| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
Environ Eng Res > Volume 19(3); 2014 > Article
Jabeen and Rafique: Synthesis and Application of Metal Doped Silica Particles for Adsorptive Desulphurization of Fuels


Petroleum a vital commodity affecting every aspect of 21st century. Toxicity and adverse effects of sulphur as catalyst in petroleum products is of great concern required development of techniques for desulphurization in compliance with the International standards. Installation of desulphurizing units costs over $200 million per unit placing economic burden on developing countries like Pakistan. Present study analysis of commercial fuels (station petrol and jet fuel JP8) on gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) identified sulphur concentration of 19.94 mg/L and 21.75 mg/L, respectively. This scenario urged the researcher to attempt synthesis of material that is likely to offer good adsorption capacity for sulphur. Following protocol of sol-gel method, transition metals (Ni, Cu, Zn) solution is gelated with tetraethoxysilane (TEOS; silica precursor) using glycerol. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra revealed bonding of Zn-O, Cu-O, and Ni-O by stretching vibrations at 468 cm−1, 617 cm−1, and 468 cm−1, respectively. Thiophene and Benzothiophene mixed in n-heptane and benzene (4:1) for preparation of Model Fuels I and II, respectively. Each of silica based metal was applied as adsorbent in batch mode to assess the removal efficiency. Results demonstrated optimal desulphurization of more than 90% following efficacy order as Si-Ni > Si-Zn > Si-Cu based adsorbents. Proposed multilayered (Freundlich) adsorption mechanism follows π-complexation with pseudo secnd order kinetics.

1. Introduction

Sulphur and organo-sulphur compounds (e.g., alkylated derivatives like thiophenes and benzothiophenes) are integral part of crude oil and processed fuels. Concentration of elemental sulphur (350–500 ppm) represents 0.12–0.25 weight% of total sulphur compounds [1], whereas thiophenes constitute 50%–80% of sulphur content in fuels. These compounds pose a great challenge to oil refining industry because of their corrosiveness, toxicity and adverse effects on the environment [2]. Automotive and power generation industries aim at removal of refractory sulphur to obtain ultra-low content preferably down to 0.1 mg/L [1]. Alkylated derivatives can be removed through catalytic reduction with hydrogen and H2SO4 [3] by a process of hydro-desulphurization. However, alkyl groups at 4 or 6 positions offer steric hindrance [4] and thus are considered refractory. Furthermore, high temperature stability of thiophenes increases its tendency to accumulate [2] and render unsuitable for removal by hydro-desulphurization.
Muzic et al. [5] suggested adsorptive desulphurization as an alternative method for the attainment of ultra-low sulphur content. Thiolane and sulfolane have been adsorbed on clay from water by Kim [6]. Metal oxide composites [7] have also been applied for adsorptive desulphurization. Hernández-Maldonado and Yang [8] investigated copper, nickel, and zinc based zeolites for desulphurization of fuels. Metal nanoparticles stabilized on silica and alumina due to the large surface areas offer better applications in adsorption.
The present study is undertaken to employ greener and relatively less destructive methods to obtain sulfur-free fuel. For this purpose, metal doped silica particles using sol-gel method were synthesized. Further, the potential of these materials was explored in applicability for adsorptive removal of thiophene and benzothiophene as representatives of organo-sulphur compounds.
It is understood that silica serves as good substrate for doping of metals [9] and allows modification in properties of incorporated metals through controlled performance [10]. Tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS) is used in the present investigation as precursor for synthesis of metal doped particles. TEOS is preferred due to its low cost (ten times cheaper) than tetramethylorthosilicate (TMOS).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

TEOS (Merck), zinc nitrate (GPR), copper nitrate (Sigma-Aldrich), nickel nitrate (AnalaR), glycerol (99% Riedel-de Haen), HNO3 (65% Riedel-de Haen), NH3 (33% AnalaR), n-heptane (99% Labscan), thiophene (>99% Sigma-Aldrich), 1-benzothiophene (Merck).

2.2 Synthesis of Metal doped Silica Particles

Transition metals (copper, nickel, and zinc) are loaded on the silica matrix using sol-gel method following protocol of Chao et al. [11] with slight modifications. In the present investigation, glycerol is attempted as templating agent. Glycerol is preferred for its high porosity [12] and less toxicity [13]. The adopted method is environment friendly, simple, efficient and works optimally at room temperature.
The general layout of synthesis procedure follows: each metal salt solution (1 molar) was hydrolyzed using 10 mL of TEOS as silica precursor and 5 mL of glycerol. Solution pH was adjusted to 1.5 by adding 0.125 M HNO3. The reaction mixture was kept for stirring for 3 hr followed by drop wise addition of ammonia solution to condense gelatin at pH 8–9. Gel was filtered, washed with alcohol and aged in ethanol-water system for 48–72 hr.
The metal doped silica particles were obtained, oven dried and calcined at 500°C for 5 hr in muffle furnace. The calcination treatment converts silica composite into metal oxide as confirmed by IR spectra, thus enhancing binding potential of particles for thiophene and benzothiophene. Similar effects of heating are reported by Seredych et al. [14].

2.3. Characterization of Metal Doped Silica Particles

The synthesized particles were characterized for surface functional groups, crystallinity, particle size and morphology by standardized analytical techniques. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of the pressed KBr pellets were recorded on Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer (FTIR 8400; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) from 4,000 cm−1 to 400 cm−1. The samples surface morphology and size was determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) coupled with EDX JED-2300 analysis station on 6490(LA) JEOL Machine with gold sputtering at a potential of 20 kV.

2.4. Preparation of Fuel Samples

Two fuel samples (coded as Model Fuel I and II) were prepared following protocol of Dai et al. [15]. Each fuel sample comprising of 80% n-heptane (aliphatic), 20% benzene (aromatic), and 2,000 mg/L of organo-sulphur compound. Model Fuel I and II contains thiophene and benzothiophene, respectively.
Two commercial fuels (petrol and jet fuel JP8) samples were diluted in n-hexane and run on gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS; GC-QP5050, Shimadzu) to determine the background concentration of sulphur in each fuel samples. The sample was injected onto a system and a split/splitless injector on DB-5 column (30 m, 0.25 mm, I.D. 0.25 μm film thickness). Oven was heated from 70°C–240°C at the rate of 5°C/min under helium atmosphere. Electron ionization detector at 70 eV was used with scanning range of 35–425 amu [16].

2.5. Procedure for Batch Adsorption Experiment

Assessment of adsorptive desulphurization was determined in a series of batch adsorption experiments. For each batch, a known mass (2 mg/kg) of metal doped silica particles was subjected to 2 μg/L of organo-sulphur compound. The mixture was agitated at 100 rpm. At regular intervals, an aliquot of sample was drawn and absorbance was noted on UV-visible spectrophotometer (UV-Vis 1601, Shimadzu) against λmax of thiophene and benzothiophene at 231 nm and 297 nm, respectively.
The concentration of organo-sulphur compounds adsorbed on each of the synthesized material was determined from standard calibration curves. Removal (in percentage) was calculated using the formula,

3. Results and Discussion

Metal doped silica particles are applied for adsorptive desulfurization of selected organo-sulphur compounds. To understand the mechanism of adsorption, the synthesized materials were also characterized using standardized techniques. Each sample was subjected to atomic force microscopy to evaluate surface topography, particle size, and surface roughness.
The micrographs (Fig. 1) depicts histogram height of 5.62, 1.93, and 2.25 nm with particle size of 5.2, 1.8, and 1.8 nm per division for silica doped with Ni, Cu, and Zn, respectively. The sequence of particle size seems to follow the order of atomic number position in the periodic table that is Ni is larger than Cu and Zn. It may be attributed to the larger atomic radii of former (175 pm) than later (128 pm).

3.1. SEM/EDX

SEM images of nickel silica 32.98–52.15 nm, copper silica 111–318 nm, and zinc silica 48.67–282.38 nm were recorded (Fig. 2).
The presently synthesized Ni, Cu, and Zn doped silica particles are larger than reported alumina mesoporous silica [11]. The particle size for all the synthesized silica based metal particles fall in the nano-size range confirming that these materials can be reported as nanoparticles. On the other hand, the different sized particles within the same sample matrix indicate polydispersity. The amorphous nature of materials contributes to polydispersity. This is significant in the application of these materials as adsorbents by providing a range of particle size to volume ratio for effective adsorption. The EDX results showed that all silica based metal nanoparticles contain 2.6% doped metal.
The Ni/Si ratio reported in literature [17] is relatively higher in comparison to Ni doped silica synthesized in present investigation. The lower nickel to silica ratio suggests that binding is preferably through silanol groups rather than metal coordination linkage. This proposed mechanism is also supported by the FTIR analysis. The application of Ni doped silica particles in desulphurization of fuels is significant contribution of present investigation and is not reported elsewhere.

3.2. X-Ray Diffraction Analysis

The diffraction pattern of the copper doped silica particles yield 2θ: 35.2, 38.7, 48.7, 58.1, 61.3, 65.7, 68.1. The present experimental results are in agreement with those reported by Das et al. [18]. These values can be assigned to the reflection lines of monoclinic CuO particles [19] (Fig. 3).
The peak at 37.9° corresponds to NiO [20], while the peak at 52.1° corresponds to Ni species incorporated in to the silica matrix. The peaks from 22.5° to 25.2° can be attributed to amorphous silica species. The strong peaks at 31.9° and 34.0° can be attributed to Ni species thus it confirms the incorporation of Ni in to SiO2 matrix Khafag et al. [21]. While the X-ray diffraction analysis of Zn showed amorphous geometry.
The crystallite sizes of samples Ni and Cu were calculated by employing Debye-Scherrer equation,
The crystallite sizes of Ni and Cu turned out to be 12.3 nm.

3.3 FTIR Analysis

The synthesized nano sorbents were subjected to FTIR analysis as pellets. The spectrum was scanned over full range from 4,000 cm−1 to 400 cm−1. The peak around 468 cm−1 in zinc silica nano-materials after calcination is ascribed to Zn-O stretching while peak at 1,089.82 cm−1 shows Si-O stretching (Fig. 4(b)), these peaks are comparable with those of 466 cm−1 and 1098 cm−1 reported in literature [22].
The presence of Zn-O stretching at 468 cm−1 in the spectra is taken as indication of incorporation of metal into silica network. A weak peak at 808.32 cm−1 suggests polymerization of silica with oxygen, i.e., Si-O-Si symmetric vibration [23, 24]. The band recorded at 1,380 cm−1 is assigned to nitrates, carbonates as reported by Waseem et al. [25]. Absorption bands within range of 3,400–3,500 cm−1 are due to stretching vibrations of silanols, alcohols and hydroxyl groups. These bands show hydrogen bonding between silanol and hydroxyl groups. The bending vibrations of hydroxyl groups are reported to be present around 1,630–1,640 cm-1 [25].
In copper doped silica nanomaterials peak observed at 468.72 cm−1 is given to Si-O-Si bending vibrations. Peak at 617 cm−1 can be given to Cu-O stretching vibration serving as indication of formation of new bonds within gel [26]. The vibrations of Cu-O within range of 430–500 cm−1 can’t be interpreted easily because of less concentration of copper and presence of very weak and overlapped peaks of silica masking Cu-O vibrations [27] (Fig. 4(c)).
Ni-O band is observed at 468.32 cm−1 which is comparable to that mentioned in literature, i.e., 455 cm−1.
This position is also shared by bending Si-O vibration. The peaks within 500–700 cm−1 region can be attributed to metal hydroxides (Fig. 4(a)) here the peak is found at 615 cm−1 [28].
IR spectra of adsorbed thiophene onto all silica based metal nanoparticles at room temperature show two bands in the range 1,600–1,300 cm−1. The bands at 1,462.09 cm−1 and 1,454 cm−1 obtained upon contact of Si metal nanoparticles at different time intervals can be described as (C=C)sym of thiophene adsorbed onto metal loaded Si nanomaterials via S atom. While band at 1,384.94 cm−1 can be ascribed to adsorbed thiophene as it shifts to lower frequency from 1,396 cm−1 by 12 to 19 cm−1 with time showing symmetric stretching vibration of C=C in the fundamental ring [29]. This shift in wavenumbers of respective peak is caused by a decrease in the electron density of the entire thiophene ring implying that the ring of the adsorbed thiophene molecule is parallel to the surface of the adsorbent [30] that is, thiophene (soft Lewis base) is adsorbed onto metal ions (soft Lewis acids) loaded over silica by pi-electronic interactions.
The IR spectra of synthesized nanomaterials show peaks from 3,400–3,500 cm−1 (Fig. 4) corresponding to OH stretching vibrations of silanol groups. However these peaks disappear during the adsorbent-adsorbate interaction at room temperature. While the peaks of very low intensity at 2,800–2,900 cm−1 are enhanced remarkably corresponding to symmetric vibrations of –CH. These peaks show hydrogen bonding between –CH and water or other glycerol hydroxyl groups [31].
The progress of reaction was examined by appearance and disappearance of peaks in spectra. Peaks observed at 2,860.53 cm−1 and 2,924.18 cm−1 correspond to –CH2 group vibrations and these results are comparable with those reported by Foresti et al. [32] and Sara et al. [33], i.e., bands between 2,980 and 2,850 cm−1 result due to stretching vibrations of CH2 groups close to a double bond (CH2 – (CH=CH2)) or sulphur atom (CH2–S–). Appearance of peaks around 2,700 and 2,380 cm−1 in thiophene adsorption spectra of Ni and Cu indicate hydrogen-bonding type of interaction between SH functional groups in mercaptans and surface SiOHAl groups [30] implying opening of thiophene ring leading to alkenethiol species formation.
The peaks at 675, 725, 755, 904, 889 cm−1 correspond to out of plane vibrations of adsorbed benzothiophene. While the bands at 1,338, 1,377, 1,454, 1,469 cm−1 point towards chemical transformation of benzothiophene. The presence of bands near 3,000 cm−1, i.e., 2,960, 2,964, 2,860 cm−1 indicates that the aromatic ring of benzothiophene remains intact while thiophene ring is opened by adsorption.
The bands observed around 3,150–3,200 cm−1 can be ascribed to aromatic/heterocyclic C–H vibrations indicating the interaction of benzothiophene with the metal cations [34]. This is also supported by Yang et al. [35] as ring of thiophene derivatives interacts with transition metal cation through s-p electron contributions resulting in a stronger adsorption complex than other alkali and alkaline earth metals like Na+ having no back donation of d electrons to the heterocyclic ring of the sulphur compounds

3.4. GC-MS Analysis of Fuel

The present investigation with GC-MS was undertaken for qualitative analysis of thiophenes in fuels. The commercial fuels of petrol and jet fuel were run on GC-MS using n-hexane as diluting solvent. Highest relative intensity is depicted by fragment (m/z 18) in both fuels as a common feature. Presence of sulphur is qualitatively identified in petrol and jet fuel with relative intensity of 39.48% and 21.23%, respectively. Retention time is noted as 34.4 and 12.8 min in respective order for petrol and jet fuel.

3.5. Batch Experiment

Batch experiments were conducted to assess the adsorptive potential of synthesized nano metal particles. Four sets of open batch as a function of time were conducted for the selective adsorption of thiophene and 1-benzothiophene as representatives of organo-sulphur compounds. The percentage removal was calculated for the sulphur compounds to determine the efficacy of synthesized nano-adsorbents.

3.5.1. Effect of time

The adsorbate adsorbent interaction was evaluated for 30 min with a regular interval of 2 min to determine the impact of contact time for the removal of thiophene and 1-benzothiophene by each silica based metal nanoparticle. The results are graphically presented in (Fig. 5).
It was generally observed that maximum adsorption occurs upon the first contact. This may be attributed to the fact that virgin adsorbent has more available sites providing space for rapid uptake of adsorbate. The continual uniform trend over the period of time significantly indicates strong interaction bond between nano-adsorbents and sulphur specie leading to chemisorption of thiophene and benzothiophene [36].
It is also noted that more than one equilibrium is established during the course of study. This initially identifies that each equilibrium is instantaneous and also indicates the heterogeneity of the system.
A striking consistent and optimal removal of thiophene and benzothiophene is generally observed for all metal nano-adsorbents. Removal efficiency of greater than 98% is evident over extended period of 30 min. However, Cu-doped silica attained optimal efficiency earlier in 24 min (Fig. 5(c)). The maxima and minima in the graphs can be assigned to the adsorption and desorption process, respectively. Desorption can be explained on the basis of energy difference between the surface layers of adsorbent due to its heterogeneous nature. Greater activation energy for desorption of adsorbate is required for the system [4].
On comparison, it becomes evident that removal of 1-benzothiophene on nano-adsorbents shows a slightly lower removal and non-uniform trend than thiophene (see Fig. 5). This difference can be attributed to structural differences, molecular weight and density of both compounds. 1-benzothiophene being derivative of thiophene is larger and possesses high density (1.15 g/cm3) and more stability towards reactions. Moreover, steric hindrance makes sulphur atom less accessible to the binding sites [37] for removal of 1-benzothiophene.

3.5.2. Effect of adsorbents

The silica based metal nanoparticles were formed by sol-gel method which ensures easy and simple dealing and control over final product. The incorporation of metals in inorganic silica source TEOS provided much better anchorage to metals and improved their adsorptive capacity for removal of thiophene [38] and 1-benzothiophene from fuels. Furthermore, presence of hydroxyl groups on surface of silica based metal nanoparticles serve as acidic centers and facilitate binding of incoming species [39].
Silica in comparison to other reported substrates like Al2O3, TiO2 is weakly acidic because of the presence of silanol groups in it. Metals incorporation in silica matrix induces more acidity of varying binding strength [40], responsible for interaction of various species on adsorbents (Figs. 6 and 7).
Thiophene being a nucleophile has two electron pairs on it. One is parallel to its ring named σ-electron pair while the other is perpendicular called pi electrons. The metals with greater electropositive character (alkali, alkaline earth metals) are able to directly link with sulphur atom of thiophene ring through its σ-electrons [35]. However, the metals like Cu, Zn (transition metals) are less electropositive in nature thus they bind with thiophene by their pi electrons following π-complexation [40]. Thiophene adopts different configurations for adsorption using both lone pairs of sulphur atom [2].

3.5.3. Kinetic studies

Different kinetic models including first order, pseudo-first-order, and pseudo-second-order and intra-particle diffusion model equations were applied to determine the mechanism involved in adsorption process. All the adsorption reactions followed pseudo-second-order kinetics for removal of thiophene and 1-benzothiophene (Fig. 8).

3.5.4. Adsorption isotherms

To explain the mechanism of adsorption of thiophene and 1-benzothiophene Freundlich, Langmuir, and Temkin isotherm models were applied on the data. The examination of correlation coefficient (R2) showed that Freundlich isotherms model better explains the mechanism of adsorption of thiophene and 1-benzothiophene by synthesized nanomaterials (Fig. 9).
Sol-gel synthesis of silica metal nanoparticles provided better anchorage of metals in to silica matrix with Si to metal ratio 15:1. Thiophene is a soft Lewis base with two electron pairs on its sulphur atom. It has ability to form both sigma and pi bonds with metals. The metals (Cu, Ni, and Zn) selected in this study lie on the borderline between hard and soft Lewis acids. Their doping on silica matrix creates acidic binding sites of varying strength. Depending on the electronegativity of the Lewis base and electropositive character of metals the affinity of base N>S>O varies towards acids thus nature of the bond changes from ionic to covalent.
In this study the bond responsible for attachment of thiophene on adsorbent surface is pi-bond. As the selected metals are serving as soft Lewis acids with relatively less electropositive character thus they form a weak bond through their d-electrons with thiophene and 1-benzothiophene. This soft Lewis acid base interaction causes oligomerization of thiophenes leading to their removal from fuel stream at room temperature [41] as evidenced by appearance of –CH stretching vibrations at 2,800–2,900 cm−1 responsible for attachment of thiophene on silica binding sites [42]. These carbons result in bonding with metal adsorbent surface that lead to ring opening.
Furthermore, there is a prominent correlation between calcination temperature and Bronsted acidity of metal incorporated silica nanoparticles. Calcination results in decomposition of water molecules of metal salts and surface hydroxyl groups and convert them into isolated acidic –OH groups from vicinal and germinal groups as in Ag loaded TiO2 and SiO2 [43]. Proposed multilayered (Freundlich) adsorption mechanism follows π-complexation with pseudo-second-order kinetics [44].

4. Conclusions

The present study focused on greener synthesis of silica supported metal nanomaterials for desulphurization of fuels. Following conclusions can be drawn from the study: 1) glycerol as templating agent is attempted in the present investigation for the synthesis of metal doped silica particles. This provides a convenient and greener approach; 2) low metal to silica ratio suggests the π-complexation mechanism for removal of refractory sulphur compounds; 3) polydispersity of nanoparticles allow adsorption of wide range of materials; 4) the nanomaterials followed the efficacy order as Si-Ni > Si-Zn > Si-Cu based adsorbents; and 5) the proposed multilayered (Freundlich) adsorption mechanism follows π-complexation with pseudo-secnd-order kinetics.


1. Ma X, Sprague M, Sun L, Song C. Deep desulfurization of diesel fuels by a novel integrated approach. Pittsburgh: National Energy Technology Lab; 2002.

2. Song C. An overview of new approaches to deep desulfurization for ultra-clean gasoline, diesel fuel and jet fuel. Catal. Today. 2003;86:211–263.

3. Srivastava VC. An evaluation of desulfurization technologies for sulfur removal from liquid fuels. RSC Adv. 2012;2:759–783.

4. Yu M, Li Z, Xi H, Xia Q, Wang S. Effect of textural property of coconut shell-based activated carbon on desorption activation energy of benzothiophene. Front. Chem. Eng. China. 2008;2:269–275.

5. Muzic M, Sertic-Bionda K, Gomzi Z. Kinetic and statistical studies of adsorptive desulfurization of diesel fuel on commercial activated carbons. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2008;31:355–364.

6. Kim CG. Adsorption behaviour of thiophene derivatives on soil materials. Environ. Eng. Res. 2002;7:207–217.

7. Kobayashi M, Flytzani-Stephanopoulos M. Reduction and sulfidation kinetics of cerium oxide and cu-modified cerium oxide. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002;41:3115–3123.

8. Hernández-Maldonado AJ, Yang RT. New sorbents for desulfurization of diesel fuels via π-complexation. AIChE J. 2004;50:791–801.

9. Lu AH, Salabas EL, Schüth F. Magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, protection, functionalization, and application. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2007;46:1222–1244.
crossref pmid

10. Anedda R, Cannas C, Musinu A, Pinna G, Piccaluga G, Casu M. A two-stage citric acid–sol/gel synthesis of ZnO/SiO2 nano-composites: study of precursors and final products. J. Nanopart. Res. 2008;10:107–120.

11. Chao MC, Lin HP, Mou CY, Cheng BW, Cheng CF. Synthesis of nano-sized mesoporous silicas with metal incorporation. Catal. Today. 2300497:81–87.

12. Yu LY, Xu ZL, Shen HM, Yang H. Preparation and characterization of PVDF–SiO2 composite hollow fiber UF membrane by sol–gel method. J. Memb. Sci. 2009;337:257–265.

13. Lai Y, Yin W, Liu J, Xi R, Zhan J. One-pot green synthesis and bioapplication ofl-arginine-capped superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2009;5:302–307.
crossref pmid pmc

14. Seredych M, Mabayoje O, Koleśnik MM, Krstić V, Bandosz TJ. Zinc (hydr)oxide/graphite based-phase composites: effect of the carbonaceous phase on surface properties and enhancement in electrical conductivity. J. Mater. Chem. 2012;22:7970–7978.

15. Dai W, Zhou Y, Wang S, Sub W, Sun Y, Zhou L. Desulfurization of transportation fuels targeting at removal of thiophene/benzothiophene. Fuel Process. Technol. 2008;89:749–755.

16. Lawal OA, Oyedeji AO. Chemical composition of the essential oils of Cyperus rotundus L. from South Africa. Molecules. 2009;14:2909–2917.
crossref pmid

17. Liu X, Chun CM, Aksay IA, Shih WH. Synthesis of mesostructured nickel oxide with silica. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2000;39:684–692.

18. Das D, Nath BC, Phukon P, Dolui SK. Synthesis and evaluation of antioxidant and antibacterial behavior of CuO nanoparticles. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2013;101:430–433.
crossref pmid

19. Thekkae Padil VV, Černík M. Green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles using gum karaya as a biotemplate and their antibacterial application. Int. J. Nanomedicine. 2013;8:889–898.
crossref pmid pmc

20. Prakasham RS, Devi GS, Rao CS, Sivakumar VS, Sathish T, Sarma PN. Nickel-impregnated silica nanoparticle synthesis and their evaluation for biocatalyst immobilization. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2010;160:1888–1895.
crossref pmid

21. Khafag MG, Mahmoud HH, Ashiry A, Israr MQ, Battisha IK. Characterization of nano-composite Ni dispersed over a silica matrix prepared by a modified sol-gel technique. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2011;5:287–295.

22. Roy A, Polarz S, Rabe S. , et alFirst preparation of nanocrystalline zinc silicate by chemical vapor synthesis using an organometallic single-source precursor. Chemistry. 2004;10:1565–1575.
crossref pmid

23. Kong DY, Yu M, Lin CK, Liu XM, Lin J, Fang J. Sol-gel synthesis and characterization of Zn2SiO4:Mn@SiO2 spherical core-shell particles. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2005;152:H146–151.

24. Shokri B, Firouzjah MA, Hosseini SI. FTIR analysis of silicon dioxide thin film deposited by metal organic-based PECVD. In : Proceedings of 19th International Symposium on Plasma Chemistry Society; 2009 Jul 26–31; Bochum, Germany. p. 26–31.

25. Waseem M, Mustafa S, Naeem A, Shah KH, Ihsan-ul-Haque IS. Synthesis and characterization of silica gel by sol-gel method. J. Pak. Mater. Soc. 2009;3:19–21.

26. Cordoba G, Arroyo R, Fierro JL, Viniegr M. Study of xerogel-glass transition of CuO/SiO2. J. Solid State Chem. 1996;123:93–99.

27. Fixman EM, Abello MC, Gorriz OF, Arrúa LA. Preparation of Cu/SiO2 catalysts with and without tartaric acid as template via a sol-gel process: characterization and evaluation in the methanol partial oxidation. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2007;319:111–118.

28. Battishaa IK, Afifya HH, Ibrahim M. Synthesis of Fe2O3 concentrations and sintering temperature on FTIR and magnetic susceptibility measured from 4 to 300 K of monolith silica gel prepared by sol-gel technique. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2006;306:211–217.

29. Tian F, Wu W, Jiang Z. , et alThe study of thiophene adsorption onto La(III)-exchanged zeolite NaY by FT-IR spectroscopy. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006;301:395–401.
crossref pmid

30. Garcia CL, Lercher JA. Adsorption and surface reactions of thiophene on ZSM 5 zeolites. J. Phys. Chem. 1992;96:2669–2675.

31. Dashnau JL, Nucci NV, Sharp KA, Vanderkooi JM. Hydrogen bonding and the cryoprotective properties of glycerol/water mixtures. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2006;110:13670–13677.
crossref pmid

32. Foresti E, Fracasso G, Lanzi M. , et alNew thiophene monolayer-protected copper nanoparticles: synthesis and chemical-physical characterization. J. Nanomater. 2008;2008:1–6.

33. Sara YY, Garcia-Martinez J, Li W, Meitzner GD, Iglesia E. Kinetic, infrared, and X-ray absorption studies of adsorption, desorption, and reactions of thiophene on H-ZSM5 and Co/H-ZSM5. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2002;4:1241–1251.

34. Jiang M, Ng FT. Adsorption of benzothiophene on Y zeolites investigated by infrared spectroscopy and flow calorimetry. Catal. Today. 2006;116:530–536.

35. Yang X, Erickson LE, Hohn KL, Jeevanandam P, Klabunde KJ. Sol-gel Cu-Al2O3 adsorbents for selective adsorption of thiophene out of hydrocarbon. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006;45:6169–6174.

36. Blanco-Brieva G, Campos-Martin JM, Al-Zahrani SM, Fierro JL. Removal of refractory organic sulfur compounds in fossil fuels using MOF sorbents. Global Nest J. 2010;12:296–304.

37. Li W, Xing J, Xiong X, Huang J, Liu H. Feasibility study on the integration of adsorption/bioregeneration of π-complexation adsorbent for desulfurization. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006;45:2845–2849.

38. Xue M, Wen P, Chitrakar R, Ooi K, Feng Q. Screening of inorganic adsorbents for selective adsorption of thiophene from model gasoline. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2012;47:1926–1936.

39. Hussain AH, Tatarchuk BJ. Adsorptive desulfurization of hydrocarbon fuels by Ag/TiOx–Al2O3 adsorbents: mechanism of sulfur adsorption at ambient conditions. In : Proceedings of the 2012 AlChE Annual Meeting; 2012 Oct 28–Nov 2; Pittsburgh, PA.

40. Kosslick H, Lischke G, Landmesser H, Parlitz B, Storek W, Fricke R. Acidity and catalytic behavior of substituted MCM-48. J. Catal. 1998;176:102–114.

41. Fuentes-Perujo D, Santamaría-González J, Mérida-Robles J. , et alEvaluation of the acid properties of porous zirconium-doped and undoped silica materials. J. Solid State Chem. 2006;179:2182–2189.

42. Vilarrasa-García E, Azevedo DC, Braos-García P. , et alSynthesis and characterization of metal-supported mesoporous silicas applied to the adsorption of benzothiophene. Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 2011;29:691–704.

43. Nair S, Shahadat Hussain AH, Tatarchuk BJ. The role of surface acidity in adsorption of aromatic sulfur heterocycles from fuels. Fuel. 2013;105:695–704.

44. Tabassum N, Rafique U, Balkhair KS, Ashraf MA. Chemodynamics of methyl parathion and ethyl parathion: adsorption models for sustainable agriculture. BioMed Res. Int. 2014;2014:831989
crossref pmid pmc

Fig. 1
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images and histograms of silica doped (a) Si-Ni, (b) Si-Zn, and (c) Si-Cu particles.
Fig. 2
Surface morphology of Silica doped (a) Si-Ni, (b) Si-Zn, and (c) Si-Cu particles.
Fig. 3
X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD) spectra of silica doped (a) Si-Ni, (b) Si-Zn, and (c) Si-Cu particles.
Fig. 4
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of silica doped (a) Si-Ni, (b) Si-Zn, and (c) Si-Cu particles.
Fig. 5
Adsorption of thiophene and benzothiophene at silica doped metal particles as a function of time.
Fig. 6
Adsorbents efficiency for removal of thiophene and benzothiophene.
Fig. 7
Adsorption of thiophene and benzothiophene from model fuels i and ii by silica doped metal particles.
Fig. 8
Kinetic model for adsorption of (a) thiophene and (b) benzothiophene.
Fig. 9
Freundlich isotherm for adsorption of (a) thiophene and (b) benzothiophene.
PDF Links  PDF Links
PubReader  PubReader
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
Editorial Office
464 Cheongpa-ro, #726, Jung-gu, Seoul 04510, Republic of Korea
TEL : +82-2-383-9697   FAX : +82-2-383-9654   E-mail : eer@kosenv.or.kr

Copyright© Korean Society of Environmental Engineers. All rights reserved.        Developed in M2community
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers