell. Electrochim Acta. 2016;222:177–184.

11. Cao Z, Zhang J, Zhou J, et al. :Electroplating sludge derived zinc-ferrite catalyst for the efficient photo-Fenton degradation of dye. J Environ Manage. 2017;193:146–153.

12. Wang S, Yan W, Zhao F. :Recovery of solid waste as functional heterogeneous catalysts for organic pollutant removal and biodiesel production. Chem Eng J. 2020;401:126104

13. Hou H, Liu Z, Zhang J, Zhou J, Qian G. :A review on fabricating functional materials by heavy metal-containing sludges. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28:133–155.

14. Chen M, Zhou J, Zhang J, et al. :Ferrite catalysts derived from electroplating sludge for high-calorie synthetic natural gas production. Appl Catal A Gen. 2017;534:94–100.

15. Liao CZ, Tang Y, Lee PH, Liu C, Shih K, Li F. :Detoxification and immobilization of chromite ore processing residue in spinel-based glass-ceramic. J Hazard Mater. 2017;321:449–55.

16. Gao Q, Wu X, Xia Z, Fan Y. :Coating mechanism and near-infrared reflectance property of hollow fly ash bead/TiO2 composite pigment. Powder Technol. 2017;305:433–439.

17. Liu B, Zhang S, Pan D, Chang C. :Synthesis and Characterization of Micaceous Iron Oxide Pigment from Oily Cold Rolling Mill Sludge. Procedia Environ Sci. 2016;31:653–661.

18. Du M, Du Y, Chen Z, et al. :Synthesis and characterization of black ceramic pigments by recycling of two hazardous wastes. Appl Phys A. 2017;123:575

19. Yuan SJ, Dai XH. :Sewage sludge-based functional nanomaterials: development and applications. Environ Sci Nano. 2017;4:17–26.

20. Saini D, Aggarwal R, Anand SR, Sonkar SK. :Sunlight induced photodegradation of toxic azo dye by self-doped iron oxide nano-carbon from waste printer ink. Sol Energy. 2019;193:65–73.

21. Kefeni KK, Mamba BB, Msagati TAM. :Application of spinel ferrite nanoparticles in water and wastewater treatment: A review. Sep Purif Technol. 2017;188:399–422.

22. Zamare MSD. :Biosynthesis of Nanoparticles From Agro-Waste: a Sustainable Approach. Int J Engg App Sci Tech. 2016;1:85–92.

23. Chen D, Li Q, Shao L, Zhang F, Qian G. :Recovery and application of heavy metals from pickling waste liquor (PWL) and electroplating wastewater (EPW) by the combination process of ferrite nanoparticles. Desalin Water Treat. 2016;57:29264–273.

24. Fan S, Wang Y, Li Y, et al. :Facile synthesis of tea waste/Fe3O4 nanoparticle composite for hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous solution. RSC Adv. 2017;7:7576–7590.

25. Heuss-Aßbichler S, John M, Klapper D, Bläß UW, Kochetov G. :Recovery of copper as zero-valent phase and/or copper oxide nanoparticles from wastewater by ferritization. J Environ Manage. 2016;181:1–7.

26. Huang R, Fang Z, Fang X, Tsang EP. :Ultrasonic Fenton-like catalytic degradation of bisphenol A by ferroferric oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticles prepared from steel pickling waste liquor. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2014;436:258–266.

27. Zhang H, Liu J, Ou C, et al. :Reuse of Fenton sludge as an iron source for NiFe2O4 synthesis and its application in the Fenton-based process. J Environ Sci (China). 2017;53:1–8.

28. Visa M, Isac L, Duta A. :New fly ash TiO2 composite for the sustainable treatment of wastewater with complex pollutants load. Appl Surf Sci. 2015;339:62–68.

29. Visa M, Bogatu C, Duta A. :Tungsten oxide - fly ash oxide composites in adsorption and photocatalysis. J Hazard Mater. 2015;289:244–256.

30. Visa M, Andronic L, Enesca A. :Behavior of the new composites obtained from fly ash and titanium dioxide in removing of the pollutants from wastewater. Appl Surf Sci. 2016;388:359–369.

31. Visa M. :Synthesis and characterization of new zeolite materials obtained from fly ash for heavy metals removal in advanced wastewater treatment. Powder Tech. 2016;294:338–347.

32. Athalathil S, Erjavec B, Kaplan R, et al. :TiO2-sludge carbon enhanced catalytic oxidative reaction in environmental wastewaters applications. J Hazard Mater. 2015;300:406–414.

33. Zhang H, Xue G, Chen H, Li X. :Magnetic biochar catalyst derived from biological sludge and ferric sludge using hydrothermal carbonization: Preparation, characterization and its circulation in Fenton process for dyeing wastewater treatment. Chemosphere. 2018;191:64–71.

34. Zhang D, Luo H, Zheng L, et al. :Utilization of waste phosphogypsum to prepare hydroxyapatite nanoparticles and its application towards removal of fluoride from aqueous solution. J Hazard Mater. 2012;241:418–426.

35. Kumar R, Sakthivel R, Behura R, Mishra BK, Das D. :Synthesis of magnetite nanoparticles from mineral waste. J Alloys Compd. 2015;645:398–404.

36. Lu X, Ning XA, Lee PH, Shih K, Wang F, Zeng EY. :Transformation of hazardous lead into lead ferrite ceramics: Crystal structures and their role in lead leaching. J Hazard Mater. 2017;336:139–145.

37. Lu X, Shih K. :Phase transformation and its role in stabilizing simulated lead-laden sludge in aluminum-rich ceramics. Water Res. 2011;45:5123–5129.

38. Lu X, Shih K. :Metal stabilization mechanism of incorporating lead-bearing sludge in kaolinite-based ceramics. Chemosphere. 2012;86:817–821.

39. Mao L, Cui H, An H, et al. :Stabilization of simulated lead sludge with iron sludge via formation of PbFeO by thermal treatment. Chemosphere. 2014;117:745–752.

40. Reddy S, Ho B, Mitoma Y, et al. :Sustainable recovery of precious metals from end-of-life vehicles shredder residue by a novel hybrid ball-milling and nanoparticles enabled froth flotation process. J Clean Prod. 2018;171:66–75.

41. Liu T, Han X, Wang Y, et al. :Magnetic chitosan/anaerobic granular sludge composite: Synthesis, characterization and application in heavy metal ions removal. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2017;508:405–414.

42. Hadi P, Xu M, Ning C, Sze Ki Lin C, McKay G. :A critical review on preparation, characterization and utilization of sludge-derived activated carbons for wastewater treatment. Chem Eng J. 2015;260:895–906.

43. Liu H, Ji Y, Zhu Y, et al. :Converting industrial waste contact masses into effective multicomponent copper-based catalysts for the Rochow process. Particuology. 2018;37:1–8.

44. Costa G, Della VP, Ribeiro MJ, Oliveira APN, Monrós G, Labrincha JA. :Synthesis of black ceramic pigments from secondary raw materials. Dye Pigment. 2008;77:137–144.

45. Lee SHM, Lee SHM, Jeong SK, et al. :Calcium extraction from steelmaking slag and production of precipitated calcium carbonate from calcium oxide for carbon dioxide fixation. J Ind Eng Chem. 2017;53:233–240.

46. Tanisan B, Turan S. :Black ceramic pigments for porcelain tile bodies produced with chromite ores and iron oxide waste. J Ceram Process Res. 2011;12:462–467.

47. Abreu MA, Toffoli SM. :Characterization of a chromium-rich tannery waste and its potential use in ceramics. Ceram Int. 2009;35:2225–2234.

48. Tu YJ, You CF, Chen MH, Duan YP. :Efficient removal/recovery of Pb onto environmentally friendly fabricated copper ferrite nanoparticles. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2017;71:197–205.

49. Li Y, Zhang H, Shao L, He P. :Preparation of a metal-phosphate /chromium oxide nanocomposite from Cr(III)- containing electroplating sludge and its optical properties as a nanopigment. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2015;98:261–267.

50. El-Amir AAM, Ewais EMM, Abdel-Aziem AR, Ahmed A, El-Anadouli BEH. :Nano-alumina powders/ceramics derived from aluminum foil waste at low temperature for various industrial applications. J Environ Manage. 2016;183:121–125.

51. Ahmad I, Siddiqui WA, Qadir S, Ahmad T. :Synthesis and characterization of molecular imprinted nanomaterials for the removal of heavy metals from water. J Mater Res Technol. 2017;1–13.

52. Abdel-aal EA, Farghaly FE, Tahawy R, El-shahat MF. :A comparative study on recovery of chromium from tannery wastewater as nano magnesium chromite. Physicochem Probl Miner Process. 2016;52:821–834.

53. Liang G, Li Y, Yang C, et al. :Production of biosilica nanoparticles from biomass power plant fly ash. Waste Manag. 2020;105:8–17.

54. Munir MT, Mansouri SS, Udugama IA, Baroutian S, Gernaey KV, Young BR. :Resource recovery from organic solid waste using hydrothermal processing: Opportunities and challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2018;96:64–75.

55. Khan FA. :Applications of nanomaterials in human health. 1st ed:Springer; 2020. p. 15–21.

56. Zang T, Wang H, Liu Y, Dai L, Zhou S, Ai S. :Fe-doped biochar derived from waste sludge for degradation of rhodamine B via enhancing activation of peroxymonosulfate. Chemosphere. 2020;261:127616

57. Mirzaei A, Neri G. :Microwave-assisted synthesis of metal oxide nanostructures for gas sensing application: A review. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2016;237:749–775.

58. Mondal P, Anweshan A, Purkait MK. :Green synthesis and environmental application of iron-based nanomaterials and nanocomposite: A review. Chemosphere. 2020;259:127509

59. Wu C, Kuo C, Lo S. :From waste to resource: a case study of heavy-metal sludge by microwave treatment. J Environ Eng Manage. 2009;19:119–125.

60. Duan S, Ma W, Pan Y, Meng F, Yu S, Wu L. :Synthesis of magnetic biochar from iron sludge for the enhancement of Cr(VI) removal from solution. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2017;80:835–841.

61. di Chen Y, Ho SH, Wang D, su Wei Z, Chang JS, qi Ren N. :Lead removal by a magnetic biochar derived from persulfate-ZVI treated sludge together with one-pot pyrolysis. Bioresour Technol. 2018;247:463–470.

62. Bandosz TJ, Block K. :Effect of pyrolysis temperature and time on catalytic performance of sewage sludge/industrial sludgebased composite adsorbents. Appl Catal B Environ. 2006;67:77–85.

63. Akpan UG, Hameed BH. :The advancements in sol-gel method of doped-TiO2 photocatalysts. Appl Catal A Gen. 2010;375:1–11.

64. Parashar M, Shukla VK, Singh R. :Metal oxides nanoparticles via sol-gel method: a review on synthesis, characterization and applications. J Mater Sci Mater Electron. 2020;31:3729–3749.

65. Yilmaz E, Soylak M. :Functionalized nanomaterials for sample preparation methods. Handbook of nanomaterials in Analytical chemistry: Modern trends in analysis. Elsevier; 2019. p. 375–413.

66. Cunha G, da C, Peixoto JA, de Souza DR, Romão LPC, Macedo ZS. :Recycling of chromium wastes from the tanning industry to produce ceramic nanopigments. Green Chem. 2016;18:5342–5356.

67. Boruah PK, Yadav A, Das MR. :Magnetic mixed metal oxide nanomaterials derived from industrial waste and its photocatalytic applications in environmental remediation. J Environ Chem Eng. 2020;8:104297

68. Kong L, Zhu Y, Liu M, Chang X, Xiong Y. :Conversion of Fe-rich waste sludge into nano- flake Fe-SC hybrid Fenton-like catalyst for degradation of AOII*. Environ Pollut. 2016;1–7.

69. Tu Y, You C, Chang C, Wang S, Chan T. :Adsorption behavior of As(III) onto a copper ferrite generated from printed circuit board industry. Chem Eng J. 2013;225:433–439.

70. Giri SK, Das NN, Pradhan GC. :Synthesis and characterization of magnetite nanoparticles using waste iron ore tailings for adsorptive removal of dyes from aqueous solution. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2011;389:43–49.

71. Mukherjee R, Sinha A, Lama Y, Kumar V. :Utilization of Zero Valent Iron (ZVI) particles produced from steel industry waste for in-situ remediation of ground water contaminated with organo-chlorine pesticide heptachlor. Int J Environ Res. 2015;9:19–26.

72. Calderon ARM, Alorro RD, Tadesse B, Yoo K, Tabelin CB. :Repurposing of nickeliferous pyrrhotite from mine tailings as magnetic adsorbent for the recovery of gold from chloride solution. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2020;161:104971

73. Jeon EK, Ryu S, Park SW, Wang L, Tsang DCW, Baek K. :Enhanced adsorption of arsenic onto alum sludge modified by calcination. J Clean Prod. 2018;176:54–62.

74. Lee D, Cho H, Lee J, Huh C, Mohanty K. :Fly ash nanoparticles as a CO2 foam stabilizer. Powder Technol. 2015;283:77–84.

75. Mousa SM, Ammar NS, Ibrahim HA. :Removal of lead ions using hydroxyapatite nano-material prepared from phosphogypsum waste. J Saudi Chem Soc. 2016;20:357–365.

76. Zhou G, Fang F, Chen Z, He Y, Sun H, Shi H. :Facile synthesis of paper mill sludge-derived heterogeneous catalyst for the Fenton-like degradation of methylene blue. CATCOM. 2015;62:71–74.

77. Vignesh Kumar TH, Sivasankar V, Fayoud N, Oualid HA, Sundramoorthy AK. :Synthesis and characterization of coral-like hierarchical MgO incorporated fly ash composite for the effective adsorption of azo dye from aqueous solution. Appl Surf Sci. 2018;449:719–728.

78. Chatterjee A, Basu JK, Jana AK. :Alumina-silica nano-sorbent from plant fly ash and scrap aluminium foil in removing nickel through adsorption. Powder Technol. 2019;354:792–803.

79. Visa M, Andronic L, Lucaci D, Duta A. :Concurrent dyes adsorption and photo-degradation on fly ash based substrates. Adsorption. 2011;17:101–108.

80. Visa M, Andronic L, Duta A. :Fly ash-TiO2 nanocomposite material for multi-pollutants wastewater treatment. J Environ Manage. 2015;150:336–343.

81. Visa M, Carcel RA, Andronic L, Duta A. :Advanced treatment of wastewater with methyl orange and heavy metals on TiO2, fly ash and their mixtures. Catal Today. 2009;144:137–142.

82. Visa M, Chelaru AM. :Hydrothermally modified fly ash for heavy metals and dyes removal in advanced wastewater treatment. Appl Surf Sci. 2014;303:14–22.

83. Visa M, Duta A. :Cadmium and Nickel Removal From Wastewater Using Modified Fly Ash: Thermodynamic and Kinetic Study. Sci Study Res. 2008;73–82.

84. Yang L, Wang F, Hakki A, Macphee DE, Liu P, Hu S. :The influence of zeolites fly ash bead/TiO2composite material surface morphologies on their adsorption and photocatalytic performance. Appl Surf Sci. 2017;392:687–696.

85. Yang L, Gao Y, Wang F, Liu P, Hu S. :Enhanced photocatalytic performance of cementitious material with TiO2@Ag modified fly ash micro-aggregates. Chinese J Catal. 2017;38:357–364.

86. Bandosz TJ, Block K. :Municipal sludge-industrial sludge composite desulfurization adsorbents: Synergy enhancing the catalytic properties. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40:3378–3383.

87. Pan ZH, Tian JY, Xu GR, Li JJ, Li GB. :Characteristics of adsorbents made from biological, chemical and hybrid sludges and their effect on organics removal in wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2011;45:819–827.

88. Zhou Y, Fang X, Wang T, Hu Y, Lu J. :Chelating agents enhanced CaO2 oxidation of bisphenol A catalyzed by Fe3+ and reuse of ferric sludge as a source of catalyst. Chem Eng J. 2017;313:638–645.

89. El-Sheikh SM, Rabah MA. :Selective recovery of chromium ions from waste tannery solution for preparation of chromium oxide nanoparticles. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2015;12:3685–694.

90. El-Sheikh SM, Rabah MA. :Optical properties of calcium chromate 1D-nanorods synthesized at low temperature from secondary resources. Opt Mater (Amst). 2014;37:235–240.

91. El-Sheikha SM, Rabbah M. :Novel low temperature synthesis of spinel nano-magnesium chromites from secondary resources. Thermochim Acta. 2013;568:13–19.

92. Mao L, Cui H, Miao C, An H, Zhai J, Li Q. :Preparation of MgCr2O4 from waste tannery solution and effect of sulfate, chloride, and calcium on leachability of chromium. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag. 2016;18:573–581.

93. Morcali MH, Eyuboglu C, Aktas S. :Synthesis of nanosized Cr2O3 from turkish chromite concentrates with sodium borohydride (NaHB4) as reducing agent. Int J Miner Process. 2016;157:7–15.

94. Murugan KP, Balaji M, Kar SS, Swarnalatha S, Sekaran G. :Nano fibrous carbon produced from chromium bearing tannery solid waste as the bitumen modifier. J Environ Manage. 2020;270:110882

95. Tu YJ, Chang CK, You CF, Lou JC. :Recycling of Cu powder from industrial sludge by combined acid leaching, chemical exchange and ferrite process. J Hazard Mater. 2010;181:981–985.

96. Crane RA, Sapsford DJ. :Selective formation of copper nanoparticles from acid mine drainage using nanoscale zerovalent iron particles. J Hazard Mater. 2018;347:252–265.

97. Mdlovu NV, Chiang CL, Lin KS, Jeng RC. :Recycling copper nanoparticles from printed circuit board waste etchants via a microemulsion process. J Clean Prod. 2018;185:781–796.

98. Manna S, Prakash S, Das P. :Synthesis of graphene oxide nano-materials coated bio-char using carbonaceous industrial waste for phenol separation from water. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2019;581:123818

99. Liu P, Chen H, Chang X, et al. :Electrochimica Acta Novel method of preparing CoFe2O4 / graphene by using steel rolling sludge for supercapacitor. Electrochim Acta. 2017;231:565–574.

100. Gaur J, Jain S, Chand S, Kaushik NK. :Tin Sulfide Nanoparticle Synthesis from Waste Waters. Amer J Anal Chem. 2014;50–54.

101. Tang B, Yuan L, Shi T, Yu L, Zhu Y. :Preparation of nano-sized magnetic particles from spent pickling liquors by ultrasonic-assisted chemical co-precipitation. J Hazard Mater. 2009;163:1173–1178.

102. Guo S, Yuan N, Zhang G, Yu JC. :Graphene modified iron sludge derived from homogeneous Fenton process as an efficient heterogeneous Fenton catalyst for degradation of organic pollutants. Micropor Mesopor Mater. 2017;238:62–68.

103. Novoselova LY. :Hematite nanopowder obtained from waste: Iron-removal sludge. Powder Technol. 2016;287:364–372.

104. Weng C, Sun X, Han B, et al. :Targeted conversion of Ni in electroplating sludge to nickel ferrite nanomaterial with stable lithium storage performance. J Hazard Mater. 2020;393:122296

105. Gu L, Li B, Wen H, Zhang X, Wang L, Ye J. :Co-hydrothermal treatment of fallen leaves with iron sludge to prepare magnetic iron product and solid fuel. Bioresour Technol. 2018;257:229–237.

106. Ren G, Yang L, Zhang Z, Zhong B, Yang X, Wang X. :A new green synthesis of porous magnetite nanoparticles from waste ferrous sulfate by solid-phase reduction reaction. J Alloy Compd. 2017;710:875–879.

107. Ashrit SS, Chatti RV, Sarkar S. :Synthesis and characterization of hematite based calcium rich hydroxyapatite-A nano material from LD slag fines. J Environ Chem Eng. 2020;8:103581

108. Zhuang Z, Xu X, Wang Y, Wang Y, Huang F, Lin Z. :Treatment of nanowaste via fast crystal growth: With recycling of nano-SnO2 from electroplating sludge as a study case. J Hazard Mater. 2012;211–2:414–419.

109. Wu J-Y, Chang F-C. :Recovery of nano-Al2O3 from waste aluminum electrolytic solution generated during the manufacturing of capacitors. Desalin Water Treat. 2016;57:29479–29487.

110. Boudinar M, Adjdir M, Bendraoua A, et al. :Solidification and stabilization of heavy metal recovered from hydro-metallurgical industry waste in the MCM-41 nanomaterial framework synthesized from raw Bentonite. Environ Nanotechnol Monit Manag. 2017;8:268–272.

111. Lu X, Wang F, Li XY, Shih K, Zeng EY. :Adsorption and Thermal Stabilization of Pb2+ and Cu2+ by Zeolite. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2016;55:8767–8773.

112. Tang Y, Shih K. :Mechanisms of zinc incorporation in aluminosilicate crystalline structures and the leaching behaviour of product phases. Environ Technol (UK). 2015;36:2977–2986.

113. Tang Y, Shih K, Wang Y, Chong TC. :Zinc stabilization efficiency of aluminate spinel structure and its leaching behavior. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45:10544–10550.

114. Su M, Liao C, Chuang KH, Wey MY, Shih K. :Cadmium Stabilization Efficiency and Leachability by CdAl4O7 Monoclinic Structure. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49:14452–14459.

115. Su M, Shih K, Kong L. :Stabilizing cadmium into aluminate and ferrite structures: Effectiveness and leaching behavior. J Environ Manage. 2017;187:340–346.

116. Gao C, Yu W, Zhu Y, et al. :Preparation of porous silicate supported micro-nano zero-valent iron from copper slag and used as persulfate activator for removing organic contaminants. Sci Total Environ. 2021;754:142131

117. Ewais EMM, Besisa DHA, El-Amir AAM, El-Sheikh SM, Rayan DE. :Optical properties of nanocrystalline magnesium aluminate spinel synthesized from industrial wastes. J Alloys Compd. 2015;649:159–166.

118. Ding H, Li J, Gao Y, et al. :Preparation of silica nanoparticles from waste silicon sludge. Powder Technol. 2015;284:231–266.

119. Na SH, Shon HK, Kim JB, Park HJ, Kim JH. :Preparation and characterization of titania nanoparticle produced from Ti-flocculated sludge with paper mill wastewater. J Ind Eng Chem. 2011;17:277–281.

120. Tsakiridis PE, Oustadakis P, Katsiapi A, Perraki M, Agatzini-Leonardou S. :Synthesis of TiO2nano-powders prepared from purified sulphate leach liquor of red mud. J Hazard Mater. 2011;194:42–47.

121. Khalil NM. :Exploitation of the ceramic wastes for the extraction of nano aluminum oxide powder. J Ind Eng Chem. 2014;20:3663–3666.

122. Yang H, Yan Y, Hu Z. :The preparation of nano calcium carbonate and calcium silicate hardening accelerator from marble waste by nitric acid treatment and study of early strength effect of calcium silicate on C30 concrete. J Build Eng. 2020;32:101507

123. El-Sherbiny S, El-Sheikh SM, Barhoum A. :Preparation and modification of nano calcium carbonate filler from waste marble dust and commercial limestone for papermaking wet end application. Powder Technol. 2015;279:290–300.

124. Kolvari E, Zolfagharinia S. :A waste to wealth approach through utilization of nano-ceramic tile waste as an accessible and inexpensive solid support to produce a heterogeneous solid acid nanocatalyst: To kill three birds with one stone. RSC Adv. 2016;6:93963–93974.

125. Swain B, Shin D, Joo SY, Ahn NK, Lee CG, Yoon JH. :Selective recovery of silver from waste low-temperature co-fired ceramic and valorization through silver nanoparticle synthesis. Waste Manag. 2017;69:79–87.

126. Yousef S, Hamdy M, Tatariants M, et al. :Sustainable industrial technology for recovery of cellulose from banknote production waste and reprocessing into cellulose nanocrystals. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2019;149:510–520.

127. Anawar HM, Strezov V, Hossain MZ. :Chapter 5-Comparison of different nanoprocesses and industrial waste-based adsorbents such as red mud, steel slag, and fly ashes for treating wastewater nanomaterial contaminants. Emerging and nanomaterial contaminants in wastewater: Advanced treatent technologies. Elsevier; 2019. p. 107–136.

128. Díez AM, Moreira FC, Marinho BA, et al. :A step forward in heterogeneous photocatalysis: Process intensification by using a static mixer as catalyst support. Chem Eng J. 2018;343:597–606.

129. Szczepanik B. :Applied Clay Science Photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants over clay-TiO2 nanocomposites: A review. Appl Clay Sci. 2017;141:227–239.

130. Duta A, Visa M. :Simultaneous removal of two industrial dyes by adsorption and photocatalysis on a fly-ash-TiO2 composite. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem. 2015;306:21–30.

131. Visa M, Isac L, Duta A. :Fly ash adsorbents for multication wastewater treatment. Appl Surf Sci. 2012;258:6345–6352.

132. Devi MM, Sunaina , Singh H, et al. :New approach for the transformation of metallic waste into nanostructured Fe3O4 and SnO2 -Fe3O4 heterostructure and their application in treatment of organic pollutant. Waste Manag. 2019;87:719–730.

133. Kahoush M, Behary N, Cayla A, Nierstrasz V. :Bio-Fenton and Bio-electro-Fenton as sustainable methods for degrading organic pollutants in wastewater. Process Biochem. 2018;64:237–247.

134. Gawande MB, Goswami A, Felpin FX, et al. :Cu and Cu-Based Nanoparticles: Synthesis and Applications in Catalysis. Chem Rev. 2016;116:3722–811.

135. MiarAlipour S, Friedmann D, Scott J, Amal R. :TiO2/porous adsorbents: Recent advances and novel applications. J Hazard Mater. 2018;341:404–423.

136. Dermatas D, Mpouras T, Panagiotakis I. :Application of Nanotechnology for waste management: Challenges and limitations. Waste Manag Res. 2018;36:197–199.

137. Mahmoodi S, Elmi A, Hallaj-nezhadi S. :Molecular Pharmaceutics & Organic Process Research Copper Nanoparticles as Antibacterial Agents. J Mol Pharm Org Process Res. 2018;6:1–7.

Fig. 1
Schematic diagram of the Fly ash/TiO2 nanocomposites and the mechanism of photo-degradation and adsorption.
Fig. 2
Schematic representation of iron waste derived catalyst and its application in pollutant remediation.
Table 1
Synthesis Method of Industrial Waste Derived Nanomaterial and Their Properties
Waste derived nanoparticle Recyclable Waste Recycling Method Properties of nanoparticle Ref.
Iron oxide waste nanomaterial with 7.6 wt.% of Titanium dioxide Iron oxide waste Planetary wet ball milling technique Particle size 10 nm [67]
MnFe2O4 and CuFe2O4 Pickling waste liquor (PWL) + electroplating wastewater (EPW) Co-precipitation MnFe2O4 30–50 nm, CuFe2O4 100–150 nm [23]
Fe3O4 Steel pickling waste liquor Co-precipitation method Particle size 20–50 nm [26]
ZnFe2O4 Electroplating sludge Calcination Crystallite size 162–213 Å [11]
Fe3O4 and Fe0 Fe-rich waste sludge Carbothermal process Spherical and flake like structure less than 50 nm [68]
CuFe2O4 Printed circuit boards sludge Ferrite process Surface area 48.3 m2/g, pore volume 0.08 cm3/g, and average pore diameter 1.36 nm [48]
CuFe2O4 Printed circuit boards sludge Acid leaching, chemical exchange, and ferrite process Particle size 20 to 120 nm [69]
Fe3O4 Iron ore tailings Acid leaching and precipitation Spheroidal or cubic in shape ranging from 8.3 to 23.0 nm [70]
Zero Valent Iron (ZVI) Steel Industry Waste Acid leaching and precipitation PAA modified S-ZVI particle size 303 nm
S-ZVI particle size 1,660 nm, surface area 0.3647 m2/g
Ag-Fe3O4 Iron ore tailings Ball milling, acid leaching and urea hydrolysis Particle size is below 100 nm, saturation magnetization value of 60 emu/g [35]
Magnetic Nickeliferous Pyrrhotite Nickel sulphide mine tailings Crushed and pulverized Specific surface area 1.00 m2/g, average pore width 14.08 nm [72]
Alum based adsorbent Aluminium oxide Alum sludge Calcination BET surface area 70–181 m2/g, Pore size 4.75–11.17 nm [73]
Fe2O3 in red mud and Cr2O3 in tannery shavings Red mud, tannery shavings and electroplating sludge Particle size 200 nm−1 μm [6]
Fe-doped biochar Waste sludge Hydrothermal carbonization Particle size 10–20 nm [56]
Magnetic biochar Ferric sludge + biological sludge Hydrothermal carbonization Particle size 200 nm [33]
Magnetic biochar Iron sludge Microwave assisted synthesis BET surface area 17.03–133.7 m2/g, Pore diameter 4–13 nm [60]
Magnetic chitosan sludge composite Anaerobic granular sludge composite Solvothermal method Spherical shapes with the diameter from 50 to 100 nm [41]
Ceramic nano pigments Cr-Al2O3 nanoparticles Tannery waste Modified sol-gel method Particle size 56 ± 4 nm [66]
Fly ash nanoparticle Fly ash Pretreated and separated into different types varying carbon content Particle Size 200–500 nm [74]
Calcium hydroxyapatite nanomaterial Phosphogypsum waste Calcination Particle size ranging from 50 to 57 nm [75]
Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles Phosphogypsum waste Microwave irradiation Hexagonal structure particle size 20 nm × 60 nm [34]
Tea waste/Fe3O4 nanocomposite Tea factory waste Co precipitation Surface area 6.906 m2/g, pore volume 0.042 cm3/g, pore diameter 65.471 nm [24]
Magnetic biochar nZVI-WSBC Persulfate-ZVI dewatered waste activated sludge Pyrolysis Particle size 20–50 nm saturation magnetization 54 emu/g [61]
Sludge carbon/TiO2 nano composites Anaerobic Sludge Hydrothermal deposition, chemical treatment Pore diameter 2.9–22.1 nm, pore volume 0.01–0.39 cm3/g [32]
PMS Fe3O4 nanocomposite Papermill Sludge Calcination Surface area 18.43 m2/g [76]
MgO incorporated fly ash composite Fly Ash Sol-gel method [77]
Alumina-silica nanosorbent Thermal power plant fly ash and scrap aluminium foil Alkali extraction, precipitation and calcination Surface area 136.18 m2/g [78]
Fly ash- TiO2 nanocomposite Fly Ash Washed, treated with NaOH and TiO2 coated BET surface area 55 ± 15 m2/g, average pore diameter of 30 nm [79]
Zeolite Fly Ash Hydrothermal process Pore diameter 14.16 nm, surface area 52.49 m2/g [31]
Biosilica nanoparticles Biomass power plant fly ash Alkaline extraction method Particle size 20 and 40 nm, surface area 115 m2/g, pore diameter 3 nm, pore volume 0.13 cm3/g [53]
Fly ash-TiO2 nanocomposite Fly Ash Washed and TiO2 coated Surface area 62.178 m2/g, pore diameter 13.64 nm [80]
TiO2-fly ash nanocomposite Fly Ash Hydrothermal method Particle size 20 and 44.28 nm
Surface area 6.16–44.948 m2/g
Tungsten oxide – fly ash composite Fly Ash Hydrothermal method Surface area 8.606–31.189 m2/g, Pore diameter 12.67–27.2 nm [29]
TiO2, fly ash Fly Ash Washed, treated with NaOH and TiO2 coated - [81]
Fly ash Nano composite Fly Ash Washed modified with NaOH and hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (HTAB) Surface area 62.57 m2/g, Average roughness 91.73 nm and 130.03 nm [82]
Nano substrate fly ash composite Fly Ash Average roughness 299–461 nm [83]
Fly Ash TiO2 composite for Fly ash Hydrothermal [28]
Zeolites fly ash bead/TiO2 composite Fly ash Alkali activation and mixing Zeolite Fly ash bead particle size~2 μm, TiO2 particle size 20 nm, pore volume 5–50 nm [84]
Ag@TiO2/ZFAB Fly ash Alkali activation and mixing Pore diameter 30–200 nm, [85]
Composite adsorbents Waste oil sludge + sewage sludge Pyrolysis Surface area between 47–202 m2/g, pore size 30–1,000 Å [62]
Industrial sludge/Sewage sludge based composite adsorbents Metal oil sludge + waste oil sludge+ Sewage sludge Pyrolysis Surface area 120–150 m2/g, pore size 20–1,000 Å [86]
Activated carbon Biological, Chemical and hybrid sludge Acid treated and pyrolyzed Pore diameter 20–1,000 Å BET surface area 89.5–1,114.7 m2/g [87]
CaO/ Fe3+ catalyst Ferric sludge Chelating agents - citric acid, oxalic acid, (EDTA) and tartaric acid [88]
Nano Magnesium chromite, Chromium oxide nanoparticles, Calcium chromate 1D-nanorods, MgCr2O4 Tannery waste water Precipitation and calcination Spherical, Particle Size 20–400 nm [52, 8992]
Nanosized Cr2O3 Turkish Chromite concentrates Pyrometallurgical process Particle Size 30–80 nm [93]
Nano fibrous carbon, Cr2O3 Chrome Tanned Buffing Dust Pulse pyrolysis method without [94]
Fly ash bead/TiO2 composite pigment Hollow Fly ash beads Chemical liquid deposition method The average diameter is 32 nm [16]
Copper ferrite Industrial sludge containing copper Acid leaching, chemical exchange and ferrite process [95]
Copper Nanoparticles Acid mine drainage Removal by nZVI, precipitation and calcination spherical-shaped nanoparticles with 20–100 nm diameter [96]
Copper oxide Nanoparticles Synthetic wastewater representing Co-precipitation Particle size: 5–50 nm [25]
Copper nanoparticles printed circuit board waste etchants Micro-emulsion process spherical-shaped nanoparticles with diameters of 20–50 nm were [97]
CuO PCB sludge Microwave Hydrothermal Particle size: 13–30 nm [59]
Graphene oxide nanomaterials coated biochar Carbonaceous jute mill industrial waste Crushed, alkaline washed and coated with grapheme oxide [98]
CoFe2O4/grapheme Steel rolling sludge surface area of 191.5 m2/g, pore size: 2.0–4.8 nm [99]
Tin Sulfide Nanomaterial Synthetic tin containing wastewater Hydrothermal method Spherical shape with particle size < 100 nm. [100]
Fe3O4 Spent pickling liquors Ultrasonic-assisted chemical co-precipitation Particle size 13–23 nm [101]
Magnetic iron oxide nanomaterial Waste iron Hydrothermal method Particle size 60–100 nm [8]
Graphene modified iron sludge Iron sludge The BET surface area: 194.56–153.42 m2/g [102]
Hematite Iron-removal sludge Calcination Specific surface area: 14 m2/g, average pore size 17.2 nm [103]
Nickel ferrite Electroplating sludge Hydrothermal acid- washing method Particle size 50 – 80 nm [104]
Ferrite catalyst Electroplating sludge Hydrothermal method Pore size: 7.2–14.4 nm, Surface Area: 5.8–243.7 m2/g [14]
Magnetite Metasequoia Leaves in the presence of iron sludge Hydrothermal carbonization Specific surface area 543.7 m2/kg, average particle size 24 μm [105]
Magnetite nanoparticle Waste ferrous sulfate and pyrite were solid-phase reduction reaction Particle size: 25–50 nm [106]
Hematite based calcium rich hydroxyapatite Non-metallic Linz and Donawitz slag Co-precipitation [107]
Metal-phosphate/chromium oxide nanocomposite Electroplating sludge Extraction, precipitation and calcination Particle size 100 nm [49]
Nano-SnO2 Electroplating sludge Particle size 4.1 nm–12.2 nm [108]
Nano-Al2O3 Waste aluminum electrolytic solution generated Co-precipitation method Particle size: 100 nm–1.221 μm [109]
Zn-Al-MCM-41 nanomaterial framework Hydrometallurgical industrial waste + bentonite Alkaline fusion process Pore size 3.8 nm – 3.9 nm, surface area 1, 100 m2/g and 980 m2/g [110]
PbAl2Si2O8 and CuAl2O4 Lead and copper adsorbed zeolite Adsorption of heavy metal and calcination [111]
PbFe12O19 Lead sludge + Iron sludge Ball milling and Thermal treatment Particle size: 10 nm [39]
Zinc aluminate spinel (ZnAl2O4) and willemite (Zn2SiO4) phases Zinc-laden sludge and clay material Sintering The surface area of ZnAl2O4: 0.830 ± 0.022 m2/g, and Zn2SiO4: 0.686 ± 0.006 m2/g [112, 113]
CdAl4O7 and CdFe2O4 Aluminum-rich precursor + cadmium-bearing waste sludge Sintering BET surface area of CdAl4O7: 2.07 ± 0.03 m2/g, CdFe2O4: 1.89 ± 0.02 m2/g, CdO: 2.63 ± 0.05 m2/g).
The average particle size of CdO: 22.1 ± 0.5 μm and CdAl4O7: 23.3 ± 0.2 μm
[114, 115]
Porous silicate supported micro-nano Zerovalent iron Copper slag carbothermal reduction technology The BET surface area 18.79 m2/g, pore volume 0.15 cm3/g, and pore diameter 32.01 nm [116]
Magnesium aluminate spinel Aluminum and magnesium scrap from foundries Co precipitation Particle size < 50 nm [117]
Silica nanoparticles Waste silicon sludge Alkali dissolution and acid precipitation Average pore size (10.52 nm), high specific surface area (430.9 m2/g), and particle size about 20–45 nm. [118]
Titania nanoparticle Ti-flocculated sludge from paper mill waste water Flocculation and incineration Irregularly aggregated round shape structure of of 10–15 nm size [119]
TiO2 nano-powders prepared Sulphate leach liquor of red mud Chemical precipitation Irregular shape and Particle size of about 200 nm [120]
Nano- A12O3 particles Ceramic waste Alumina extraction with KHSO4 Particle size < 50nm [121]
Nano calcium carbonate Marble waste Nitric acid treatment Particle size 70 nm [122]
Nano calcium carbonate filler Marble waste dust and limestone Carbonation method Particle size 20–120 nm [123]
Nano-Ceramic Tile Waste supported sulfonic acid catalyst Nano ceramic tiles Waste Ball milling, ethanol washing, sulfonic acid treated Spherical, Particle size 30 nm to 500 nm [124]
Ag nanoparticles Co-fired ceramic waste Leaching and wet chemical reduction Particle size 100 nm [125]
Cellulose nanocrystals Banknote production waste Crushing and Acid hydrolysis Particle size 70 nm [126]
Table 2
Industrial Waste Based Nanomaterial in Pollutant Removal and Their Removal Capacities and Metbods
Pollutant Sludge based nanomaterial Percentage removal Conditions Treatment Method Ref.
Rhodamine B MnFe2O4 and CuFe2O4 99% Initial pH 3, RhB (10 mg/L), time 20 min, solution temperature 25°C, catalyst loading (0.40 g/L) Degradation [23]
Rhodamine B Fe doped biochar 97.27% Initial pH 5, RhB (100 mg/L), time 10 min, catalyst loading (0.6 g/L) Degradation [56]
Orange G Porous silicate supported micro nano zero valent iron 100% Catalyst dosage 0.25 g/L, solution temperature 28°C, initial pH 6.90 Degradation [116]
Bisphenol A Fe3O4 BPA close to 100% removal and 45% total organic carbon removal Catalyst dose 585 mg/ L, H2O2 concentration 114 mmol/L, pH 7 Degradation [26]
Methylene blue ZnFe2O4 88.3% MB concentration10 mg/L, dosage of solid 0.5 g, pH 3, H2O2 concentration 2.5 mmol/L Photo-Fenton degradation UV/H2O2 system [11]
AOII Fe3O4 and Fe° 98% Catalysts 2.0 g/L, AOII 200 mg/L, H2O2 17 mM, temperature 30°C, pH 7, time 30 minutes Fenton degradation [68]
Methylene blue, COD and TOC Magnetic Biochar catalyst MB 98%
COD 47 ± 3.3% TOC 49 ± 2.7%
Time 12 min, ferric sludge/biological sludge ratio of 1:2, Temperature 473 K Fenton degradation process [33]
Methylene blue PMS Fe3O4 nanocomposite 93.3% Catalyst 1 g/L, 3% H2O2 - 2 mL/L, MB 50 mg/L, time 80 min Fenton-like degradation [76]
Bisphenol A CaO/ Fe3+ catalyst 93.8% CaO2 dose 2 mM and Fe3+ dose 3 mM, BPA concentration 0.4 mM Fenton process [88]
Methyl orange, Cd2+ and Cu2+ TiO2, fly ash 95% NaOH 2N, time 48 h Photodegradation [81]
Methylene blue, Cu2+, Cd2+ Fly ash- TiO2 nanocomposite Catalyst dose 1g in 25 mL Photocatalytic degradation and adsorption [79]
Rhodamine B, Methylene blue, Congo red and E.Coli Waste iron oxide nanomaterial with 7.6 wt.% TiO2 93.2% and 84% Catalyst dose 1 g/L Photocatalytic degradation and disinfection [67]
Bisphenol A Sludge carbon/TiO2 nano composites 96.4% BPA concentration 10 mg/L, Ozonation 60 min, catalyst loading of 300 mg at 200°C, total pressure of 25.5 bar Photocatalytic reaction, catalytic ozonation and catalytic wet air oxidation [32]
Nitrophenol Cr-Al2O3 55%–98% Nitrophenol concentration 0.036 mol/L, NaBH4 concentration 4 mol/L, Cr weight 20 mg Catalytic reduction [66]
Propane Fe2O3 and Cr2O3 Catalytic oxidation [6]
Rhodamine B Zeolites fly ash bead/TiO2 composite 83.8% Irradiation time 60 min, alkali activation time 4 h, TiO2 concentration 1.68g/L Photocatalytic degradation and adsorption [84]
Benzene Ag@TiO2/ZFAB 96.3% ZFAB particles 10 g, alkali activation time 4 h Photocatalytic degradation and adsorption [85]
Bemacid Blau and Bemacid Rot Fly ash-TiO2 nanocomposite BR 93%
BB 77%
Time 240 min, pH 10.6 temperature 22°C, substrate 0.5 g in 50 mL Adsorption and Photocatalysis [130]
Copper, Bemacid Blau and Bemacid Rot Fly ash-TiO2 nanocomposite η > 90% Time 120–360 min, pH 6.74 Adsorption and Photocatalysis [80]
Methylene blue, (Dodecyl benzene sulfonate–SDBS) degradation, copper TiO2-fly ash (TiO2-FA) nanocomposite MB: 74.72% SDBS: 62.08% Cu2+: 67.34% Substrate 0.1g in 50 mL, Temperature 20–23°C Adsorption photo-catalysis processes [30]
(Bemacid Blau - BB and Bemacid Rot - BR and copper Tungsten oxide – fly ash oxide composite BB dye 70%
Cu 90%
Dye concentration 50 mg/L, and Cu2+ concentration 01 N Adsorption photo-catalysis processes [29]
Pb2+, Cd2+ and Zn2+ NaOH modified fly ash η > 90% for all cation less than 100 ppm pH 5.5–6.6, time 240 min, temperature (20–25°C) Adsorption [131]
Pb2+, Cu2+, Cd2+, Zn2+ and Ni2+ Zeolite 80% Contact time 60–90 min, adsorbent dose 6 g/L Adsorption [31]
Phenol Graphene oxide coated biochar Maximun adsorption capacity 7.35 mg/g Adsorption [98]
Cd2+, Cu2+ methylene blue Fly ash Nano composite MB 90%
Cd2+ 60%
Cu2+ 71%
Substrate 0.1g in 50 mL, time 120 min Adsorption [82]
Pb CuFe2O4 90% Maximun adsorption capacity 17.83 mg/g sorbent at pH 4.5 and 298 K. Adsorption [48]
As(III) CuFe2O4 98.9% Maximum adsorption capacity 41.2 mg/g at pH 4.2, Temperature 25°C, As(III) concentration 100 mg /L Adsorption [69]
Cr(VI) TW/Fe3O4 nanocomposite 70% The maximum adsorption capacity 75.76 mg/g, pH 2, Adsorption-reduction process [24]
Cr(VI) Original Cotton Biochar Magnetic Biochar 63.1%
Fe Biochar maximum adsorption capacity 67.44 mg/g at pH 1.07 Adsorption and Reduction [60]
As(V) Alum based adsorbent Sorbent 0.1 g in 30mL of solution; initial pH was adjusted to 2 to 12 at 293 K Adsorption [73]
Pb(II) Calcimn hydroxyapatite nanomaterial 97.8% The maximum adsorption capacity (qmax) for Pb ions was 769.23 mg/g, Temperature 25 ± 0.2°C, adsorbent dose 0.5 g/L, pH ranging from 4.5 to 5.5, shaking time 5 min. Adsorption [75]
Pb2+ Fe2O3 in red mud and Cr2O3 in tannery shavings 90% Maximum adsorption capacity 180 mg/g, nZVI-WSBC dosage 0.2%, pH 6 Adsorption [61]
Pb(II) and Cu(II) Magnetic chitosan sludge composite Pb(II) and Cu(II) concentration 40 mg/L, temperature 25°C, time 12 h, Maximum adsorption capacity Pb(II) 97.97 mg/g and Cu(II) 83.65 mg/g Adsorption [41]
Au Magnetic Nickeliferous pyrrhotite 100% Ph < 5.5, contact time 15 min. Adsorption [72]
Ni Alumina silica nano sorbent 99.9% Sorbent dose 2 g/L, Adsorption capacity 49.7 mg/g, pH 7 Adsorption [78]
Methylene blue Fe3O4 62.4% Adsorption capacity for methylene blue 70.4 mg/g Adsorption [70]
Congo red Fe3O4 72.1% adsorption capacity for Congo red 172.4 mg/g Adsorption [70]
F Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles (nHAp) 99% nHAp dose 0.2 g, fluoride concentration 50 mg F/L, temperature 298 K) Adsorption [34]
H2S Composite adsorbents 30% Column adsorption, 3,000 ppm of H2S passed at 0.5 L/min, temperature 25°C Adsorption [62]
H2S Industrial sludge/Sewage sludge-based composite adsorbents 10% Column adsorption, 3,000 ppm of H2S passed at 0.5 L/min, temperature 25°C Adsorption [86]
Water disinfection AgFe3O4 Hydrophilic AgFe3O4 - 10° CFU/ml at 120 min Disinfection [35]
CO2 Conversion Treated Electroplating Sludge based Catalyst Conversion to valuable products: Methane: 37.3%, Ethylene: 25.9%, Carbon monoxide: 7.8%, Acetate: 6.8% Electrocatalysis [10]
PDF Links  PDF Links
PubReader  PubReader
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
Editorial Office
464 Cheongpa-ro, #726, Jung-gu, Seoul 04510, Republic of Korea
TEL : +82-2-383-9697   FAX : +82-2-383-9654   E-mail : eer@kosenv.or.kr

Copyright© Korean Society of Environmental Engineers. All rights reserved.        Developed in M2PI
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers