| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
Environ Eng Res > Volume 26(4); 2021 > Article
Jo, Hong, Kim, Zhuliping, and Ahn: Removal of biological organics in high-salinity wastewater produced from methylcellulose production and subsequent changes in the microbial community

Abstract

The wastewater generated in methylcellulose (MC) production is characterized by high salinity and pH due to the residual sodium and chlorine separated from the methyl group. It is difficult to treat wastewater using the conventional activated sludge method because the high concentration of salt interferes with the microbial activity. This study confirms the biological removal of organic matter from MC wastewater using sludge dominated by Halomonas spp., a halophilic microorganism. The influent was mixed with MC wastewater and epichlorohydrin (ECH) wastewater in a 1:9 ratio and operated using a sequencing batch reactor with a hydraulic retention time of 27.8 d based on the MC wastewater. The removal efficiency of chemical oxygen demand (COD) increased from 80.4% to 93.5%, and removal efficiency had improved by adding nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus to the wastewater. In terms of microbial community change, Halomonas spp. decreased from 43.26% to 0.11%, whereas Marinobacter spp. and Methylophaga spp. increased from 0.50% to 15.12% and 7.51%, respectively.

1. Introduction

Although cellulose is a widely used natural polymer material, its use is limited due to its low solubility. Cellulose derivatives have been studied to address this issue and expand the scope of applications. In particular, methylcellulose (MC) is a cellulose derivative that resolves the insoluble properties of cellulose in organic and inorganic solvents, and has recently been used in diverse industrial applications such as food, petrochemicals, and building materials [13].
MC wastewater is characterized by high levels of salinity and organic matter. During MC production, chloride ions are separated from chloromethane and sodium ions separated from sodium hydroxide are discharged as wastewater [4, 5]. In addition, MC production involves the addition of a plasticizer (propylene glycol) and solvent (1-methoxy-2-propanol) [6], and the chemical oxygen demand (COD) concentration in the wastewater is increased by residual plasticizers and solvents.
High concentrations of salt affect biological activity in the conventional activated sludge process [7], in which microorganisms have a high osmotic pressure in their cells. High osmotic pressure can lead to the dehydration and degradation of cells and inhibit the growth and activity of microorganisms [8]. However, halophiles are known to dominate highly saline conditions and have the capacity to remove organic compounds without inhibition [913].
Although research on MC wastewater treatment has confirmed the potential to substitute an external carbon source necessary for denitrification [14], there is insufficient research compared to other cellulose-based wastewaters. A study on carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) wastewater treatment, a cellulose ether (carboxy alkyl series) similar to MC, was conducted using a physicochemical treatment method [15, 16] and a physicochemical-biological mixing method [17, 18]. Although these studies demonstrated effective organic matter removal, each of the physicochemical treatments used had the disadvantage of high energy consumption [16, 19].
Petrochemical and food processing wastewaters are similar to MC wastewater with high salt and organic content [20, 21]. High-salt wastewater is treated in parallel with physical and chemical treatments [20, 22, 23], at great expense and energy expenditure [7]. Although studies using anaerobic sequencing batch biofilm reactors (AnSBBR) and membrane bioreactors (MBR) require lower cost and energy consumption compared to physicochemical treatments [24, 21], extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) released by microorganisms at high salt concentrations exhibit sub-optimal performance of the membrane (biofilm and membrane) [25, 26].
Other studies have applied several physicochemical methods such as cohesion, distillation, photocatalysts, and membranes [1518, 20, 2224]. However, there has been an absence of studies demonstrating the removal of COD from MC wastewater using biological methods. The purpose of this study was to remove the COD of MC wastewater through a biological method under highly saline conditions using sludge dominated by halophiles. In this study, we aimed to identify the microbial community changes through pyrosequencing and provide useful insights into MC wastewater treatment.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Properties and Characteristics of the Wastewater

The wastewater used in the study was actual wastewater generated during MC and ECH manufacturing processes. MC wastewater has a high organic matter load of 40,000–60,000 mg/L COD; and its properties are shown in Table 1 [14]. In this study’s preliminary experiments, a foaming problem occurred when MC wastewater was independently treated. The method of mixing ECH wastewater was found to resolve this foaming problem. The ECH wastewater is wastewater from other processes generated during MC manufacturing and has lower salinity and COD concentrations than MC wastewater. The ECH wastewater is characterized by a COD of 150–1,500 mg/L, total nitrogen (TN) N.D., total phosphorus (TP) N.D., and an NaCl concentration of 2,000 mg/L.

2.2. Reactor and Experimental Setup

In this study, a laboratory-scale sequencing batch reactor (SBR) with a 5 L effective volume (length: 155 mm, width: 155 mm, height: 222 mm) was used (Fig. S1). The initial mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) concentration was 6,000 mg/L and the seed sludge was dominated by Halomonas spp.. The influent used was a mixture of MC and ECH wastewater, mixed at a ratio of 1 to 9, respectively. The SBR operation consisted of one cycle per day under aerobic conditions, and air was introduced by an air diffuser at the bottom of the reactor with a 2 L/min aeration flow rate. The SBR cycle times were controlled using a programable logic controller (PLC), and each cycle lasted for, with a feeding of 10 min aeration of 23 h and 10 min, settling of 30 min, and a decanting time of 10 min. The total operation period was 108 d, and the hydraulic retention time (HRT) was 2.78 d (exchange rate 36%).
In the initial operation, organic matter removal occurred without the addition of phosphorus and nitrogen. The removal efficiency in this study was less than 80% as the wastewater was nutrient-deficient and required for the biological reaction. To increase removal efficiency, nutrients were administered as shown in Table 2 after 53rd day. The nutrients were used in the following reagents; the nitrogen source being ammonium chloride (NH4Cl, SAMCHUN Chemical, Korea), and the phosphorus source being potassium phosphate (KH2PO4, SAMCHUN Chemical, Korea).

2.3. Analysis of Microbial Community

Changes in the microbial community were observed by pyrosequencing analysis, carried out using the initial and end phases. The supernatant was removed after centrifugation, and deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was extracted using the FastDNA SPIN Kit for soil (MP Biomedicals). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (C1000 Touch thermal cycler, Bio-Rad) used 2 μL of extracted DNA and proceeded with the primary amplicon and secondary index. In the primary PCR amplicon, the initial denaturation was performed at 95°C for 3 min. After 25 cycles of denaturation (95°C, 30 s), the annealing (55°C, 30 s), extension (72°C, 30 s), and final extension (72°C, 5 min) was conducted and finally fixed at 4°C. In the secondary index PCR, initial denaturation was performed at 95°C for 3 min. After 8 cycles of denaturation (95°C, 30 sec), annealing (55°C, 30 s), extension (72°C, 30 s), final extension (72°C, 5 min) was performed and finally fixed at 4°C. Illumina MiSeq was used for DNA sequencing, and the obtained nucleotide sequence was subsequently analyzed using CLcommunity™ (Chunlab Inc., Seoul, Korea). [27, 28].

2.4. Water Quality Analysis

Water quality analysis was performed with a filtrate using a glass fiber filter (GF/C). In addition, COD, NH4+-N, PO4−3-P, and MLSS were analyzed according to the standard method [29]. The shape of the sludge was observed at 40× magnification using an optical microscope (OLYMPUS CX31).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Biological COD Removal

Fig. 1 presents the concentration profiles and the COD removal efficiency in Phase 1. The average COD concentrations of the influent and effluent was 4,400 and 1,300 mg/L, respectively. Removal efficiency was up to 80% over a period of approximately 50 d without the addition of nutrients. Studies of complex chemical wastewater treatment with similar properties obtained a removal efficiency of 50% and 51% [24, 30]. Although Qin et al. [21] confirmed a removal efficiency of 77% of organic matter in the salt (30,000 mg NaCl/L) higher than in this study (13,800 mg NaCl/L), we confirmed a relatively high removal efficiency even in a nutrient-deficient state.
Nitrogen, phosphorus, and external carbon sources should be added because industrial wastewater may lack the nutrients necessary for biological treatment [31]. The ratio of carbon (C) to nitrogen (N) to phosphorus (P) in biological treatment is known to be 100:5:1 [32]. However, the MC wastewater contained no nutrient salts other than the organic compounds, thus the change in COD removal efficiency was confirmed by adding deficiency nutrients (i.e., nitrogen and phosphorus).
Fig. 2 presents the concentration changes in COD, nitrogen, and phosphorus during the operation period. Following nutrient injection, the accumulation of nitrogen and phosphorus occurred because of the excessive nutrients required by microorganisms. As such, the injection of nitrogen and phosphorus in Phase 3 was reduced to half that of Phase 2. In Phase 4, nitrogen injection was reduced to half that of Phase 3, but the accumulation of nitrogen was confirmed. In the next phase, nitrogen had not increased as nitrogen injection had reduced to half of Phase 4.
Ammary [33] showed that the C:N:P ratio was 113:3.3:1 in a similar wastewater treatment study using biological treatment, and the removal efficiency of organic compounds was 75%. In this study, the maximum efficiency in Phase 1 was 80.4%, and increased up to 93.5% through nutrient injection after Phase 2. At that time, the C:N:P ratio was 240:1.3:1 (Phase 5). This indicates that the removal of high concentrations of organic matter may be achieved through the injection of appropriate nutrients.

3.2. MLSS and Sludge Morphology

Fig. 3 shows the change in MLSS and COD removal efficiency. The MLSS concentration increased from 6,000 mg/L to approximately 12,000 mg/L during Phase 1. During Phases 2 to 4, the MLSS concentration gradually increased to 18,000 mg/L. In Phase 5, agitation by aeration was difficult because of the high MLSS concentration, and sludge washout occurred during the effluent (96 d). At that time, the sludge in the reactor had a high proportion of filamentous (Fig. 4(i)), and the suspended solids (SS) of the effluent increased, resulting in a decrease to MLSS to approximately 13,500 mg/L.
Studies using biological treatment processes (industrial wastewater: COD 1,000–1,800 mg/L) demonstrate an increase in MLSS of approximately 3,000 mg/L after 2 and 4 months [34, 35]. The results of a study on municipal wastewater (biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) 100 mg/L) confirmed an MLSS increase of approximately 2,000 mg/L after 12 months [36]. However, this study observed a large increase in MLSS, attributed to the higher COD concentration (4,600 mg/L) compared to other studies.
Fig. 4 shows the sludge morphology observed with an optical microscope during the operation period. The sludge was observed to exhibit a granular morphology after the 30th day. The formation of extracellular polymer substances (EPS) by bacteria is known to increase with osmotic pressure with a rise in the salt concentrations of the wastewater [37]. EPS plays an important role in the formation and stabilization of granules by combining bacteria [38, 39]. In addition, Ca+2 is able to bind to negatively charged groups of bacterial surfaces and EPS and act as a bridge to interconnect these components [40], enabling the replacement of Ca+2 by Na+ in highly saline wastewater [41].
The salt concentration of MC+ECH wastewater was 13,800 mg/L, higher than that of other wastewaters. In this study, we confirmed the formation of granular sludge over 1 mm, and the saline condition was favorable for the formation of aerobic granular sludge [42]. In addition, granular sludge formation based on salt condition changes confirmed that an average of 4 mm of granular sludge had formed in salt condition of 40,000 mg/L [43]. Fig. 4(g)–(i) shows that the sludge had a complete granular morphology after the 50th day.

3.3. Microbial Community Analysis

Fig. 5 illustrates the change in the microbial community based on phylum ((a): initial, (b): end). In the Proteobacteria of the great population proportion, (a) and (b) were 59.23% and 40.30%, respectively. In general, Betaproteobacteria in Proteobacteria dominate the microbial community of wastewater treatment systems [44]. However, in this study, the Proteobacteria was dominated by Gammaproteobacteria. The majority of Gammaproteobacteria identified in the study were halophilic microorganisms, in which Gammaproteobacteria dominated saline wastewater treatment systems [45]. The reduction proportion (22%) of Gammaproteobacteria was similar to that of Proteobacteria (19%), which indicates large-scale changes in other halophilic species or phylum (e.g., Chloroflexi, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria).
The dominant phylum in the microbial community changed from Bacteroidetes to Chloroflexi, Actinobacteria etc.. Chloroflexi and Actinobacteria constituted a low proportion of the microbial community at 0.36% and 0.54% in (a), and increased significantly to 26.24% and 16.63% in (b), respectively. Chloroflexi and Actinobacteria belong to filamentous bacteria such as Caldilineaceae and Nocardiaceae, respectively [46, 47]. Filamentous bacteria are known to physically induce binding between bacteria to provide the necessary attraction in the early stages of granulation [48]. Although Chlorobi was not present in (a), it was present at 4.62% in (b). Some microorganisms belonging to the Chlorobi phylum have thermophilic characteristics and are able to decompose compounds such as phthalate esters [49]. The proportion of Rhodothermaeota increased from 2.83% in (a) to 4.02% in (b). It is known that microorganisms belonging to Rhodothermaeota possess thermophilic characteristics and mainly grow in a saline environments similar to seashores [50, 51]. The increase in thermophilic microorganisms is expected to be related to the operating temperature used in this study. The temperature of the discharged MC wastewater was greater than 75°C, and the temperature of the reactor in the actual wastewater treatment plant was approximately 40°C. In our study, it was estimated that an increased proportion of thermophilic microorganisms (e.g., Chlorobi and Rhodothermaeota) was possible as the operating temperature was approximately 35–40°C.
There was a reduction in the proportion of Bacteroidetes, Planctomycetes, Firmicutes, Verrucomicrobia, and Tenericutes. Bacteroidetes decreased from 26.53% to 4.03%, and are typically found in various wastewater treatment systems, some of which have halophilic characteristics [44]. Planctomycetes, known as aerobic chemo heterotrophs, decreased slightly from 1.50% to 1.26%; these are mainly found in chemical wastewater treatment [52, 53]. It is estimated that they can grow in halophilic and thermophilic environments. Firmicutes, Verrucomicrobia, and Tenericutes decreased from 5.48%, 2.16%, and 0.98% to 0.31%, 0.05%, and 0.01%, respectively. Firmicutes are mainly found in the anaerobic digestion process [54], and Verrucomicrobia has a hydrocarbon hydrolase [55]. They seem to be difficult to grow under the wastewater treatment environment of this study. Altough Tenericutes are also found in various wastewater treatment systems, they exist at a low proportion [5658] and as such, their contribution is expected to be low.
Fig. 6 shows the pyrosequencing results of Proteobacteria using a dynamic pie chart (Krona) ((a): initial, (b): end). We investigated the Proteobacteria genus to identify microbial characteristics. Halomonas spp. was present in the highest proportion (43.26%) in (a), and has been reported to grow under highly saline conditions, contributing to the treatment of saline wastewater [59]. Though some Alphaproteobacteria, such as Roseinatronobacter spp. (3.45%), Pararhodobacter spp. (2.31%), and Glycocaulis spp. (1.30%), have been found to grow in highly saline environments [6062], they were not found in (b). Similarly, certain Gammaproteobacteria such as Marinospirillum spp., Aliidiomarina spp., and Alcanivorax spp. are known to be capable of treating highly saline wastewater or soil [6365]. However, with the exception of Halomonas spp. (0.11%), they were not observed in (b). Marinobacter spp. and Methylophaga spp. constituted 15.12% and 7.51% of the microbial community, respectively, unlike the well-known halophilic microorganisms, Gammaproteobacteria [6668]. In several studies, the dominant microorganisms in saline wastewater were Halomonas spp., Paenibacillus spp., and Marinobacter spp. [6972]. We confirmed that Marinobacter spp. and Methylophaga spp. were dominant and are highly biodegradable in a saline environment. Although the seed sludge was dominated by Halomonas spp. growing in high salinity, changes in microbial species appeared due to the wastewater containing methyl groups. Therefore, we estimated that Marinobacter spp. and Methylophaga spp. was dominated by influent. The genera of the sample in the initial and end phases were 297 and 493, respectively, indicating that microbial communities were diverse in the end phase. This may be regarded as an increase in microbial diversity by operating.

4. Conclusions

This study biologically removed the organic matter from highly saline MC wastewater and observed microbial community changes used for biological treatment. The removal efficiency of COD in biological treatment increased from 80.4% to 93.5%, and removal efficiency was improved by the addition of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus to the wastewater. In this case, the ratio of C:N:P was 240:1.3:1. Although the energy and cost consumption in this study was minimal due to the lack of a physicochemical treatment process, it has a limitation requiring the addition of nutrients for high removal efficiency. However, mixing with high concentrations of industrial or municipal wastewater instead of nutrient-deficient ECH wastewater may resolve this requirement to add chemicals, also achieve scale-up.
The sludge was granulated because of the highly saline conditions and the presence of filamentous bacteria. The microbial community in the sludge was dominated by Proteobacteria ((a): 59.23%, (b): 40.30%) in the initial and end phases. There was an increase in the ratio of Chloroflexi ((a): 0.36%, (b): 26.24%) and Actinobacteria ((a): 0.54%, (b): 16.63%), both of which are filamentous bacteria. Proteobacteria was the dominant Halomomas spp. (43.26%), a halophilic microorganism, in (a), whereas Marinobacter spp. (15.12%) and Methylophaga spp. (7.51%) were dominant in (b). In this study, Marinobacter spp. and Methylophaga spp. were dominant, which differs from the results of previous studies whereas Halomonas spp. was dominant in the biological treatment of saline water [73, 74]. Therefore, we expected Marinobacter spp. and Methylophaga spp. to contribute to the biological treatment of MC wastewater.
This study revealed that Marinobacter spp. and Methylophaga spp. contribute to the treatment of MC wastewater, and confirmed that the addition of nutrients is necessary. Through, this study provided information on MC wastewater treatment that was not previously studied, and contributed to the development of industrial wastewater treatment.

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgment

This subject is supported by Korea Ministry of Environment as “Global Top Project” (Project No.:2016002190006).

Notes

Author Contributions

G.S.J. (M.S. student) conducted all the experiments and wrote the manuscript. S.W.H. (Ph.D. student) conducted all the experiments and revised the manuscript. H.G.K. (Ph.D.) revised the manuscript. Z.L.P. (Professor) revised the manuscript. D.H.A. (Professor) revised the manuscript.

References

1. Hirrien M, Desbrières J, Rinaudo M. :Physical properties of methylcelluloses in relation with the conditions for cellulose modification. Carbohydr Polym. 1996;31:243–252.
crossref

2. Dicastillo CL, Bustos F, Guarda A, Galotto MJ. :Cross-linked methyl cellulose films with murta fruit extract for antioxidant and antimicrobial active food packaging. Food Hydrocoll. 2016;60:335–344.
crossref

3. Lee JY. :Relationship between rheological behavior and electrospinnability of methylcellulose and its application for enzyme immobilization [dissertation]. Seoul: Seoul National University; 2016.


4. Kamitakahara H, Nakatsubo F, Klemm D. :Block co-oligomers of tri-O-methylated and unmodified cello-oligosaccharides as model compounds for methylcellulose and its dissolution/gelation behavior. Cellulose. 2006;13:375–392.
crossref pdf

5. Kamitakahara H, Nakatsubo F, Klemm D. :New class of carbohydrate-based nonionic surfactants: diblock co-oligomers of tri-O-methylated and unmodified cello-oligosaccharides. Cellulose. 2007;14:513–528.
crossref pdf

6. Han JH. :Innovations in food packaging. 2nd ed:New York: Academic Press; 2014. p. 213–255.


7. He H, Chen Y, Li X, Cheng Y, Yang C, Zeng G. :Influence of salinity on microorganisms in activated sludge processes: a review. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation. 2017;119:520–527.
crossref

8. Hong J, Li W, Lin B, Zhan M, Liu C, Chen BY. :Deciphering the effect of salinity on the performance of submerged membrane bioreactor for aquaculture of bacterial community. Desalination. 2013;316:23–30.
crossref

9. Rene ER, Kim SJ, Park HS. :Effect of COD/N ratio and salinity on the performance of sequencing batch reactors. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:839–846.
crossref

10. Chowdhury P, Viraraghavan T, Srinivasan A. :Biological treatment processes for fish processing wastewater–A review. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:439–449.
crossref

11. Lofrano G, Meriç S, Zengin GE, Orhon D. :Chemical and biological treatment technologies for leather tannery chemicals and wastewaters: a review. Sci Total Environ. 2013;461:265–281.
crossref

12. Lefebvre O, Moletta R. :Treatment of organic pollution in industrial saline wastewater: a literature review. Water Res. 2006;40:3671–3682.
crossref

13. Kargi F, Dinçer AR. :Use of halophilic bacteria in biological treatment of saline wastewater by fed-batch operation. Water Environ Res. 2000;72:170–174.
crossref

14. Kim YB. :The application of mecellose wastewater as aternative external carbon for BNR process [dissertation]. Pusan: Pusan National University; 2004.


15. Goswami S, Mazumder D. :Treatability study of carbxyl methylcellulose manufacturing wastewater by physico-chemical methods. Indian J Environ Prot. 2018;38:533–542.


16. Yin L, Wang J, Chen F. :Method for treating waste liquid of cellulose ether production. China Patent. 2005. CN1594113A:


17. Rao PH, Zhang WQ, Yao W, et al. :Chemical compounds recovery in carboxymethyl cellulose wastewater treatment. Kem Ind. 2015;64:247–254.
crossref pdf

18. Du F, Tang H. :Processing method of salty wastewater in cellulose ether production. China Patent. 2012. CN102344225A:


19. Gutiérrez-Guerra R, Segovia-Hernández JG, Hernández S. :Reducing energy consumption and CO2 emissions in extractive distillation. Chem Eng Res Des. 2009;87:145–152.
crossref

20. Jorfi S, Alavi S, Jaafarzadeh N, Ghanbari F, Ahmadi M. :COD removal from high salinity petrochemical wastewater using photo-assisted peroxi-coagulation. Chem Biochem Eng Q. 2018;32:229–238.
crossref pdf

21. Qin L, Liu Q, Meng Q, et al. :Anoxic oscillating MBR for photosynthetic bacteria harvesting and high salinity wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol. 2017;224:69–77.
crossref

22. Zinatloo-Ajabshir S, Morassaei MS, Amiri O, Salavati-Niasari M. :Green synthesis of dysprosium stannate nanoparticles using ficus carica extract as photocatalyst for the degradation of organic pollutants under visible irradiation. Ceram Int. 2020;46:6095–6107.
crossref

23. Fan J, Zhang J, Zhang C, Ren L, Shi Q. :Adsorption of 2, 4, 6-trichlorophenol from aqueous solution onto activated carbon derived from loosestrife. Desalination. 2011;267:139–146.
crossref

24. Mohan SV, Babu VL, Bhaskar YV, Sarma P. :Influence of recirculation on the performance of anaerobic sequencing batch biofilm reactor (AnSBBR) treating hypersaline composite chemical wastewater. Bioresour Technol. 2007;98:1373–1379.
crossref

25. Jang D, Hwang Y, Shin H, Lee W. :Effects of salinity on the characteristics of biomass and membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors. Bioresour Technol. 2013;141:50–56.
crossref

26. Wang Z, Wu Z. :A review of membrane fouling in MBRs: characteristics and role of sludge cake formed on membrane surfaces. Sep Sci Technol. 2009;44:3571–3596.
crossref

27. Chun J, Lee J, Jung Y, et al. :EzTaxon: a web-based tool for the identification of prokaryotes based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:2259–2261.
crossref

28. Chun J, Kim KY, Lee J, Choi Y. :The analysis of oral microbial communities of wild-type and toll-like receptor 2-deficient mice using a 454 GS FLX Titanium pyrosequencer. BMC Microbiol. 2010;10:101
crossref

29. APHA (American Public Health Association). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington D.C.: APHA; 2005.


30. Belkin S, Brenner A, Abeliovich A. :Biological treatment of a high salinity chemical industrial wastewater. Water Sci Technol. 1993;27:105–112.
crossref pdf

31. Driscoll T, Kartik J. :Industrial wastewater management, treatment and disposal WEF Manual of Practice No FD-3rd. New York: Mcgraw-Hill; 2008. p. 474–489.


32. Metcalf L, Eddy HP, Tchobanoglous G. :Wastewater engineering: treatment, disposal, and reuse. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2003.


33. Ammary BY. :Nutrients requirements in biological industrial wastewater treatment. Afr J Biotechnol. 2004;3:236–238.
crossref

34. Friha I, Karray F, Feki F, Jlaiel L, Sayadi S. :Treatment of cosmetic industry wastewater by submerged membrane bioreactor with consideration of microbial community dynamics. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation. 2014;88:125–133.
crossref

35. Rosman NH, Anuar AN, Othman I, et al. :Cultivation of aerobic granular sludge for rubber wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol. 2013;129:620–623.
crossref

36. Yae J, Ryu J, Tuyen NV, et al. :An aerobic granular sludge process for treating low carbon/nitrogen ratio sewage. Environ Eng Res. 2018;24:238–245.
crossref pdf

37. Wang Z, Gao M, She Z, et al. :Effects of salinity on performance, extracellular polymeric substances and microbial community of an aerobic granular sequencing batch reactor. Separ Purif Technol. 2015;144:223–231.
crossref

38. Zhu L, Zhou J, Lv M, Yu H, Zhao H, Xu X. :Specific component comparison of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in flocs and granular sludge using EEM and SDS-PAGE. Chemosphere. 2015;121:26–32.
crossref

39. Corsino SF, Capodici M, Torregrossa M, Viviani G. :Fate of aerobic granular sludge in the long-term: the role of EPSs on the clogging of granular sludge porosity. J Environ Manage. 2016;183:541–550.
crossref

40. Jiang H, Tay J, Liu Y, Tay ST. :Ca+2 augmentation for enhancement of aerobically grown microbial granules in sludge blanket reactors. Biotechnol Lett. 2003;25:95–99.
crossref

41. Corsino SF, Capodici M, Torregrossa M, Viviani G. :Physical properties and extracellular polymeric substances pattern of aerobic granular sludge treating hypersaline wastewater. Bioresour Technol. 2017;229:152–159.
crossref

42. Kim H, Ahn D. :The effects of high salinity on nitrogen removal and the formation characteristics of aerobic granular sludge. Environ Eng Res. 2020;25(5):659–667.
crossref pdf

43. Corsino SF, Capodici M, Pippo FD, Tandoi V, Torregrossa M. :Comparison between kinetics of autochthonous marine bacteria in activated sludge and granular sludge systems at different salinity and SRTs. Water Res. 2019;148:425–437.
crossref

44. Calderón K, Martín-Pascual J, Poyatos JM, Rodelas B, González-Martínez A, González-López J. :Comparative analysis of the bacterial diversity in a lab-scale moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) applied to treat urban wastewater under different operational conditions. Bioresour Technol. 2012;121:119–126.
crossref

45. Zhang X, Li J, Yu Y, Xu R, Wu Z. :Biofilm characteristics in natural ventilation trickling filters (NVTFs) for municipal wastewater treatment: Comparison of three kinds of biofilm carriers. Biochem Eng J. 2016;106:87–96.
crossref

46. Hanada S. :The phylum chloroflexi, the family chloroflexaceae, and the related phototrophic families oscillochloridaceae and roseiflexaceae. The Prokaryotes. Berlin: Spinger; 2014. p. 515–532.
crossref

47. Lerner PI. :Nocardiosis. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22:891–903.
crossref pdf

48. Liu Y, Tay J. :The essential role of hydrodynamic shear force in the formation of biofilm and granular sludge. Water Res. 2002;36:1653–1665.
crossref

49. Gao DW, Wen ZD. :Phthalate esters in the environment: A critical review of their occurrence, biodegradation, and removal during wastewater treatment processes. Sci Total Environ. 2016;41:986–1001.
crossref

50. Olapade OA. :Bacterial Community Composition and Diversity along the Southern Coastlines of the Atlantic Ocean in Cape Town, South Africa. bioRxiv. 2020;doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.27.969030 :
crossref

51. Munoz R, Rosselló-Móra R, Amann R. :Revised phylogeny of Bacteroidetes and proposal of sixteen new taxa and two new combinations including Rhodothermaeota phyl. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2016;39:281–296.
crossref

52. Yang Q, Jia Z, Liu R, Chen J. :Molecular diversity and anammox activity of novel planctomycete-like bacteria in the wastewater treatment system of a full-scale alcohol manufacturing plant. Process Biochem. 2007;42:180–187.
crossref

53. Chouari R, Le Paslier D, Daegelen P, Ginestet P, Weissenbach J, Sghir A. :Molecular evidence for novel planctomycete diversity in a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:7354–7363.
crossref

54. Chen S, Cheng H, Wyckoff KN, He Q. :Linkages of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes populations to methanogenic process performance. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;43:771–781.
crossref pdf

55. Martinez-Garcia M, Brazel DM, Swan BK, et al. :Capturing single cell genomes of active polysaccharide degraders: an unexpected contribution of Verrucomicrobia. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(4):e35314
crossref

56. Storey S, Chualain DN, Doyle O, Clipson N, Doyle E. :Comparison of bacterial succession in green waste composts amended with inorganic fertiliser and wastewater treatment plant sludge. Bioresour Technol. 2015;179:71–77.
crossref

57. Ferrera I, Sanchez O. :Insights into microbial diversity in wastewater treatment systems: How far have we come? Biotechnol Adv. 2016;34:790–802.
crossref

58. Yang Y, Yu K, Xia Y, et al. :Metagenomic analysis of sludge from full-scale anaerobic digesters operated in municipal wastewater treatment plants. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98:5709–5718.
crossref pdf

59. Jung R, Yang H, Lee J, Kim Y. :A novel halophilic Halomonas sp. having an excellent digestive effect of organic material, a soil conditioner for the reclaimed land using said strain and a method for plant growth-promoting thereof. Republic of Korea patent application. 2008;


60. Sorokin DY, Tourova T, Kuznetsov B, Bryantseva I, Gorlenko V. :Roseinatronobacter thiooxidans gen. nov., sp. nov., a new alkaliphilic aerobic bacteriochlorophylla—containing bacterium isolated from a soda lake. Microbiology. 2000;69:75–82.
crossref pdf

61. Foesel BU, Drake HL, Schramm A. :Defluviimonas denitrificans gen. nov., sp. nov., and Pararhodobacter aggregans gen. nov., sp. nov., non-phototrophic Rhodobacteraceae from the biofilter of a marine aquaculture. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2011;34:498–502.
crossref

62. Lv X, Xie B, Cai M, et al. :Glycocaulis albus sp. nov., a moderately halophilic dimorphic prosthecate bacterium isolated from petroleum-contaminated saline soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:3181–3187.
crossref

63. Zhang W, Xue Y, Ma Y, Grant WD, Ventosa A, Zhou P. :Marinospirillum alkaliphilum sp. nov., a new alkaliphilic helical bacterium from Haoji soda lake in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China. Extremophiles. 2002;6:33–37.
crossref pdf

64. Xu L, Sun J, Wang L, et al. :Aliidiomarina soli sp. nov., isolated from saline–alkaline soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:724–728.
crossref

65. Dastgheib SMM, Amoozegar MA, Khajeh K, Ventosa A. :A halotolerant Alcanivorax sp. strain with potential application in saline soil remediation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;90:305–312.
crossref pdf

66. Gauthier MJ, Lafay B, Christen R, et al. :Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus gen. nov., sp. nov., a new, extremely halotolerant, hydrocarbon-degrading marine bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1992;42:568–576.
crossref

67. Yoshie S, Noda N, Tsuneda S, Hirata A, Inamori Y. :Salinity decreases nitrite reductase gene diversity in denitrifying bacteria of wastewater treatment systems. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:3152–3157.
crossref

68. Surakasi VP, Antony CP, Sharma S, Patole MS, Shouche YS. :Temporal bacterial diversity and detection of putative methanotrophs in surface mats of Lonar crater lake. J Basic Microbiol. 2010;50:465–474.
crossref

69. Bonfá MRL, Grossman MJ, Piubeli F, Mellado E, Durrant LR. :Phenol degradation by halophilic bacteria isolated from hypersaline environments. Biodegradation. 2013;24:699–709.
crossref pdf

70. Dosta J, Nieto J, Vila J, Grifoll M, Mata-Álvarez J. :Phenol removal from hypersaline wastewaters in a membrane biological reactor (MBR): operation and microbiological characterisation. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:4013–4020.
crossref

71. Lee JW, Kim BH, Park YS, Song YC, Koh SC. :Microbial community analysis in the wastewater treatment of hypersaline-wastewater. Korean J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;42:377–385.
crossref

72. Berlendis S, Cayol JL, Verhé F, et al. :First evidence of aerobic biodegradation of BTEX compounds by pure cultures of Marinobacter. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2010;160:1992–1999.
crossref pdf

Fig. 1
The profiles of SCODCr concentration and removal efficiency in phase 1.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2020-187f1.gif
Fig. 2
The profiles of NH4+-N, (a), PO4−3-P, (b), SCODCr, (c) concentration and removal efficiency according to operating condition change (②: phase 2, ③: phase 3, ④: phase 4, ⑤: phase 5).
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2020-187f2.gif
Fig. 3
The profiles of MLSS concentration and SCODCr removal efficiency.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2020-187f3.gif
Fig. 4
Morphology observation of sludge during the operation((a): 3 d, (b): 10 d, (c): 20 d, (d): 31 d, (e): 38 d, (f): 45 d, (g): 62 d, (h): 73 d, (i): 97 d (X40 magnification by optical microscope)).
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2020-187f4.gif
Fig. 5
Bacterial compositions at the phylum level((a): initial, (b): end).
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2020-187f5.gif
Fig. 6
Results of microbial communities using dynamic pie chart (Krona)((a): initial, (b): end).
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2020-187f6.gif
Table 1
The Compounds of MC Wastewater
Compound Composition(wt%)
Methanol 30
Propylene glycol 30
1-methyloxy-2-propanol 30
NaCl 12
Table 2
The Change of Condition by Operating Period
Operation time (d) NH4+-N (mg/L) PO4−3-P (mg/L)
Phase 1 0–53 - -
Phase 2 54–56 75 15
Phase 3 57–60 35.5 7.5
Phase 4 61–80 18.75 7.5
Phase 5 81–108 10 7.5
TOOLS
PDF Links  PDF Links
PubReader  PubReader
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
Supplement  Supplement
  E-Mail
  Print
Share:      
METRICS
0
Crossref
0
Scopus
660
View
11
Download
Editorial Office
464 Cheongpa-ro, #726, Jung-gu, Seoul 04510, Republic of Korea
TEL : +82-2-383-9697   FAX : +82-2-383-9654   E-mail : eer@kosenv.or.kr

Copyright© Korean Society of Environmental Engineers. All rights reserved.        Developed in M2PI
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers