Comparison of response surface methods for the optimization of an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket for the treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater
Martha Noro Chollom, Sudesh Rathilal, Feroz Mohammed Swalaha, Babatunde Femi Bakare, Emmanuel Kweinor Tetteh
Environmental Engineering Research. 2020;25(1):114-122.   Published online 2019 Mar 18     DOI:
Citations to this article as recorded by Crossref logo
Insight into the amoxicillin resistance, ecotoxicity, and remediation strategies
Kushneet Kaur Sodhi, Mohit Kumar, Dileep Kumar Singh
Journal of Water Process Engineering.2021; 39: 101858.     CrossRef
Analytical procedures, data reporting and selected reference values for biological hydrogen production
Zeynep Yilmazer Hitit, Patrick C. Hallenbeck
Biomass and Bioenergy.2021; 147: 106014.     CrossRef
Optimization of immobilized Lactobacillus pentosus cell fermentation for lactic acid production
Jianfei Wang, Jiaqi Huang, Hannah Laffend, Shaoming Jiang, Jing Zhang, Yuchen Ning, Mudannan Fang, Shijie Liu
Bioresources and Bioprocessing.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
Study on treatment of paper mill wastewater by electrocoagulation and its sludge analysis
Neha Pandey, Chandrakant Thakur
Chemical Data Collections.2020; 27: 100390.     CrossRef
Modeling and Optimization of Aqueous Mineral Carbonation for Cement Kiln Dust Using Response Surface Methodology Integrated with Box-Behnken and Central Composite Design Approaches
Muhammad Faisal Irfan, S. M. Zakir Hossain, Ihtisham Tariq, Niaz Ali Khan, Abdulaziz Tawfeeqi, Anastasia Goeva, Mohamed Wael
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration.2020; 37(4): 1367.     CrossRef
Statistical Comparison of Response Surface Methodology–Based Central Composite Design and Hybrid Central Composite Design for Paper Mill Wastewater Treatment by Electrocoagulation
Neha Pandey, Chandrakant Thakur
Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainab.2020; 4(4): 343.     CrossRef